Trainwreck Onision / James Gregory Jackson / Gregory James Daniel/Jackson/Avaroe - Edgy king of the tweens, Vegan with deformed dick, Pedo, Destroying the Environment. Serial Domestic Abuser, Served the wrong Chris Hansen.

look at the way the lines change direction mid stroke, especially at the very end
mans' making up names so fast he can't learn his new signature

I guess no one has told Grog your signature doesn’t have to be your name, it can be anything you want, as long as you use it consistently.
Ooh, Daniel giving us some body positivity there:

View attachment 1127521

Just another average drama video on an average day on Youtube.

He’s diversifying from the foot fetishists, soon everyone around onion will have an only fans account
 
Last edited:
So I've searched specific keywords relating to what I'm about to bring to the table in this thread, i.e. "Christopher John Ryan," "diaper", etc. and nothing came up, and I don't remember seeing anything about this in the thread before now, so I assume I'm not late.

Yesterday, a YouTube channel by the name of Nuke uploaded two videos.

ONISIONS FATHER #EXPOSED DIAPER FETISH LEAK

ONISION DAD DIAPER FETISH LEAK!!! WITH PROOF!
Nuke, in the description of the first video titled "Onision Father #Exposed Diaper Fetish Leak", claims "this is a real video of #onisionsdad from his deleted fetish archive. Not joking, this was posted in a filedump by Greg himself a couple years ago. I managed to salvage one of the non corrupted videos and have decided to share it publically. In this video, Mr. Jackson locks himself in a plastic."

In the description of the second video entitled "Onision Dad Diaper Fetish Leak!!! With Proof!", claims that he found this when he "infiltrated [Onision's] discord." This video shows screenshots of Onision dumping the file links in the discord chat.

As of 9:00 PM (US Central Time), Nuke commented on the second video two hours ago with this:
Screenshot (264).png


For what it's worth, Nuke joined YouTube in 2017 and has been consistently making videos about random stuff, so I doubt this is a false flag from Onion.
This has also been shared to Reddit.

I learned all about this rabbit hole during the Deadwing Dork ft. Fuzhou stream tonight, in which they watched more of Onion's recent meltdown videos. Someone in chat Googled the diaper guy's shirt in a video and somehow discovered the guy is a "Christopher John Ryan" who has been regularly and proudly displaying his diaper fetish to YouTube. Chris seems to young to be Onion's father, among other things.
20200202_204438.jpg

20200202_204428.jpg

20200202_204418.jpg
In the description of one of his videos, Nuke claims Onion collected the pics and videos and dropped them in discord a "couple years ago", but Christopher joined YouTube in February of 2019 (at least with this channel) and his oldest upload is 8 months ago. It's not impossible for Christopher to have shared his fetish on other sites, though.

Again, I searched his name on here and nothing came up. Chris might be a new cow, guys. I am unable to archive at the moment, so if anyone's up for it, here ya go.
 
So I've searched specific keywords relating to what I'm about to bring to the table in this thread, i.e. "Christopher John Ryan," "diaper", etc. and nothing came up, and I don't remember seeing anything about this in the thread before now, so I assume I'm not late.

Yesterday, a YouTube channel by the name of Nuke uploaded two videos.

ONISIONS FATHER #EXPOSED DIAPER FETISH LEAK

ONISION DAD DIAPER FETISH LEAK!!! WITH PROOF!
Nuke, in the description of the first video titled "Onision Father #Exposed Diaper Fetish Leak", claims "this is a real video of #onisionsdad from his deleted fetish archive. Not joking, this was posted in a filedump by Greg himself a couple years ago. I managed to salvage one of the non corrupted videos and have decided to share it publically. In this video, Mr. Jackson locks himself in a plastic."

In the description of the second video entitled "Onision Dad Diaper Fetish Leak!!! With Proof!", claims that he found this when he "infiltrated [Onision's] discord." This video shows screenshots of Onision dumping the file links in the discord chat.

As of 9:00 PM (US Central Time), Nuke commented on the second video two hours ago with this:
View attachment 1127771

For what it's worth, Nuke joined YouTube in 2017 and has been consistently making videos about random stuff, so I doubt this is a false flag from Onion.
This has also been shared to Reddit.

