Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging


I love this dumb comeback to the plain statement that Africa is a shithole and blacks are lucky their ancestors were brought here:

lol I love the comment "the best reparations is being born in the US and not Africa". It just shows such a lack of self-awareness and an unwillingness to even pursue the thought process to figure out WHY Africa is such a destabilized region. To them, the modern world seems to just exist in a vacuum with no outside influences from the past. Africa and the Middle East are shitholes simply because that's their natural state of existence I guess. It has nothing to do with us systematically gutting the region of its local governments, establishing puppet states all over the region and then simply leaving when we got bored of them.

In the 12th century Ghana was the richest country in the world and the largest gold producer. Africa has the oldest crust on the planet and as such contains enough mineral wealth to destabilize the European economy. This is why Europeans worked so hard gutting the continent and creating artificial shortages in supply. As for the Middle-East it's the birthplace of agriculture, civilization, and the oldest cities, empires, written stories, literally the foundation of their vaunted "Western Civilization".

I mean, okay, if Africa is that great then you'll love my proposal for reparations - we deport all blacks back to Africa with, say, 10k each. If its so great they should do fine with that seed money and no evil white racism to hold them down!

Of course, somebody beat me to it and so much better.

So you are saying that white people is so awesome that we beat em all even with a headstart?

:story:
 
Last edited:
You know, Africa isn't all just jungles and straw huts. There ARE cities, and suburbs, just like everywhere else. Besides, we DON'T know what things would've been like if some nations hadn't been exploited by major asshole empires. (Mostly Britain and France, not to mention Belgium). And if you want proof that it's not because of race, look at the shitty things England did in Ireland, and how long it took them to recover?*

History is complex, and full of assholes being assholes. That's been my observation.


He just said "wife's bits". There you go. Seriously, why make it more complicated than it is? Jesus.





*I'm part Irish. So I'm not about to defend the British Empire. Fuck those guys.😉
 
I mean, okay, if Africa is that great then you'll love my proposal for reparations - we deport all blacks back to Africa with, say, 10k each. If its so great they should do fine with that seed money and no evil white racism to hold me down!

LOL. All these faggots have this delusion that it's whitey that keeping Africa from becoming the glorious Kingdom of Wakanda. Yeah, because all that infighting and murder between tribes and factions like the Hutu and the Tutsis was really a bunch of white dudes in black face. :story:
 
LOL. All these faggots have this delusion that it's whitey that keeping Africa from becoming the glorious Kingdom of Wakanda. Yeah, because all that infighting and murder between tribes and factions like the Hutu and the Tutsis was really a bunch of white dudes in black face. :story:
"B-but it all started because whitey favoured the Tutsis"-Them, probably. African kingdoms did achieve great wealth in certain periods, but they mostly used it to enslave their neighbors and build monuments, so it's funny to see borderline "We wuz kangz!" types accuse whitey of being what their vaunted kingdoms actually were. As if scaled-up gangsterism is the only means to power that they understand.
 
You know, Africa isn't all just jungles and straw huts. There ARE cities, and suburbs, just like everywhere else. Besides, we DON'T know what things would've been like if some nations hadn't been exploited by major asshole empires.

Those cities were built, for the most parts, by whites. Because European civilization has been more advanced than African civilizations for millennia. If Africa had been kept isolated until just now they'd still be in mud huts and massacring each other, just as they did for thousands of years whenever Northern nation-states weren't dragging them kicking and screaming toward advancement.

The sociological reason why civilizations in Europe and Greater Asia advanced while most of Africa, Australia, and North/South America never developed is subject to debate but the reality of cultural development can't be ignored.
 
Last edited:
Africa was really nothing special. It was pretty typical. They thought conquering and enslaving their neighbors was a great and glorious thing, just like everyone else did. They had some big cities, a few empires, some centers of trade and learning. It was a mile away from the glorious Wakanda SJWs wish was true but also from the backwards shithole that /pol/tards dream up. It was just normal.

The whole Europe ascendant thing was pretty much luck. Each area had periods where they were ahead in learning and the thing about technology and learning is that it accelerates. It's taken 200 years to go from basic circuits to super computers. It took more than 10,000 to get from agriculture to crop rotation. Europe happened to be ahead at the time when serious global trade got going and it started being possible to do the whole conquering and enslaving on people very far away and the rest is history.
 
