Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

TaimuRadiu · Dec 19, 2019

JY's Tampon said:
No one EVER said anything about intersex people. Why do they always throw intersex people under the bus in an attempt to justify troonery.
View attachment 1058488

how many of these intersex individuals (or people with Klinefelter's) make up the current batch of troons?

like, non troon trans exist (

) but these seem to be the vast, vast minority in a wave of genderspecials (

)

neverendingmidi · Dec 19, 2019

TaimuRadiu said:
how many of these intersex individuals (or people with Klinefelter's) make up the current batch of troons?

like, non troon trans exist () but these seem to be the vast, vast minority in a wave of genderspecials ()

They define intersex about as incoherently as they do gender. If a woman has PCOS then she's intersex under the new language rules, and that's double plus good!

Otterly · Dec 19, 2019

Freddy Freaker said:
Intersex people are extremely rare anyway.

TaimuRadiu said:
how many of these intersex individuals (or people with Klinefelter's) make up the current batch of troons?

0.018% of babies have a chromosome complement that doesn’t match their outward appearance of sex.
Intersex conditions have no relevance to troonism.
Any doctor who starts pontificating about this should be asked outright. ‘Are you willing to say a human can CHANGE their sex? ‘ the judge in the mF case should have been asked this as well.
We are absolutely fucked if this continues. Because it won’t stop here. Women were just an easy first target. The precedents set will set up a system where the government can in effect tell you what to believe, and if you object, you’re in big trouble. Regardless of whether that belief is religious, or a proveable scientific fact, that’s what people should be worried about - the UK courts have just decreed that 2+2=5.

OttoWest · Dec 19, 2019

J.K. Rowling is a TERF!
The thought that I will no longer be welcome in a fictional school for wizards has destroyed me

J.K. Rowling is a TERF! | Spectator USA

What does a cis woman like Rowling know about being a woman in any case? She has no idea of the struggles we trans women go through

spectator.us

Archive

This is the person Maya Forstater called a man:

Gregor Murray is an independent councillor for Dundee. He was suspended in May for violating codes of conduct (abusive and harassing public tweets). Murray also resigned from the SNP in May.

Murray, who is male, identifies as both transgender and non binary; his posting history on reddit shows activity in subs for gay men. He is also very active in the Scouts Association and is a scout leader per his twitter bio.

Murray has a history of being a twat while serving as a council member. Before his suspension, Murray was convenor of the Dundee city council’s Children and Family Services committee and deputy convenor of Education. Prior to his political career, Murray worked in IT. Judging by his numerous scuffles against various churches and clergy, I’d wager he’s another euphoric atheist of the David Muscato variety as well. You can find his reddit here, LinkedIn here and currently locked twitter here.

Call me Helen Lovejoy, but a single male autist so invested in shaping policy affecting kids and pushing for the Stonewall agenda in primary schools just seems a little hinky.

Silence of the Troons · Dec 19, 2019

OttoWest said:
Murray has a history of being a twat while serving as a council member

From the first link said:
n July 2018, Murray referred to the political equality group Women 50:50 as “absolute roasters”, which was criticized by Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale. “Roaster” is Scottish slang for an objectionable person.

Sounds an awful lot like "roasties"

Oscar Wildean said:
Amanda's book.

View attachment 1058665

Ah, she's profiting off of the story, I see. As soon as I saw someone tweet about her book I had a hunch that it was going to be a cash grab using the child.

Speaking of Amanda's book, she apparently chose it because it's supposed to represent the little girls her teenage son and her husband feel they truly are https://twitter.com/DysphoriaJoe/status/1206682172557602816

A very good question indeed. Why?

Dolphin Lundgren · Dec 19, 2019

ATaxingWoman said:
Sounds an awful lot like "roasties"Speaking of Amanda's book, she apparently chose it because it's supposed to represent the little girls her teenage son and her husband feel they truly are https://twitter.com/DysphoriaJoe/status/1206682172557602816
View attachment 1058749
A very good question indeed. Why?

0/10, wouldn't recommend or read. That book looks boring as hell.

Silence of the Troons · Dec 19, 2019

Since some of the exceptional who are coming for Rowling now have already been brought up, here's another one to add to the list. This guy, Eugene Gu

JY's Tampon said:
No one EVER said anything about intersex people. Why do they always throw intersex people under the bus in an attempt to justify troonery.
View attachment 1058488

apparently may or may not have a not so flattering history of male feminist behavior https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/5/1...-social-justice-activism-abuse-sexual-assault

I SPOKE TO @DOCTORMEOWSKIS over the phone not long after the news about Vanderbilt came out. Allison* (her name has been changed to protect her identity) is a 30-year-old medical student in a “middle of nowhere” town within driving distance of Tennessee. Her voice is bright, a little chirpy. Allison began turning to Twitter as an outlet for the stresses of medical school. She quickly became part of the #MedTwitter world, where doctors and medical students discuss their work, ask earnest questions or offer advice, or tweet medical puns and jokes. Allison liked to post funny, candid anecdotes from her life: detailing a date with a cardiologist (which #MedTwitter compared to watching Grey’s Anatomy), or talking about her struggles with her studies. One day, around December 2016, she got a DM from Gu, telling her that he was impressed by how open she was on Twitter.

