Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You make the Torah look bad.

I've actually done a lot of reading about various religions and I've read the Bible twice (I don't need to reread a book everyday to understand it.) You choose to see the scripture I view as true as false, just as I view your beliefs on religion as false. At least if I'm incorrect, I'm incorrect in favor of love and forgiveness. Unlike you who are wrong in favor of rape, slavery and violence.

And for the millionth time stuff you self publish on a site that allows anyone to post to it isn't actual "scholarship". Especially when it'ssite that is considered unreliable and a fucking joke to most people. Except people like you with unwarranted self importance, that thinks self publishing something on their means something to anyone but themselves!

No one can make The Torah look bad. Your relationship with Elohim, including your view of Their Torah, is your own responsibility. It's no one's responsibility to lead you to The Torah. It's YOUR choice whether or not to follow it.

But otherwise, I disagree about the merits and value of the site I use to self publish. I'd bet all the people who pay for subscriptions on there disagree with you too

I could quite little quote anything you've said in the last 50 pages of this thread as proof that you don't fucking think when you speak, if at all. It's hard not to doubt your fucking stupidity. If you had a single though running through you'd head, your ass would've never entered the thread. You make yourself look bad, you make Judaism and any branch or sect of it look bad, everything you touch and defend turns to garbage because you can't formulate an argument with evidence outside shit you say is true and the Torah.

Now go ham on me with that useless bachelor's degree, I'm gonna make some rice n pork

Those are still all baseless accusations. Still waiting for proof...

 

[Deadpool]

No one can make The Torah look bad. Your relationship with Elohim, including your view of Their Torah, is your own responsibility. It's no one's responsibility to lead you to The Torah. It's YOUR choice whether or not to follow it.

But otherwise, I disagree about the merits and value of the site I use to self publish. I'd bet all the people who pay for subscriptions on there disagree with you too

I'm sure people who pay to jerk themselves off, to the thought of claiming "scholarship" disagree that their bullshit is bullshit.


Really though having to pay to have it published should tell you they'll publish anything because they're being paid to

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Those are still all baseless accusations. Still waiting for proof...

How am I supposed to prove you can't shut the fuck up when you dismiss evidence of you being incapable of shutting the fuck up

 

[Viridian]

Wow, your head and your comment is one disordered uneducated mess!

1 John is not Christian in origin. It is Netzarim in origin. Learn the history of the original disciples of The Messiah and read before you speak.

Secondly, why do you persist in telling me I don't know the difference in The Torah and Tanakh? Where are you getting that from? Baseless accusations just make you look very uneducated.

Lastly, quoting a Netzarim writing (1 John) , a disciple of The Messiah, all goes back to The Torah.

Think before you speak!

You really need to take your own advice. The "Netzarim" you describe is a modern movement founded by some exceptional former Baptist minister in the 1970s. There's zero scholarly or archaeological basis for them having existed contemporaneous with the birth of Christianity. He made them up, and you're sharing the same fairy tale because you're desperate to feel special somehow. That's all there is to it.

Now, the First Epistle of John and the Gospel of John (which are different texts, though you seem to conflate them) were likely written by the same author (along with the Second and Third Epistles of John) according to textual analysis. This author is traditionally believed to be John the Evangelist, who is absolutely 100% a Christian figure. Who the author actually was (or if there was in fact a single author) is of course a matter of much fascinating scholarly debate, but in none of those debates do your special snowflake "Netzarim" come up, because they are a completely modern movement and have no relevance to the discussion of Biblical texts.

Regardless, none of the texts in the "New Testament" are considered part of the Tanakh (or Torah, as you keep erronously referring to the whole text). They are not Jewish texts. They are Christian texts. Their original language was Koine Greek, or maaaaaybe Aramaic in a few cases, never Hebrew. You're completely talking out of your ass here.

 

[Bryan Dunn]

Dude @TamarYaelBatYah what in the fuck are you talking about? Go take care of your kids or something. Take a break from your thread. We all can only handle so much crazy for one day.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You really need to take your own advice. The "Netzarim" you describe is a modern movement founded by some exceptional former Baptist minister in the 1970s. There's zero scholarly or archaeological basis for them having existed contemporaneous with the birth of Christianity. He made them up, and you're sharing the same fairy tale because you're desperate to feel special somehow. That's all there is too it.

Now, the First Epistle of John and the Gospel of John (which are different texts, though you seem to conflate them) were likely written by the same author (along with the Second and Third Epistles of John) according to textual analysis. This author is traditionally believed to be John the Evangelist, who is absolutely 100% a Christian figure. Who the author actually was (or if there was in fact a single author) is of course a matter of much fascinating scholarly debate, but in none of those debates do your special snowflake "Netzarim" come up, because they are a completely modern movement and have no relevance to the discussion of Biblical texts.

