Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am fairly convinced that An0minous does not sleep.
I plotted his reactions and posts for 2020 into a 24-hour window and... well, he probably sleeps at some point...
1579197007775.png
edit: for time zones more familiar to the continental US, the left and right edges of the plot correspond to the time 19:00 eastern, 18:00 central, 17:00 mountain, or 16:00 pacific.
 
Last edited:
If I am reading this correctly, that leaves lunch as the only time he is not posting.
The time axis that I used was UTC (or GMT). It's the time zone that the UK is in, so they'd be having lunch when he's not posting.

The current UTC time is 18:43 (6:43 PM)... I don't know what time zone AnOminous is in, and that's the ISO standard that Javascript's toISOString method gave anyway.
 
Last edited:
The time axis that I used was UTC (or GMT). It's the time zone that the UK is in, so they'd be having lunch when he's not posting.

The current UTC time is 18:43 (6:43 PM)... I don't know what time zone AnOminous is in, and that's the ISO standard that Javascript's toISOString method gave anyway.

Just shift perspective by -6 to match CST with UTC and Central which is Chicago/Minneapolis (thanks RuneScape).

This puts him not posting as much at 1am Nick's time but there's still lots of prior, when Nick would be doing a show, so I don't think it's Nick.

My guess he's in EST being that Nick's shows end around 2-3am (3-4am EST) when this guy is typically going to bed
 
Last edited:
The time axis that I used was UTC (or GMT). It's the time zone that the UK is in, so they'd be having lunch when he's not posting.

The current UTC time is 18:43 (6:43 PM)... I don't know what time zone AnOminous is in, and that's the ISO standard that Javascript's toISOString method gave anyway.
Just shift perspective by -6 to match CST to match UTC and Central which is Chicago/Minneapolis (thanks RuneScape).

This puts him not posting as much at 1am Nick's time but there's still lots of prior, when Nick would be doing a show, so I don't think it's Nick.


My guess he's in EST being that Nick's shows end around 2-3am, when this guy is typically going to bed

Hmm. Can we weaponize this technology for doxxing? Obviously not An0minous. Just... In general.

Don't look at me like that. Everyone here was thinking it.
 
Hmm. Can we weaponize this technology for doxxing? Obviously not An0minous. Just... In general.

Don't look at me like that. Everyone here was thinking it.
I do this stuff for my marketing freelance work anyways. It's like doxing but used to make you and others money instead. Hours and hours of reading demographics data, charts, looking at road accident reports, etc to help assess things like good locations for signs, or businesses, etc.

Just a bit of advice if this line of work interests other kiwis- I don't recommend it as freelancer gig. I can only take on all-in-ones that can be scaled to one person. So get a job at a big boy company.
 
I don't know who the fuck Joe the Lawyer is.
Nobody does. His Youtube channel is only one month old, and he has managed a whopping 216 views.
EDIT: Joe the lawyer is his second channel. His first channel mostly covers sovereign citizens.
 
Last edited:
I just pray this doesn't somehow turn into Shane 2.0

EDIT: I have this burning desire to rub Joe's head for good luck.
 
Joe's thoughts on Vic (after a crash course from Rackets):

Vic definitely suffered damage.
Joe would have sued Hanleia and rolled the dice with jurisdictional fuckery, on account she actually called him a pedophile.
"They're claiming Vic's suit was a SLAPP suit? Wow..."
"It's hard for me to believe none of his claims were meritorious."
"I don't know much about anti-SLAPP or the details, but I think he has a good chance in appeals."
He's not a fan of cancel culture.

BuT nO LAwYeRS bUT nicK and tY THiNk vIC Has A CAse!

Also, I think Nick's enthusiasm about the case is rubbing off on him. Could be interesting if he wants to noodle the Vic case too and brings a fresh perspective. He wasn't a bad guest, though Nick dominated the air time. Mostly because Nick loves to talk and Joe was in a new environment and was probably just quiet because of that.

Also something I didn't know: Apparently Chupp's bad day wasn't anything related to a writ of mandamus, it was because Chupp didn't get appointed to the appeals court, and they apparently ghosted him when they denied him.
 
Last edited:
Joe's thoughts on Vic (after a crash course from Rackets):

Vic definitely suffered damage.
Joe would have sued Hanleia and rolled the dice with jurisdictional fuckery, on account she actually called him a pedophile.
"They're claiming Vic's suit was a SLAPP suit? Wow..."
"It's hard for me to believe none of his claims were meritorious."
"I don't know much about anti-SLAPP or the details, but I think he has a good chance in appeals."
He's not a fan of cancel culture.

BuT nO LAwYeRS bUT nicK and tY THiNk vIC Has A CAse!


Also, I think Nick's enthusiasm about the case is rubbing off on him. Could be interesting if he wants to noodle the Vic case too and brings a fresh perspective.

Also something I didn't know: Apparently Chupp's bad day wasn't anything related to a writ of mandamus, it was because Chupp didn't get appointed to the appeals court, and they apparently ghosted him when they denied him.
Chupp is trying to get to the Appeals court again though despite that. I think he's legit some kinda brain damaged.
 
Also something I didn't know: Apparently Chupp's bad day wasn't anything related to a writ of mandamus, it was because Chupp didn't get appointed to the appeals court, and they apparently ghosted him when they denied him.

I missed how he was open to being appointed because it's usually an elected position in Texas. Did someone die or retire? He got his current judgeship by being appointed by Rick Perry even though that's also usually an elected position, then has been reelected as an inevitability. So he was apparently expecting to get appointed to fill a vacancy?

I wonder if they realized he's not fit to be on the appeals court. He'd be a disaster. More likely they just gave it to someone better politically connected.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back