I learned all about this rabbit hole during the Deadwing Dork ft. Fuzhou stream tonight, in which they watched more of Onion's recent meltdown videos. Someone in chat Googled the diaper guy's shirt in a video and somehow discovered the guy is a "Christopher John Ryan" who has been regularly and proudly displaying his diaper fetish to YouTube. Chris seems to young to be Onion's father, among other things.
In the description of one of his videos, Nuke claims Onion collected the pics and videos and dropped them in discord a "couple years ago", but Christopher joined YouTube in February of 2019 (at least with this channel) and his oldest upload is 8 months ago. It's not impossible for Christopher to have shared his fetish on other sites, though.

Again, I searched his name on here and nothing came up. Chris might be a new cow, guys. I am unable to archive at the moment, so if anyone's up for it, here ya go.
1) It's not Onion's father
2) Dude this guy literally craves humiliation and jacks off to people making fun of him, why on God's green earth would we make a thread for him, it's literally giving him exactly what he wants.
 
This is something that needs to be corrected. Lainey came from an affluent background, in that she never wanted for anything material, had the assumption her college bills would be paid by parents, and similar privileges. But she did not have a stable home that showed her what healthy relationships looked like or that children should be protected from their parents' crappy relationships. Her father broke the family up by running away with the babysitter, a girl much younger than him that his daughters had developed a relationship with, only to essentially lose their father to her. Her mother later had a turbulent relationship, married the man, only to end up divorcing him six months later. Lainey's lessons growing up were that older women like her mother were disposable, that constant tumult was common and that people came in and out of her life on the whims of her parents' sexual relationships.

So she has the presumptions that came with upper middle class opportunities but lived in emotional chaos that taught her lots of crappy lessons about relationships that she is reenacting with Greg. She's literally being replaced with younger women continually, she's exposing her kids to sexual partners who come and go, she's had a nanny that her husband seduced and she lives in constant upheaval. She has very little trust either parent could be reliable emotionally so she could retreat to them, and it might be better than what she is experiencing now, but it's not like she grew up knowing her parents would put her first should she need them to do so.

I have zero fucking desire to discuss whether or not all of this should be something Lainey could overcome because muh personal responsibility muh bad childhood but I'm not a pedophile and similar whargarbl that infests this thread. I'm not sure any of this matters in terms of what Lainey has let her life become, but it doesn't hurt to know what she actually experienced when she was a kid.

I'm so fucking glad someone finally clarified all this because people on here keep saying that the kids should go to Lainey's parents. They also say Lainey's "lawyer daddy" would help her immediately. And granted, I didn't know all this before, but you gotta realize they can't be good parents merely because they raised Lainey.

They're still better than crazy Tammi tho but no, a stable home does not produce a Lainey
 
And being that it's a children's movie - one assumes that the children were with them. So Greg is making this out like he was too noble to accept a BJ mid-movie... because he thinks nothing of performing sex acts in front of his own kids, let alone anyone else's.

Why am I suddenly reminded of the movie theater scene in Fight Club?
 
Adobe_20200202_225555.jpg
- Greasy Hair
- Socially Inept
- Polo shirt
- Screeching voice
- Blames 'da trolls' for every problem in his life
- Autistic long rambling (Information Overload)
- Hides behind LGBT in lieu of Criticism
- Has memorable quotes

"I NAME ISN'T GREGORY. JACKSON. SOMETHING"
"She was EIGHTEEN AND HALF YEARS OLD"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's really angry about Sarah specifically, isn't he? I'm glad she riles him up so much. He was petty about the others but he seems to hate Sarah. She's the one currently making him crack.
Sarah is the one that managed to create a huge fuss around the fact that he is a groomer and an abusive person. She is the one that brought to social medias Shiloh, Skye, and her sister, and that brought Chris Hansen's attention on him.
 
View attachment 1127815

- Greasy Hair
- Socially Inept
- Polo shirt
- Screeching voice
- Blames 'da trolls' for every problem in his life
- Autistic long rambling (Information Overload)
- Hides behind LGBT in lieu of Criticism
- Has memorable quotes

"I NAME ISN'T GREGORY. JACKSON. SOMETHING"
"She was EIGHTEEN AND HALF YEARS OLD"
If I had to choose between the two I'd pick CWC, because Greg is short and I would not have sex with him.

Seriously, chris is taller than this guy lol.
 
Y'all missing one thing.

If James Jackson loses Kai Jackson he loses his biggest claim to "innocence".

