Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

[AnimuGinger]

But why would we ask you about any of those things? You apparently have no real knowledge of any such things.

Your comment about mercury shows you know nothing about vaccines and immunology.

Your comment about gold coins shows you know nothing about economics.

Your comments about higher education shows you know nothing about the peer review process and the scientific method.

Everything you say about about anthropology is highly suspect because you dismiss multiple lines of convincing, replicable evidence in favour of your own demonstrably wrong idea of human lineage based on no other proof than "because I said so!!!"

Everything you say screams ignorance. It'd be like if I showed up at a NASA conference and said "hey smartypants scientists, if the earth is round like you say, how come we don't fall off the bottom?" Every topic you expound upon shows you have no knowledge of the underlying principles.

In short, we doubt your ideas because your ideas are easy to prove wrong.

No, his proof is that academia is poison. That is how all of his ideas on anthropology and right and ours are wrong.

This sentiment is also shared by many feminists. Irony.

 

[Coldgrip]

If you have any questions about RELEVANT things (sexual dynamics,...

Shit you know nothing about.

...the science of faces and skulls, anthropology, archaeology...

Your blatantly racist views you attempt to justify with pseudoscience bullshit.

...politics, etc.)

Why do I get the feeling that you'd of voted for Pat Buchanan?

I will be happy to answer them.

Post pictures of your dog condom snorter.

 

[Sandwichu]

I have been reading some posts on this thread, and i don't need an expensive degree or the blessed genetics of a nobilid individual no aknowdlege that Mr. Amud's beahivor is typical of a class-III lolcow.
One question remains. Does Amud expect to cheat nature by feigning a nobilid phenotype?

 

[MerriedManJr]

I think it's all a bunch of nonsense, the product of scienmajustikal academics with nothing better to do than lecture our students about intersectionality and how to design inclusive, non-triggering video games.

But do you support #gamergate? Do you watch every Sargon video, retweet everything by Total Biscuit, and accuse people of being SJW shills on an hourly basis?

 

[Marvin]

Okay, from now on, I am done responding to posts about the following:

*challenging my credentials or scientific knowledge
*LE CONDOM SNORTER xD
*why are you racist/sexist/autistic/etc.

If you have any questions about RELEVANT things (sexual dynamics, the science of faces and skulls, anthropology, archaeology, politics, etc.) I will be happy to answer them.

Aren't your credentials at the center of all your claims? That seems to be the most relevant thing to discuss, actually.

 

[TM Ambrose]

Okay, from now on, I am done responding to posts about the following:

*challenging my credentials or scientific knowledge
*LE CONDOM SNORTER xD
*why are you racist/sexist/autistic/etc.

If you have any questions about RELEVANT things (sexual dynamics, the science of faces and skulls, anthropology, archaeology, politics, etc.) I will be happy to answer them.

Condom snorter do you know where you are?

Also you never answered these post to begin with except with stuff that boils down to "because i say so". If you want to have any credibility you should actually backup your fucking claims. You claim credibility when an actual scientist calls you on your shit, and your only defense is "i know as much as any scientist", not only an untrue statement but one that is narcissistic and pretty fucking out there.

 

[Positron]

I think it's all a bunch of nonsense, the product of scienmajustikal academics with nothing better to do than lecture our students about intersectionality and how to design inclusive, non-triggering video games.

Anita Earrings has nothing to do with science, academics or "scienmajustikal academics".

As Sun Zhu says, "know your enemies".

 

[Wolf Fetuses]

I think women should learn to appreciate me more. I've already done my part of the burden by contributing so much to our body of scientific knowledge.

I know this is from a few pages back but I've been at college/sleeping for the past 18 hours and this is too golden for me to not dig up again... inb4 "Late" ratings, I know.

The NCR process involves using a toothpick to push a finger cot into the nasal turbinates. There are no condoms or snorting involved.

You're saying this like it would be less insane than snorting a condom. First, toothpicks are made of wood. They are porous, nearly impossible to sterilise fully and can harbour massive amounts of bacteria. At the top of your nasal passage is a bunch of nerves connecting your nose to your brain. If these get infected, it can put pressure on the brain. Would be shame for a superior intellect such as yourself to become a dribbling vegetable as a result of narcissism.

Anyway, I got more questions. @Amud, do you make any attempt to sterilise your equipment at all? How? Do you perform this procedure in your home? Have you observed any changes in the structure of your skull since beginning treatment? If the hormones of "sluts" and "chads" supposedly have such a big effect on the structure of the skull, why not just buy hormone injections off the black market?
Also, on a different note, what would you look for in a potential mate?

*challenging my credentials or scientific knowledge

"Other than my questionable world views, I have no credible evidence for the bullshit science I made up, so please stop asking me about it"

 

[JU 199]

*challenging my credentials or scientific knowledge
*LE CONDOM SNORTER xD
*why are you racist/sexist/autistic/etc.

@Amud -

• Where did you obtain your credentials and scientific knowledge?
• Why do you snort condoms?
• Why are you racist, sexist and autistic?

