Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 14.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 109 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 79 18.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 180 41.1%

  • Total voters
    438
Christopher Hook is one hardcore lawyer.
Chris Hook is a gem.

If he somehow gets on Nick show it'd be a masterpiece.

I mean, I'm not a lawyer, but I doubt "gay boys" and "faggot" are normal things you find in legal filings.

1575959819647.png
 
I gotta ask the gallery here, what's the deal with NR riding Hook's dick so much lately? Is it because he really wants him on the show? If so, I wish he would have tried that tactic with Russell Greer. Is it because he legitimately thinks the guy is kewl because he uses words like "gayboy" in communications with opposing counsel? Is it the defendants, who are sucking the teat of a scummy insurance company? Or is it because Nick hates the practice of law so much that, in addition to eschewing it in favor of youtubeing (which I guess is more honorable) he wants to burn the whole system down? Or does he just want to be contrary and 'redpilled' to what all the other youtube\blog lawyers (popehat et al) say about someone?

It's confusing because to me the Hook guy sounds like he's legit deranged (and probably with a dash of tism, given his photo), throwing childish tantrums rather than the sort of clever repartee that would be more useful and less likely to get one disbarred.

(edit: Hook is getting fucked based on his appearance in front of a judge)
 
Last edited:
I gotta ask the gallery here, what's the deal with NR riding Hook's dick so much lately? Is it because he really wants him on the show? If so, I wish he would have tried that tactic with Russell Greer. Is it because he legitimately thinks the guy is kewl because he uses words like "gayboy" in communications with opposing counsel? Is it the defendants, who are sucking the teat of a scummy insurance company? Or is it because Nick hates the practice of law so much that, in addition to eschewing it in favor of youtubeing (which I guess is more honorable) he wants to burn the whole system down? Or does he just want to be contrary and 'redpilled' to what all the other youtube\blog lawyers (popehat et al) say about someone?

It's confusing because to me the Hook guy sounds like he's legit deranged (and probably with a dash of tism, given his photo), throwing childish tantrums rather than the sort of clever repartee that would be more useful and less likely to get one disbarred.
I think Nick is just really amused by the guys behavior on court documents and wants the chance to pick his brain. I'm not sure I'd want that guy as a lawyer, but it is some of the funniest shit I've read. He's gotta have some fun stories if he's willing to put that down in legal papers.
 
Nick is debating Vince James on the Killstream:

Nick vs. Vince James on Killstream.PNG


Watch for the replay.
 
This Vince James faggot is terrible at arguing points. "Don't agree with me? You're a jew lawyer. You don't agree with a loiscense for porn? You support child porn! Adults watch porn? THAT has let to drag queens reading children books to kids!" Vince is nothing but a red herring arguer.

BTW, DLive is absolute shit for streaming; the chat is 98% spamming that same 3 emotes over, and over, and over again--not sure why anyone enjoys it.

Edit: Nick, if you ever read this, stop being squirrel brained and having your attention diverted so easily by any nut-argument flicked out and your dumbass chases it. You ain't cut out for any of this IBS live stuff. You try to argue one point Vince made, he flicks out a new one, and your low attention span runs off and chases that ignoring the original point.
 
Last edited:
Edit: Nick, if you ever read this, stop being squirrel brained and having your attention diverted so easily by any nut-argument flicked out and your dumbass chases it. You ain't cut out for any of this IBS live stuff. You try to argue one point Vince made, he flicks out a new one, and your low attention span runs off and chases that ignoring the original point.
Imagine falling for a staggered Gish Gallop in 2019. How embarrassing.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Iron Hamster
If there's anybody that I want to have NR debate it's David 'Ultradavid' Graham, an 'esports' attorney and FGC shill/dicksucker. He has a lot of shit takes on esports and fair use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kill all whales
Nick is debating Vince James on the Killstream:

View attachment 1059554


Watch for the replay.
Replay mirror.

 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: 5t3n0g0ph3r
Nick might be interested in talking to Louis Rossmann. He's a business running youtuber with 1m subs who is doing a oddly dramatic series on new york real estate while trying to find a bigger place for his repair business. The entirety of new york is scam city when it comes to buildings. The guy just got screwed over by a scummy contractor. He did some digging and found the contractor has a super sketchy background full of lying and other weird stuff. Like potentially burning his own house down for fraudulent reasons.