That he did nothing wrong when she was 17 (and younger), because they are married aren't they?
I tried to make this point before. We shouild root for Taylor to leave because of two words: Spousal privilege. As long as they are married and sticking together she can't be forced to talk against him. If she leaves, she can be convinced to A. Divorce him, or B. Waive it voluntarily.

If Taylor no longer wants to (or no longer has a right to) protect him, he has no viable defense. Also she gains one whether her Dad is her lawyer or a Public Defender is. It wouldn't take the worlds best defense attorney to get her an incredibly light sentence if she breaks from him BEFORE she gets arrested.
 
Greg is truly a disgusting and depraved manchild who has never grown up and I would consider him a danger to any young woman who happened to fall for his line of bullshit.
That being said, I have read this thread, and have looked at all the "evidence" that has been asserted here. I have been trying mightily to apprehend any actual criminal activity by Greg. I have come up some with some "ifs" that would definitely put him behind bars, but I just haven't seen that evidenced here. Before I get the garbage cans, hear me out.

I think the strongest possibility for criminally prosecutable evidence would have to come from Greg's forum where he wanted women/girls to send him photo's of their bodies so he could "rate" them. If there is evidence of underage photo's that would satisfy the definition of CP, he should be quaking in his boots. I have seen photo's of purported minors in underwear, but other than rumours, I have not seen any actual nudes. I think the other thing that could get him in CP trouble is rather strange, but entirely possible. Greg could have actually legally (in WA and some other states) been fucking 16 year olds, but if he took photos of his "girlfriends", that would be considered illegal because they were under 18.
I found it telling that Chris Hansen was asking on twitter for victims of Onionboi to come forward and contact the authorities. That tells me that the evidence they have so far, may be lacking. I can see where it would be difficult legally for any minors to come forward with the goods for several reasons. The first being the actual shame and embarrassment they feel they would be subjected to, and additionally, the legal trouble that the minors could be in for sending Onion their photo's. They would not be the first underage kids to be charged with producing CP. Just look at the cases of underage boyfriend and girlfriends who have been put on the sexual offenders registry for taking/sharing photos.
In that one thing, Greg is correct. "Grooming" is not a criminal thing. He could groom underage girls all he wanted, but if he didn't dick them until they were 16 (in WA) I don't believe there is anything illegal. Is it immoral, disgusting, vile, sociopathic and deserving of total social shunning? Absolutely. I guess I am trying to look at this from a legal standpoint and not an emotional one. IANAL however, and would love if someone like @AnOminous would weigh in on the legalities, as he see's them. I think I have a good grasp on how he feels about Onion otherwise. 🔫
 
In that one thing, Greg is correct. "Grooming" is not a criminal thing. He could groom underage girls all he wanted, but if he didn't dick them until they were 16 (in WA) I don't believe there is anything illegal. Is it immoral, disgusting, vile, sociopathic and deserving of total social shunning? Absolutely. I guess I am trying to look at this from a legal standpoint and not an emotional one. IANAL however, and would love if someone like @AnOminous would weigh in on the legalities, as he see's them. I think I have a good grasp on how he feels about Onion otherwise. 🔫

It's still solicitation if you're seeking sexual relations with a minor even if you're hoping to brainwash them so they do it when they're 18, it's just difficult to prove. If he was a legal guardian, it's just straight up illegal even if they're 16-18. A different age of consent applies in that situation. If he can be proved to have solicited, sent, produced, or received CP he's also hosed. Just because it's not nude doesn't mean it's not CP if it was used for salacious purposes by the perp, and just because it is nude doesn't mean it is, but let's just say if it is nude it's going to be pretty easy to prove and if it isn't, it's going to be pretty hard.
 
Watching some of those clout vids people keep making about our boyo, and I noticed something. In one of his videos of him attacking Billie he mentions her "scoring low on an IQ test" and I also remember somewhere else mentioning one of his pony girls also took an IQ test under his request... does he do this with all of his girls?
 
Greg is truly a disgusting and depraved manchild who has never grown up and I would consider him a danger to any young woman who happened to fall for his line of bullshit.
That being said, I have read this thread, and have looked at all the "evidence" that has been asserted here. I have been trying mightily to apprehend any actual criminal activity by Greg. I have come up some with some "ifs" that would definitely put him behind bars, but I just haven't seen that evidenced here. Before I get the garbage cans, hear me out.

