War Iran-United States Military Crisis of 2020 - US Baghdad embassy under siege, rocket fire in US Baghdad green zone, Ukrainian Airlines flight 752 crash, and more!

January 10th:
Exclusive: Informants in Iraq, Syria helped U.S. kill Iran's Soleimani - sources (archive)(post)
Iraqi Shia cleric whose militia killed American troops says crisis is over following Iran strike and Trump speech (archive)(post)
Iraqi PM tells US to decide mechanism for troop withdrawal (archive)(post)
Mike Pence says Congress might 'compromise sources and methods' if fully briefed on the Soleimani strike (archive)(post)
Unidentified planes hit Iraqi militiamen in Syria, killing 8 (archive)(post)
Iraq: The Master Of Mayhem Meets A Missile (archive)(post)
Eliminating Qasem Soleimani was Donald Trump’s Middle East farewell letter (archive)(post)
Iran uses BULLDOZERS to clear debris from plane crash site while accusing US of ‘big lie’ that they shot it down (archive)(post)
Swiss Back Channel Helped Defuse U.S.-Iran Crisis (post)

January 11th:
UKRAINIAN AIRCRAFT WAS BROUGHT DOWN IN IRAN DUE TO 'HUMAN ERROR' (archive)(post)
Iran minister says 'human error' caused by 'US adventurism' led to deadly crash of Ukrainian jetliner (archive)(post)
Ukrainian aircraft was brought down in Iran due to 'human error' (archive)(post)
Trump, at Ohio rally, says Democrats would have leaked Soleimani attack plans (archive)(post)
The Atlantic's David Frum blames Trump for downing of plane in Iran, deaths of 176 (archive)(post)
Associated Press changes ‘shockingly bad’ headline about Soleimani, Ukrainian plane crash after backlash (archive)(post)
GOP Rep. Doug Collins apologizes for saying Democrats are 'in love with terrorists' (archive)(post)
Iran demands West 'show findings' as new video reveals aircraft was struck before fiery crash (archive)(post)
Warren town hall interrupted by angry protester accusing her of ‘siding with terrorists’ (archive)(post)
Trump administration announces new sanctions on Iran (archive)(post)
Prepare For the Worst From Iran Cyber Attacks, As DHS Issues Warning: Experts (archive)(post)
Trump tells Fox News' Laura Ingraham 'four embassies' were targeted in imminent threat from Iran (archive)(post)
Trump tweets support for Iranian protesters as they demand Khamenei quit (archive)(post)
Trump warns Iran against ‘another massacre’ as protests flare over downed jet (archive)(post)

January 12th:
Trump tweet in Farsi 'the most liked Persian tweet' in history of Twitter (archive)(post)
Iraq warned to keep US troops or risk financial blow-WSJ (archive)(post)
Iran arrests UK ambassador in what Britain calls ‘flagrant violation of international law’ (archive)(post)

January 13th:
Trump authorized Soleimani's killing 7 months ago, with conditions (archive)(post)

edit: This is a WIP. All links are posted in the order they appear in the thread, not in chronological order of their publication.


---Original OP before the merge---
Iraqi supporters of Iran-backed militia attack US Embassy
https://apnews.com/75228a8a607a44863b57021ac33264dc (http://archive.vn/ljm9Y)

By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA12 minutes ago

BAGHDAD (AP) — Dozens of angry Iraqi Shiite militia supporters broke into the U.S. Embassy compound in Baghdad on Tuesday after smashing a main door and setting fire to a reception area, prompting tear gas and sounds of gunfire.

An Associated Press reporter at the scene saw flames rising from inside the compound and at least three U.S. soldiers on the roof of the main building inside embassy. It was not clear what caused the fire at the reception area near the parking lot of the compound. A man on a loudspeaker urged the mob not to enter the compound, saying: “The message was delivered.”

The embassy attack followed deadly U.S. airstrikes on Sunday that killed 25 fighters of the Iran-backed militia in Iraq, the Kataeb Hezbollah. The U.S. military said it was in retaliation for last week’s killing of an American contractor in a rocket attack on an Iraqi military base that it had blamed on the militia.