It was months before Gu would become Twitter famous for his kneeling photo. Allison had been impressed by his credentials — a surgeon who had gone to Stanford and Duke — and thought he looked cute in his pictures. Their conversation turned from DMs to texts, which turned into phone calls. In the beginning, Allison says, Gu was charming. They talked about Marsha Blackburn, and when Gu talked about his research, he told her how much respect he had for the women who donated the aborted fetuses. “When he talked about that, he was a very impressive man,” Allison says.

They spent hours on the phone. “[Gu] called me a lot, even when he was at work,” Allison says. “He’d spent 15, 20 minutes standing in the stairwell. I thought that was cute.” They talked about other things, too, like their views on marriage and children. And they talked about Twitter. Allison gave Gu tips on how to get more followers: you make a hashtag about something that’s trending, then jump in the conversation. She remembered when Gu tried out the strategy for the first time how happy he was that it worked. He told Allison that they would become Twitter’s “power couple.”

Finally, Gu invited Allison to visit him in Nashville for Valentine’s Day in 2017. He promised to show her around town, and to let her shadow him at work. “Hell, yeah!” Allison said. She got lost trying to find his apartment building, and then, when she met him, she was surprised at how different he seemed from the impression he’d made online. From his picture, she’d imagined him as cute, tall, and confident. In person, he seemed mousy and uncertain, and he apologized constantly.

There would be many more disappointments on that visit. It turned out that she couldn’t actually shadow Gu at work, since he’d forgotten to get permission from his program. And when they went out to lunch, he was often on his phone, “focusing more on Twitter than me, asking me to retweet stuff.” He spoke about how much he wanted to get “revenge” on Vanderbilt through his Twitter following. His apartment was a mattress on the floor and a dining room table.

“I was like, Wow, okay, that’s how a big-time surgeon lives,” she says. They took a nap, and when she woke up, he was already between her legs, putting a condom on. “It was over as soon as it began. I didn’t have time to think about it… I guess we kind of said we’re seeing each other. I was a little upset about it,” Allison says. “I wasn’t really sure I wanted to have sex with him.” But then again, she reasoned, she couldn’t feel too upset. She’d agreed to come to Tennessee as a date, after all. The next few days, Gu left her alone while he went to work. She went to the Whole Foods near his apartment, bought him snacks and pineapple (his favorite fruit). She was looking forward to Valentine’s Day, when Gu promised to go on a real date. But when the date came, they were interrupted again by his feud with Vanderbilt.

Gu’s adviser had asked him to come in for a meeting, where they told him again that he couldn’t speak badly about VUMC online. “He got really angry,” Allison says. When he eventually calmed down, they went to a local pizza place for their romantic date.

”You’re the only person in the world I can talk to,” Gu told her. “If it wasn’t for you, I might have killed myself tonight.” Back at Gu’s apartment, he started “pawing” at her while she tried to refuse. She tried to push him away. He kept at it. “It was just like that until he passed out. That’s when I got up, turned on the shower, and was crying.”

AND THEN THERE WAS MARY. @MaryLauryMD had introduced herself to Allison on Twitter even before Allison had met Gu in person. She didn’t think anything unusual of their conversation. After all, Allison had talked to other female doctors on Twitter, many of whom turned into real-life friends. But her conversations with Mary took strange turns, especially after the Valentine’s Day visit. Mary often talked about Gu: “I follow Gu because I saw him on the news,” she’d say. And: “I think he’s so hot, and I’ve never had sex with an Asian guy before.” Mary said that she printed out Gu’s picture and posted it on her wall. “I make sure I retweet him all the time so he notices me,” Mary said. “He’s retweeting you a lot … are you dating him?”

Allison told her no — even if Gu called her “baby” over text, they weren’t officially in a relationship. “I was scared that if I told [Mary] we were dating, she would go psycho,” Allison says. “She seemed creepy, like she would get aggressive and post it all over her timeline and dox me.” Mary’s messages were making Allison nervous. When she brought the DMs to Gu, he quickly dismissed it. He told her that many people wrote to him on Twitter, but Allison was the only one he talked to.

Allison’s contact with Gu slowly tapered off in the months after they met. Eventually, Allison muted Gu’s account. (She thought he would notice if she unfollowed him, and she didn’t want to risk it.) Eventually, Mary’s messages stopped coming, too. Then, in July 2018, another controversy struck #MedTwitter, with Mary at the heart of it. She’d accused an account called Dr. Glaucomflecken of donning blackface. Dr. Glaucomflecken’s avatar was an ophthalmoscope dressed up with a top hat, cartoon eyes, mustache, and goatee. One could potentially interpret it as blackface — or see it as a personified, accurate representation of a black medical instrument. Allison thought it was ridiculous. She had been following Dr. Glaucomflecken for a while, and “he never said anything mean about anyone.”

After Allison saw that Gu had retweeted Mary, she decided to call out Mary’s bizarre accusation. Her spotlight on Mary drew others’ attention, too. While Allison was out, her friends texted her. “Did you see that people are saying Mary is actually Gu on Twitter?”