.
The whole Europe ascendant thing was pretty much luck. Each area had periods where they were ahead in learning and the thing about technology and learning is that it accelerates.

Wrong. Luck had nothing to do with it. I suggest you start with Diamonds excellent book and go from there.

Enjoy this small portion from the Wikipedia article, which actually goes quite in depth. You might not even need the book.

Diamond argues that Eurasian civilization is not so much a product of ingenuity, but of opportunity and necessity. That is, civilization is not created out of superior intelligence, but is the result of a chain of developments, each made possible by certain preconditions.

The first step towards civilization is the move from nomadic hunter-gatherer to rooted agrarian society. Several conditions are necessary for this transition to occur: access to high-carbohydrate vegetation that endures storage; a climate dry enough to allow storage; and access to animals docile enough for domestication and versatile enough to survive captivity. Control of crops and livestock leads to food surpluses. Surpluses free people to specialize in activities other than sustenance and support population growth. The combination of specialization and population growth leads to the accumulation of social and technological innovations which build on each other. Large societies develop ruling classes and supporting bureaucracies, which in turn lead to the organization of nation-states and empires.

Although agriculture arose in several parts of the world, Eurasia gained an early advantage due to the greater availability of suitable plant and animal species for domestication. In particular, Eurasia has barley, two varieties of wheat, and three protein-rich pulses for food; flax for textiles; and goats, sheep, and cattle. Eurasian grains were richer in protein, easier to sow, and easier to store than American maize or tropical bananas.
 
Screen Shot 2019-12-01 at 9.42.01 PM.png

in other news the "ok boomer" meme is heading to heat death rapidly. Normies got it early
image0.jpeg

"we have a potental solution to world power issues, but we want social change so its not a solution"
(he doesn't een bring up the real issue with nuke power)
 
I'll preface this by saying I never studied anthropology but I have heard this claim:
Diamond is a total joke in anthropology circles.
in the past and looked into it a bit and I never saw any real evidence of anyone saying this outside of the crowd that just doesn't think he is woke enough, and a few redditors.
The whole Europe ascendant thing was pretty much luck. Each area had periods where they were ahead in learning and the thing about technology and learning is that it accelerates. It's taken 200 years to go from basic circuits to super computers. It took more than 10,000 to get from agriculture to crop rotation. Europe happened to be ahead at the time when serious global trade got going and it started being possible to do the whole conquering and enslaving on people very far away and the rest is history.
I read Guns, Germs & Steel probably about 5-6 years ago and I don't remember anything in it that really conflicts with this statement.
 
Diamond is a total joke in anthropology circles.
He's so notable and his shit gets cited a lot because he's great at summarizing the material others have written. He's to anthropology and that sort of study of civilizations what Black Science Man is to astrophysics.
"we have a potental solution to world power issues, but we want social change so its not a solution"
(he doesn't een bring up the real issue with nuke power)
The powers that be want this to be the face of the movement to fix climate change so nobody actually does anything about the problem aside from shrieking GREEN NEW DEAL OR WE'RE DEAD BY 2030 and giving politicians huge amounts of control over peoples' lives all the while they keep taking money from oil companies and Saudi Arabia and oil companies get richer.
I guess if you want to just toss out insults instead of addressing points that is fine by me, faggot.
While Jared Diamond mostly comes to good conclusions because he does know how to read the literature, sometimes he comes to hilariously wrong and bizarre conclusions like "the Norse in Greenland didn't eat fish, therefore they were unsuited to their environment" (because the bones of the fish they ate preserved poorly or were for whatever reason not noted in excavations of the middens) even though the Norse everywhere else love fish so much they eat shit like hakarl, lutefisk, and surstromming.
 
I'll preface this by saying I never studied anthropology but I have heard this claim:

in the past and looked into it a bit and I never saw any real evidence of anyone saying this outside of the crowd that just doesn't think he is woke enough, and a few redditors.

