Orbiter šŸ³ļøā€šŸŒˆšŸ± Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

Nick is pretty cute honestly, I'd make him my sub boi anyday, bet that ass is tight af yo. Also fashdaddy x catboy qt? UwU sounds so cuteeee (*“ω`*)
... Jim?

If they're smart, TPUSA will run with the "IS NICK FUENTES FRIENDS WITH A PEDOPHILE!?" instead of "Ha Gaaaayy."

If they're smart, TPUSA, Kirk and Shapiro will stay silent and let him self-destruct without getting involved. Shapiro made a mistake making a full speech and full video about him after the 'chance' encounter, and it looks like Shapiro MIGHT have learned that lesson.

No, that's my youtube channel. Subscribe if you'd like

Ah, okay. So your ACTUALLY retarded. Got it.
 
Nick is super block heavy on twitter and name searches himself, I was never blocked by him since I always found him to be stupid so never mentioned him but still saw people RT him, untill I made a tweet saying he looks like a pokemon and he blocked me and everyone who replied to it.
sirfetchd.jpg
 
... Jim?



If they're smart, TPUSA, Kirk and Shapiro will stay silent and let him self-destruct without getting involved. Shapiro made a mistake making a full speech and full video about him after the 'chance' encounter, and it looks like Shapiro MIGHT have learned that lesson.



Ah, okay. So your ACTUALLY exceptional. Got it.
I agree, conservative inc should just get out their champagne and smugly chuckle to each other in private. I can’t say I haven’t seen a person who refers to themself as a groyper who isn’t retarded. I agree with nick on a number of issues but I’d never refer to myself as a groyper, political movements are gay af which is probably why people like Nick always seem to be in the middle of them.
 
The Catboy incident won't be what destroys Nick. His completely low-level response to it is what will be the first real crack in his persona and reputation. With the time that's passed and his lackluster response, he's lost his chance to strongly refute the narrative building around him. That crack is causing him to leak momentum.

He's now open to those who would enjoy him failing hammering on that crack in an effort to collapse the structure.

Additionally in the minds of many of his young fans he's moved from infallible to fallible. He will be questioned more often and given less leeway.

That crack will be joined by others until all his momentum drains from it, or it's completely smashed and he loses it at top speed.

His response to the whole thing is a combination of his huge ego, lack of experience and having nobody to advise him properly. Almost anyone with any media or public facing experience could have told him his hypocritical approach and weak denial wouldn't help.

We'll probably have a slow leaking of momentum followed by increased pressure from his enemies as well as a series of controversies leading to his growth stagnating and then his audience declining. This will be interspersed with new apparent highs and successes, but it won't be enough. His star is likely to fade slowly, as more of his flaws are revealed and more cracks form.

He could still turn this around and apply the Flex Tape, but I doubt he will.
 
The Catboy incident won't be what destroys Nick. His completely low-level response to it is what will be the first real crack in his persona and reputation. With the time that's passed and his lackluster response, he's lost his chance to strongly refute the narrative building around him. That crack is causing him to leak momentum.

He's now open to those who would enjoy him failing hammering on that crack in an effort to collapse the structure.

Additionally in the minds of many of his young fans he's moved from infallible to fallible. He will be questioned more often and given less leeway.

That crack will be joined by others until all his momentum drains from it, or it's completely smashed and he loses it at top speed.

His response to the whole thing is a combination of his huge ego, lack of experience and having nobody to advise him properly. Almost anyone with any media or public facing experience could have told him his hypocritical approach and weak denial wouldn't help.

We'll probably have a slow leaking of momentum followed by increased pressure from his enemies as well as a series of controversies lead to his growth stagnating and then his audience declining. This will be interspersed with new apparent highs and successes, but it won't be enough.