Regardless, none of the texts in the "New Testatment" are considered part of the Tanakh (or Torah, as you keep erronously referring to the whole text). They are not Jewish texts. They are Christian texts. Their original language was Koine Greek, or maaaaaybe Aramaic in a few cases, never Hebrew. You're completely talking out of your ass here.

Incorrect.

The Netzarim were the original disciples of Messiah, from the 1st century. Started long before the 1970s. They are mentioned in The Talmud as "Natsari". You can read more about them in works written by Eisenmann, Schonfeld and Ray Pritz.

If you'd do some actual research instead of just googling "Netzarim" to come up with a response to me you'll learn what "Iesou Tou Nazoraiou" really means.

The Messiah was a Jewish man born in Israel. His disciples were Jewish. Their writings are Jewish commentary on The Torah.

You're incorrect, once again

Dude @TamarYaelBatYah what in the fuck are you talking about? Go take care of your kids or something. Take a break from your thread. We all can only handle so much crazy for one day.

So you are a sexist too who assumes women aren't allowed lesiure time on the Internet, all the child care responsibility is mine as a woman, and there is no possible way someone else could be watching my children right now? Get a life loser

Dude, you're here by your own free will asking me questions and reading this thread. Leave if you don't like what I'm saying in response to your questions

 

[Viridian]

Incorrect.

The Netzarim were the original disciples of Messiah, from the 1st century. Started long before the 1970s. They are mentioned in The Talmud as "Natsari". You can read more about them in works written by Eisenmann, Schonfeld and Ray Pritz.

If you'd do some actual research instead of just googling "Netzarim" to come up with a response to me you'll learn what "Iesou Tou Nazoraiou" really means.

The Messiah was a Jewish man born in Israel. His disciples were Jewish. Their writings are Jewish commentary on The Torah.

You're incorrect, once again

Garbage an exceptional former Baptist minister posted on a vanity website doesn't count as scholarly or archaeological evidence. I challenge you to find something outside of the self-publishing zone, something from an actual peer-reviewed journal, supporting your imaginary "Netzarim" (as you describe them as the "original" followers of Jesus, not just as references/words for "branches" or the like). I bet you can't.

Oh, and for anyone curious, here is the exceptional former Baptist minister in question, who claims to have "reconstructed" original Hebrew New Testament texts (that never actually existed but that didn't stop him!). Even his website design is exceptional (and stuck in the late-90s Geocities look).

 

[Deadpool]

Incorrect.

The Netzarim were the original disciples of Messiah, from the 1st century. Started long before the 1970s. They are mentioned in The Talmud as "Natsari". You can read more about them in works written by Eisenmann, Schonfeld and Ray Pritz.

If you'd do some actual research instead of just googling "Netzarim" to come up with a response to me you'll learn what "Iesou Tou Nazoraiou" really means.

The Messiah was a Jewish man born in Israel. His disciples were Jewish. Their writings are Jewish commentary on The Torah.

You're incorrect, once again

How can some one as stupid as you, who is as wrong as about everything the way you are, be so smug? Oh yeah you're the living embodiment of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

How can some one as stupid as you, who are wrong as about everything the way you are be so smug? Oh yeah you're the living embodiment of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Baseless accusations

Hey, here's an idea: get some.education and facts before you speak. You're still stuck in moron mode

Garbage an exceptional former Baptist minister posted on a vanity website doesn't count as scholarly or archaeological evidence. I challenge you to find something outside of the self-publishing zone, something from an actual peer-reviewed journal, supporting your imaginary "Netzarim" (as you describe them as the "original" followers of Jesus, not just as references/words for "branches" or the like). I bet you can't.

Oh, and for anyone curious, here is the exceptional former Baptist minister in question, who claims to have "reconstructed" original Hebrew texts (that never actually existed but that didn't stop him!). Even his website design is exceptional (and stuck in the late-90s Geocities look).

One site out of many. Your point?


Hey dummy, I already answered you. Are you that illiterate?

Go read Schonfeld, Pritz and Eisenmann's work. Read before you speak!

 

[Fannyscum]

there is no possible way someone else could be watching my children right now?

Someone that isn't a violent, inbred, idiot rapist?

 

[Viridian]

Baseless accusations

Hey, here's an idea: get some.education and facts before you speak. You're still stuck in moron mode




One site out of many. Your point?


Hey dummy, I already answered you. Are you that illiterate?