Dozens of protesters marched inside the compound after smashing the gate used by cars to enter the embassy. The protesters, many in militia uniform, stopped in a corridor after about 5 meters (16 feet), and were only about 200 meters away from the main building. Half a dozen U.S. soldiers were seen on the roof of the main building, their guns were pointed at the protesters.

Smoke from the tear gas rose in the area, and at least three of the protesters appeared to have difficulties breathing. It wasn’t immediately known whether the embassy staff had remained inside the main building.

The protesters hanged a poster on the wall: “America is an aggressor.”

Shouting “Down, Down USA,” the crowd tried to push inside the embassy grounds, hurling water and stones over its walls. They raised yellow militia flags and taunted the embassy’s security staff who remained behind the glass windows in the gates’ reception area. They sprayed graffiti on the wall and windows in red in support of the Kataeb Hezbollah militia: “Closed in the name of the resistance.”

Hundreds of angry protesters, some in militia uniforms, set up tents outside the embassy. As tempers rose, the mob set fire to three trailers used by security guards along the embassy wall.

No one was immediately reported hurt in the rampage and security staff had withdrawn to inside the embassy earlier, soon after protesters gathered outside.

The U.S. attack — the largest targeting an Iraqi state-sanctioned militia in recent years — and the subsequent calls by the militia for retaliation, represent a new escalation in the proxy war between the U.S. and Iran playing out in the Middle East.

Tuesday’s attempted embassy storming took place after mourners and supporters held funerals for the militia fighters killed in a Baghdad neighborhood, after which they marched on to the heavily fortified Green Zone and kept walking till they reached the sprawling U.S. Embassy there.

AP journalists then saw the crowd as they tried to scale the walls of the embassy, in what appeared to be an attempt to storm it, shouting “Down, down USA!” and “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.”

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Sunday’s strikes send the message that the U.S. will not tolerate actions by Iran that jeopardize American lives.

The Iranian-backed Iraqi militia had vowed Monday to retaliate for the U.S. military strikes. The attack and vows for revenge raised concerns of new attacks that could threaten American interests in the region.

The U.S. attack also outraged both the militias and the Iraqi government, which said it will reconsider its relationship with the U.S.-led coalition — the first time it has said it will do so since an agreement was struck to keep some U.S. troops in the country. It called the attack a “flagrant violation” of its sovereignty.

In a partly televised meeting Monday, Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi told Cabinet members that he had tried to stop the U.S. operation “but there was insistence” from American officials.

The U.S. military said “precision defensive strikes” were conducted against five sites of Kataeb Hezbollah, or Hezbollah Brigades in Iraq and Syria. The group, which is a separate force from the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, operates under the umbrella of the state-sanctioned militias known collectively as the Popular Mobilization Forces. Many of them are supported by Iran.









.
 
Last edited:
ENYV3WGWkAEpXaq.jpg


CNN comin' at us with the real headline news.
 
What exactly am I blubbering about? The fact that the endless quagmire of war we've gotten ourselves into is bad, which you seemingly agree with? Are you referring to the fact that I call these wars imperialism? Because what else do you call these American intrusions into Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and now attempts at Iran?

I haven't been following this argument, but calling the United States imperialist when that's the literal objective of Islam (and has been for most of recorded history) is foolish. If they aren't kept in check they will continue to act like barbarians at the gates of all human society. A majority of Muslims support that idea, so it's not like there is a diplomatic solution here. Their numbers have to be culled regularly to instill fear, just as we've done in the case of other violent animals.

Does that mean I support more boots on the ground? No, and neither do most Americans.

The beauty of this drone strike is it demonstrates the United States can have considerable influence in the region with minimal infantry presence. If someone is identified as causing problems, they can be blown out of the sky by a literal toy. So with this knowledge that the caliphate will never behave nor respect its neighbors without regular shows of force, we've pursued innovation that allows our military to exert said force from the comfort of a heavily-fortified bunker.