Allison freaked out. Then she saw the growing evidence: Mary posted pictures that were actually Gu’s, and posted things about Vanderbilt that no one other than Gu would have known. The hospital where Mary claimed she worked didn’t list a doctor under her name. When Allison finally tweeted at Gu to stop tweeting as Mary, the account was immediately deleted. “That was enough evidence for me,” Allison says. “This Mary character who I’ve met would have loved this controversy. She would have loved the chance to defend his honor.”

BEFORE I SPOKE TO ALLISON, I had noticed unsettling tweets from Mary Laury’s profile, too. I was writing a profile on Gu, and I’d been trying to get in touch with some of his critics. Though I agreed with Gu’s left-leaning political views, it was clear most media coverage of him was very one-sided: they only told Gu’s story, the one that made him out to be a victim and hero. I tweeted at an especially ardent critic, the (now deleted) @NefariousMD, asking for his perspective on Gu. @NefariousMD often posted screenshots of an unsettling piece of Gu’s past: a series of arrest citations, including filed restraining orders and allegations of domestic violence. I’d come across the allegations early in my research, and asked Gu about it in our interviews.

Gu told me that all the charges from the filings had been expunged. “The labeling of these things sound terrible,” he said. “You can’t use family law court filings that get dismissed by a judge as evidence of wrongdoing, but you can paint a really bad picture about someone.” He said the citations were tactics of an overly aggressive lawyer, and that it wasn’t fair to bring his ex-wife into the story. At the time, I’d agreed. But still, something gnawed at me, something that didn’t feel quite right. Maybe it was how easily Gu sounded indignant during our interviews, or the tense, charged terms he used to describe the alleged discrimination he suffered, or how, in every narrative, he was always the victim.

A day after I tweeted at @NefariousMD, I got a surprising email from Gu. “If you do a story with [@NefariousMD’s] input, it would be a gross miscarriage of journalistic integrity and ethics,” Gu wrote. And: “any allegations of domestic violence are completely unwarranted… Please know that any publication insinuating that I committed any act of domestic violence will be met by a libel and defamation suit.” He emphasized again that there were no court records for the arrest charges and criminal records in the screenshot often shared online, which meant that they’d been expunged by a judge.

The tone of his email was completely different from any of our prior interactions. The email seemed unwarranted, excessive. I looked back at @NefariousMD’s tweets, trying to understand what would unnerve Gu so much that he would try to stop me from even having a conversation. Aside from posting domestic-violence screenshots, @NefariousMD also tweeted about Gu’s “sock puppet accounts,” including @MaryLauryMD. I’d noticed Mary’s account before, and it hadn’t seemed remarkable. There were tweets about social justice issues and retweets of other physician activists. But her replies to @NefariousMD took a very different tone.

She spoke as if she knew @NefariousMD personally, implied that he was a fellow resident in Gu’s residency program, and alleged that he was responsible for a patient’s death in increasingly graphic terms. “The public demands to know why @nefariousmd got away with ramming a central line into a patient’s carotid artery, killing the patient with a massive stroke. Is this standard of care at Vanderbilt? Why is a white resident like @nefariousmd held to a different standard?” she tweeted.

In the course of one day, June 8th, I counted over 60 tweets directed at or related to @NefariousMD in intense, graphic language. Finally, Mary went even further, posting a photo of a patient on a hospital bed: body bare on the operating table, lines and tubes inserted into his chest, perhaps the same patient she alleged that @NefariousMD had killed.

The tweets were disturbing; the photo was shocking. Even if @NefariousMD had been racist at work, even if he had been responsible for a patient’s death, I couldn’t imagine what it’d be like to be constantly reminded of your mistake, to see a photo of a patient you lost posted in a public forum.

Days after Mary posted the photo, @NefariousMD’s Twitter account was deleted.

MARY LAURY’S ACCOUNT WAS BIZARRE,aggressive, and confrontational, unlike Gu’s, and I wanted to understand what, exactly, Gu was trying to do with Mary’s account. Did it exist to torment other users, defend himself from perceived attackers? Could he have been doing it for fun? For possible answers, I spoke to Whitney Phillips, an assistant professor in Communication, Culture, and Digital Technologies at Syracuse University and author of a book on online trolls. According to Phillips, Gu’s alter ego account made perfect sense for someone with a high profile. “In some ways,” Phillips tells me, “it sounds like brand management.”

Gu had built a popular persona as a staunch progressive, a social justice activist. He’d gotten extensive, positive press coverage of his story: the hardworking Asian American doctor attacked by conservatives, by his own medical program for daring to stand up against racism. “By cordoning off his positive account from the more antagonistic account, it allows the media coverage to be more universally beneficial to his narrative and his brand,” Phillips says. The fake account, meanwhile, was a way for Gu to freely retaliate against critics, without harming the identity that he’d so carefully built up.

It’s much harder to pinpoint why he might have felt the need to be hostile at all. “My work has deliberately sidestepped psychological profiling questions,” Phillips says. “In many cases, we just don’t have access to people’s inner emotional ecosystems. Even if we [do] … people are really busy trying to manage their public perception. There’s a very high likelihood that someone accused of problematic behavior is going to downplay it or lie.”

