Iowa caucus vote totals delayed amid 'inconsistencies'; Trump team suggests contest 'rigged' - Beyond Parody

From Fox News (archive)
--------
The Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) still has not reported official vote totals in the critical Iowa caucuses as of early Tuesday morning, in a largely unexplained and unprecedented delay that has raised questions about the legitimacy of the contest -- and campaign officials are livid, Fox News has learned.

The Trump campaign, meanwhile, openly suggested that the delay meant that the caucuses were being "rigged," and that the embarrassing night proved that the Democratic Party can't be trusted to run Americans' health care and implement sweeping new government programs. Even if a winner is ultimately announced, the chaos and confusion has seemingly erased any hope for the major momentum boost that would normally result.

"We found inconsistencies in the reporting of three sets of results," the IDP said in a statement at 11:30 p.m. ET. "In addition to the tech systems being used to tabulate results, we are also using photos of results and a paper trail to validate that all results match and ensure that we have confidence and accuracy in the numbers we report. This is simply a reporting issue. The app did not go down and this is not a hack or an intrusion. The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results."

Fox News is told that during a call with the campaigns, an IDP representative said the party would be "getting photos of the paper results sent over," but didn't answer any questions and then hung up on all the campaigns, even as frustrated staffers pushed for answers. A campaign staffer told Fox News the brief call was "crazy." A second campaign official told Fox News, “Yes, they did hang up.”

The Biden campaign then wrote to the IDP, complaining about the "considerable flaws" in the caucus reporting process.

"The app that was intended to relay Caucus results to the Party failed; the Party’s back-up telephonic reporting system likewise has failed," the campaign wrote in a letter. "Now, we understand that Caucus Chairs are attempting to — and, in many cases, failing to — report results telephonically to the Party. These acute failures are occurring statewide. We appreciate that you plan to brief the campaigns momentarily on these issues, and we plan to participate. However, we believe that the campaigns deserve full explanations and relevant information regarding the methods of quality control you are employing, and an opportunity to respond, before any official results are released."

About an hour earlier, IDP spokesperson Mandy McClure said in a statement, "The integrity of the results is paramount. We have experienced a delay in the results due to quality checks and the fact that the IDP is reporting out three data sets for the first time. What we know right now is that around 25% of precincts have reported, and early data indicates turnout is on pace for 2016."

Turnout in the 2016 Democratic caucuses in Iowa was 171,109. That was far below the nearly 240,000 that took part in the 2008 Democratic caucuses, when then-Sen. Barack Obama won the contest.

"With every passing minute that there is a delay, we worry that the process will lose credibility," a top Elizabeth Warren aide told CNN.

In a surreal moment shortly before Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar took the stage to thank her supporters -- even as no voting results were available -- a precinct chief was being interviewed on CNN while he was on hold for more than an hour with the IDP to report results. The IDP then hung up on the precinct chief live on-air after he was too slow to respond once they took him off hold.

At least four precincts had to resolve ties in their vote results by flipping a coin during the evening, Fox News has learned.

Speaking at 11:30 p.m. ET, former Vice President Joe Biden said he felt good about the caucus, then remarked, "It's on to New Hampshire! ... We're in this for the long haul."

Taking the microphone ten minutes later, Sanders said that when the results were in, he had a "good feeling we're going to be doing very very well here in Iowa."

For the first time ever, the IDP has previously said it will report three sets of results at the end of the state’s first-in-the-nation caucuses: a tally of caucus-goers’ initial candidate preference; vote totals from the “final alignment” after supporters of lower-ranking candidates were able to make a second choice, and the total number of State Delegate Equivalents each candidate receives. There is no guarantee that all three will show the same winner.

Earlier in the evening, an IDP official told Fox News the party was doing “quality control checks, making sure the numbers are accurate,” adding that “people are still caucusing; we are working to report results soon.”
----

tl;dr: Results from the Democratic Iowa Caucus are late coming in, DNC is blaming an app and claiming they are currently doing "quality control."
 
