Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

[Wally Balljacker]

Absolutely not. I believe I discussed Franklin inmy Noble Phenotypes thread on The Apricity. If not, I will soon.

My mistake. I should have known that something like this could have only been written by a sexual conservative.

 

[CatParty]

For those of you who insist on telling me that my theories have no "backing" no "evidence" or whatever other bullshit you keep trying to spew, I will explain why you are wrong for once and for all.

All of your criticisms of me are based on the assumption that whatever is found in "official" sources is good, and whatever is found in "unofficial" sources is bad. You seem to have an especially great fetish for "peer-reviewed journals". All of this is nonsensical. Academia is simply a qualification circle-jerk over who can be the most QUALIFIED and who can have the most SCIENMAGISTICAL PAPERZ. You have to remember that academic institutions are first and foremost MONEY-MAKING ORGANIZATIONS and POLITICAL organizations. Academia is governed not by science, but by money and politics.

This is why they charge innocent students 50000 dollars per year for a piece of scienmajistikal paper. Does having this paper make them any smarter than the person who can not afford to pay 50,000 dollars per year to learn about feminism, diversity studies and queer studies? These are REQUIRED CLASSES now. And politics has infected the education of our young children as well. No longer are they learning to multiply and divide. Instead, they are learning to ponder the philosophical implications of the strawberry-picking escapades and school play ticket sales of Tyrone, Chung-Lei, Kumardeep, Eagle Talon, Ahmed, Rosita, and M'banwenge'. Meanwhile, these institutions are siphoning millions of dollars off of the school to get these required books, just like psychopathic inbred bankers siphon money off of us to get required bank loans so we can go to colleges and learn about strawberry picking and intersectionality.

And yet, even after knowing all of this, you STILL insist that I am somehow "less qualified" than these strawberry-pickers, and that my opinions are somehow less valid. You'd have to be far more insane than I am if you think what they say even merits consideration.

where do you go to school? yo ucould fix all of this by proving you go to one of the better schools. or maybe you cna tell us where you went to high school. you are just giving us baseless words if we do not know where you are coming from.

also if degrees are so useless why are you even going to college?

 

[AnimuGinger]

Your opinions are less valid because your evidence doesn't hold up to criticism by an outside party.

And my school is only 10k a year. And doesn't require I learn about diversity. Did you get rejected by your dream school and it made you bitter?

 

[Durable Mike Malloy]

For those of you who insist on telling me that my theories have no "backing" no "evidence" or whatever other bullshit you keep trying to spew, I will explain why you are wrong for once and for all.

All of your criticisms of me are based on the assumption that whatever is found in "official" sources is good, and whatever is found in "unofficial" sources is bad. You seem to have an especially great fetish for "peer-reviewed journals". All of this is nonsensical. Academia is simply a qualification circle-jerk over who can be the most QUALIFIED and who can have the most SCIENMAGISTICAL PAPERZ. You have to remember that academic institutions are first and foremost MONEY-MAKING ORGANIZATIONS and POLITICAL organizations. Academia is governed not by science, but by money and politics.

This is why they charge innocent students 50000 dollars per year for a piece of scienmajistikal paper. Does having this paper make them any smarter than the person who can not afford to pay 50,000 dollars per year to learn about feminism, diversity studies and queer studies? These are REQUIRED CLASSES now. And politics has infected the education of our young children as well. No longer are they learning to multiply and divide. Instead, they are learning to ponder the philosophical implications of the strawberry-picking escapades and school play ticket sales of Tyrone, Chung-Lei, Kumardeep, Eagle Talon, Ahmed, Rosita, and M'banwenge'. Meanwhile, these institutions are siphoning millions of dollars off of the school to get these required books, just like psychopathic inbred bankers siphon money off of us to get required bank loans so we can go to colleges and learn about strawberry picking and intersectionality.

And yet, even after knowing all of this, you STILL insist that I am somehow "less qualified" than these strawberry-pickers, and that my opinions are somehow less valid. You'd have to be far more insane than I am if you think what they say even merits consideration.

Less whining, more lore.

 

[JU 199]

All of your criticisms of me are based on the assumption that whatever is found in "official" sources is good, and whatever is found in "unofficial" sources is bad. You seem to have an especially great fetish for "peer-reviewed journals". All of this is nonsensical. Academia is simply a qualification circle-jerk over who can be the most QUALIFIED and who can have the most SCIENMAGISTICAL PAPERZ. You have to remember that academic institutions are first and foremost MONEY-MAKING ORGANIZATIONS and POLITICAL organizations. Academia is governed not by science, but by money and politics.

And yet, even after knowing all of this, you STILL insist that I am somehow "less qualified" than these strawberry-pickers, and that my opinions are somehow less valid. You'd have to be far more insane than I am if you think what they say even merits consideration.

You don't understand how the scientific method works. Why are we supposed to take your ridiculous assertions seriously?