Phillips believes it’s the performative element of social media that most influences someone’s decisions and behaviors. People’s behavior online tends to correlate to a group norm: “If the performative expectation in [Gu’s] mind is that he needs to behave in this highly progressive, staunch social-justice orientation, of course that’s how he’s going to behave.” But on Mary Laury’s account, Gu was free. And while Gu’s case may seem extreme, brand management is something that everyone does, online or off. It stems, after all, from the same basic human desire: as social creatures, we want to be accepted and loved.

And the way Gu became obsessed with his Twitter following, brought it up often in his offline life, imagined it as a tool of revenge? Perhaps that wasn’t so far-fetched, either. According to Phillips, Gu was using social media in exactly the way it was designed to be used. Twitter and Facebook aren’t incentivizing restraint, after all: they incentivize communication and exaggeration, the more the better. Gu’s case was a “grotesque extension of how a lot of people use these sites and are encouraged to use these sites by the sites themselves,” Phillips says. “These companies make money off convincing people that social media engagement is a validation of a person’s worth, that our sense of self-worth, who we are and why we matter, is tethered to quantitative metrics. And that can go to a very ugly place very, very quickly.”

ALLISON HAD TOLD ME that she hadn’t wanted to go public with what happened between her and Gu: he was supporting good causes, and she didn’t want to take anything away from that. But discovering the Mary Laury account pushed her over the edge. In July 2017, she tweeted: “I’m freaking out now knowing my ex boyfriend was tormenting me with a fake female account. Sending me DMs obsessing over him, asking intimate details about my sex life, and then trying to convince me they slept together. I’m going to be sick.” She described a man obsessed with his Twitter following, a date that turned into something resembling sexual assault: “He is on top of me, groping me, trying to kiss me as I keep trying to get up and telling him no. Moving my face away from his kisses. He kept saying he wanted to have unprotected sex so he could get me pregnant so I could never leave him. I continued to fight him off until eventually he tired himself out and passed out.”

For a while, before I spoke to Allison, I debated about whether to write this story, too. Even if Gu had a shadow side, even if he had unresolved questions from his past, he hadexperienced racism in his residency program, and he was starting conversations that were important. But maybe it was just as unfair to erase the complications. Maybe Gu could be both a victim and entitled by his role as a victim.

Not long after Allison’s tweets went viral, Gu posted his own account of what happened between the two of them on Twitter. In his version, Allison was the seducer, and he the unwilling victim. Allison’s allegations were “100 percent empathetically false,” he said. He denied many details from the Valentine’s Day meeting, including the fact that he went in for a meeting with Vanderbilt. He sent a sexually explicit voicemail and a drunk voicemail that he allegedly received from Allison months after the Nashville visit as evidence of his innocence. On Twitter, he claimed that Mary Laury’s account was “an anonymous account people close to me created to address the trolling issues I was encountering from Trump supporters on Twitter. After a while I also shared access of this account to help combat the trolls.” Gu described using the burner account to “turn [Allison] off from me and drive a wedge between us romantically.” (Later, in an email to The Verge, he contradicts this statement: the Mary Laury account was “was originally an account meant for my mom to learn how to use Twitter. That must be clarified.”)

On Twitter, Gu ended with a broad statement against sexual assault and harassment. “Men can be victimized by women too. And false accusations without due process is a weapon of terror,” he wrote. “I know public figures are supposed to handle whatever attacks come our way, but sometimes things are just too much for a human being. I’ll be taking a break from Twitter.”
His Twitter break lasted just 19 days. Then he was back online, posting familiar tweets about activism. If you read his timeline today, you wouldn’t be able to spot any signs of the whirlwind with Allison and Mary Laury. Today, he’s up to 257,000 followers. Sometimes voices in his replies call out his alleged abusive behavior toward Allison and his ex-wife. But the block button is an easy click away, and he still has plenty of supporters.

He still tweets about Vanderbilt (from December 5th: “we need a full and thorough investigation of a culture of silence and zero accountability in medicine”). But he also posts photos of himself with a happy-looking new partner, accounts of the two of them watching Miyazaki movies together, and sometimes what sounds like a softer approach to activism. “We all have an innate desire for violence, bullying, and revenge hardwired in our limbic system,” he tweeted on January 4th. “Left unchecked, we can behave just like animals to each other. But as human beings, we also have a neocortex that allows us to show compassion, forgiveness, and mutual understanding.”

And another time: “It never hurts to be a little more kind. Even to our enemies.”

And another: “Anything can go viral these days as long as they are sensational enough. But the difference between Fake News and the Truth is that the truth lasts until the end and never goes away. Lies vanish under the scrutiny of time and investigation.”

Also, if you mention it on Twatter and tag him, he will block you.

Now, this doesn't say anything about the nature of his argument (although as has already been stated earlier, intersex and trans are two completely separate things), but it is quite interesting how Rowling is getting dogpiled on by wokes for "abusive words" but don't seem to have a problem with actual abusive pieces of shit.

AnOminous · Dec 19, 2019

ATaxingWoman said:
A very good question indeed. Why?

He doesn't have a little girl inside him. He wants to be inside a little girl.