Chuck Todd caught on Hot mic calling the Iowa situation an f'ing disaster (sorry for reddit link, but my download is breaking somewhere so i can't upload it)

Conspiracies are revving up
DHS offered to vet the problematic App and was turned down by the Iowa Democratic Party
The mobile app that appears to have caused problems during the Iowa presidential caucuses was built by a small Washington, D.C.-based company called Shadow Inc., the tech arm connected to nonprofit progressive digital strategy firm Acronym, according to people familiar with the matter.

State records show that the Iowa Democratic Party paid Shadow a little more than $63,000 over two payments in November and December. Shadow describes itself as a company that builds “affordable and easy-to-use tools” for progressives, according to its website.

In a statement, the Iowa Democratic Party said there had been no evidence of a hack of the app. The party hasn’t publicly disclosed the identity of the app’s creator, a decision that previously prompted alarm from cybersecurity experts.

In a statement late Monday, Acronym distanced itself from Shadow, saying it was one of a number of investors in the company. Acronym also said it was “reading confirmed reports of Shadow’s work with the Iowa Democratic Party on Twitter” and awaiting more information from the party about what had happened. Last year, Acronym’s Chief Executive Tara McGowan said it was launching Shadow as part of an acquisition of a political customer-relationship management tool.

The problems that surfaced Monday deeply frustrated party officials in Iowa, where voting was supposed to have wrapped up hours ago. Some precinct chairs struggled to transmit caucus results, according to people familiar with the situation, both via a mobile app and by a backup telephone system.

The state party said last month that it would record votes from the Iowa caucuses using the smartphone app because they said it would be easier and faster to report results from some 1,700 caucus sites.

The app was intended to help the precinct chairs record the results from each round of voting and take care of the delegate math. Then the precinct chair was supposed to use the app to send the results to the Iowa Democratic Party.

But critics expressed concern about the reliability of the app given security concerns around the 2020 elections. Cybersecurity experts also roundly criticized the Iowa Democratic Party’s decision to not identify the app maker publicly or allow it to be subject to open security and reliability testing.

The cybersecurity wing of the Department of Homeland Security recently offered to do some security testing on the app but the Iowa Democratic Party declined the outreach, according to people familiar with the matter. DHS declined to comment on the app, referring questions to the Iowa Democratic Party. After being sent multiple requests for comment, a spokeswoman for the Iowa Democratic Party said that she was checking about this and would circle back.

The state party has defended its plan, with officials saying in January that they were confident in their security systems and that if there were errors, the party would be able to correct them because there would also be paper records of the votes.

Monday’s challenges were the latest example of the perils that can result when technology is introduced to the voting process. Though digitized election equipment can often streamline vote tabulation and reporting, it introduces often unforeseen vulnerabilities that can shake public trust in the democratic process—a concern that has been top of mind for election officials since Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential contest.

Last summer, the Iowa Democratic Party dropped plans to allow voting by phone—so-called “virtual caucuses”—after the party’s national committee objected to the proposal due to security concerns.

The apparent app mishap wasn’t the first time that the Democratic Party has faced technical issues due to a vendor. In 2018 the party’s national committee had to walk back the announcement of a suspected attempt to hack its voter database after it learned the issue was a false alarm set off by a security firm that detected a phishing test built by DigiDems, a volunteer group of technology experts that does work for Democrats.

Problems began surfacing on Monday a few hours before voting started after some precinct chairs said that they had trouble downloading or logging into the app. At the time, the state Democratic Party said the reported issues so far were mainly from areas with poor cell service or involved minor user errors that were being resolved.

The state party also said that precinct chairs could call in the results over a secure phone line, which they had already set up as a backup measure. But Monday night, caucus workers reported that they were stuck on hold, some for over an hour, when they tried to phone in the results.

The state party said that their paper records would allow them to conduct a full recount if needed. They could be called upon to do that now amid the difficulties with reporting the results.

Nevada is currently planning to use a similar mobile app to record results during its caucus later this month. The Nevada State Democratic Party paid $58,000 to Shadow in August, according to Federal Election Commission records. Representatives for the Nevada State Democratic Party didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

Acronym is led by Ms. McGowan, a Democrat political strategist, and has several related arms, including a political-action committee with a roughly $75 million advertising budget to target voters in swing states.
 
