Megathread Insane Parents of "Transgender" Kids - Parents who push a transgender identity on their children

[Non-Expert!]

It's because of social media. People are obsessed with your gender/pronouns/sexuality, people talk about non-stop can constantly rave about how "brave and stunning" the lgbt are. Of course an impressionable little girl is going to want to "fit in."
Seeing young kids declare themselves to be genderspecials or weird sexualities isn't at all uncommon online, I knew more than a few girls growing up who bought into it. When I was 13 I used a lot of Tumblr and had a phase where I declared myself asexual because I hadn't hit the age where I could understand what attraction was yet. I imagine something similar happened to this girl.

Parents: monitor your children's internet activity. Be shameless about your presence in their lives. Their right to privacy is limited. Spend time with your kids doing fun, age-appropriate stuff. Get to know the parents of their friends. Keep the line of communication open with their teachers. Be on friendly terms with their principal. Do what you need to do, to break your child away from circles of friends who are a detrimental influence to her well-being.

No child should be discussing anything -sexual, at the age of 10. They are too young to understand these concepts.

 

[Peaches Demure]

No child should be discussing anything -sexual, at the age of 10. They are too young to understand these concepts.

Sex and sexual attraction to a child this age (or should be to a child this age) are nothing but abstract, theoretical concepts that they don't have the equipment or maturity to understand except on a very superficial level. They don't understand what propels a crush or any of the feelings involved. Once they do experience this feeling, they'll realize how naive and shallow their previous conception of sexuality was, but with kids like Jazz who were biochemically stunted, this realization will never occur.

 

[Non-Expert!]

Sex and sexual attraction to a child this age (or should be to a child this age) are nothing but abstract, theoretical concepts that they don't have the equipment or maturity to understand except on a very superficial level. They don't understand what propels a crush or any of the feelings involved. Once they do experience this feeling, they'll realize how naive and shallow their previous conception of sexuality was, but with kids like Jazz who were biochemically stunted, this realization will never occur.

Please don't take this to be homophobia.

But at the age of 10, kids can pick out the odd kid in their cohort, and identify him as "gay." I remember an example, from when I was a kid, that their was this slightly odd boy in the class, that the kids called Ben-gay. (After the ointment). This was back in the 80s.

They understood "gay" to mean "gender non-conforming" but you don't need the jargon to identify it. Kids can generally detect it.

However in the cohort there were also little girls with hair cut in mullets, who excelled in soccer and refused to play dolls with you. They remained unlabeled. Or maybe "tomboys." But kids didn't find tomboys worthy of much of anything except for being recruited for sports teams.

Basically my point is, that in calling Ben "Bengay" they weren't thinking of this kid 10 years down the line, advertising himself as a powerbottom ... They were simply pointing out that this kid Ben seemed "gay" = not like the other boys, and more like girls in some ways.

All I am saying is that kids slap labels on others, that they don't fully understand. The kids were not accusing Ben of wanting to be fucked in the ass by other men, unless they had been exposed to the sexual implications of that label, which is child abuse, by the way. But the 10 year old who self-identifies as "pansexual" is either spouting some label she heard, or is being exposed to material that is age-inappropriate. If pan-sexual is actually a category, its nuances are complex, and why the hell are kids discussing it in the first place?

 

[largetiger]

Parents: monitor your children's internet activity. Be shameless about your presence in their lives. Their right to privacy is limited.

I’ve often wanted to construct a FB post in order to scare my normie friends and family into yanking the tablets, Chromebooks and old iPhones out of their kids hands... I think I could add any random 10 images from KF and be successful

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

However in the cohort there were also little girls with hair cut in mullets, who excelled in soccer and refused to play dolls with you. They remained unlabeled. Or maybe "tomboys." But kids didn't find tomboys worthy of much of anything except for being recruited for sports teams.

Your school was kind. We had all kinds of "butch" and "dyke" puns for those girls, and when locker room changing started, the most "mean girl" type girls would scream in mock terror of the dykes who were supposedly watching them change. Shit like this is why one of those girls ended up FTM later on. She had PCOS and a light beard by age 15, when she transitioned everyone was like "oh, I guess she's sort of like a boy anyway, it makes sense, don't it?"