 

[Durable Mike Malloy]

STOP SAYING I SNORT CONDOMS, you are slandering me. The NCR process involves using a toothpick to push a finger cot into the nasal turbinates. There are no condoms or snorting involved.

Okay, from now on, I am done responding to posts about the following:

*challenging my credentials or scientific knowledge
*LE CONDOM SNORTER xD
*why are you racist/sexist/autistic/etc.

If you have any questions about RELEVANT things (sexual dynamics, the science of faces and skulls, anthropology, archaeology, politics, etc.) I will be happy to answer them.

This is a good example of a post that I consider useless and will not be answering.

(yes, I did technically answer it, but only to use it as an example of a useless post)

I think it's all a bunch of nonsense, the product of scienmajustikal academics with nothing better to do than lecture our students about intersectionality and how to design inclusive, non-triggering video games.

These posts are all deficient in lore. One begins to doubt your status as Neandertal loremaster.

 

[Ruin]

How disappoint are your parents that they raised a racist who posts pictures of himself snorting condoms online?

 

[Fwiffo]

I always lol at these @Holden and @Amud types who wax lyrical about these grand plans for society and that prosperity is JUST around the corner as soon as those nasty Chads/Rape Apes/what-have-you are out of the way. Oh wait, they have zero requisite achievements of their own? Well those damn ignobilids keep taking our jobs/women!!

 

[Amud]

Okay, so this thread is about a weird guy who shoves condoms up his nose? He also has misoginistic views on women apparently, and he's actually on the thread responding to things people post.

I guess it's better late than never to join the thread.

I like how he claims that it's abnormal to snort condoms, but it's perfectly fine to shove them up his nose with a toothpick. That's kind of like saying that it's fine to smoke cocaine but it's not fine to snort it.

I appreciate your interest and will do my best to explain what is happening here.

1. I do not shove condoms up my nose. I shove finger cots up my nose and inflate them with a sphygmonometer bulb.
2. I do not have misogynistic views on women.
3. Yes, I am responding to select queries. I have already explained which types of queries that I will not be responding to.

I have been reading some posts on this thread, and i don't need an expensive degree or the blessed genetics of a nobilid individual no aknowdlege that Mr. Amud's beahivor is typical of a class-III lolcow.
One question remains. Does Amud expect to cheat nature by feigning a nobilid phenotype?

I have a relatively Nobilid phenotype as it is.

Anita Earrings has nothing to do with science, academics or "scienmajustikal academics".

As Sun Zhu says, "know your enemies".

She's another branch of the same tree.

 

[José Mourinho]

1. I do not shove condoms up my nose. I shove finger cots up my nose and inflate them with a sphygmonometer bulb.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_cot

A finger cot[1] (also finger frock or finger stall,[1] informally finger condom) is a medical supply used to cover one or more fingers in situations where a full glove is unnecessary. Like medical and rubber gloves, finger cots may be made from a variety of water-tight materials including latex, nitrile rubber, and vinyl.

They are used in medicine to limit patient exposure to infection, and to protect health professionals from contact with bodily fluids that can transmit disease. Finger cots can be used in a wide scope of medical procedures and examinations, for example, when applying a topical medication or during digital rectal examination.[2] Finger cots may be used when bandaging a finger to secure the dressing and keep it dry. The term "fyngyr stalle" was recorded in 1483; "cot" has been used since 1617.[1] Early stalls were usually made of leather.[3

 

[Atsimuel]

I think it's all a bunch of nonsense, the product of scienmajustikal academics with nothing better to do than lecture our students about intersectionality and how to design inclusive, non-triggering video games.

Whoah, slow down with your big words there mr. clever. We be just simple farm folk with none of your fancy community college book-learning.

Seriously though, is that a thing, or did you just make it up?

 

[JU 199]

@Amud

2. I do not have misogynistic views on women.

Yes you do

3. Yes, I am responding to select queries. I have already explained which types of queries that I will not be responding to.

Why do you shove condoms up your nose?

 

[Fwiffo]

@Amud why should anybody listen to what you have to say? What advancements have your writings fostered?

 

[TM Ambrose]

I like how this guy won't say anything directly too me. Shows that he really stands behind his work and isn't a coward. But it's fine. He can yell about how the condoms he shoves up his nose aren't condoms while the real scientist contribute to society.

 

[Coldgrip]

This is a good example of a post that I consider useless and will not be answering.

(yes, I did technically answer it, but only to use it as an example of a useless post)

This my dear Kiwis is a fine example of a buttmad lolcow. Note how he says he won't answer yet he still does and then attempts to justify it by saying he's just "pointing it out". A tactic often used by attention whores and those with cranial deformities, they insist that people conform to their demands or they'll stop answering questions and leave the internets forever. Only to come back less than a day later (and often times only in a matter of minutes) to respond and "set the facts straight". This always turns out badly for the lolcow and only results in more slanderous mockeries from kiwis and crying from overly sensitive cows having their egos crushed.

 

[Ruin]

The first twenty Google results for "Phrenology" all state that it is pseudoscience that has been completely debunked. Why should I believe you over any of those sources?