Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sluthate, is mostly a troll site with a lot of truth in between. The guys simply want to be attractive and there is nothing wrong with that. Did you guys know that females consider 80% of men below average. Go lurk that site and eventually you'll get it. It's not as bad as you guys are making it seem.
 
@AMOGGED sent me his picture after I asked him. I promised I wouldn't post, and I won't - I'm not a liar. That's a shame though, because I think we'd all agree that he's actually, even speaking objectively, very good looking. Maybe we could have drilled it into his head that it's his personality that's the problem when it comes to women.

(I did a google image search, and it doesn't look like it was stolen from anywhere, so I'm assuming it's genuinely him)

Post it.
 
@AMOGGED sent me his picture after I asked him. I promised I wouldn't post, and I won't - I'm not a liar. That's a shame though, because I think we'd all agree that he's actually, even speaking objectively, very good looking. Maybe we could have drilled it into his head that it's his personality that's the problem when it comes to women.

(I did a google image search, and it doesn't look like it was stolen from anywhere, so I'm assuming it's genuinely him)


Quoted for truth.
 
@All the Loveshies, what did you expect to achieve by coming here? Were you just trying to rescue @Amud or???

Same old incel crap as usual.

Desperately, desperately trying to prove to us, and themselves, that their worldview is correct and so they should totally be allowed to get maximum gains with minimum effort. They have a lot invested in this idea. They can't let it go.

Otherwise they might have to actually make changes, and they are far too stubborn and lazy to do that.
 
@AMOGGED sent me his picture after I asked him. I promised I wouldn't post, and I won't - I'm not a liar. That's a shame though, because I think we'd all agree that he's actually, even speaking objectively, very good looking. Maybe we could have drilled it into his head that it's his personality that's the problem when it comes to women.

(I did a google image search, and it doesn't look like it was stolen from anywhere, so I'm assuming it's genuinely him)

What % maxilla is he though? I need to know.
 
No you're right if this were a criminal trial the standard of proof would be high and you would not be a racist.
But it isnt. This is an online forum.

The stardard of proof just needs to be convincing to the audience- nothing more. And the fact that you are unable or unwilling to disprove the accusation against you while admitting that you frequent that forum is enough for us to call you a racist and a sexist. This is the kirkwood rule of evidence.

One could argue that defending being a member of a forum called slut hate is in itself sexist.

Mate, I like you. Something tells me you're a bit better at this than the average joe. That being said, I will say what I must.

Your argument begins on shaky foundation when you admit an institution that requires a high amount of evidence would not label me as racist. As opposed to trying to generate more evidence, you try to justify the diminishing of necessary evidence for such a labeling. That, my friend, is novel, and entertaining. But, it should emphasize the dubious nature of your contention.

The kirkwood rule of evidence allows for appeals to majority, authority, etc. And, I think it is apparent that Sluthate is not received well here. So, the kirkwood rule of evidence, while as a matter of practicality, would certainly end up with me being labeled a racist, it does little to justify the logicality of such a labeling.
 
@AMOGGED sent me his picture after I asked him. I promised I wouldn't post, and I won't - I'm not a liar. That's a shame though, because I think we'd all agree that he's actually, even speaking objectively, very good looking. Maybe we could have drilled it into his head that it's his personality that's the problem when it comes to women.

(I did a google image search, and it doesn't look like it was stolen from anywhere, so I'm assuming it's genuinely him)
I am actually totally disappointed he didn't send you, say, goatse or lemonparty. Or hell, just straight-up rickroll. Truly we are living in a fallen world.
 
This is a common misconception, they are not. It's proven by science. People have certain preferences but it doesn't have a great influence.
Your mother drank while she was pregnant with you, didn't she? Be honest with me. I won't be mean.
It's not as bad as you guys are making it seem.
See my above question to @averageGuy. Please answer it, as well.

And no mentioning the "golden ratio," we all know about it.
 
Sluthate, is mostly a troll site with a lot of truth in between. The guys simply want to be attractive and there is nothing wrong with that. Did you guys know that females consider 80% of men below average. Go lurk that site and eventually you'll get it. It's not as bad as you guys are making it seem.
I've been there.
I could be a regular there considering my beliefs, but Kiwi farms is much comfier.
>Sluthate, is mostly a troll site
That's like saying /pol/ is a troll site.
I'm starting to think you're not really female and just someone posing to be female in hopes it would convince us to leave y'all alone or something.
 
@AMOGGED sent me his picture after I asked him. I promised I wouldn't post, and I won't - I'm not a liar. That's a shame though, because I think we'd all agree that he's actually, even speaking objectively, very good looking. Maybe we could have drilled it into his head that it's his personality that's the problem when it comes to women.

(I did a google image search, and it doesn't look like it was stolen from anywhere, so I'm assuming it's genuinely him)
its elliot rodger all over again. Sluthate, I'll just address you all at once. your problem is not any of this bullshit you think it is, your problem is your stinted personalities, how did you guys not learn your lesson already?
 
This is a common misconception, they are not. It's proven by science. People have certain preferences but it doesn't have a great influence.
Why wouldn't it be subjective? We could be a race of cat people and people would be debating over which fur patterns are more attractive, or a race of lizards arguing over how many claws per hand is attractive. It's all subjective.

If you say science backs it up, then by all means, show it. Don't go claiming anything you can't back up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back