- Joined
- Feb 26, 2019
In conclusion, Taylor is definitely complicit but she's not at Karla Homolka levels of complicit.
Taylor doesn't remind me of Karla Homolka, as much as she does Magda Goebbels.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In conclusion, Taylor is definitely complicit but she's not at Karla Homolka levels of complicit.
look at the way the lines change direction mid stroke, especially at the very end
mans' making up names so fast he can't learn his new signature
Ooh, Daniel giving us some body positivity there:
View attachment 1127521
Just another average drama video on an average day on Youtube.
1) It's not Onion's fatherSo I've searched specific keywords relating to what I'm about to bring to the table in this thread, i.e. "Christopher John Ryan," "diaper", etc. and nothing came up, and I don't remember seeing anything about this in the thread before now, so I assume I'm not late.
Yesterday, a YouTube channel by the name of Nuke uploaded two videos.
ONISIONS FATHER #EXPOSED DIAPER FETISH LEAK
ONISION DAD DIAPER FETISH LEAK!!! WITH PROOF!
This has also been shared to Reddit.Nuke, in the description of the first video titled "Onision Father #Exposed Diaper Fetish Leak", claims "this is a real video of #onisionsdad from his deleted fetish archive. Not joking, this was posted in a filedump by Greg himself a couple years ago. I managed to salvage one of the non corrupted videos and have decided to share it publically. In this video, Mr. Jackson locks himself in a plastic."
In the description of the second video entitled "Onision Dad Diaper Fetish Leak!!! With Proof!", claims that he found this when he "infiltrated [Onision's] discord." This video shows screenshots of Onision dumping the file links in the discord chat.
As of 9:00 PM (US Central Time), Nuke commented on the second video two hours ago with this:
View attachment 1127771
For what it's worth, Nuke joined YouTube in 2017 and has been consistently making videos about random stuff, so I doubt this is a false flag from Onion.
I learned all about this rabbit hole during the Deadwing Dork ft. Fuzhou stream tonight, in which they watched more of Onion's recent meltdown videos. Someone in chat Googled the diaper guy's shirt in a video and somehow discovered the guy is a "Christopher John Ryan" who has been regularly and proudly displaying his diaper fetish to YouTube. Chris seems to young to be Onion's father, among other things.
In the description of one of his videos, Nuke claims Onion collected the pics and videos and dropped them in discord a "couple years ago", but Christopher joined YouTube in February of 2019 (at least with this channel) and his oldest upload is 8 months ago. It's not impossible for Christopher to have shared his fetish on other sites, though.
Again, I searched his name on here and nothing came up. Chris might be a new cow, guys. I am unable to archive at the moment, so if anyone's up for it, here ya go.
This is something that needs to be corrected. Lainey came from an affluent background, in that she never wanted for anything material, had the assumption her college bills would be paid by parents, and similar privileges. But she did not have a stable home that showed her what healthy relationships looked like or that children should be protected from their parents' crappy relationships. Her father broke the family up by running away with the babysitter, a girl much younger than him that his daughters had developed a relationship with, only to essentially lose their father to her. Her mother later had a turbulent relationship, married the man, only to end up divorcing him six months later. Lainey's lessons growing up were that older women like her mother were disposable, that constant tumult was common and that people came in and out of her life on the whims of her parents' sexual relationships.
So she has the presumptions that came with upper middle class opportunities but lived in emotional chaos that taught her lots of crappy lessons about relationships that she is reenacting with Greg. She's literally being replaced with younger women continually, she's exposing her kids to sexual partners who come and go, she's had a nanny that her husband seduced and she lives in constant upheaval. She has very little trust either parent could be reliable emotionally so she could retreat to them, and it might be better than what she is experiencing now, but it's not like she grew up knowing her parents would put her first should she need them to do so.
I have zero fucking desire to discuss whether or not all of this should be something Lainey could overcome because muh personal responsibility muh bad childhood but I'm not a pedophile and similar whargarbl that infests this thread. I'm not sure any of this matters in terms of what Lainey has let her life become, but it doesn't hurt to know what she actually experienced when she was a kid.