He could still turn this around and apply the Flex Tape, but I doubt he will.
100 percent agree, and it’s super disappointing. I wanted him to really succeed because either it might make changes I’d like to see happen, or more likely result in an even bigger and more hilarious debacle bringing him down. Maybe he’ll have a meltdown soon though? I think maybe the Ben Shapiro thing is what set him off. ā€œBen wouldn’t give me attention, I’ll try to seek attention in other ways no matter how self-destructive.ā€
 
Shapiro devoted an entire speech and a full episode to whining about "muh victimhood". That's more attention and focus than hes given any single individual outside of Trump. Nick got the exposure he wanted out of that incident, I highly doubt THAT is what pushed him over the edge.
I’m talking this Ben Shapiro incident. He was doing well when Ben was freaking out, but Ben must’ve got some good advice from his handlers in Israel to just ignore Nick Fuentes.
 
Shapiro devoted an entire speech and a full episode to whining about "muh victimhood". That's more attention and focus than hes given any single individual outside of Trump. Nick got the exposure he wanted out of that incident, I highly doubt THAT is what pushed him over the edge.

The speech happened before he ran into him. I highly doubt Shapiro will give him any attention now. That won't stop Nick from taking it up the ass to own the Zionists.
 
The speech happened before he ran into him. I highly doubt Shapiro will give him any attention now. That won't stop Nick from taking it up the ass to own the Zionists.
I’m imagining him getting railed by the catboy and screaming ā€œyea we’re really owning the libs now! We’re so based and redpilled!ā€ Is there anything gayer than two men stroking eachother’s egos while one of them is fucking the other up the ass?
 
100 percent agree, and it’s super disappointing. I wanted him to really succeed because either it might make changes I’d like to see happen, or more likely result in an even bigger and more hilarious debacle bringing him down. Maybe he’ll have a meltdown soon though? I think maybe the Ben Shapiro thing is what set him off. ā€œBen wouldn’t give me attention, I’ll try to seek attention in other ways no matter how self-destructive.ā€
I'm not sure it was Ben Shapiro situation that set this all off. I think we're just seeing the inevitable cycle of E-celeb happening again. Someone gains momentum, then uses the clout and success to surround themselves with people that agree with them. As they get successful their ego inflates and they stop listening to moderating voices creating their own little reality where they are always right/successful/correct and self-awareness suffers as a result. Eventually, being surrounded by people who sycophantically agree with them on everything, those bad ideas and stupid decisions everyone has don't get questioned or quashed. As a result of this the E-celeb, high on their own ego and lacking sensible advice, acts on them which eventually exposes them as dumb/hypocritical/weird. As these things more frequently occur and the person is seen as increasingly fallible the attention they receive shifts from positive to questioning to mocking. As the attitudes shift you get an increase in desperation from that person trying to reclaim that positive attention (whilst still lacking moderation and good advice) which just accelerates the process and downfall. Eventually they end up with a thread on here in which people just laugh at the dumb/hypocritical/weird shit the person does as they chase that attention/praise fix having discarded any from of self awareness in their pursuit of e-fame. It's a series of incrementally bad decisions that start off small that go unaddressed due to ego. I may be wrong but this seems to be the process of every e-celeb from Channel Awesome to Skeptic to New Right Youtuber I've seen come along. Nick just seems to have gone through this process a little quicker than others.

I think the worst thing you can ever do to a person is surround them completely with people who will always praise and agree with them.
 
I'm not sure it was Ben Shapiro situation that set this all off. I think we're just seeing the inevitable cycle of E-celeb happening again. Someone gains momentum, then uses the clout and success to surround themselves with people that agree with them. As they get successful their ego inflates and they stop listening to moderating voices creating their own little reality where they are always right/successful/correct and self-awareness suffers as a result. Eventually, being surrounded by people who sycophantically agree with them on everything, those bad ideas and stupid decisions everyone has don't get questioned or quashed. As a result of this the E-celeb, high on their own ego and lacking sensible advice, acts on them which eventually exposes them as dumb/hypocritical/weird. As these things more frequently occur and the person is seen as increasingly fallible the attention they receive shifts from positive to questioning to mocking. As the attitudes shift you get an increase in desperation from that person trying to reclaim that positive attention (whilst still lacking moderation and good advice) which just accelerates the process and downfall. Eventually they end up with a thread on here in which people just laugh at the dumb/hypocritical/weird shit the person does as they chase that attention/praise fix having discarded any from of self awareness in their pursuit of e-fame. It's a series of incrementally bad decisions that start off small that go unaddressed due to ego. I may be wrong but this seems to be the process of every e-celeb from Channel Awesome to Skeptic to New Right Youtuber I've seen come along. Nick just seems to have gone through this process a little quicker than others.

