Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[Vault Boy]

Good, no one should feel obligated to entertain the notions of a piece of shit like that guy.

And really, why does the LGBT community want to die on this hill? Think of the optics, fools.

 

[AnOminous]

When you attempt to redefine "transphobia" to include things like someone speaking or writing the name you were born with, or lesbians not wanting to have sex with penises, or stating that biological sex cannot be changed, all you do is make normal people decide that transphobia isn't so bad after all.

Troons do themselves no favors defining refusing to be raped by them as "transphobia." Imagine if black or any other equality activists had declared that what they were fighting was the horrible injustice of not being able to get laid.

 

[OnMoTi]

Anywhere I could find the actual opinion/documents? I'm interested to know if it's only for inmates, who by committing crimes have theoretically had most rights revoked, or if it's for the trans people in general.
Either way, this should be a good precedent against thought-crimes and the like. I don't want someone to be fined or whatever because they call Bruce Jenner Bruce Jenner.
Words are not crimes. Nobody has any right to have other people call them something. It's just polite to do so, kind of like a nickname.

http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/19/19-40016-CR0.pdf

tl;dr - his name change wasn't legal, nearly every motion he filed was invalid, and there is no statute that requires judges use 'preferred pronouns.'

 

[Grapefruit Soda]

so is converting to troon while in prison just the new wave of people who used to convert to islam in prison?

I'm pretty sure it's because pedos get the shank in prison, trying to act like a woman is a smoke screen to not die.

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/19/19-40016-CR0.pdf

tl;dr - his name change wasn't legal, nearly every motion he filed was invalid, and there is no statute that requires judges use 'preferred pronouns.'

Thanks.

Here's something strange I found;

Varner’s letter explained that he “ca[me] out as a transgender woman” in 2015 , began “hormone replacement therapy” shortly after, and planned to have “gender reassignment surgery in the near future” in order to “finally
become fully female.” Attached to Varner’s letter was a certified copy of a 2018 order from a Kentucky state court changing Varner’s name.

How did he get HRT if he was sentenced to, quote;

180 months in prison, to be followed by 15 years supervised release

How does that happen? I thought that Praylor v. Tex. Dep’t of Crim. Justice, 430 F.3d 1208, 1208–09 (5th Cir. 2005), said that denying HRT for inmates was absolutely halal. Are my tax dollars going to this dudes titty skittles? Or am I on the crazy pills this time?

 

[OnMoTi]

Are my tax dollars going to this dudes titty skittles?

Yes.

Side note; the article got one thing flat out wrong.

He also denied her request to have prison guards use female pronouns when referring to her.

This is factually incorrect. In his ruling, he said;

The government also pointed out that, under Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) regulations, Varner would be able to use his preferred name as a secondary name or alias. See BOP Policy No. 5800.15, § 402(d). [...] As the court explained, BOP regulations allow Varner to use “Kathrine Nicole Jett” as a secondary name and also authorize BOP staff “to use either gender-neutral or an inmate’s requested gender-specific pronoun or salutation when interacting with transgender inmates.” Id. (citing BOP Policy No. 5800.15, § 402(d); BOP Policy No. 5200.04, § 11).

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

Yes.

Side note; the article got one thing flat out wrong.



This is factually incorrect. In his ruling, he said;

First off, that sucks.
Second, it says it ‘authorizes’ the use of preferred pronouns, not that it requires the use of them.
That may be a case for a different day, though.

 

[Norman B. Normal]

Eh 9000 is minimal go away money, I don’t think the troon was discriminated against. Only the troon’s word that they did well in the interview, and only the troon’s word that they got an “anonymous” email? Sure, troon, sure.

Perhaps. But whether this particular individual was discriminated against or not doesn't have any bearing on the question of whether, from a legal or moral standpoint, people ought to be discriminated against because they're transgender.

What's crazy to me is that, according to every definition of discrimination and prejudice I grew up with for 90 percent of my life, I should be the very model of a transgender rights ally. I don't think transgender people ought to be discriminated against in employment, housing, business, or public accommodations. I think they ought to be able to marry any consenting adult who'll have them. And although I know there will be plenty here who will disagree with me, I think it's a good thing that Western society in general has adopted the consensus view that racial and homophobic prejudice are considered sufficiently toxic as to be universally unwelcome in public circles. Society is willing to excuse a lot of human failings, but it does not put up with bigotry. And I'm totally fine with that.

So when troons call people bigots for simply stating the incontrovertible fact that biological sex is immutable and that transwomen will always be fundamentally male, that cheapens the concept, makes it less toxic. And they're too self-absorbed to realize that if prejudice becomes more socially acceptable, they'll be the very first ones up against the wall. And then they'll learn the difference between the "violence" of being misgendered, and the kind that involves skulls interacting with baseball bats.