 

[Sigma]

Peer review means that it has been looked over by other people in your field. It tends to be extensively tested by others and known as reliable. With you, you just came up with an idea and you accept it as fact and you think of actual scientists as knowing jack about science.

 

[DuskEngine]

No longer are they learning to multiply and divide. Instead, they are learning to ponder the philosophical implications of the strawberry-picking escapades and school play ticket sales of Tyrone, Chung-Lei, Kumardeep, Eagle Talon, Shlomo, Ahmed, Rosita, and M'banwenge'.

wow i have no idea how anyone here could accuse you of racism dude

 

[Ruin]

He might actually be legit. Most trolls would have gotten bored by now.

 

[José Mourinho]

For those of you who insist on telling me that my theories have no "backing" no "evidence" or whatever other bullshit you keep trying to spew, I will explain why you are wrong for once and for all.

All of your criticisms of me are based on the assumption that whatever is found in "official" sources is good, and whatever is found in "unofficial" sources is bad. You seem to have an especially great fetish for "peer-reviewed journals". All of this is nonsensical. Academia is simply a qualification circle-jerk over who can be the most QUALIFIED and who can have the most SCIENMAGISTICAL PAPERZ. You have to remember that academic institutions are first and foremost MONEY-MAKING ORGANIZATIONS and POLITICAL organizations. Academia is governed not by science, but by money and politics.

This is why they charge innocent students 50000 dollars per year for a piece of scienmajistikal paper. Does having this paper make them any smarter than the person who can not afford to pay 50,000 dollars per year to learn about feminism, diversity studies and queer studies? These are REQUIRED CLASSES now. And politics has infected the education of our young children as well. No longer are they learning to multiply and divide. Instead, they are learning to ponder the philosophical implications of the strawberry-picking escapades and school play ticket sales of Tyrone, Chung-Lei, Kumardeep, Eagle Talon, Shlomo, Ahmed, Rosita, and M'banwenge'. Meanwhile, these institutions are siphoning millions of dollars off of the school to get these required books, just like psychopathic inbred bankers siphon money off of us to get required bank loans so we can go to colleges and learn about strawberry picking and intersectionality.

And yet, even after knowing all of this, you STILL insist that I am somehow "less qualified" than these strawberry-pickers, and that my opinions are somehow less valid. You'd have to be far more insane than I am if you think what they say even merits consideration.

Translation: Evidence is the tool of the patriarchal/matriarchal privileged nonsensical greedy scientists who exist to oppress these poor less-privileged SlutHaters. Check your SlutHating privilege, shitlord!

So basically by your logic, fat people are oppressed because of political greedy scientists making shit up to oppress fat people because of their weight, leading to serious issues such as thin priviledge. Oh wait that happened before...

 

[Dalcon]

You do realize however that even if we buy into your bizarre views on university credentials you haven't really provided any "backing" or "evidence" for your skullology theory beyond some weird pictures of faces and even an weirder take on evolutionary theory? Plus the racism of course, but that isn't evidence of anything other than you being a racist.

 

[Dalcon]

He might actually be legit. Most trolls would have gotten bored by now.

We also used to say that about a certain individual who is dear to many of us here on the forum.

 

[JU 199]

He might actually be legit. Most trolls would have gotten bored by now.

@Amud are you a deep cover troll?

 

[Wally Balljacker]

For those of you who insist on telling me that my theories have no "backing" no "evidence" or whatever other bullshit you keep trying to spew, I will explain why you are wrong for once and for all.

You have the floor sir. I'm willing to see you finally post evidence we've only been asking you for for 40 pages now.

All of your criticisms of me are based on the assumption that whatever is found in "official" sources is good, and whatever is found in "unofficial" sources is bad. You seem to have an especially great fetish for "peer-reviewed journals". All of this is nonsensical. Academia is simply a qualification circle-jerk over who can be the most QUALIFIED and who can have the most SCIENMAGISTICAL PAPERZ. You have to remember that academic institutions are first and foremost MONEY-MAKING ORGANIZATIONS and POLITICAL organizations. Academia is governed not by science, but by money and politics.

Oh, I see. That explains everything.

Except that there are very good reasons why peer review is not only a good thing, but a working system for weeding out bad science. It's almost like you're ignoring anything contradictory to your own backwards beliefs and only sticking to things that confirm your biases. They need a name for that kind of thinking.

This is why they charge innocent students 50000 dollars per year for a piece of scienmajistikal paper. Does having this paper make them any smarter than the person who can not afford to pay 50,000 dollars per year to learn about feminism, diversity studies and queer studies? These are REQUIRED CLASSES now. And politics has infected the education of our young children as well. No longer are they learning to multiply and divide. Instead, they are learning to ponder the philosophical implications of the strawberry-picking escapades and school play ticket sales of Tyrone, Chung-Lei, Kumardeep, Eagle Talon, Ahmed, Rosita, and M'banwenge'. Meanwhile, these institutions are siphoning millions of dollars off of the school to get these required books, just like psychopathic inbred bankers siphon money off of us to get required bank loans so we can go to colleges and learn about strawberry picking and intersectionality.