I think the worst thing you can ever do to a person is surround them completely with people who will always praise and agree with them.
Absolutely, it’s so easy to get comfortable having your own hug box without realizing it’s going to suffocate you eventually if you never leave it.
 
The speech happened before he ran into him. I highly doubt Shapiro will give him any attention now. That won't stop Nick from taking it up the ass to own the Zionists.

What's your point? Shapiro gave him the attention, before someone at DW WITHOUT tiny hat staples in their brain said "Knock it off, dumbass."

I get that you guys wanna see a Manlet on Manlet showdown, like warski and tonka, (which, admittedly, WOULD be hilarious) but it ain't gonna happen.

TBH, the only thing that surprised me about that remtard 'incident' was the fact Andy Ngo involved himself in it.
 
If they're smart, TPUSA, Kirk and Shapiro will stay silent and let him self-destruct without getting involved. Shapiro made a mistake making a full speech and full video about him after the 'chance' encounter, and it looks like Shapiro MIGHT have learned that lesson.
True, the less people on the overt warpath, the less Nick can deflect. Vaush gave Nick something of an out with his audience, by claiming most the people coming after him are Vaush and his crew. You just need a couple rationalizations and copes to keep the outer core loyal and not thinking.
 
What's your point? Shapiro gave him the attention, before someone at DW WITHOUT tiny hat staples in their brain said "Knock it off, dumbass."

I get that you guys wanna see a Manlet on Manlet showdown, like warski and tonka, (which, admittedly, WOULD be hilarious) but it ain't gonna happen.

TBH, the only thing that surprised me about that remtard 'incident' was the fact Andy Ngo involved himself in it.
I think the point is that Nick’s formula for success was triggering conservative inc and revealing them for the grifters they are. But conservative inc must’ve hired some decent consultants or got new orders from Jerusalem because they’ve adapted and done the smart thing in ignoring him now. Nick doesn’t seem to have much of a plan right now (which is hilarious since he always says to ā€œtrust the plan).
Based and redpilled big guy!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the point is that Nick’s formula for success was triggering conservative inc and revealing them for the grifters they are. But conservative inc must’ve hired some decent consultants or got new orders from Jerusalem because they’ve adapted and done the smart thing in ignoring him now. Nick doesn’t seem to have much of a plan right now (which is hilarious since he always says to ā€œtrust the plan).

Let me spoil the ending for you:
There never was a plan. 😧
 
  • Agree
Reactions: L. Duse
Bwahahahaha, do you actually think there was EVER a plan?


Let me spoil the ending for you:
There never was a plan. 😧
Oh I think there was always a plan: create a political movement and grift stupid zoomers and poltards into thinking he’s ā€œour guy.ā€ He’s like the Bernie Sanders of the right without any amount of electoral success (Bernie at least has won multiple statewide elections in Vermont). No refunds!
F093DD5C-6CD4-4CE0-882D-55B7DCF6FB4F.jpeg
 
100 percent agree, and it’s super disappointing. I wanted him to really succeed because either it might make changes I’d like to see happen, or more likely result in an even bigger and more hilarious debacle bringing him down. Maybe he’ll have a meltdown soon though? I think maybe the Ben Shapiro thing is what set him off. ā€œBen wouldn’t give me attention, I’ll try to seek attention in other ways no matter how self-destructive.ā€

I have no investment into Fuentes' autistic brand of conservatism, but I do prefer hearing opinions from all angles. Little Nicky's problem is his propensity to see Israel as the bogeyman. His groyper army seems to have a Pavlonian response every time the Jews can be "named" (blamed) for anything happening in the world. This creates an exceptional cycle of reading the news, naming the Jews, and getting positive reinforcement from chat. This cycle feeds into his already unjustifiably inflated ego, increasing the likelihood of a repeat performance on the next stream. Repeat ad nauseam
 
Back