TaimuRadiu · Dec 19, 2019

ATaxingWoman said:
Since some of the exceptional who are coming for Rowling now have already been brought up, here's another one to add to the list. This guy, Eugene Guapparently may or may not have a not so flattering history of male feminist behavior https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/5/1...-social-justice-activism-abuse-sexual-assaultAlso, if you mention it on Twatter and tag him, he will block you.

Now, this doesn't say anything about the nature of his argument (although as has already been stated earlier, intersex and trans are two completely separate things), but it is quite interesting how Rowling is getting dogpiled on by wokes for "abusive words" but don't seem to have a problem with actual abusive pieces of shit.

EUGENE GU, MD has been well documented in the Trump Derangement Syndrome thread

GenderCop · Dec 19, 2019

Our very own lolcow Kyle is going after rowling on VOX

J.K. Rowling’s transphobia is a product of British culture
Her “gender critical” tweet on Thursday shouldn’t be surprising.

and more Vox, which appears traumatized (this by Aja Romano)

J.K. Rowling’s latest tweet seems like transphobic BS. Her fans are heartbroken.
JKR just ruined Harry Potter, Merry Christmas.

Now, in response to a significant UK court case, Rowling has provided what might be the ultimate, upsetting confirmation of her perceived transphobic leanings — and many fans are taking the revelation as a betrayal of the values of tolerance, compassion, and equality that they first learned from the Harry Potter series itself.

***

think I'm gonna cry,

queue-anon · Dec 19, 2019

Frank_Jaeger said:
Was "gender and sex are different" just a trojan horse for the even more absurd idea that biological sex isn't real and that there are no differences between men and women?

Just about everything about trannydom is a Trojan horse. Honoring pronouns was a way to brainwash people into thinking hulking men in drag belong in the women’s locker room and in women’s sports. “We just need to pee” was a total fucking lie. So, yes, I’m sure separating sex and gender is another. It also doesn’t help that most people think “gender” means sex.

ATaxingWoman said:
However, I find it significantly harder to feel sympathy when it comes to the second group: the women who are fully aware of what's going on – that gender self ID laws lead to predators like Yaniv or that pink haired troon in Chicago who was EXALTED to finally be able to shower with female peers gaining access to female locker rooms, prisons and shelters or that children are being pumped full with horse piss hormones at this very moment – and not only still support it but actively shame and silence those who speak out against it. If you're in favor of a definition which says claiming you're a woman makes you female and campaign in favor of laws which follow that definition, you shouldn't be surprised when one beautiful day a Jake Alley look alike shows up in the shower room of your favorite gym and you can't do shit about it.

The latter group is almost entirely made up of mean girls. Women who hate other women and seem to enjoy watching trannies destroy other women’s hopes and dreams and basic human dignity. I often get a good laugh from the absurd collection of women this draws. There are the loathsome, hideous fatasses like Kitty Stryker, and there are also the bitchy instathots like Christa Peterson. Peterson is also hilarious because she seems to think that advocating for trannies will finally make people take her dumb ass seriously.

It might go without saying that I find the Strykers to be the most pathetic of the lot. Men, including trannies, find women like her disgusting. No amount of sucking them off is going to change that.

Silence of the Troons · Dec 19, 2019

Julie Bindel on Twitter

“So the Guardian style guide is freezing the use of ‘cis gendered’ due to disagreements and complaints from both staff and readers. Good.”

twitter.com

This appears to be true. In the cached version from three days ago, the term "cisgender" is still listed; on the live version of the webpage, it is gone.

theshep · Dec 19, 2019

ComZet said:
I don't see the point of these arguments. Sure chromosomal abnormalities exist - so what?

We're sexed for reproduction. A male inseminates a female, which results in pregnancy and birth. There are sex characteristics which can vary in both sexes - but that doesn't negate the fact.

If transwomen were women then why are they transitioning?

I hate people bringing up intersex as come kind of argument. Intersex people are rare.

Someone posted on Twitter the other day 'the existence of green still wouldn't make blue or yellow'.

Elbe · Dec 19, 2019

Eggsy said:
Good for Rowling. I hope she sticks to her guns this time around and doesn't backpedal. Again.

I reckon she'll just quit Twitter.

Smaug's Smokey Hole · Dec 19, 2019

Freddy Freaker said:
Intersex people are extremely rare anyway. Only one I've ever heard of was an (allegedly) intersex trucker that would call into the Dr. Drew show like 10 years ago.

It's a common tactic to force implausible scenarios or extreme edge cases into the discussion as a trump card. If you don't have exactly 100% of the answers that satifies them while it equally applies to all possible situations or scenarios and all people, even ones they are making up on the spot, then you have nothing.
It's minority rule or as it was called in the past: concern trolling.

Bob's Vagene · Dec 19, 2019

Elbe said:
I reckon she'll just quit Twitter.

or reveal that we're all gay.

sperginity · Dec 19, 2019

So on twitter it looks like the people chimping out against JKR are about evenly matched with the people chimping out for her, but the for JKR crowd seems to be about half conservatives, a little bit of terves, and a whole bunch of people who had no idea how insane things had gotten. I am so glad that a tweet saying "identify and present and love whoever you want" is being used to try and cancel her. "sex is real" is the most innocuous message possible. normies are waking up.