You can call it "imperialism" all you want, but the United States seems more interested in not having presence in the region. The only group looking to capitalize on regional instability and blows to the caliphate are Israel, but they help fund that nonsense in the first place, so as far as I'm concerned they're next on the shit list.
 
Not just chilling with them, but apparently they fucking tagged his name in the embassy with something along the lines of “WE’RE WITH SOLEIMANI!!!”

Devoid of context that seems like a clear false flag meant to bait the US into killing this dude, but it seems that he was honest to god that fucking brazen about it.
Awhile back Soleiman had an underling bring a text message to the US General in Iraq to inform teh General that any and all discussions, plans and negotiations regarding IRAQ's future (not Iran, Iraq!) were to be directed through him Soleiman. Yeah he was that fucking brazen.
 
And? That literally happens whenever anything happens in the middle east.

Edit:
Awhile back Soleiman had an underling bring a text message to the US General in Iraq to inform teh General that any and all discussions, plans and negotiations regarding IRAQ's future (not Iran, Iraq!) were to be directed through him Soleiman. Yeah he was that fucking brazen.
Big if true. Do you have sauce?
 
The funniest part of this whole ordeal for me is that I absolutely fucking refuse to believe that even a tenth of these people had any goddamned idea who Qasem Soleimani was before last night. In the span of minutes every single monkey with a cell phone and an opinion is suddenly a certifiable expert on the Middle East and still somehow can't fathom why anyone would want Soleimani dead.

The only people in the world who didn't want Qasem Soleimani's head on a pike were terrorists and people who had no idea who he even was.

I didn't even know the dude's name, but when someone said "Quds Force Commander" my reaction was "Fucking good, but we're like 10 years late". Quds was the reason that IEDs were such a huge fucking problem in Iraq and Afghan from 04 to now. They were the ones giving out the copper core explosives/projectiles that were shredding Humvees, LAVs and Strikers. I remember having to sit through a few briefings where we were shown shit the Rangers had recovered with help from the Kurds showing Iranian shipping crates being found that were half full of the damn things.
 
Again, stop all that damn crying and pay the fuck attention. If you honestly think modern Iran, only 41 years removed from its last monarchy, and run by Shia Islamists, has no imperialist ambitions, you're a fucking idiot.

And nobody is getting drafted into a new war, so all this spastic tard-raging you're doing is premature at best.
Your point gets little awkward since the US is responsible for the removal and subsequent revolution too
1578083629146.png

The embassy shouldn't even exist. I don't even know if I should bother as you seem to be entirely delusional about the reality of the situation. America did start it. The entire premise that Saddam Hussein had WMDs, was working with Al Qaeda, and helped orchestrate 9/11 was a full on lie.
Actually it goes even further than that!
 
Last edited:
Your point gets little awkward since the US is responsible for the removal and subsequent revolution too
View attachment 1081200
That's true. It's also true Iran agreed to delay the release of the embassy hostages until after Reagan became President in 1980. They also traded weapons for cash (which was actually drug money the CIA amassed) so the Reagan administration could continue arming its Contra freedum fighters. This goes on and of course you have the planeload of cash Obama sent them and that treaty he negotiated. Iran is very much willing to work with the US except when it isn't.

No one has clean hands but Iran is especially hypocritical. They see Iraq as their rightful sphere of influence and we made it clear it isn't.
 
More details on the strike.
New Details About Strike On Top Iranian Commander Emerge As Americans Are Told To Flee Iraq (Updated)
Thousands of American troops are heading to the Middle East as Iraqi officials are mulling kicking the U.S. military out and amid Iranian threats.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said that Qasem Soleimani, commander of Iran's Quds Force, posed an "imminent" threat and that a drone strike that killed him and the other occupants of two SUVs outside of Baghdad International Airport in Iraq "saved American lives." At the same time, repercussions from the unprecedented U.S. military operation are being felt, with the increasing possibility that the Iraqi government might order American forces out of the country and the State Department itself urging American citizens to leave as soon as possible. The United States has also formally decided to send thousands more troops to the region to bolster security as countries throughout the Middle East brace for any number of responses from Iran and its proxies.