 

[AnOminous]

I'm pretty sure it's because pedos get the shank in prison, trying to act like a woman is a smoke screen to not die.

It's either to be more attractive to Bubba so maybe he doesn't kill you, or to get into a women's prison because you're a rapist and want to rape women.

 

[Ningen]

Nice to see the alphabet people defending the rights of a convicted pedophile.

Extremely relevant video:

Jensen may be crook but a stopped clock is right at least twice a day.

 

[frozenrunner]

And really, why does the LGBT community want to die on this hill? Think of the optics, fools.

They really don't like not having a powerful, effective social wedge issue like gay marriage. This is all they've got, and they're going to scream at you until it works. (Lol.)

 

[Alec Benson Leary]

True. FTMs were sort of unknown for a long time. I'm under the impression the ones who showed up to the doc were actually already living secretly as men, basically -- very butch, they were already passing. So perhaps they weren't as involved with the lesbian culture in general (though some were, like Leslie Feinberg).

From what I've seen with this uptick of FTMs, there are two kinds: masculine lesbians encouraged to transition, and fujoshis of unknown sexuality who want to be cool gay men. I'm not sure which outnumbers the other though, because the trans lobby doesn't allow us to talk about the fact that there's different categories of trans-identified people.

And let's call a spade a spade: the reason MTFs get so much more attention than the other way around is absolutely because the identity of womanhood is fetishized and put on a pedestal of moral purity. Men are just men and they don't have victimhood or morality or valued experience, so why would anyone want to become one? Well the narrative-pushers can't just be obvious and accuse FTMs of bigotry for becoming the enemy - even though there's definitely an undercurrent of that - because they're also still trans and you can't criticize trans people, so instead we just don't put them on big magazine covers like we do the Caitlyn Jenners.

What's crazy to me is that, according to every definition of discrimination and prejudice I grew up with for 90 percent of my life, I should be the very model of a transgender rights ally. I don't think transgender people ought to be discriminated against in employment, housing, business, or public accommodations. I think they ought to be able to marry any consenting adult who'll have them. And although I know there will be plenty here who will disagree with me, I think it's a good thing that Western society in general has adopted the consensus view that racial and homophobic prejudice are considered sufficiently toxic as to be universally unwelcome in public circles. Society is willing to excuse a lot of human failings, but it does not put up with bigotry. And I'm totally fine with that.

So when troons call people bigots for simply stating the incontrovertible fact that biological sex is immutable and that transwomen will always be fundamentally male, that cheapens the concept, makes it less toxic. And they're too self-absorbed to realize that if prejudice becomes more socially acceptable, they'll be the very first ones up against the wall. And then they'll learn the difference between the "violence" of being misgendered, and the kind that involves skulls interacting with baseball bats.

That is exactly the position I find myself in as well. Along with everyone who now calls themselves a "classical liberal" because it's become clear they can no longer abide the political motivations of the establishment left. What was defined as good, moral progressive attitudes less than a decade ago is now condemned as nazi and white supremacist apologia or outright support. And it's pure madness. Sane people understand that equal treatment and rights also comes with equal responsibility and there is no escaping this - if I can be called toxic and fragile and whatever else because someone doesn't like my beliefs that's fine, but they have to endure criticism as well and they don't want to. The nazi exterminators will always need new roaches to exterminate even if they've already done the job, because otherwise their paychecks will stop coming. That's why you're the new nazi, and it's why they need to divide and subdivide humans into as many hostile, xenophobic groups as they can and get them all to hate each other.

 

[AnOminous]

Well the narrative-pushers can't just be obvious and accuse FTMs of bigotry for becoming the enemy - even though there's definitely an undercurrent of that - because they're also still trans and you can't criticize trans people, so instead we just don't put them on big magazine covers like we do the Caitlyn Jenners.

Jenner is a perfect example of the troon stereotype other than that Jenner is apparently not a complete and absolute piece of shit compared to most troons. And this is even considering the Kardashian aspect and that whole clan being garbage, AND the fact that Jenner murdered an old woman. Even with that, not as bad as the average troon.

But Bruce Jenner was a privileged white man who was a celebrity his entire life, and then trooned out when his star was waning and he'd gotten involved in a scandal involving literally killing someone. And all sins were forgiven, nobody even remembers the victim, Kim Howe, or the other victims, and now Caitlyn Jenner is officially Brave and Beautiful for no reason other than no longer having a cock.