You know that paper is a shorthand way of signifying that you've spent numerous hours studying your field right? You'd know this is you bumped up beyond community college. Most people grow out of the "it's only a piece of paper" mentality after their high school years. Sure, college isn't for everyone, but that doesn't mean subscribing to the Tumblr notion that internet circlejerk communities are somehow more informed is a good substitute for proper acadamia.

And yet, even after knowing all of this, you STILL insist that I am somehow "less qualified" than these strawberry-pickers, and that my opinions are somehow less valid. You'd have to be far more insane than I am if you think what they say even merits consideration.

Dude, you shove condoms up your nose as DIY cosmetic surgery.

 

[Coldgrip]

I don't have the evidence or time to come up with a length explanation and there's to point in reinventing the wheel, so I'm just going to post this link to a thread where a friendly poster has compiled a big list of evidence that argues against the Out of Africa theory. For the record, I'm not totally convinced. I lean more to the side of the Multiregional model, but I am still more or less agnostic on the matter.
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?162942-Skulgrimen-checking-in

FTFY.

Nice racism bro.

 

[MerriedManJr]

@Amud are you a deep cover troll?

If he was, he wouldn't tell you. Why not just enjoy the ride?

 

[TonySnark]

50,000 year old European


Can you pinpoint where the "replacement out of Africa" occurred? Because I sure can't. I see a continuous gradient of changing skeletal characteristics. They're always telling us humans came out of Africa, but I'm not seeing a sharp change in the phenotype of Europeans from "Neanderthal" to "Human" that would correspond with this migration.

Would you happen to be in New England?

If so, I know a fine gentleman in Massachusets that you would be great friends with. He also has a thing for skeletons and making sure the races don't marry. He is, in fact, the leader of a whole federation of like minded individuals.

 

[Arctic]

@Amud, I have to admit I was wrong about composers. Not all of them are chads. After long hours of analysis, I have concluded that Mozart and Beethoven are actually part of the ignoble potatid race, rendering all of their contributions to civilization void (pay special attention to Mozart's ignoble chin). Richard Wagner however, is still 100% Chad, as can be seen by his massive jaw and downward-pointed eyebrows.

Spoiler: LOOK AT THE CHARTS

 

[TM Ambrose]

You have to remember that academic institutions are first and foremost MONEY-MAKING ORGANIZATIONS and POLITICAL organizations.

Wrong in this assertion. Scientific credibility isn't based on money or politics. Yes independent organizations work on scientific pursuits but they have to be verified by opposing sources.

Does having this paper make them any smarter than the person who can not afford to pay 50,000 dollars per year to learn about feminism, diversity studies and queer studies?

Basic sociology and psychology are required but if you're in a scientific field gender studies and political geography aren't required. You'd know this if you actually knew anything about college beside the money. Also if you're good enough people will pay for you to go.

No longer are they learning to multiply and divide. Instead, they are learning to ponder the philosophical implications of the strawberry-picking escapades and school play ticket sales of Tyrone, Chung-Lei, Kumardeep, Eagle Talon, Shlomo, Ahmed, Rosita, and M'banwenge'.

Tell that to my calc class....
Also do you understand what a major is? I don't think you do. Also most scientist have a doctorate or a graduate degree beyond a Bachelors.

And yet, even knowing all of this, you STILL insist that I am somehow "less qualified" than these strawberry-pickers, and that my opinions are somehow less valid.

You are less qualified because you're uneducated in basic epistemology along with anything dealing with biological sciences. You've proven you don't understand collegiate education because you apparently believe everyone has to take polisci classes even though they don't. You obviously weren't able to have your college paid for and now are trying to make up for it like everybody who is insecure by saying you don't need it. An educated opinion is more significant than an uneducated opinion. I'd trust a doctor to treat cancer more than I'd trust you. You obviously don't understand why scientific journals exists, but I can tell you that organizations typically aren't allowed to publish their own papers, and if they are they are typically verified by an outside source. The paper I got published was a repeat of an experiment done by Oceana and I wasn't paid by Oceana or any related organization. Guess what? I got similar results.

 

[Rammspieler]

Is it just me, or do all his phenotype classifications sound like shit either from phrenology books of the 19th century something from Tumblr? I always read "potatid ethnikid" as "Potatohead Otherkin".

 

[Coldgrip]

...incel.

I keep hearing this word and every time I try and look it up I can't find anything. Can you direct me to it's wiki page?

Otherwise I'll have to conclude that it's just made up bullshit created by sad, lonely, borderline racist neckbeards as an excuse to why they can't get a date.

Please post pics of your dog. We want to know if they're alright.