Go read Schonfeld, Pritz and Eisenmann's work. Read before you speak!

Look, I get that you exceptional wannabe special snowflakes have been pushing this lie for years, shitting up Wikipedia article talk threads at least since the early 2000s trying to "fake news" your way into legitimacy, but it's not going to work. Oh, and the link I posted earlier was from the website created by Clint Van Nest himself. Straight from the source.

Rattling off a few last names without context isn't evidence, fivehead. Full names, names of the books they've written or the articles they've had accepted to peer-reviewed journals on relevant topics, scholarly credentials... you're the one making the exceptional claim, surely you can at least point me at an Amazon link for their self-published dreck?

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Baseless accusations

Hey, here's an idea: get some.education and facts before you speak. You're still stuck in moron mode




One site out of many. Your point?


Hey dummy, I already answered you. Are you that illiterate?

Go read Schonfeld, Pritz and Eisenmann's work. Read before you speak!

Are you mentally ill or disabled?
I ask this genuinely. It's the only explanation I can form to explain your idiocy besides you being a failed abortion and an incest baby.

 

[Deadpool]

Baseless accusations

Hey, here's an idea: get some.education and facts before you speak. You're still stuck in moron mode

No, their not baseless, but it would be counter productive to quote every post you've made to show your stupidity. Oh I found a picture of dinner time at your house. Your family looks happy!

 

[Bryan Dunn]

So you are a sexist too who assumes women aren't allowed lesiure time on the Internet, all the child care responsibility is mine as a woman, and there is no possible way someone else could be watching my children right now? Get a life loser

Dude, you're here by your own free will asking me questions and reading this thread. Leave if you don't like what I'm saying in response to your questions

Sorry I'm not Nick Fuentes but if you want to keep doing this dance than have fun?

 

[Cheerlead-in-Chief]

She should mate with an animal at this point, the animal would treat her better than Mitchell ever could.
Jesus despite having half human righteous rage at the Market at the once Holy temple was overall loving in the Bible.
Then again, her toilet paper Torah allows her to stew in her hatred and failure to properly file a lolsuit.

 

[Cow Poly]

Is it even proven she has read the Torah or practices? I was simply mocking her in my last post by stating a passage but I doubt she even knew it existed tbh.

@TamarYaelBatYah has read the Torah. We know she can read. She’s probably read it countless times. It’s reading comprehension where she is lacking or voided completely.

 

[Adamska]

How on earth do you correlate the word "set apart" with not learning to cook or write a resume?

And how on earth do you correlate women using the internet with child neglect?

Or you just like to throw around baseless accusations as some sort of sickness in you?

Here's an idea: Why don't you go get some education and then open your mouth? You have the mouth of a fool.

In this order:

1. Those are valid life skills I bet you never taught them since you yourself at least would fail one of those.
2. You lurk on here for most of your waking day besides posting. Ergo it is reasonable to state you regularly neglect your kids because of your narcissism and stupidity if it's this easy to keep you from them.
3. It's not baseless given you still live with a confirmed abuser and rapist by your own words. No goalpost shifting or rationalization changes this. You openly admit that at any point that insecure little retarded manlet will probably kill another kid like Bradley when his ego can't take anymore.
4. Get educated is tardspeak for "FUCKING AGREE WITH ME! REEE!", especially since it's confirmed you're a dumb jobless thot who projects her own tardery on others and has cripplingly bad cases of narcissism and duning-kruger.

 

[Chad Nasty]

You know, I gotta hand it to her. She's got a lotta gumption to be this involved with the thread.

 

[Spergichu]

Baseless accusations

Hey, here's an idea: get some.education and facts before you speak. You're still stuck in moron mode

Do... do you even know what the Dunning-Kruger Effect is?

 

[redcent]

So you read from beginning to end huh? Your reading comprehension is very poor then.

In case you didn't notice...no wait, you didn't notice: I didn't write the original article. The person who wrote it (my husband's vindictive ex wife) put MY VAGINA on trial from the start.

Am I the one then responsible for Kiwi Farms discussing what I do with my own damn vagina? The answer is a big resounding NO.

Secondly, Kiwi Farms users then turned the attention onto MY labia and MY sex life. In case you didn't notice...no wait, you didn't...I never brought any of it up.

Thirdly, if you blush and get creeped out by simple words like vagina, dick, penis, BDSM, labia, and rape then maybe you are the one who needs sex therapy because nothing I've said is extreme at all. Trust me, I've spared lots of details

Fourthly, there is nothing dirty about having a public discussion about the moral philosophy of sex and the theology that relates to it. Everything I've said has been within a scholastic context. I enjoy scholastic debate about The Torah and moral philosophy, on all subjects, sex included.

