Crime French writer Gabriel Matzneff 'regrets' his paedophile sex tourism in Asia - Says no one ever told him engaging in sex with minors was a crime


PARIS (AFP) - French writer Gabriel Matzneff said in an interview on Wednesday (Jan 29) that he "regrets" his trips to Asia to have sex with children, claiming that at the time "no one ever said it was a crime".

The veteran essayist is being investigated by French police after a leading French publishing executive detailed how he abused her when she was 14 in an explosive new bestseller.

"A tourist should not behave like that," the 83-year-old told a French television channel in Italy, where he has fled to, to escape the storm the revelations stirred.

French publishing houses pulled his works from bookshops last month, a move that Matzneff has denounced.

"I find it stupid, extravagant that in 2020, I am facing grief for books I wrote more than 40 years ago," he said.

But in the new interview with BFMTV, he was more contrite.

"An adult should turn their head away and resist the temptation. Naturally, if I did something that was not good, I regret it.

"You were there as a traveller, and young boys and girls were trying to pull you in the street and jump on you under the benevolent eye of the police."

Matzneff never made any secret of his sexual preference for adolescent girls and boys and it did not stop him from winning the Renaudot prize in 2013.

He also was awarded major state honours in France.

And the writer even enjoyed a special pension and reduced rent for his apartment in a chic district of the French capital.

The case has shone a light on what many see as an overly permissive attitude towards sexual harassment and sexual abuse of children in France.

But attitudes towards the writer changed dramatically after publisher Vanessa Springora revealed her tortured relationship with him in her book Consent, published on Jan 2.

She described how Matzneff, then in his 50s, would wait for her outside school and then take her to a hotel for sex.

Matzneff denies any wrongdoing, insisting there was an "exceptional love" between him and Ms Springora. During the interview with BFMTV, he railed against the French government for threatening to take away his special pension.

But French equality minister Marlene Schiappa said the problem with Matzneff "was not what he wrote but what he did". His case has exposed "major dysfunction" in French society, she said. "There are Matzneffs everywhere, and we have to denounce them."

–End of article 1–​
Bonus excerpt
‘Like the Soviet Union’
In Les Moins de Seize Ans (“The Under 16s”), first published in 1974 and reissued in 2005, Matzneff was frank about indulging his obsession for underage partners and sex tourism.

In the 1990s, he told French television that “a very young girl is rather sweeter, even if she becomes very quickly hysterical and just as crazy as she will be when she is older.”

But attitudes toward the writer changed dramatically after Springora, now 47, revealed her tortured relationship with him in her book The Consent, published on January 2.

She described how Matzneff, then in his 50s, would wait for her outside school and then take her to a hotel for sex.

Matzneff denies any wrongdoing, insisting there was an “exceptional love” between him and Springora.

During the interview with BFMTV, Matzneff insisted: “I never said anything nasty about her, because she is a luminous person.”

But he railed against the French government for threatening to take away his special pension.

“It’s like the Soviet Union,” said the writer, whose parents were White Russian refugees.

–End of article excerpt 2–
More like "I am sorry I started receiving criticism for it"
 
Last edited:
Who would have suspected he liked fucking children with an appearance like that?
 
I'm a bit too optimistic but maybe the party will end for Roman Polanski in France.

Doubt. The French have always had a soft spot for Polanski. Sure, some progressive outlets will be outraged, as always, but it never stopped the government and private investors to sponsor his films, which are actually pretty good, if you disregard the man and his crimes.

Also, small powerlevel - back when I was in middle school, our teachers got Polanski to come with us to a private cinema to watch Oliver Twist and entertain us kids (since he happened to be the friend of quite a few parents).
And it didn’t really strike anyone as weird to have a paedophile, or rather ephebophile, to be allowed to casually sit down with 11-12 year old girls.

That’s just French society for you.
 
What is the problem with French intellectualism and pedophilia?