Eggsy · Dec 19, 2019

Elbe said:
I reckon she'll just quit Twitter.

Maybe. She had to have known the furor she would have caused by tweeting it, since she was similarly 'cancelled' earlier in the year for following Magdalen Berns.

Rowling has taken twitter hiatuses before, so I reckon she'll take another one if not outright quit.

Nykysnottrans · Dec 19, 2019

Gather around because we need to talk about a publication that has been discussed here before, the book Fucking Trans Women by Mira Bellwether. TL;DR review: it's terrible. We're talking about "I can see Leah Tverly blasting this book for an hour in a video" terrible.

Background: an SJW British Youtuber called "PhilosophyTube" made a video titled Queer where he told his fans to get this book. One of his fans got the book and posted some excerpts to /r/MensLib LMAO:

r/MensLib - I highly recommend everyone to check Fucking Trans Women (a book recommended in PhilosophyTube's latest video). Some excerpts! [x-post from r/Breadtube]

732 votes and 110 comments so far on Reddit

www.reddit.com

Contrary to what he claims, these excerpts posted to imgur are not SFW at all, all include explicit descriptions of sexual acts using sexual slang so click at your own risk, you've been warned. I am placing everything behind a spoiler without any embeds.

First of all, I am not lambasting this book because trannies might need a book to figure out how to have sex, if any, post-HRT/SRS. There seems to be a huge demand for this book amongst trannies - which IMO is an indication of what their sex lives are like post-HRT/SRS despite all their sexual braggadocio in the social media - so if this book helps someone actually get laid, more power to them I guess. I am rather lambasting PhilosophyTube's suggestion that cis people should use this book as an instruction manual for having sex with trannies. It's like giving a copy of The Lesbian Sex Guide to some virginal straight guy and saying, "here, this'll teach you how to fuq a woman right.". That's not how it works IRL. If sex is not more simple and straight-forward, no one is gonna fuq anyone. If you need an instruction manual ("with diagrams!", enthused PhilosophyTube) to fuq anyone, well, to quote Nyk's cousin Pink, "listen up, it's just not happening.". Even women, who unlike men need more preparatory work and lengthier courtship, they too actually want that to be simple and straight-forward. "It's complicated" is a major turn-off for the overwhelming majority of humans, male or female.

Especially cis women - who can and do get pregnant and have 100% legit questions about birth control - they should not be reading a book that mindfucks them and guilt-trips them into thinking that it's rude to ask a pre-op trannie about whether they can get them pregnant "because that question about my sperm load gives me gender dysphoria."

"... wait a minute, WTF?", you ask, ladies. "That's in this book?"

I kid you not, there's a passage in this book that says pretty much exactly that. That passage is followed with the author disavowing what he just said a moment before and insisting that he "really truly does practice safer sex always", but that disavowal and reassurance is hardly believable after what precipitated it and IMO plainly smacks of a mindfuck played on the reader. But more on that later.

Since I made fun of the book without having read it, I decided to have a look at the SFW (yeah right) parts that this person posted to Reddit so that I can more solidly criticize it:

https://i.imgur.com/6esJCoZ.png

"I'm talking about beginning with sensation, not with names"

"Oh honeyyy hon, can I lick your... uh... um... hmmm... um... can I just point at the... um... the thing? You know, the thing there? That thing there. The thing I wanna lick, can I lick it? What did you say there? Oh, you want me to lick the... um... the other thing? This thing or that?"
(Getting horny yet people? All those years you wasted learning how to dirty-talk and call things by their name only to end up being told by the SJW cult that you can't use names in the bedroom anymore...)

Look dude, if you close your eyes everything feels great... until you open them the next morning and realize who you're with and what you've done and regret washes over you like a cold shower. What do sexologists always tell their clients with sex problems? You need to learn to have sex sober with your eyes open and the lights on.

"Fucking Trans Women is basically a cookbook"

That sounds gross, consumeristic, objectifying and cannibalistic AND it reminds me of this Russian TERF comics that all the SJWs on Twitter got their pants in a bunch about a few years back:

Human beings are not a plate of soup or a piece of cherry pie.

"The recipes are for good sex, tenderness, better communication, intense pleasure, hot fucking, sharing new ideas and developing and sharing techniques."

That's literally the contents of every other Dr Ruth sex book on the shelf of your local book chain, so why would anyone bother with this book over those other books? Oh, I get it, Dr Ruth uses the names of things and that's verboten by the cult.

"This first issue, the Zero issue, is your invitation to send in your recipes"

Ah, now I get it! This book is basically one of those scams where others write the actual content but the editor pretends that they are the auteur of it all just because they compiled other people's input into a book.

Let's look at the next page:

https://i.imgur.com/dNI5Oir.png

More than one of my lovers, in fact basically all of them, has at one time or another lamented that there's no "instruction manual" for my body.

"Instruction manual"? As in "RTFM"? OK, this book was compiled by an AGP for sure. I know this because I read that other book (that troons don't want you to read). That other book, which is immensely more informative than this one here when it comes to giving you an understanding the sex lives of transwomen, said this:

"I've had to learn all kinds of stuff about my body on the fly that I would rather not have learned the hard way."