I read Guns, Germs & Steel probably about 5-6 years ago and I don't remember anything in it that really conflicts with this statement.
Wait, what's the woke explanation? We won because we're devils and therefore favoured by the Lord of this World? Or we retroactively defined what we did as "winning" when the truth was that we were the only ones playing the game?
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™
Wait, what's the woke explanation? We won because we're devils and therefore favoured by the Lord of this World?
I don't remember but that was my impression at the time. After I read the book I Googled it just to see what kind of criticism was out there and literally the first result was a Reddit post with an almost word for word quote "Jared Diamond is a joke in academia". I'm going to try to find some of the stuff I read before and see if I can dig up criticism from the "woke" crowd. If I find it and consider it on topic, I will post it.

Edit: To be clear, it was mostly generic accusations of racism but I will try to find specific points (if there were any)
 
"we have a potental solution to world power issues, but we want social change so its not a solution"
(he doesn't een bring up the real issue with nuke power)
The levels of obsession that it takes to make statements like this. It has to be a joke right? I mean what possible method of clean energy could there be that solves social problems? Get everyone in the ghetto to ride generator bikes?

Actually on reflection...

I never saw any real evidence of anyone saying this outside of the crowd that just doesn't think he is woke enough
The complaints against him are that he's a bad anthropologist (he doesn't actually have any anthropology qualifications btw) who was more interested in telling his story than actual investigation. The real problem is it tries to tie everything back to geological causes and that just doesn't work out. There's loads of counter evidence for a lot of the claims he makes that he just ignores for his books.

I dunno where the "not woke enough" stuff comes from. I don't doubt someone somewhere has said he isn't woke enough but he's pretty woke. He's is staunchly anti-racist and his book was written to refute a lot of racist ideas. One of his most public critics ran a blog called savageminds and is no friend of the woke crowd because they bullied him into changing the name.

He's to anthropology and that sort of study of civilizations what Black Science Man is to astrophysics.
Nah, Black Science Man actually knows what he's talking about, even if he doesn't explain everything all the time. Astrophysicists love him. Anthropologists don't feel the same way about Diamond.

While Jared Diamond mostly comes to good conclusions because he does know how to read the literature
Somewhat. The problem is he only read the bits he liked. So while it's not all totally wrong, the grand sweeping story it tries to tell is bunk and he just did not check his facts nearly enough. Norse not eating fish is one among a litany of factually wrong shit he's published.
 
The levels of obsession that it takes to make statements like this. It has to be a joke right? I mean what possible method of clean energy could there be that solves social problems? Get everyone in the ghetto to ride generator bikes?
No, it means it doesn't take down the evil capitalists by giving the Right People (communists and progressives) complete and total power over everybody.
 
He's so notable and his shit gets cited a lot because he's great at summarizing the material others have written. He's to anthropology and that sort of study of civilizations what Black Science Man is to astrophysics.

The powers that be want this to be the face of the movement to fix climate change so nobody actually does anything about the problem aside from shrieking GREEN NEW DEAL OR WE'RE DEAD BY 2030

We're so totally dead by 2030 they aren't even willing to consider nuclear power even though it's the most carbon neutral energy available. Hydropower and geothermal and solar are nice but they're not going to be more than niche sources and solar in particular is far from carbon neutral once you factor in the incredible toxicity of solar panel manufacture and disposal.
 
he doesn't actually have any anthropology qualifications
He has a degree in Anthropology from Harvard (a BA)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Diamond#Early_life_and_education]
I dunno where the "not woke enough" stuff comes from
I am pretty sure this Reddit thread in r/AskHistorians was the one where I first saw all the crazies coming out to scream "racist". If you sort it by old, you can see all the racism comments have been "deleted by user" but they were at the time I read it (which I can see by the dates, I read the book closer to 8 years ago). If you read the replies to those "deleted by user" comments, you can see that the discussion is clearly about race. (the deleted comments don't seem to be available on https://ceddit.com either)
One of his most public critics ran a blog called savageminds
I vaguely remember this at the time.

Edit: I Just wanted to add that:
[He] was more interested in telling his story than actual investigation
is what academics always say when one of their peers (or their peers work) becomes prevalent in popular culture.
 
Last edited:
Back