Manosphere Fonduman / mooooo - (he shits up our loveshy threads)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
This is why you don't learn. Statements are judged by their own merit. If something makes sense, it doesn't matter who said it. You blinker yourself by dismissing all statements from a certain group of people, and using your dismissal as proof that they weren't worth listening to in the first place in a piece of circular logic.


keep telling yourself your dick is normal
 
To get back to the original point of this thread, i believe the problem with MRAism in general is that they never really do anything except complain about feminists. I've never heard of an MRA group or even individual who went out and made a better world for others, mainly they just complain when a woman gets away with a false rape allegation.
Despite what you might think about 3rd wave feminism, feminism has done a lot of good for the world by promoting gender equality, starting women's shelters, changing the public opinion of women in the workplace, and even teaming up with LGBT rights members to promote lesbianism (and by proxy other sexualities.) The fact that internet shams like Brianna Wu and pseudo-tolerant SJW's are shitting up that legacy is rather disgusting to me but come on, at least they're doing something rather than shitting up Wizardchan.
MRA's believe in something that's good, but they need to do something about that if they want people to side with them or agree with their opinions.

The thing is, society was quite amenable to giving women what they wanted back when feminism was relevant. We've always had a kind of implicit programming in our biology that females are valuable and we should cater to them. Compare that to people flipping out at the mere concept of men being disadvantaged in modern society, and you'll see why it's difficult to do anything. An MRA can't even give his real name usually because he'll be shunned by society.
 
The thing is, society was quite amenable to giving women what they wanted back when feminism was relevant. We've always had a kind of implicit programming in our biology that females are valuable and we should cater to them. Compare that to people flipping out at the mere concept of men being disadvantaged in modern society, and you'll see why it's difficult to do anything. An MRA can't even give his real name usually because he'll be shunned by society.


are you an mra because of your tiny penis?
 
Technically, no equality is "necessary". Slavery probably works quite well, technically. Movements don't exist because they're necessary, BLAH BLAH BLAH BABY BLAB BER
Okay baby dick, no one cares about that. Let the real impartial folk talk, and by that I mean Not you.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FramerGirl420
What I don't get is, why do you keep posting the one with the skin retracted? I thought it was foreskin americans are terrified of because the majority were mutilated. The pic you post of the lovely vibrant purple head seems fine to me :)


you're pleased with your tiny dick and everyone laughing at you?
 
What I don't get is, why do you keep posting the one with the skin retracted? I thought it was foreskin americans are terrified of because the majority were mutilated. The pic you post of the lovely vibrant purple head seems fine to me :)
Quit talking about dicks fag boy. We are trying to talk grown up here, butt you keep bringing up your dick. Why?
 
This is why you don't learn. Statements are judged by their own merit. If something makes sense, it doesn't matter who said it. You blinker yourself by dismissing all statements from a certain group of people, and using your dismissal as proof that they weren't worth listening to in the first place in a piece of circular logic.

The point of my post, tiny-dick, was that the *merit* of your statements depends largely upon us trusting your judgment and powers of observation, which have been shown -- in your thread, where you should return -- to be utter shite.

Let me demonstrate below:
The thing is, society was quite amenable to giving women what they wanted back when feminism was relevant.
This is *your* reading of both history and what women wanted. So your abilities to understand complex events / social situations are relevant in determining the merits of this statement.
We've always had a kind of implicit programming in our biology that females are valuable and we should cater to them.
Care to give me a source for this "implicit programming" and desire to "cater"? No? Okay, then that's your personal perception. So, again, your utter lack of perspicacity is *relevant* to the merits of this statement.
Compare that to people flipping out at the mere concept of men being disadvantaged in modern society, and you'll see why it's difficult to do anything. An MRA can't even give his real name usually because he'll be shunned by society.
Again, your perception. No hard data to back that up. So, again, your clearly demonstrated lack of ability in judging social situations is relevant to our analysis of whether or not to lend credence to your judgment here.

In short, @mooooo , you need to grow up. In the meantime, go back to your thread or bugger off.

And, oh, by the way, you still have a tiny dick:

boYZRin.jpg
 
you're pleased with your tiny dick and everyone laughing at you?
Well a top down view can hardly get a good idea for length anyway. I've already posted the length, and it's about average. So if they call it small, they're just incorrect, and it doesn't bother me. And even if it was small, it would be juvenile to judge someone on it, like judging a girl for small breasts. So either you're incorrect, or your opinion is deemed unimportant due to your immaturity. So it doesn't bother me either way.
 
The thing is, society was quite amenable to giving women what they wanted back when feminism was relevant. We've always had a kind of implicit programming in our biology that females are valuable and we should cater to them. Compare that to people flipping out at the mere concept of men being disadvantaged in modern society, and you'll see why it's difficult to do anything. An MRA can't even give his real name usually because he'll be shunned by society.

Do you want to know why?

Its because MRA's have the stereotype of being fat neckbeards on the internet who complain all the time. Its people like you who continue that stereotype.

Women have it worse, lets be real here. They've always gotten the short end of the stick for a long while. The fact that society has reached a point where they can be seen as equal to men is amazing. Sure, we're gonna have a rough couple of years where shitty women are gonna take control of that and use it to their advantage, but for the most part its been better for everyone.
Men do have some disadvantages in society and i definitely think that they are valid concerns and that they should be talked about, such as men being disadvantaged in parental ownership and false rape allegations. But the way MRA's seem to go about it is to complain really really really loudly and do the same #slacktivism they give feminists shit for.
If someone could go and actively push mens rights using actual activism in real life and not on the hugbox, then i have no reason to see how it could fail.
 
"Your seeing the penis wrong its actually bigger than it looks, trust me!"

It bet you with your fat ass from the zoo is off perspective and your really not some fat spaz.
 
Back