Manosphere Fonduman / mooooo - (he shits up our loveshy threads)

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
mooooo said:
It doesn't matter, because an admittance wouldn't have a grade on it. It's just the phrasing. Here's another:

1-1410201F5140-L.jpg


If you went to a UK university you know "first class honours" is a grading. You finished the degree.
Click to expand...
What the hell is a "Bachelor of Bcience"? What sort of strip-mall "university" is this?

How come the only place I can find images of this "diploma" is on Chinese websites selling fake diplomas riddled with misspellings?
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Taco Bell Chihuahua, Traditional Tet, Randall Fragg and 20 others
mooooo said:
so what would you count as proof if a legit one looks like a copied one?

Well, for one thing at the bottom left you can see the 3 dimensional depth of the stamp thingy
Click to expand...
mooooo said:
not really a stamp, like a pressure imprint. back of the page:

http://s12.postimg.org/kar8vs2e3/IMG_20150302_223927.jpg
Click to expand...
Count groudon said:
I know its an imprint, youre the one who called it a stamp first. And still it looks more like something edited on instead of an actual imprint, and like I said ive never seen the imprint go over the text before. And come to think of it, it looks a bit too bland. Most schools usually put some sort of decorative border on it or at least some kind of symbol. Yours just seems pretty blank
Click to expand...

It's...it's called embossing.
Sorry, that was just going to bug me. :sighduck:
 
  • Informative
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: CisCat, BOLDYSPICY!, Ti-99/4A and 12 others
KatsuKitty said:
The B isn't even anywhere near the S. How did this happen?
Click to expand...
You can get one too from diploma8@hotmail.com!

贝尔法斯特女王大学学位证样本Queen's University Belfast.jpg


I'm not even sure these are diplomas. It just says the student is "admitted" to the program. I'm betting the university throws these in with your acceptance letter and these Chinese sites repackages copies as "diplomas."
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Randall Fragg, Trombonista, Cephalometrist and 7 others
Meowthkip said:
I'm not disputing that. I'm just amazed he's still around when he's getting like, nothing out of it.

Also LOL, that diploma.
Click to expand...

That's not what he seems to think.

Fonduman said:
I've been reading on a bit in Dante's thread. I don't agree with all his views, but I've come to a conclusion that the posters there are largely not worth discussing things with. They're not even necessarily stupid, per se, but this quote from a newspaper article I read today sums up most of the issue:

He cites the work of Russian neuroscientist Alexander Luria, who studied indigenous people in the Soviet Union. "He found that they were very pragmatic and concrete in their thinking," says Flynn, "and they weren't capable of using logical abstractions or taking hypotheticals seriously." Luria put the following problem to the head man of one tribe in Siberia: Where there's always snow, the bears are white; there's always snow at the North Pole - what colour are the bears there?

The head man replied that he had never seen bears that were any colour other than brown, but if a wise or truthful man came from the North Pole and told him that bears there were white, he might believe him. The scientific methods of hypothesising, classifying and making logical deductions were alien to him.
Click to expand...


In other words, they can't deal with abstraction and logic, is the issue. For example, Dante made a post recently that pedophiles don't want to hurt children, they want to fulfill urges. While this may not be true for literally every pedophile, the desire to fulfil urges is instrinsically part of their definition, whereas the desire to cause harm is an individual thing that is not required for the definition at all. So this is a very reasonable claim.

Then they responded sarcastically that molesting children hurts them.

So what we have is this, in this example:
Dante has the correct definition of a pedophile in mind; that is, an innate and exclusive attraction to children.
Their definition of a pedophile is along the lines of "someone who molests children"

Now, one might think that correcting them to highlight their error would then put Dante's post into context and show it is correct, but experience says this is not so. Knowledge would not fix them. It is how they think. They don't operate by conceiving of a logically precise abstract idea or definition and then acting upon the construct, similar to the example in the quoted article. They don't start from first principles then work their way through each step to a conclusion, they just attain a vague sense of an idea then kinda splatter it into their minds in a finished state. It's messy and not very precise.

There's many other examples in which they failed to assimilate information accurately, missed the point or meaning of an analogy, took a comparison as literal instead of extracting the correct data from it, etc. This goes beyond disagreement, down to thought dysfunction. Hence, I see little point in engaging with them further. But if i'm in work and bored I might still poke them to see what comes out.
Click to expand...

That's from just yesterday, by the way.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!, Cephalometrist, Wally Balljacker and 1 other person
https://archive.today/X8Uoo#selection-1463.0-1471.102
fonduman said:
Personal Info: Other relevant info about yourself (hobbies, family, school/job, etc.):
Well, i'm doing a masters in Physics atm. This is reminiscent of job applications
upload_2015-3-3_1-2-47.gif
. I enjoy badminton, karate, attempting to fish, reading, guitar playing, watching stuff like House :biggrin:. I have a thing for lasers that can burn through plastic, perhaps unsurprising for someone doing physics
upload_2015-3-3_1-2-47.gif
. There are some other areas of interest I occasionaly will look into, like philosophy or psychology.
Click to expand...
Either @mooooo has turned into a completely useless NEET over the past few years, or he is a dirty liar.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Cephalometrist, BriarHeart, Wally Balljacker and 2 others
Has anyone figured out the ratio of kiwi members to how many of those members become cows yet? We could totally predict roughly how long it will be before our next toy arrives. ;)

I just don't understand why anyone would get a bug up their ass and try to take on an entire forum like this. It's impossible to win.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Traditional Tet, BOLDYSPICY!, DuskEngine and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back