A drone under the control of the Joint Special Operations Command, reportedly an MQ-9 Reaper, carried out the mission. The Iranian regime has now confirmed that Soleimani along with four other members of the country's powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), died in the strike. The Quds Force is the part of the IRGC responsible for conducting and coordinating terrorist and militant activities outside of Iran. "Highly classified information from informants, electronic intercepts, reconnaissance aircraft, and other surveillance" went into the planning of the strike, according to The New York Times.

"I can’t talk too much about the nature of the threat," Secretary Pompeo said in an interview on CNN's "New Day" on Jan. 3, 2020. Pompeo did describe the threat as "imminent" and stressed that it was directed at American interests in the Middle East, but declined to elaborate.

“It was the time to take this action so we could disrupt this plot... The risk of doing nothing was enormous, the intelligence committee made that assessment," he added. “We will do our best to release everything we know that’s appropriate that doesn’t put anyone at risk."


First footage to show the moment when US drone struck the convoy in which #QassemSoleimani was traveling at the #Baghdad Airport. pic.twitter.com/3KGABE5kMR
— Aldin 🇧🇦 (@aldin_ww) January 3, 2020
Pondering the geography of the strike that killed Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani -- which occurred next to Baghdad Int'l Airport, ~2.25 mi from the Al Faw Palace that was U.S. military HQs in Iraq. Quite a commentary QS's freedom of movement https://t.co/IZTwXcvMdg pic.twitter.com/8ijfnH76qE
— Phillip Carter (@Carter_PE) January 3, 2020
Asked if he would release more intel behind the attacks, Pompeo says “we will do our best to release everything we know that’s appropriate that doesn’t put anyone at risk.”
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 3, 2020
“General Qassem Soleimani has killed or badly wounded thousands of Americans over an extended period of time, and was plotting to kill many more…but got caught!” U.S. President Donald Trump also wrote in a series of Tweets. “He was directly and indirectly responsible for the death of millions of people, including the recent large number of PROTESTERS killed in Iran itself.”


....of PROTESTERS killed in Iran itself. While Iran will never be able to properly admit it, Soleimani was both hated and feared within the country. They are not nearly as saddened as the leaders will let the outside world believe. He should have been taken out many years ago!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
It's not entirely clear how long the strike on Soleimani had been in the making. The New York Times has reported that the White House approved the plan to kill the Quds Force commander on Dec. 27, 2019, immediately after a rocket attack on K-1 base in the northern Iraqi city of Kirkuk, which killed a U.S. contractor and wounded American troops. An earlier statement from the Pentagon about Soleimani's death had blamed him and the Iranian government of masterminding a rocket attack on K-1 base. That incident had already prompted American airstrikes on Kata'ib Hezbollah, an Iranian-backed Iraqi militia, which actually carried out the attack on K-1, on Dec. 29.
Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican and close confidant of U.S. President Donald Trump, also told Fox News on Jan. 3 that he had received a briefing about a potential targeted strike "when I was down in Florida." Reporters had spotted Graham at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort on Dec. 30 and 31, 2019. This further indicates that the actual planning for the operation underway beforehand.


Sen. Lindsey Graham, who was seen at Mar-a-Lago on Monday and Tuesday, says on Fox News, “I was briefed about the potential operation when I was down in Florida.”
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) January 3, 2020
This would also mean that the Trump Administration had decided to strike Soleimani before the subsequent attack on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad on Dec. 31. The U.S. military had also said that the Quds Force commander orchestrated that incident, which was ostensibly in response to the airstrikes. Members of Kata'ib Hezbollah and other Iranian-supported militias in Iraq operating under the umbrella of the Iraqi government's Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), along with their supporters, carried out that attack, as well.

In the aftermath of the Embassy attack, the U.S. military sent portions of a U.S. Marine Corps crisis-response force from Kuwait to bolster security at that diplomatic compound. It also announced that it would be deploying personnel from one brigade of the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne Division, as well as supporting troops, which together form what is now called the Immediate Response Force (IRF), a rotating extremely high-readiness global response contingent that is on alert at all times, to various locations in the Middle East.