LMAO, so this book is basically the printed version of every "He Didn't Know I Was Trans" video on Youtube. If you've never seen one of those videos, every Youtube vlog account that is some trannie's transition timeline will basically have at least one of those videos within the first six months of their transition. It's almost like an obligatory rite of passage for transwomen to make such a video about how they passed so well that they managed to seduce some unsuspecting man. Not all HDKIWT videos are NSFW though, some are relatively tame with the protagonist only getting kissed and groped but breaking loose before something more compromising could occur, some are more explicit with the eventual grand piece de resistance, the big gender reveal moment that the story arch is inevitably working towards.

I've had to invent words, metaphors, and stories, to explain to myself and to others how I think my body works, and what it can do.

So this is where shit like "girldick" and "mouthfeel" came from? This book here? LMAO, I can imagine having to invent words when you've told your lovers not to use the existing ones. You'll be receiving the Enochian Keys from the Transgender Angels like John Dee next.

That's to say that just because what's in my crotch looks like a penis doesn't necessarily mean that it works like a penis.

But the cold hard fact is it does work like a penis a lot of the time. That's why born women don't want you in their changing rooms, and that's why you SJWs keep lying about how all transwomen are either post-op (they're not, most are pre-op or non-operative) and when called out on that lie, you insist that all transwomen have killed their dick with HRT and can't get it up. 30%-40% of transwomen openly admit they still practice penetrative sex, either PiM or PiV or PiA. The fact a lot of you have killed your dick with HRT and can't get it up anymore doesn't discount the fact that at least one in three of you can still get erections. Just stop lying about this, not matter how many people you ban on Twitter everyone and their mother can look up those studies for themselves.

I'm talking about starting from data and working toward conclusions rather than the opposite

That's exactly what I did, hon: the studies say that many of you can still have your dicks and can still get them up and running. This is why women don't want you in their changing rooms. Because your dicks work like dicks. Stop lying about this.

"something very much like sexy mad science (white lab coats and leather gloves optional.)"

Yes, I've seen that movie too.

That a was pre-HRT video, BTW.
Nyk's post-HRT doctor character is boring.

Next page:

https://i.imgur.com/GUfRtXE.png

If you're used to penises showing pleasure by getting hard (and depending on the penis you're pleasuring, it might do just that at some point)

LMAO, here you go people, they can't avoid admitting it. Transwomen can get it up just like any man.

you might feel a little unsure of how to tell that what you're doing feels good. This is exactly why it's so important to keep your lover talking, and talking about what their body is feeling.

I know a word for this. It's called a mindfuck. So, you can't fuck a trannie unless they and you suffer from verbal diarrhea during sex? How sexee and arousing! By the end of this book, you might as well become a sex line operator while you're at it.

For trans women in particular it can be very important and productive to treat a soft (or hard) penis as you would a cis women's clit.

But it's not a clit. It doesn't even remotely work like one. For example, a clitoris retracts if it's overstimulated (oral sex directly on the clitoris is actually painful for some women). No dick ever does that. Clearly the author of this book doesn't know this either or they would never make such a ridiculous statement. You cannot treat a dick like a clit.

Some trans women like fucking and penetrating with their own genitals, and likewise lots of us like getting blowjobs, especially if they're done enthusiastically and well.

Ladies and gentlemen, there you go, they openly admit this shit in their own writings. They just lie to your faces about it because they think you're stupid and gullible.

Remember to lubricate.

Because that thing ain't lubricating out of itself, apparently. I thought the magic of peritoneal grafts took care of that? I guess that technique was only popularized after this book or something.

If you're not having fun after a while, find a way to have fun or move on to something else. Fucking is all about having a good time with someone else. Otherwise what's the point?

And reading a sex book - that is hopefully filled with something other than meaningless tired old clichés such as this - is about learning something you didn't know yet. Otherwise what's the point?

And another page:

https://i.imgur.com/Gh1i6fw.png

Definitely this book was put together by an old AGP because it a younger trannie had editted it, those comics would be manga for sure.

Y'all gonna love this part:

https://i.imgur.com/dUlYzmN.png

Deep in the unclean bowels of the internet

... where the plastic surgeon cut out the piece of colon that was used to line the internet's neovaginal cavity, back before peritoneal grafts became all the rage... (shhh, you fucker, don't name things)

nerds and terrible people make horrible inside jokes that spread and mutate and eventually become what we have learned to call "memes".

Nothing turns me on like quotation marks being used around the word "memes" to express derision and rejection.

At least 50% of memes are racist, sexist, homophobic, misogynist or otherwise offensive; the rest involve cute animals. One of the most disgusting memes is the use of the word "trap" to describe trans women.

See? I told you guys, you're gonna love this part.

There is also a latent assumption that all images of women invite their sexuality

This sentence is not English. Rephrase please.

and so a photo can be a "trap"

"A photo can be a trap"? No honey, the person on the picture is a trap. Your rage bait is preventing you from thinking logically here.

whether the woman in it is masturbating or balancing her checkbook.