And being that it's a children's movie - one assumes that the children were with them. So Greg is making this out like he was too noble to accept a BJ mid-movie... because he thinks nothing of performing sex acts in front of his own kids, let alone anyone else's.
Sarah is the one that managed to create a huge fuss around the fact that he is a groomer and an abusive person. She is the one that brought to social medias Shiloh, Skye, and her sister, and that brought Chris Hansen's attention on him.He's really angry about Sarah specifically, isn't he? I'm glad she riles him up so much. He was petty about the others but he seems to hate Sarah. She's the one currently making him crack.
If I had to choose between the two I'd pick CWC, because Greg is short and I would not have sex with him.View attachment 1127815
- Greasy Hair
- Socially Inept
- Polo shirt
- Screeching voice
- Blames 'da trolls' for every problem in his life
- Autistic long rambling (Information Overload)
- Hides behind LGBT in lieu of Criticism
- Has memorable quotes
"I NAME ISN'T GREGORY. JACKSON. SOMETHING"
"She was EIGHTEEN AND HALF YEARS OLD"
I tried to make this point before. We shouild root for Taylor to leave because of two words: Spousal privilege. As long as they are married and sticking together she can't be forced to talk against him. If she leaves, she can be convinced to A. Divorce him, or B. Waive it voluntarily.Y'all missing one thing.
If James Jackson loses Kai Jackson he loses his biggest claim to "innocence".
That he did nothing wrong when she was 17 (and younger), because they are married aren't they?
In that one thing, Greg is correct. "Grooming" is not a criminal thing. He could groom underage girls all he wanted, but if he didn't dick them until they were 16 (in WA) I don't believe there is anything illegal. Is it immoral, disgusting, vile, sociopathic and deserving of total social shunning? Absolutely. I guess I am trying to look at this from a legal standpoint and not an emotional one. IANAL however, and would love if someone like @AnOminous would weigh in on the legalities, as he see's them. I think I have a good grasp on how he feels about Onion otherwise.![]()
Greg is truly a disgusting and depraved manchild who has never grown up and I would consider him a danger to any young woman who happened to fall for his line of bullshit.
That being said, I have read this thread, and have looked at all the "evidence" that has been asserted here. I have been trying mightily to apprehend any actual criminal activity by Greg. I have come up some with some "ifs" that would definitely put him behind bars, but I just haven't seen that evidenced here. Before I get the garbage cans, hear me out.
I think the strongest possibility for criminally prosecutable evidence would have to come from Greg's forum where he wanted women/girls to send him photo's of their bodies so he could "rate" them. If there is evidence of underage photo's that would satisfy the definition of CP, he should be quaking in his boots. I have seen photo's of purported minors in underwear, but other than rumours, I have not seen any actual nudes. I think the other thing that could get him in CP trouble is rather strange, but entirely possible. Greg could have actually legally (in WA and some other states) been fucking 16 year olds, but if he took photos of his "girlfriends", that would be considered illegal because they were under 18.
I found it telling that Chris Hansen was asking on twitter for victims of Onionboi to come forward and contact the authorities. That tells me that the evidence they have so far, may be lacking. I can see where it would be difficult legally for any minors to come forward with the goods for several reasons. The first being the actual shame and embarrassment they feel they would be subjected to, and additionally, the legal trouble that the minors could be in for sending Onion their photo's. They would not be the first underage kids to be charged with producing CP. Just look at the cases of underage boyfriend and girlfriends who have been put on the sexual offenders registry for taking/sharing photos.
In that one thing, Greg is correct. "Grooming" is not a criminal thing. He could groom underage girls all he wanted, but if he didn't dick them until they were 16 (in WA) I don't believe there is anything illegal. Is it immoral, disgusting, vile, sociopathic and deserving of total social shunning? Absolutely. I guess I am trying to look at this from a legal standpoint and not an emotional one. IANAL however, and would love if someone like @AnOminous would weigh in on the legalities, as he see's them. I think I have a good grasp on how he feels about Onion otherwise.![]()
Been debunked already. Like, a page ago.what does Onision's father look like? Because there's a video circulating that he's supposedly a diaperfag