Well chaps, if shit is as desperate as it looks for the dems then I suggest you look to the east...

...for beneath the Black Pyramid atop the plains of Leng, chained within its iron coffin, and bound by the blood sacrifice of Thirteen Virgin Children stolen from the Temple of Epstein, a dread evil of the ancient world stirs....sensing its hour of vengeance upon the waking world might soon be nigh, as its former cultists and slaves squabble and prey upon eachother, leaving the way wide open for its return....
avatarhill2.png
 
Last edited:
It seems odd to me that anyone would actually bother to fix the Iowa primary when, historically speaking, Iowa tends to not go to the Democrat who actually gets the nomination and goes on to the general election.
And that leads to MY conspiracy theory. Dems rigged the caucus to fail not to tank any one candidate, but so they can make the argument later to move a more 'cosmopolitan' state as the first in the nation. That way Dems can start pandering to the swing state votes that count. Dems know they're losing in the short term, but want to make a long term improvement in their ability to pick an establishment friendly, but electable, candidate.
 
JewsDidThis.jpg TroonsDidThis.jpg. How much do you want to bet that the Iowa DNC had some sort of virtue-signaling requirement that their tech vendors implement "diversity"? And that since IT swarms with troons, that a troon company got the bid?
The mobile app that appears to have caused problems during the Iowa presidential caucuses was built by a small Washington, D.C.-based company called Shadow Inc., the tech arm connected to nonprofit progressive digital strategy firm Acronym, according to people familiar with the matter.

---

Acronym is led by Ms. McGowan, a Democrat political strategist, and has several related arms, including a political-action committee with a roughly $75 million advertising budget to target voters in swing states.
[/SPOILER]
The App-maker sure looks like the kind of company who hires for diversity-points first and competence second.
 
Chuck Todd caught on Hot mic calling the Iowa situation an f'ing disaster (sorry for reddit link, but my download is breaking somewhere so i can't upload it)

Conspiracies are revving up
DHS offered to vet the problematic App and was turned down by the Iowa Democratic Party
The mobile app that appears to have caused problems during the Iowa presidential caucuses was built by a small Washington, D.C.-based company called Shadow Inc., the tech arm connected to nonprofit progressive digital strategy firm Acronym, according to people familiar with the matter.

State records show that the Iowa Democratic Party paid Shadow a little more than $63,000 over two payments in November and December. Shadow describes itself as a company that builds “affordable and easy-to-use tools” for progressives, according to its website.

In a statement, the Iowa Democratic Party said there had been no evidence of a hack of the app. The party hasn’t publicly disclosed the identity of the app’s creator, a decision that previously prompted alarm from cybersecurity experts.

In a statement late Monday, Acronym distanced itself from Shadow, saying it was one of a number of investors in the company. Acronym also said it was “reading confirmed reports of Shadow’s work with the Iowa Democratic Party on Twitter” and awaiting more information from the party about what had happened. Last year, Acronym’s Chief Executive Tara McGowan said it was launching Shadow as part of an acquisition of a political customer-relationship management tool.

The problems that surfaced Monday deeply frustrated party officials in Iowa, where voting was supposed to have wrapped up hours ago. Some precinct chairs struggled to transmit caucus results, according to people familiar with the situation, both via a mobile app and by a backup telephone system.

The state party said last month that it would record votes from the Iowa caucuses using the smartphone app because they said it would be easier and faster to report results from some 1,700 caucus sites.

The app was intended to help the precinct chairs record the results from each round of voting and take care of the delegate math. Then the precinct chair was supposed to use the app to send the results to the Iowa Democratic Party.

But critics expressed concern about the reliability of the app given security concerns around the 2020 elections. Cybersecurity experts also roundly criticized the Iowa Democratic Party’s decision to not identify the app maker publicly or allow it to be subject to open security and reliability testing.

The cybersecurity wing of the Department of Homeland Security recently offered to do some security testing on the app but the Iowa Democratic Party declined the outreach, according to people familiar with the matter. DHS declined to comment on the app, referring questions to the Iowa Democratic Party. After being sent multiple requests for comment, a spokeswoman for the Iowa Democratic Party said that she was checking about this and would circle back.