I think the strongest possibility for criminally prosecutable evidence would have to come from Greg's forum where he wanted women/girls to send him photo's of their bodies so he could "rate" them. If there is evidence of underage photo's that would satisfy the definition of CP, he should be quaking in his boots. I have seen photo's of purported minors in underwear, but other than rumours, I have not seen any actual nudes. I think the other thing that could get him in CP trouble is rather strange, but entirely possible. Greg could have actually legally (in WA and some other states) been fucking 16 year olds, but if he took photos of his "girlfriends", that would be considered illegal because they were under 18.
I found it telling that Chris Hansen was asking on twitter for victims of Onionboi to come forward and contact the authorities. That tells me that the evidence they have so far, may be lacking. I can see where it would be difficult legally for any minors to come forward with the goods for several reasons. The first being the actual shame and embarrassment they feel they would be subjected to, and additionally, the legal trouble that the minors could be in for sending Onion their photo's. They would not be the first underage kids to be charged with producing CP. Just look at the cases of underage boyfriend and girlfriends who have been put on the sexual offenders registry for taking/sharing photos.
In that one thing, Greg is correct. "Grooming" is not a criminal thing. He could groom underage girls all he wanted, but if he didn't dick them until they were 16 (in WA) I don't believe there is anything illegal. Is it immoral, disgusting, vile, sociopathic and deserving of total social shunning? Absolutely. I guess I am trying to look at this from a legal standpoint and not an emotional one. IANAL however, and would love if someone like @AnOminous would weigh in on the legalities, as he see's them. I think I have a good grasp on how he feels about Onion otherwise. 🔫

Moving underage girls across state lines to places where the AOC is lower in order to have sex with them, or flying them in from another country for the same, is illegal in not just the US but other countries as well. Onion has done this repeatedly.

Having sex with someone under 21 over whom you had a role of authority or guardianship of any sort is illegal. Onion has done that repeatedly.

Even if all the charges for crimes against women and children fall through (highly unlikely, but IF), he's still looking at charges for the wetlands destruction.
 
People with BPD on the whole, suck.
The only treatment requires them to really take a good hard look at themselves and they simply refuse to nor can they bare to. Especially the more malicious ones.

Cluster B is a pretty wide ranging spectrum. From quiet borderlines, to Sammie Busharts, to cold hard fucking psychopaths, to Susan Schofields. Anyone on cluster B typically carries traits from other cluster B disorders, even if they're only diagnosed with one specifically. Sub types exist.

From the way Sarah has acted though, I don't think she does have BPD. I don't think she's even particularly on cluster B anyway. Not about to armchair psychiatrist, of course, but if she did have BPD I think we would have seen some solid sperging by now. Shiloh style.

I feel fucked up teenage years and resulting depression is Sarah's problem, not BPD, but BPD is the absolute perfect way to discredit someone making allegations of abuse toward you because they are quite widely known to be the ones who make false allegations. If this ever went to court, she should get a second opinion and see about getting the diagnosis revoked. If the second opinion changes anything, it would make her way more reliable and attractive as 'the victim' to a jury.

If the actual evidence never comes to fruition and all the symptoms of BPD are read out in defense of Greg and his actions, guilty could be a tough sell. I guess it's why the predators always choose their prey like this. It's why some people still shit on and don't believe Virginia Roberts from the Epstein case.

With regard to Billie, I feel the most sorrow for her. She was already doomed before she even met Greg. Social media is bullshit. That interview was the real Billie. And she is teetering. She is on the edge, she is completely broken and you could see it. You could also see she definitely isn't the sharpest tool in the box at all. Not having the intelligence to be able to properly process what has happened to you must be torture. Ayalla is a hero. Without her, I think Billie would have become part of the furniture at the swamp shack.
 
what does Onision's father look like? Because there's a video circulating that he's supposedly a diaperfag
Been debunked already. Like, a page ago.

And why do you Twitter people always come out of the woodwork looking for info on onions dad? By all accounts except Grug & Crazy Tami's, he's just a normal guy. Leave the poor bastard alone.
 
Captain Gurggles is really stepping in it. You can tell he doesn't have a lawyer because even someone like Snotty Avenatti would tell him to keep his legs and mouth closed in this situation. You can really get a great great glimpse into how jealous he is over Hansen & Repzion's e-begging power. I hope they raise more money, and I hope that Gurggles has to sell his crappy bullet proof vest to buy some retin-A and monoxodil.
 
Back