Lastly, I don't believe I need therapy. I believe that you have not explored or studied moral philosophy and The Torah and you are experiencing the pain of walking to the edge of your cage to see the light shining in




I respect that you cited an article, but the article you posted on supports my view. Orthodox Jews don't actually follow The Torah, so yes, their babies would have health issues. Remember, I did not say being a Jew prevented illness, I said *following The Torah* means your baby will be born 100% healthy. Orthodox Jews follow The Talmud, not The Torah. They promote sexism, Polygyny and Brit Milah....all of which The Torah does not condone.


For your questions about my children and who is dad to them....

My children that were born to me before I married Marshall have all been adopted by Marshall. Marshall is their REAL dad. He is the only dad child #2 through #5 has ever known. My first child did call my first husband dad when he was very small but he has no memory of it or that person. That particular person had his visitation rights terminated by a Court (a course of action I also believe to have been best for them)

Whoever conceives a child doesn't determine who is their dad (or mom) for life. Everyone has a psychological (spiritual) parent or parents too.

Before I married Marshall my children saw themselves as one family clan under me. They had no idea that they were a blended family, they simply loved each other as siblings. Then I married Marshall and our family grew. They see themselves all as our children under our marriage. We are all bound together by Torah. It's really beautiful how Elohim redeemed the whole family into one clan under Torah


I don't think I have secluded them from life. Instead, I see it that I have created a set apart life for them, out of the world.

I also don't think my life is a nightmare. I am blessed, according to definitions in The Torah





I'm sure ...because you're not stating the correct sequence of events. For one, I NEVER tried to convince any of my ex-family of my beliefs. One, because I don't believe in converting people. I believe that The Elect and The Righteous don't need conversion, they will be called by The Father. For two, I don't think most of the people in my ex-family are even worthy of eternal life, they can rot in hell for all I care.

They measure life by worldly standards, not scripture, so they couldn't even recognize a righteous person from an evil one. As it is written, "woe to you who call evil "good"..."

Secondly, I cut them off long before I married Marshall and long before I had broken up with several guys.

Lastly, I keep records of the wrongs people have done to me. I know the dates and actions, because they are all written down. 4 of the 6 women in my ex-family have attacked me out of envy. 2 of them because they were envious of my homebirths while they got scissored up in C Sections, thats when their attacks escalated. 4 of them when I returned to college ....they are pathologically envious of anyone they see as smarter than them, so they make verbally abusive comments. As it is written, "the fool wants and doesn't have". 2 of them are just worldly. Instead of being happy for me when I do something well they prefer to be verbally abuse to assuage their envy. I have zero tolerance for verbal abuse and I prefer to raise my own family free of that toxicity.

My life and my personal well being has proven to be better without them.

I do have one Aunt though that never verbally or physically attacked me. She has a Master's degree ...and we got along.

why do I interpret this as melinda accusing two innocent women who had to get a c section as having to do so because of being evil and sinful and when the two told her to piss off she screeched that they were just jelly of her uncared for litter she pops out and ran off instead of handling disagreements like an adult, particularly with family?

Sarah has a baby in her 90s (Book of Genesis) and Elizabeth had a baby in her old age (Book of Luke). My personal opinion is that Rebekah was around 40 when she carries Esau and Jacob because she didn't have any more children after that (ie menopausal). (Israelite/Hebrew women didn't use birth control of any kind)

Point being, their stories show that being Righteous and following The Torah results in a healthy baby.

Pretty heady to consider yourself as blessed as someone in the Torah to have magic non-tard-baby making abilities as them at old age. What makes you think you're so special

You know, deep down in the depths of my chink skull, I like to think she's just fucking with us and is really dedicated to the bit, but with how goddamn exceptional she is a lose faith in humanity and YHWH day to day.

I am wondering if melinda is in fact an euphoric atheist larping as a mountain jew on order to shit on religion. It wouldn't surprise me.

You're interacting with other humans using a plastic box and you're worried about ME being schizophrenic?

I don't buy into everything psychology says, some of it contradicts Scripture....so even if I was (and never have been diagnosed btw) it wouldn't bother me. There's evidence in Scripture that Tzaddikim displayed traits of schizophrenia.

I've never read your thread. I could though. But I disagree that this is just a humor site. It has a much deeper demonic purpose. I believe Satan has used The Stalker and Kiwi Farms to try to attack my husband and I.

And I am also wondering if satan himself is using melinda to make a mockery out of all things Holy

Heck if anyone is demon possessed I'd say it's this chick right here