 

[pwnest injun]

Extremely relevant video:

Jensen may be crook but a stopped clock is right at least twice a day.

The girl trying to shout him down is straight up defending pedophile advocacy, and I doubt that she was ever held to account at all. Infuriating.

 

[Yamma Damma]

Jenner is a perfect example of the troon stereotype other than that Jenner is apparently not a complete and absolute piece of shit compared to most troons. And this is even considering the Kardashian aspect and that whole clan being garbage, AND the fact that Jenner murdered an old woman. Even with that, not as bad as the average troon.

But Bruce Jenner was a privileged white man who was a celebrity his entire life, and then trooned out when his star was waning and he'd gotten involved in a scandal involving literally killing someone. And all sins were forgiven, nobody even remembers the victim, Kim Howe, or the other victims, and now Caitlyn Jenner is officially Brave and Beautiful for no reason other than no longer having a cock.

I will NEVER forgive Jenner for being the cause of the troon wave, mainly for what it's done to who knows how many children's bodies and minds. The fact that Jenner got away with fucking MURDER speaks volumes about the true reason why so many criminals (and war criminals like Manning) suddenly "feel" like the opposite sex. (Because females and their emotions, AMIRITE?)

Gay marriage got legal in 2014. Jenner trooned out in 2015, right when the gay organizations ran out of shit to LARP as freedom fighters for, so they proped up their queer cousins. But all it did was turn them into suicide-baiting monsters who rewrite history (Stonewall) and divide an already divided community! (Bisexual hatred & radfem lesbos)

5 years of "muh pronouns" and biology bullshittery for what? For lulz I guess.

 

[Positron]

Drag Queen Story Hour stirs Missouri lawmaker to support limits on library programming

JEFFERSON CITY

Public libraries that display “age-inappropriate material” could lose state funding and even see their librarians fined or jailed, under a bill proposed by a Missouri lawmaker.

The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Ben Baker, a southwest Missouri Republican, said Thursday that the “Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act” did not target books but was drafted in reaction to Drag Queen Story Hours being held across the state.

“In some places -- St. Louis, Kansas City and I think St. (Joseph) -- they’ve had these drag queen story hours and that’s something that I take objection to and I think a lot of parents do,” Baker, R-Neosho, said. “That’s where in a public space, our kids could be exposed to something that’s age-inappropriate. That’s what I’m trying to tackle.”

The first Drag Queen Story Hour was held in San Francisco in 2015. Since then the events, meant to give kids “glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models,” according to a website that tracks them, have spread across the nation through public libraries, museums and bookstores.

Though not all drag queens are gay or transgender, the events have become a kind of barometer for a community’s tolerance of expressing queer identities in public.

While the Kansas City Public Library has not held Drag Queen Story Hours, they have been held as ticketed events at area theaters and museums.

The St. Louis Public Library’s Drag Queen Storytime is one of its most popular events. Biannually, hundreds attend, with few protesters.

The St. Joseph Public Library’s first story time drew 500 people, with police stationed outside to monitor protesters and counter protesters. A Catholic group, America Needs Fatima, which protests drag queen story hours around the Midwest, shuttled in protesters from as far away as Topeka to pray the rosary for attendees.

The bill would give parents “recourse” to say they were “not OK” with the programming introduced into their community, Baker said. It requires each library district to create five-person oversight board of adults that would hold public hearings and make final decisions on whether “material” was age-inappropriate.

Inappropriate “material” would then be moved so it could not be accessed by minors.

Librarians who refused to do so could be convicted of a class B misdemeanor, and be required to pay a $500 fine and be sentenced up to a year in jail.

Baker insisted he intended the bill to be about programming and not books. The language of the bill required work, he added.

“If we were trying to ban books or censor literature, I would kill the bill, myself,” Baker said.

A young child seeing a drag queen could instigate a conversation about “adult themes” that parents are not ready to have with their children, Baker said.

“Some of those events are open from ages 1 to teen years,” Baker said. “I don’t think a 2-, 3-, 4-year-old is prepared to grapple with those ideas and I don’t think they should be subjected to that just by walking through the library.”

Baker took it one step further by alleging the story hours to be a public safety issue, saying they have “drawn child predators, pedophiles” in the past.

The Houston Public Library received national attention when a drag queen who read at two of its story time events was later revealed to be a registered child sex offender. The library later apologized for not conducting a background check of the volunteer, as required by their policies.

There are few other public reports of such situations.

Crosby Kemper III, Kansas City Public Library’s outgoing executive director, said drag queen story hours have become “a big national issue.” Kemper was appointed by President Donald Trump as the director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services and will begin his new job at the federal agency next week.