-End of part 1, will follow up with part two because I can't post it at the same time because of character limits.-​
 
-Part 2-​
Plane spotters using online flight tracking software also noticed the apparent deployment of special operations forces from Europe to the region. The massive air bridge to bring all these personnel and equipment into the theater, which involves U.S. military airlifters and other aircraft flying through various air bases and civilian airports on their way to various locations in the Middle East, as well as Turkey, and back again, is still ongoing.


Flights update:

Inbound #Rota from #Hunter Airfield:#RCH978, 69-0024, the last of 4x C-5M
From #Ramstein:#RCH917, 01-0187#RCH687, 02-1110#RCH402, 09-9210
Inbound Ramstein from #Bangor:#RCH857, 94-0069
[From #Aviano Air Base: #RCH427, 08-8201]
Screenshot mostly @ADSBexchange pic.twitter.com/j7O5gYYsej
— Gerjon | חריון (@Gerjon_) January 3, 2020
USAF C-17A 08-8204 #RCH894 was one of 3 C-17s to be rushed to #Iraq #IraqProtests using aerial refueling. His colleagues 10-0222 #RCH892 and 07-7188 (now oddly using #RCH894) returned to Rota (Spain).

08-8204 however continued from #Kuwait to #Qatar to #Afghanistan as #RCH616. pic.twitter.com/aBwG5g5nW8
— Gerjon | חריון (@Gerjon_) January 3, 2020
This is likely to continue in the near future as the U.S. military has now confirmed that it will send thousands more troops to the region. It appears that this is just a formal decision to send the remaining elements of the brigade-sized IRF, which consists of between 4,000 and 5,000 personnel, though additional units may be preparing to deploy, as well.


The US is deploying 3,500 more troops from the 82nd Airborne to the CENTCOM region, according to defense & military officials. They will be a response force to threats throughout the region, officials say. @CENTCOM
— Courtney Kube (@ckubeNBC) January 3, 2020
NEW: Another 3,000 US soldiers with the 82nd Airborne Division headed to #Kuwait to help bolster security for US personnel & bases in the #MiddleEast, US defense official confirms to @VOANews

This is in addition to 750 troops sent earlier in the week for the same pupose
— Jeff Seldin (@jseldin) January 3, 2020
These deployments, especially activating the IRF, had also seemed somewhat excessive given that the Iraqi militias had caused no casualties during their attack on the American Embassy in Baghdad and had only done relatively limited damage to exterior portions the overall Embassy compound. However, it now seems very prudent in light of the response from Iran and its regional proxies to the death of Soleimani. It's important to note that Abu Mahdi al Muhandis, Kata'ib Hezbollah's leader and the Deputy Chairman of the Popular Mobilization Committee, which oversees the PMF, was also killed in the U.S. drone strike, which has already prompted additional calls for revenge from Iranian-backed elements in Iraq.

"If we get word of attacks or some type of indication, we will take preemptive action, as well to protect American forces, to protect American lives," U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper had told reporters on Jan. 2 before the strike on Soleimani. "So, the game has changed."
It's also worth pointing out that reports had emerged in early December 2019 that the U.S. government had new streams of intelligence indicating increased threats against American interests in the Middle East from Iran and its proxies. Only limited details about this new information subsequently emerged, but there were 11 rocket attacks on bases in Iraq housing American forces that month, including the one on K-1, all tied to Iranian-backed militias.
Whatever the case, Soleimani has been on the U.S. government's radar for decades now and American officials had considered targeting him on a number of occasions in the past. Retired U.S. Army General Stanley McChrystal says that he opted not to strike the Quds Force commander in Iraq in 2007, when he was commander of the Joint Special Operations Command, for a number of reasons, including potential political blowback. At that time, the Quds Force was aiding groups in Iraq fighting the U.S.-led coalition there, as well as engaging in attacks directly.
President George W. Bush reportedly vetoed a proposal from the Central Intelligence Agency and Israel's Mossad to assassinate him in Syria the following year over similar concerns. The CIA and Mossad did kill Imad Mughniyeh, the second in command of the Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah in the Syrian capital Damascus, which was also part of the plan.