Could be a fun guest. Talk about shitty new york real estate and go over any potential sue-ability for the scammery and the contractors shady past. Nick could probably also access lawsuit related stuff that us plebians cant access.

To get on track:
Search for a new shop: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eslf2kxKB40&list=PLkVbIsAWN2lvKojYIchFhwXQq-nX09K2u
Day by day progress on the scam shop: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DESqNHJ-28k&list=PLkVbIsAWN2lucdpXqcM4qW6ev60OSXdw4 (watch the pl in reverse order)
 
So when do we get to reality of this man and turn him into the lolcow he is. I called him out on his lies, contradictive hypocrisy, and over all disingenuous nature, with facts and evidence found in the screen grabs below. and he couldn't even admit he made a mistake and even was proven wrong in his own reply lmfao. He is an embarrassing human being, clearly playing his fans for fools. Just glad I was able to see through his nonsense some time ago.

 
So when do we get to reality of this man and turn him into the lolcow he is. I called him out on his lies, contradictive hypocrisy, and over all disingenuous nature, with facts and evidence found in the screen grabs below. and he couldn't even admit he made a mistake and even was proven wrong in his own reply lmfao. He is an embarrassing human being, clearly playing his fans for fools. Just glad I was able to see through his nonsense some time ago.

You come of as an unhinged sperg with an autism to rival good old chris boy.
 
You come of as an unhinged sperg with an autism to rival good old chris boy.

You can say that, but literally everything I stated is irrefutable. It's cool if you're a fanboy but facts are facts and he is clearly misguiding his base on the law and his own words make him incredibly hypocritical to his views and stances he has been presenting he stands for since he started his channel.

I suggest you actually look at the facts I presented rather than doing what you attribute to me and sperging out at me for pointing out the nonsense of your idol. Had he refuted my evidence, said it was a mistake, unintentional, or anything of the sort it would have been done right there. But he doubled and tripled down on his nonsense. As I told him in the images, people come to him to learn and words have meaning for a reason, as well as context matters. Neither benefit his defense.
 
You can say that, but literally everything I stated is irrefutable. It's cool if you're a fanboy but facts are facts and he is clearly misguiding his base on the law and his own words make him incredibly hypocritical to his views and stances he has been presenting he stands for since he started his channel.

I suggest you actually look at the facts I presented rather than doing what you attribute to me and sperging out at me for pointing out the nonsense of your idol. Had he refuted my evidence, said it was a mistake, unintentional, or anything of the sort it would have been done right there. But he doubled and tripled down on his nonsense. As I told him in the images, people come to him to learn and words have meaning for a reason, as well as context matters. Neither benefit his defense.
Dude its weird and autistic to post a 2 page essay on youtube comments and no one wants to read it.
 
Dude its weird and autistic to post a 2 page essay on youtube comments and no one wants to read it.

Cmon now my guy, think about it. He is a lawyer, had I not been definitive with my argument/point he would have weaseled out of it as he clearly tried to do in his replies. You don't even need to read the entire thing to see the facts. Any of the posts make my point, and the entirety shows a multitude of them.

Edit: Look at the final image alone, it proves multiple times he was lying or at the very least being egregiously disingenuous . and had seen the evidence that proves him to be a liar from his first video.
 
Last edited:
lol I couldn't care less about the situation. It's the internet. I made the comment to thoroughly prove to his fans that he is deceiving them and they're getting inaccurate information as it pertains to the law in the US, as well as his hypocrisy. An I brought it to you all, because A. he has fans here and will be seen by far more people than on his page. and B. you guys collect information like this.

Question: If this is "sperging out" then what on earth do you call the entire premise of this site? lolcow threads, and much of the other content (Like That umbrella Guys thread) is literally nothing but people sifting through the bullshit to present situations like the ones I called Rackets out for.

Either way as I said I couldn't care less, I just thought you all might be interested in the facts. But apparently not when they pertain to your idols. It's all good carry on with your sperg wars. I presented my information and that was all I intended to do here, not argue about trivial nonsense.
 
Back