From your link...
They wanted...
"the decriminalization of all consensual relations between adults and minors below the age of fifteen "

The main person behind all this (Michel Foucault) claimed children were able to consent to sex with adults and "forcefully argued or defended the idea that sex with minors is a form of human liberation"
(:_(


Foucault was the first public figure in France to die of AIDS, so make of that what you will.

Even pediatric doctors were signing the petition to decriminalize sex with children!
Some even made the idiotic argument that if a young girl could be the recipient of the birth control pill, well basically it should be ok for old men to have sex with her.
 
Last edited:
Not that I disagree but there was a small but strong pedo movement in Europe at the time. Sale of child pornography was even legalized in some countries. If he immersed himself in the environment and politics of people that believed in the sexual liberation of children he probably got a bit twisted. Either way, he absolutely knew that it was wrong but people like him wanted it to be right via 'muh sexual politics!' and that group reinforced and normalized each others beliefs. Sounds familiar?
this
At one point, I think somewhere in the 70's, many european leftist parties (eg. german Greens) were pushing for normalising pedophilia the same way that in the 90's and 00's they were pushing for normalising homosexualism. As you said at the time children pornos were legal in several places in Europe (supposedly Swedish national library still has a lot of cp porn mags in their vaults because the law has them keep a copy of every publication). And then many nominally non-porn movies from that era would probably be classified as cp today due to extensive underage nudity.
Not that I'm defending the old fuck in any way, but it was more socially acceptable to diddle kids back then than it is today, and people back then were less likely to treat it as a big deal.

it makes one wonder how social norms will change in next 40-50 years, and what things that are normal now will be seen as unethical in the future. Owning pets? Being against homosexual rights? Being pro-homosexual rights? shitposting on internet?
 
I've seen people call the UK the Pedoph Isles, but reading this thread I'm really wondering what kind of shit has been buried in France.

Pulling the tangled sludge up from the shower drain that is the fashion industry of France and Italy would probably unearth some very nasty things. Brand designers and such were usually gay, photographers and other people associated with it were not. Swedish actress Malin Akerman talked about her time as a teen model in that environment and basically said it was a prostitution ring.
This is going into conspiracy theory territory, but do you think it was a coincidence that Epstein ran a "modelling" agencies for minors in the US?
Even Harvey Weinstein appears to have some common decency compared to them, only going after women of legal age.

Not that I'm defending the old fuck in any way, but it was more socially acceptable to diddle kids back then than it is today, and people back then were less likely to treat it as a big deal.

The thing is that it wasn't, it was intensely unpopular among the plebs, but fuck the plebs right, being progressive is more important. The pedo-rights movement at the time could be compared to the trans-rights right now, or immigration in certain countries, where popular/populace opinion is ignored and they are expected to grin and bear it.

edit: look up the breendoggle on how progressive people in Berkley handled a pedophile that... it's just too fucked up to describe, google it.
 
Last edited:
The thing is that it wasn't, it was intensely unpopular among the plebs, but fuck the plebs right, being progressive is more important. The pedo-rights movement at the time could be compared to the trans-rights right now, or immigration in certain countries, where popular/populace opinion is ignored and they are expected to grin and bear it.

yeah, that's what I meant. I didn't mean to imply that people were fucking kids left and right, but it was no secret some people did, and it was socially acceptable enough that even if someone was revealed to diddle kids, there was no mobs with tar and feathers knocking on his door.
Your comparison with trans rights is spot on, I mean look at that celebrity trans boy Desmond whateverhisname that they keep pushing as a celebrity. I'd assume most people are probably horrified by this freakshow circus going on around the poor kid, or at least think that this is wrong, but todays social norms are so that you aboslutely cannot criticise this, you cannot criticise putting 8 year old kids on hormone blockers, because that makes you a bigot transophobe, so most people just go along with it. I assume it was more or less similar back then with kid diddling. After all Polansky was caught having sex with a 13 year old girl, and had Hollywood rally behind him. They still rallied behind him in late 2008 or 2009 when he was facing extradition from Switzerland and a new trial over that, and only quietly abandoned him in like 2018.
 
Back