Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Top post on r/itsafetish is hilarious
gith7mttuy941.jpg


The fact he jumped from talking about "breastfeeding" to talking about pressing his "boobs" against another set, is fucking concerning and sounds like those two coincide. I hope to God he never has access to kids.
 
Usually when they have real wives/girlfriends, it's someone who was with them before they trooned out and has already become emotionally invested in them. Less common are the ones who score some cluster b bisexual after trooning out. The odds are low for a guy who started transitioning without first finding someone who can put up with him.
sometimes they date each other
are MTFs who date other MTFs actually bisexual or is it autogynephilic pseudobisexuality again?
 
sometimes they date each other
are MTFs who date other MTFs actually bisexual or is it autogynephilic pseudobisexuality again?
Right, I was only talking ones who got an actual woman as a partner. I think when they pair off it's both pseudobisexuality and/or gynandromorphophilia. Anne Lawrence also had this to say:
In my experience, MtF transsexuals often partner with each other, before and
after SRS, for reasons that have more to do with mutual acceptance and an absence
of other viable alternatives than with specific sexual attraction to one another.
Indeed, many of these partnerships appear to be affectionate but largely asexual.
 
For any guys who are into science, bullshit or not?
View attachment 1093033
That is, on the whole, fucking depressing. Their insistence on the conflation of intersex disorders with transgenderism is absolutely disingenuous. For every fact presented in this video, there are leaps of reasoning to match it. It's just all too tiresome. Their science ultimately isnt even the issue; it's the conclusions they reach. Absolutely nothing they presented lends credence to the idea of the transgender brain; they simply Said It did.
 
Is this real? I have hard time believing that this is a real troon because he should have seen tons lesbian porn and know the answer. Heck he should have seen women hugging each other in some point of his life and know the answer. Just incase there really are people that stypid, no boobs won’t get in the way of lesbian kissing. Unless you have one of those ridiculously huge implant boobs, they aren’t that large factor in kissing. Also the boobs against each other don’t feel anything special. Women hug their friends and female relatives all the time and it’s not an orgasmic experience the slightest. Boobs are fun but they are more aesthetic than anything else. Sure there are nerve endings especially in the nipples so touch can feel nice but they aren’t extra clitorises or anything like that.
Or you could arch your back to avoid someone else's boobs?
 
For any guys who are into science, bullshit or not?
The embryology is okay, although of course they have to conflate chromosomal disorders with troons. Troons can't seem to face up to the fact that the overwhelming of them are 46XY.

I can't conform the male-and-female brain difference cited in the video, but the male and female hypothalami are indeed different (there is a part called, literally, the Sexually Dimorphic Nucleus). Ironically it is usually troons who deny there is ever differences between male and female sex. I guess science is invalid if that doesn't agree with you.

Cyp17 polymorphism was recently implicated in transgenderism. I cannot find the original paper (Sci Hub is no help), but in case you get your hands on it, let me caution you that studies of DNA polymorphism is statistically quite unlike most biological studies, simply because the researchers look at dozens to hundreds of gene loci at the same time and therefore are likely to "discover" some significance by chance. Don't accept anything with p-values larger than say 10⁻⁸. If, as the video claims, scientists are looking at 3 million gene loci, you have to make your p-values much, much lower still (10⁻³⁰ or something like that)

1.png


The presentation is grossly misleading. The researchers weren't doing genealogical studies. And even if a certain polymorphism in the Cyp17 locus might predispose men to trooning out and that your grandfather had that polymorphism, it doesn't mean he was a troon!
 
The embryology is okay, although of course they have to conflate chromosomal disorders with troons. Troons can't seem to face up to the fact that the overwhelming of them are 46XY.

I can't conform the male-and-female brain difference cited in the video, but the male and female hypothalami are indeed different (there is a part called, literally, the Sexually Dimorphic Nucleus). Ironically it is usually troons who deny there is ever differences between male and female sex. I guess science is invalid if that doesn't agree with you.