“One thing I’ve said to other librarians are libraries are pretty good about understanding their communities,” Kemper said.

“I think there are communities where doing a drag queen story time is throwing something in people’s faces, a deliberate provocation,” he added. “There are other places that people find it amusing or friendly or whatever. Communities have a different sense of what’s appropriate and what’s inappropriate.”

Any issue about programming and books should “begin with a conversation,” Kemper said.

“Librarians are trained to pick books that are important to their communities,” Kemper said. “If there is something inappropriate then parents should go to the librarians and have a discussion about that, rather than... mandates through state funding.”

Public libraries already have oversight through a board of trustees elected or appointed by the community, Cynthia Dudenhoffer, the Missouri Library Association president, said. The association has come out against the bill, decrying it as “censorship.”

“I’m sure any library board and their director take the responses from their community very, very seriously,” Dudenhoffer said.

PROMO Missouri, the state’s largest gay rights advocacy organization, was “disappointed” Baker was “attempting to restrict the very thing libraries do best,” its communication manager Shira Berkowitz said.

“Libraries have long been a safe place for everyone to learn, a place that promotes acceptance and challenges us to accept new ideas,” Berkowitz said.

LGBT visibility helps children cultivate a positive self-image, as well, she said.

“Especially in a state where lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people can still be denied housing, fired from their jobs and denied public service, it’s really important to have these safe spaces where children and families can come into the visibility of LGBT people or queerness, or playfulness in their identities, whether that be through literature or the performative nature of drag culture,” Berkowitz said.

Though Baker’s bill has received national headlines, it has not yet been referred to a committee.

It will most likely not this legislative session, according to another southwest Missouri lawmaker, state Sen. Bill White. White represents Baker’s district.

“It will have a very difficult time going through in its current fashion, in its current drafting,” White, R-Joplin, said.

White said though he has not read the bill, he doesn’t plan on supporting it.

“I do not believe in banning books — you have parental control,” White said. “I do not believe in having boards that become the decider in what is free speech and what is part of free speech for libraries and artistic expression.”

TL;DR -- Rainbow degenerates liken a sensible bill to protect minors as "censorship" and "banning books", and they think an event where 4-and-5-year-olds getting groomed by an adult male without supervision is a "safe space".

 

[Smaug's Smokey Hole]

And let's call a spade a spade: the reason MTFs get so much more attention than the other way around is absolutely because the identity of womanhood is fetishized and put on a pedestal of moral purity. Men are just men and they don't have victimhood or morality or valued experience, so why would anyone want to become one? Well the narrative-pushers can't just be obvious and accuse FTMs of bigotry for becoming the enemy - even though there's definitely an undercurrent of that - because they're also still trans and you can't criticize trans people, so instead we just don't put them on big magazine covers like we do the Caitlyn Jenners.

They also get a lot of attention because they take up so much space socially and vocally, a very male trait. They shout down, shut down and boss around women in women's spaces to elevate themselves above actual women.
FTMs can't do the same thing in groups of men that they are part of, for many reasons. They can claim discrimination, transphobia and bigotry so they're not entirely toothless but they can't strong-arm the people around them and impose their will in the same way MTFs can and do.

 

[Marvin]

Drag Queen Story Hour stirs Missouri lawmaker to support limits on library programming



TL;DR -- Rainbow degenerates liken a sensible bill to protect minors as "censorship" and "banning books", and they think an event where 4-and-5-year-olds getting groomed by an adult male without supervision is a "safe space".

https://twitter.com/demure_kitty/status/1218697036515532800

 

[GenderCop]

they're coming for us, guys.

first they came for the lesbians, and i didn't say anything because....

Trans Women Deserve To Be Loved Proudly. Straight Guys, I'm Looking At You.
I’ve been told that I’m very feminine and pass as female (a problematic privilege), but that doesn’t seem to reassure these straight dudes that everything will be OK when we meet. They’re afraid of being found out, persecuted and rejected.

That’s fair, I get it. I really do. Social stigma is real.

But it seems they don’t consider how their actions affect me. I’m treated like a perpetual post-midnight booty call, reduced to some fetish or kink that can only be explored under a hidden veil of shame. It makes me feel dirty, like a horrible secret. It’s a degrading, disgraceful feeling to not want to be seen with — to be unwanted and unacknowledged is rejection.

It impacts the heart, stings the soul.

***

i'm married, so i have an excuse to avoid the trannies. the rest of you guys better get married soon or come up with some creative reason why you are stinging their souls, you meanies.

 

[Cheesetoast]

come up with some creative reason why you are stinging their souls, you meanies.

I'd love to but I'm washing my hair. Sorry.