2 US had an opportunity 2 kill Soleimani. In 2007 when US forces led by General McChrystal followed him in Iraq and lost him. In 2008 when Mossad&CIA together killed Hezbollah's Mughniyeh in Syrira. Soleiman was in his company. Mossad wanted to kill him too. Bush vetoed it
— Yossi Melman (@yossi_melman) January 3, 2020
The two administrations I worked for both determined that the ultimate ends didn’t justify the means. The Trump Administration has made a different calculation.

The Iranian government has vowed to retaliate and avenge Soleimani’s death, and could do so in any number of ways:
— Rep. Elissa Slotkin (@RepSlotkin) January 3, 2020
All told, it's not surprising that the fallout from killing Soleimani just in Iraq that is already unfolding lines up well with these known concerns dating back to the George W. Bush Administration. Making things particularly complicated is the Iraqi government's own strong connections with Iran and that the strike also killed an official representative of the Iraqi government, Kata'ib Hezbollah's chief Muhandis.
Iraqi authorities had already been publicly critical of the U.S. military's unilateral strikes against Kata'ib Hezbollah and the country's Prime Minister, Adil Abdul-Mahdi, has now issued an even more strongly-worded statement in response to the new strikes near Baghdad's airport. "The assassination of an Iraqi military commander holding an official position is an act of aggression against Iraq, and the Iraqi people," he said.
"The assassinations violate the conditions governing the presence of US forces in Iraq whose role is to train Iraqi forces and assist in the fight against Daesh as part of the Global Coalition," he continued. "We have today requested that the Council of Representatives (Parliament) holds an emergency session to take the appropriate legislative measures in a manner that preserves the dignity, security, and sovereignty of Iraq."


PM @AdilAbdAlMahdi: We condemn in the strongest terms the assassination by US forces of Iraqi and Iranian figures who were symbols of the victory against Daesh.
— Government of Iraq - الحكومة العراقية (@IraqiGovt) January 3, 2020
PM @AdilAbdAlMahdi: Carrying out operations to assassinate Iraqi figures and figures from another country on Iraqi soil is a flagrant violation of Iraqi sovereignty and a dangerous escalation.
— Government of Iraq - الحكومة العراقية (@IraqiGovt) January 3, 2020
PM @AdilAbdAlMahdi: We have today requested that the Council of Representatives (Parliament) holds an emergency session to take the appropriate legislative measures in a manner that preserves the dignity, security and sovereignty of Iraq.
— Government of Iraq - الحكومة العراقية (@IraqiGovt) January 3, 2020
Pro-Iranian members of Iraq's parliament have been calling for the removal of U.S. forces for various reasons on and off for the last year or so and have now renewed their calls to do so. Muqtada al Sadr, a controversial Shia cleric and influential Iraqi politician, who was in Iran at the time of the strikes that killed Soleimani, has declared his intention to reform the Al Mahdi Army and Al-Yom Al-Maw'oud militias, which fought against the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq in the mid- and late-2000s.


BREAKING: Iraq’s Parliament vows to eliminate the US presence in #Iraq — deputy parliament speaker says they’ll hold an emergency meeting & make "decisive decisions that put an end to US presence inside Iraq"
— Gillian Turner (@GillianHTurner) January 3, 2020
Muqtada al Sadr gives orders via statement on twitter to revive Al Mahdi Army and Al-Yom Al-Maw'oud militias.
— Rasha Al Aqeedi (@RashaAlAqeedi) January 3, 2020
Secretary Pompeo has insisted that killing Soleimani, who was a key player in coordinating Iranian support for terrorists and militants across the Middle East, as well as the Syrian regime of dictator Bashar Al Assad, has left the world a safer place overall. However, the State Department is now reportedly considering evacuating its personnel from Iraq and has told U.S. citizens to stay away from the Embassy in Baghdad. The U.S. government has also issued an alert advising all Americans to leave the country as soon as possible, preferably by air, for fear they may become targets of terrorist attacks or kidnappings.