Wow, am I seeing a SWERF argument here? This is what anti-porn radical feminists have been saying for years, that images of women can be pornographic whether that woman in the picture is dressed up or naked, engaged in an explicit sexual act or not. So trannie agrees with that statement? Look at, trannie and radfems finally agree on something.

To be labeled a trap is to be reduced to a sexual object that is taboo, and to be labeled a seductive deceiver who tricks heterosexual men out of their rather precarious sexuality simply by being seen.

Yet all these transwomen who so aggressively reject the term trap have never actually been called one because they just don't pass well enough to be considered one. Like I said, this book has most likely been assembled by an older AGP, so inevitably there was going to be a jab at younger HSTS who pass well and are considered traps by their chasers. This page is basically it.

My favorite trap of all time is Myra Breckinridge from the novel Myra Breckinridge.

What did I tell you about this book being written by an older AGP mad sad at all the younger HSTS traps? Here you go. Younger trannies have no idea who the fuck that is. They don't read fictional books about trannies, they watch Youtube videos with actual trannies.

This last page is the worst of the worst. TERFs and safer sex enthusiasts, this is the part you've been waiting for:

https://i.imgur.com/vTQDlWT.png

I hate reaching those moments when a lover realizes that my cum is also jizz, that it could get them pregnant and they begin treating my cum like radioactive waste.

Dude, that's a rather roundabout (read: another mindfuck) way of saying: "You can use your trans status as an excuse to avoid wearing a condom/having safer sex.". Just STFU and just put a condom on that dick already. You can catch some scary shit from a woman too, you dumbass. "A real man will use one, a real woman doesn't have to ask."

Typically I am asked questions about my body that I have no answers for, like what my sperm count is and how statistically likely it is that I will knock someone up. NOBODY KNOWS THIS STUFF AND NO ONE SHOULD HAVE TO.

... Oliver actually endorses this? This anti-birth control bullshit? This anti-safer sex shit? This is now the new left? The new left is about using transness as an excuse to avoid discussing birth control? A biological woman asking a biological man with a dick, "hey dude, can you actually, you know, get me knocked up while on HRT? Do you still have a high sperm load?" as part of safer sex negotiations, that's transphobic now?

#PEAKTRANSING so hard right now, bitches. (You really don't wanna see this, believe me, it's not as sexy as it sounds.)

I have never before seen transness being used as an excuse for such blatant unsafe sex and anti-birthcontrol regressiveness. I can't believe SJW TRAs would sink that low, but there you have it.

"I practice safer sex"

No, bitch, you don't. This is the "(describing rape) what I just described isn't actually rape" fake disclaimer of your text. Everything you just described previously was about how you use your transness to avoid discussing safer sex, ie birth control. Telling cis women to not ask you about whether you can get them knocked up with your "radioactive" jizz is not "practicing safer sex", it's the very opposite of that. It's mindfucking cis women into having unsafe sex with you and other pre-ops by man-whining about how discussions of pregnancy and being asked to use condoms to dispose of your "radiactive waste" (LMAO) supposedly makes you feel dysphoric. You are a manipulator and a mindfucker, if this is how you roll in bed. And once again you dumbass, YOU YOURSELF can catch some really scary shit from an infected woman too if you don't put a condom on that dick, regardless of the HRT affecting your sperm load. How stupid can you be?

Let's end this with Mira Bellwether's favourite song, shall we:

Seriously, how the fuck are Leah Tverly & Co not all over this? This shit is the worst cotton ceiling bullshit I've read since Riley Dennis accusing women of being transphobic for not wanting to suq the girldiq.

This is the "author" of the book BTW - can you imagine them rolling on a condom? Neither can I for some strange reason...

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1199059361080979457/rs0DkPFL_400x400.jpg

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTICwKg10zmBM-9N2ww1ry1zUEHEy-ETFVFL51vk65TO8ZibZL9ig&s

OneEyedCool · Dec 19, 2019

What Jew is wanting to pay off Rowling to betray a large part of her Potter fanbase that thought and identified Dumbledore as a transwoman just to cause all this discord among them?

Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

TaimuRadiu

Kaiserin

neverendingmidi

it just goes on and on and on and on...

Otterly

Primark Primarch

OttoWest

J.K. Rowling is a TERF! | Spectator USA

Silence of the Troons

It rubs the lotion on its skin

Dolphin Lundgren

Picking blueberries with Henry Fonda.

Silence of the Troons

It rubs the lotion on its skin

AnOminous

SOMEBODY SET UP US THE BOMB

TaimuRadiu

Kaiserin

GenderCop

Friendly neighborhood gender cop

queue-anon

Silence of the Troons

It rubs the lotion on its skin

Julie Bindel on Twitter

theshep

Elbe

You don't rape a hamster

Smaug's Smokey Hole

Closed for summer

Bob's Vagene

It's only gay if the balls touch.

sperginity

the only normal person here

Eggsy

kingsman

Nykysnottrans

鬼女

r/MensLib - I highly recommend everyone to check Fucking Trans Women (a book recommended in PhilosophyTube's latest video). Some excerpts! [x-post from r/Breadtube]

OneEyedCool