 

[Non-Expert!]

Your school was kind. We had all kinds of "butch" and "dyke" puns for those girls, and when locker room changing started, the most "mean girl" type girls would scream in mock terror of the dykes who were supposedly watching them change. Shit like this is why one of those girls ended up FTM later on. She had PCOS and a light beard by age 15, when she transitioned everyone was like "oh, I guess she's sort of like a boy anyway, it makes sense, don't it?"

At 10? How can girls look like dykes, before puberty? How the fuck did kids know about that stuff?
I learned that terminology and what it actually meant, from my dad. I know, gross. But I think I was a teenager. If he used it around me before I reached puberty, I was oblivious to it.

 

[Amber the Hedgehog]

At 10? How can girls look like dykes, before puberty? How the fuck did kids know about that stuff?
I learned that terminology and what it actually meant, from my dad. I know, gross. But I think I was a teenager. If he used it around me before I reached puberty, I was oblivious to it.

Well it's not that hard to a kid pick up bad or just wierd words. Tv shows, books, internet, songs, overhearing adult conversations and so on allow natural expansion of vocabulary, including sexual stuff without any abuse going on. This exposing doesn't have be long or consistant, sometimes even one time will do as kids are really strongly disposed towards learning new words. As long as they can talk they can then say those words regardless of topic but that doesn't mean they understand what those words really mean. It's perfectly normal to use word that you don't really know but get the mood provoke. This could something like saying science jargon to sound smart, say formal words sound fancy or say a bad word to upset people. From my experience kids using gay or duke as insults usually don't get that well those mean homosexual, just that they are insults and possibly that it should used toward feminine boys or masculine girls. Similar to fuck, pussy or dick, kids usually get they are bad words and so they use them for swearing but their understanding of sexual nature of these word is usually pretty shaky or abstract.

 

[trannyfucker]

The psycho mom who wants to rename her son after a Harry Potter character just lost another court case

Texas mother of 7-year-old boy with gender dysphoria loses second court case

A Texas mother who wanted to medically transition her 7-year-old son and call him Luna lost another court case.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Mother trying to transition her son into a girl loses in court

A judge has ruled that a father fighting to stop his seven-year-old son from transitioning to a girl will now be allowed to have a say in future medical decisions related to his child.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[fishercat]

The psycho mom who wants to rename her son after a Harry Potter character just lost another court case

Texas mother of 7-year-old boy with gender dysphoria loses second court case

A Texas mother who wanted to medically transition her 7-year-old son and call him Luna lost another court case.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Mother trying to transition her son into a girl loses in court

A judge has ruled that a father fighting to stop his seven-year-old son from transitioning to a girl will now be allowed to have a say in future medical decisions related to his child.

www.dailymail.co.uk

I'm still amazed that she's a pediatrician.

 

[vanilla_pepsi_head]

That kid must have been molested a lot.

But at least we know he was molested by an appropriately gender diverse spectrum of people, so that makes it ok again!

 

[AnOminous]

The psycho mom who wants to rename her son after a Harry Potter character just lost another court case

Just the Harry Potter thing alone should lose her custody permanently and get her committed to a lunatic asylum. Also didn't she get the memo that J.K. Rowling is a TERF who literally murders trannies every morning before breakfast?

 

[Otterly]

The psycho mom who wants to rename her son after a Harry Potter character just lost another court case

I would put money on her being one of these women who is devastated when they get another boy, because they want a little mini me to doll up and play with. Poor kid, let’s hope he gets through this. At least his dad is batting for him

 

[drfuzzyballs]

Mother trying to transition her son into a girl loses in court

A judge has ruled that a father fighting to stop his seven-year-old son from transitioning to a girl will now be allowed to have a say in future medical decisions related to his child.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Sweet jesus some good news for a change

 

[Non-Expert!]

I would put money on her being one of these women who is devastated when they get another boy, because they want a little mini me to doll up and play with. Poor kid, let’s hope he gets through this. At least his dad is batting for him

Yeah well .. coincidentally this little boy is the biological offspring of her ex-husband an an egg-donor.

Baby was conceived via Petri dish.