The French Minister of State for Europe and Foreign affairs said this morning, “Today we wake up to a more dangerous world.” Asked to respond, Pompeo said, “The French are just wrong about that. The world’s a much safer place today.”
— Betsy Klein (@betsy_klein) January 3, 2020
US official at the Baghdad Embassy tells me “we are sitting on the fence of either fleeing or hunkering down and riding out the wave of hell Iran will bring...but we have scotch still.”
— Alex Ward (@AlexWardVox) January 3, 2020
New U.S. travel advice for Iraq:
-Depart Iraq immediately
-Depart via airline “while possible”
-Failing that, to “other countries via land” (what other countries? Iran? Syria?)
-U.S. citizens should not approach the embassyhttps://t.co/xt5HgQbetd
— Liz Sly (@LizSly) January 3, 2020
Those are just two asymmetric options available to Iran and its regional proxies against Americans in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East. You can read more in-depth about the various different avenues Iran has to respond to, short of an all-out war against the United States that it cannot hope to win and that would be devastating for all involved, in the War Zone's previous reporting about the strikes that killed the Quds Force commander.
For its part, Iran has declared three days of mourning for Soleimani and appointed his deputy of some 20 years, Brigadier General Esmail Ghaani, to be the new head of the Quds Force. The Iranian regime has promised "severe revenge" for the American strikes and it seems hard to see how they will not retaliate in some fashion the future against the United States, as well as any of its allies or partners, especially Israel and Saudi Arabia, it sees as also being responsible.


Footage from Kerman, the hometown of the killed IRGC al-Quds forces leader Qassem Soleimani. pic.twitter.com/hmDL8OuzAn
— Aldin 🇧🇦 (@aldin_ww) January 3, 2020
“Mr. Ghaani, who has been Mr. Soleimani’s deputy commander in the Quds Force for more than 20 years, would continue Mr. Soleimani’s work in the Middle East with undiminished force, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said in a statement.” https://t.co/VmnFuu8AyB pic.twitter.com/FMNFfN7Eel
— Phillip Carter (@Carter_PE) January 3, 2020
Commander of Iran Quds Force in wake of US strikes in Iraq stating people need to be patient and "wait to see the dead bodies of Americans all around the Middle East" https://t.co/LBIMLmqvcr
— Matthew Borie (@phxasc) January 3, 2020
"Just as Israel has the right of self-defense, the United States has exactly the same right," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement commending President Trump personally on taking action against the Quds Force commander." Israel stands with the United States in its just struggle for peace, security, and self-defense."
Saudi Arabia does not appear to have issued a formal statement as of yet. “With knowledge of the operations and threats to the security of the region and the threats posed by terrorist militias that require their cessation, the Kingdom, in light of the rapid developments, calls for the importance of self-restraint to ward off all that may lead to aggravating the situation with its unbearable consequences,” an unnamed source told the country's Al Arabiya news network.
Other prominent American allies have largely avoided lauding the strikes outside the airport in Baghdad, which, by every indication, the U.S. carried out unilaterally. The United Kingdom has notably called on "all parties to de-escalate." France has also said the American operation has made the world a "more dangerous" place.


Iran: UK responds to US airstrike on military commander in Iraq
— Foreign Office 🇬🇧 (@foreignoffice) January 3, 2020
The United Kingdom and France, along with Germany, Russia, and China, make up the remaining international partners to the controversial deal over Iran's nuclear program. These countries are no doubt concerned that the strikes could lead Iran to further escalate its violations of the terms of that agreement, steps the regime in Tehran has been pursuing for months now already in an effort to pressure the parties into granting it sanctions relief and other concessions.
In the meantime, Iran and its proxies in Iraq seem to be immediately focused on burying their dead, but it seems hard to see how de-escalation will be on their minds in the near term.
UPDATE: 3:30pm EST—
President Trump has now said that he does not seek war with Iran or regime change in Tehran, but has also threatened to conduct more strikes against Iranian interests, if necessary, saying that other targets are "identified" already.