The state party has defended its plan, with officials saying in January that they were confident in their security systems and that if there were errors, the party would be able to correct them because there would also be paper records of the votes.

Monday’s challenges were the latest example of the perils that can result when technology is introduced to the voting process. Though digitized election equipment can often streamline vote tabulation and reporting, it introduces often unforeseen vulnerabilities that can shake public trust in the democratic process—a concern that has been top of mind for election officials since Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential contest.

Last summer, the Iowa Democratic Party dropped plans to allow voting by phone—so-called “virtual caucuses”—after the party’s national committee objected to the proposal due to security concerns.

The apparent app mishap wasn’t the first time that the Democratic Party has faced technical issues due to a vendor. In 2018 the party’s national committee had to walk back the announcement of a suspected attempt to hack its voter database after it learned the issue was a false alarm set off by a security firm that detected a phishing test built by DigiDems, a volunteer group of technology experts that does work for Democrats.

Problems began surfacing on Monday a few hours before voting started after some precinct chairs said that they had trouble downloading or logging into the app. At the time, the state Democratic Party said the reported issues so far were mainly from areas with poor cell service or involved minor user errors that were being resolved.

The state party also said that precinct chairs could call in the results over a secure phone line, which they had already set up as a backup measure. But Monday night, caucus workers reported that they were stuck on hold, some for over an hour, when they tried to phone in the results.

The state party said that their paper records would allow them to conduct a full recount if needed. They could be called upon to do that now amid the difficulties with reporting the results.

Nevada is currently planning to use a similar mobile app to record results during its caucus later this month. The Nevada State Democratic Party paid $58,000 to Shadow in August, according to Federal Election Commission records. Representatives for the Nevada State Democratic Party didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

Acronym is led by Ms. McGowan, a Democrat political strategist, and has several related arms, including a political-action committee with a roughly $75 million advertising budget to target voters in swing states.

Video Archive:
 
Honestly my cynical side is having a wee little meltdown right now....it just cannot bring itself to believe the democrats are this fucking stupid and incompetent and just plain obvious with the "screw bernie" spooknigger ops, and it keeps trying to reason that this might be all part of some 4D chess strategy or is just some wild coincidental clusterfuck on everyones part

I mean for fuck sake if you are this fucking incapable of rigging an election then why would you even try?!
 
Honestly my cynical side is having a wee little meltdown right now....it just cannot bring itself to believe the democrats are this fucking stupid and incompetent and just plain obvious with the "screw bernie" spooknigger ops, and it keeps trying to reason that this might be all part of some 4D chess strategy or is just some wild coincidental clusterfuck on everyones part

I mean for fuck sake if you are this fucking incapable of rigging an election then why would you even try?!
Ffs, they started trying to push Buttegg once it was clear Biden would not be pulling through; Buttegg. The guy whose literal only platform is being gay, and tbh with the American Macron vibes he gives me he might be faking being gay for all I know.

Holy hell, this is how you end up with actual communists, nice going DNC.
 
Holy hell, this is how you end up with actual communists, nice going DNC.
Either communists or the one thing worse than communists....
lol1.png


Also im calling it now, if the DNC continues against all sanity to keep this fucking farce going in a desperate effort to prevent Uncle Boiney getting the nomination, expect the usual media/activist subjects from the NYT to the SPLC and the ADL to declare that the word "rigged" is alt right berniebro code for "nigged" or some similar calibre bullshit in order to try and kill discussion of how fucking blatant this shit is
 
Last edited:
They haven't had riots break out yet, so it isn't 1968 tier yet.
Emphasis on "Yet"

If this trend continues I think there is a real good chance that Uncle Boiney supporters are going to riot, or atleast voice their anger and kick enough chairs during the convention that the dems freak out and calls in the crowd control cops and the whole thing devolves into an riot
 
So, Trump is getting two terms then?

This shit show sort of cements it in my mind.

If people don't think the Dems are incompetent they'll think they're trying to rig stuff.

I do think I know what happened with the app. It doesn't have the feature to count the votes of the dead.
 
Back