CPS wouldn't take custody in this situation, because the family called 911 and got her immediate medical attention. Accidents happen with toddlers especially those who love to climb and are overly active. She even seems pretty smart (not to mention strong and good use of gross and fine motor skills) to have figured out how to unlock the window and then push it open, so it is reasonable that her parents would not have predicted her doing that. Now, did she open the window or was it already open? Good question, but we won't know and in terms of temporary removal it doesn't matter, because she wasn't thrown from the window. Police investigated while the family was at the hospital and found that she fell, had she been thrown that would have gotten both her and her brother removed from the home. Had onion not called 911 then that could be a case for neglect or dependency, but even in those cases that does not mean immediate removal of a child from parents. CPS may have opened a case without removing either child (because there are definite concerns regarding how she managed to open the window/ if the window was already open*), but that is not something they can inform the public about and it's not like onion is going to share that information. If the family does what the agency wants to see in a certain time frame then they close the case.
If the other calls you are referring to are about the grooming allegations... well those aren't relevant to the shallots. If the reports were about inappropriate sexual contact between any adult and the shallots that is different. The exposing of Cloey to a three-some is sexual abuse, but if that was reported or if CPS opened a case, again we will not know that. CPS cannot confirm or deny if they are open on a family regardless if they are court involved or not. Back to these other calls... random people calling in allegations without having first hand accounts of alleged abuse is not going to get a case open on this family and it definitely won't lead to the removal of the children. People sperging and calling CPS about the onions' grooming is not relevant to the shallots. Parents do all kinds of disgusting abhorrent things, but if the children are not exposed to it then it's irrelevant. Onion can be a sex pest anytime and anywhere, so long as it is not in front of or exposing children to it. Having random young women rotating through the house is obviously ridiculous, but unless those kids know that those girls are there for sexual purposes, it's not enough. Are his behaviors in poor taste? Absolutely. He is a disgusting predator/groomer? Absolutely. Unless he gets convicted of something in regard to sexual misconduct with a minor child and/or is put on the sex-offender registry those kids aren't going anywhere. Hopefully CPS has the Sarah situation documented so the two of them can never obtain legal custody of a child again, but that would only help in cases where CPS would somehow be involved and could inform the court prior to custody being granted.