President Trump defends authorizing the strike that killed Soleimani: "We took action last night to stop a war. We did not take action to start a war."
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) January 3, 2020
Notable that President Trump makes clear he does not seek regime change after his former national security adviser called for it within hours of the strike.
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) January 3, 2020
"We have the best intelligence in the world," Trump says, praising the agencies he has doubted in the past. He adds that if Americans anywhere are threatened "we have all of those targets already fully identified and I am ready and prepared to take whatever action is necessary."
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) January 3, 2020
The U.S. State Department has now designated the Iraqi militant group Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq as a terrorist group, as well. Brothers Qays and Laith al-Khazali, who head the group, received their own designations.


Violent proxies of #Iran, Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq and its leaders, Qays and Laith al-Khazali, designated as terrorists by @StateDept. pic.twitter.com/719yqqUE6Y
— Steve Herman (@W7VOA) January 3, 2020
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had previously named Qays al-Khazali as one of the Iranian-sponsored actors responsible for the attack on the Embassy in Baghdad. He had notably fought against the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq, first as a member of Muqtada al Sadr's Al Madhi Army, before forming Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq. This group was responsible for various terrorist attacks, kidnappings, and other acts of sectarian violence against the coalition and other Iraqis. Coalition forces detained Qays between 2007 and 2010, when he was released in a prisoner swap.
There are reports that Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq fighters are preparing for attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq now and that they believe American troops will be leaving the country soon.


Reuters reported that Qais al-Khazali on Friday ordered his fighters to be on high alert for an upcoming battle and said that U.S. military presence in Iraq would end soon.

Local TV channel al-Ahd, which is close to his Asaib Ahl al-Haq militia, quoted him, Reuters said. https://t.co/8Cj0II5Zvo
— Chad Garland (@chadgarland) January 3, 2020
In the meantime, American oil workers, among others, have begun to follow the advice of the U.S. government and leave the country. The increasingly worrisome security situation may make it difficult to do so, at least by air, in the future, with Royal Jordanian Airlines and Gulf Air both suspending flights to Baghdad indefinitely.


Dozens of U.S. citizens working for foreign oil companies in the southern Iraqi oil city of Basra are leaving the country after U.S. air strike, the Oil Ministry said https://t.co/iWV9nGSi63 pic.twitter.com/5lWRlrB8J0
— Reuters (@Reuters) January 3, 2020
Both Royal Jordanian Airlines and Gulf Air hace suspended flights to Iraq due to safety and security issues#Iraq #Baghdad https://t.co/ddMCYCXx0e
— CNW (@ConflictsW) January 3, 2020
Elements of the U.S. Army's 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team, based in Italy, is also reportedly now on alert for a possible deployment to Lebanon in light of increase security concerns there.


The Pentagon placed an Army brigade in Italy on alert to fly into #Lebanon if needed to protect the American Embassy there. An official said the U.S. could send 130 to more than 700 troops to Beirut from Italy. https://t.co/SWngI4JPyu
— Zeina Karam (@zkaram) January 3, 2020
-End of Article-​
 
The New Yorker is running again a 2013 profile they did of Suleimani entitled The Shadow Commander. Gives you a better idea of who the man was and what he might have been trying to get up to in Iraq. Seems he liked to run his operations from in-country (maybe this is a cultural thing?) and was very savvy and charismatic.

Also, Pelosi et al. bitching that Trump didn't run this by them are utterly exceptional. As I mentioned before, Trump had the Quds Force designated as terrorist. That means he doesn't need authorization, under the post-9/11 Authorization for Use of Military Force. Granted, I have my reservations about an actual country's military being designated as terrorists, but Trump's actions were legal.

Once again, Nutty Nancy puts party before country, for all the reasons you mentioned. Must give that bitch a thrill to see caskets of American troops coming into Dover AFB. You can bet she's never met one of the flights. President Trump has. He's doing his job as Commander-in-Chief. You can also bet your underwear that if it was a Democratic President ordering the kill (fat chance of that), Nasty Nancy would be jumping for joy.

Have also read comments by that most despised evil cunt Omar. She, of course, has a problem with this general being offed. But we already know who she represents - Islam, not Americans.
 
Back