Basically yanking out the kids nads is a triple-quadruple win for her:

1. She gains asspats as an "enlightened" pediatrician among the 150 crunchy-anti-vax and/or queer parents in her part of Texas.

2. She gets an eternal little girl who will always have some issue that Mom, and only Mom, can help her with. No chance of grandkids to distract from her supermom status.

3. She denies her ex the relationship that he is entitled to, with the two boys. She breaks up the bond there.

4. With one boy castrated, that significantly reduced her ex's hope and chance of ever having biological grandchildren.

 

[who dare wins?]

Yeah well .. coincidentally this little boy is the biological offspring of her ex-husband an an egg-donor.

Baby was conceived via Petri dish.

Basically yanking out the kids nads is a triple-quadruple win for her:

1. She gains asspats as an "enlightened" pediatrician among the 150 crunchy-anti-vax and/or queer parents in her part of Texas.

2. She gets an eternal little girl who will always have some issue that Mom, and only Mom, can help her with. No chance of grandkids to distract from her supermom status.

3. She denies her ex the relationship that he is entitled to, with the two boys. She breaks up the bond there.

4. With one boy castrated, that significantly reduced her ex's hope and chance of ever having biological grandchildren.

Honestly why would someone marry her in the first place considering how batshit crazy she is

 

[Non-Expert!]

Honestly why would someone marry her in the first place considering how batshit crazy she is

It never works that way with these high-functioning types. They have this mask and then the ugly comes slowly but surely, once you are stuck.

 

[jorgoth]

Everywhere in the West there are subversive minorities who, sheltered by our humanitarianism and our sense of justice, hold the incendiary torches ready, with nothing to stop the spread of their ideas except the critical reason of a single, fairly intelligent, mentally stable stratum of the population. -Carl Gustav Jung, The Undiscovered Self

Western civilization is ill-equipped to deal with such people, IMO. I think theocracy existed in the past primarily to suppress the rabble instinct on the part of this subversive minority and possibly root it out.

 

[Non-Expert!]

Western civilization is ill-equipped to deal with such people, IMO. I think theocracy existed in the past primarily to suppress the rabble instinct on the part of this subversive minority and possibly root it out.

Actually there are very effective ways of addressing such social ills, as long as you are willing to live like this:

LGBT rights in North Korea - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Anti-gay purges in Chechnya - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

LGBT rights in Asia - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Most of this stuff IS restrictive due to religion.

I agree, we are ill-equipped to deal with these people in the "West" primarily because we are unwilling to torture and kill them. Even if you were prepared to do that, that also means that YOU will live under a government willing to torture and kill any non-conformists or free-thinkers.

So we need to come up with a plan B.

Plan B should not include castrating Little James and rechristening him "Luna" probably short for Lunacy.

 

[jorgoth]

I agree, we are ill-equipped to deal with these people in the "West" primarily because we are unwilling to torture and kill them. Even if you were prepared to do that, that also means that YOU will live under a government willing to torture and kill any non-conformists or free-thinkers.

All we need is a government that knows how to step aside. If anything it's the subversive minority that depends on the government in the Occident, at least post 1945.

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

Yeah well .. coincidentally this little boy is the biological offspring of her ex-husband an an egg-donor.

Baby was conceived via Petri dish.

Basically yanking out the kids nads is a triple-quadruple win for her:

1. She gains asspats as an "enlightened" pediatrician among the 150 crunchy-anti-vax and/or queer parents in her part of Texas.

2. She gets an eternal little girl who will always have some issue that Mom, and only Mom, can help her with. No chance of grandkids to distract from her supermom status.

3. She denies her ex the relationship that he is entitled to, with the two boys. She breaks up the bond there.

4. With one boy castrated, that significantly reduced her ex's hope and chance of ever having biological grandchildren.

5. Since he isn’t her biological child and she clearly did not bond with either twin even if she actually did gestate them, she’s just doing this to a stranger’s son, not her own. No bio connection kicking in making her feel even the tiniest bit bad for planning to mutilate the boy, since he isn’t hers.

ETA: I recall that in the UK, at least, an awful lot of foster carers seem to be making a habit of transing all the kids they take in. Same thing as this nutcase: not their biological material, so they’re free material to reconfigure for attention and additional $$.