Cyp17 polymorphism was recently implicated in transgenderism. I cannot find the original paper (Sci Hub is no help), but in case you get your hands on it, let me caution you that studies of DNA polymorphism is statistically quite unlike most biological studies, simply because the researchers look at dozens to hundreds of gene loci at the same time and therefore are likely to "discover" some significance by chance. Don't accept anything with p-values larger than say 10⁻⁸. If, as the video claims, scientists are looking at 3 million gene loci, you have to make your p-values much, much lower still (10⁻³⁰ or something like that)

View attachment 1093268

The presentation is grossly misleading. The researchers weren't doing genealogical studies. And even if a certain polymorphism in the Cyp17 locus might predispose men to trooning out and that your grandfather had that polymorphism, it doesn't mean he was a troon!
This guy gets it. Thank you. I'm too lazy to give the explanation you did. Well done.
 
The embryology is okay, although of course they have to conflate chromosomal disorders with troons. Troons can't seem to face up to the fact that the overwhelming of them are 46XY.

I can't conform the male-and-female brain difference cited in the video, but the male and female hypothalami are indeed different (there is a part called, literally, the Sexually Dimorphic Nucleus). Ironically it is usually troons who deny there is ever differences between male and female sex. I guess science is invalid if that doesn't agree with you.

Cyp17 polymorphism was recently implicated in transgenderism. I cannot find the original paper (Sci Hub is no help), but in case you get your hands on it, let me caution you that studies of DNA polymorphism is statistically quite unlike most biological studies, simply because the researchers look at dozens to hundreds of gene loci at the same time and therefore are likely to "discover" some significance by chance. Don't accept anything with p-values larger than say 10⁻⁸. If, as the video claims, scientists are looking at 3 million gene loci, you have to make your p-values much, much lower still (10⁻³⁰ or something like that)

View attachment 1093268

The presentation is grossly misleading. The researchers weren't doing genealogical studies. And even if a certain polymorphism in the Cyp17 locus might predispose men to trooning out and that your grandfather had that polymorphism, it doesn't mean he was a troon!
Woke science is garbage and bias.
 
View attachment 1092067

Jesus. Christ. :story: But it's not a fetish....
I'm going to assume for the sake of not needing to specify anyone's actual gender or sex that everyone involved is just really into sex. Normally this would seem obvious, even if these were all cis biological females but I don't want to discriminate nor raise any hackles at the idea that trans biological females might be overly into sex. I've been on the internet (and shamefully, also in real life) long enough to know that the cis biological female can be as obsessed with this.

Our first data point is that we have a friend who does porn. The LESS shocking thing should be that they want to film porn with me. They have multiple incentive structures for this assuming they make money off of it. The other claim that they "really wants to fuck me" can either be true or a lie and is entirely irrelevant as to the film porn claim.

Which leaves us with our "dream come true" that we "can't believe is [our] life now" being literally that someone who does porn wants to use our labor for free to create porn. Maybe.

We have achieved the pinnacle of our life by joining a troon harem. Well, not even a harem. And not even a bordello. Because those actually have interests in maintaining the state of their... participants (I can't call this person a worker) to at least some level. Madams of the 19th Century understood this and the MEN who technically outranked them also did to where many of these informal arrangements were respected by both sides. Plus things like directing lesser customers to your lesser employees. (Just to mention a fictional example that has some basis in reality, look at how the "whores" of Deadwood have considerable standing in their shared market with the rest of Al's business.) Even farther back this was understood under how harems of the Middle East operated.

"I can't believe this is my life now" is literally one in which they are actually probably not at all respected in any way, not even for their body. They aren't filming porn like the traditional porn star who, at least, in theory is gaining something extra. This is like an amateur, who nobody wants to see, getting a pity fuck "on film" from a "friend" more than it is their glorious rebirth into the wonderful female slut they always imagined themselves to be.

Also, they mangled their crotch in the process, when they probably could have found a dude who does porn and wants to fuck them on camera.

Essentially, this is what I am trying to say. It is truly rewarding and empowering to know that even in the hellscape that is Trump's America some people, especially marginalized folx, can achieve their dreams.
 
Back