Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[ZehnBoat]

Twitter

White woman threatens to kill herself because she said "nigga" lol

do a flip nigga

 

[Dom Cruise]

One part is immersion - when the voice and face match, it "feels" realer. Not to mention that if you are shooting for any kind of realism in a game, having characters who are unattractive adds to that realism (as there are unattractive people in the world).

Another part is cost - using the Debra Wilson example - she's mostly famous for "Mad TV" - she probably didn't cost all that much and has a very specific "kind of crazy" look about her. If they wanted to use someone else (like Kit Harrington, who they've used previously) more attractive, it likely would have cost them more money. Considering her part in that game (a single 3 minute scene) it likely wasn't worth it.

What's that military saying? Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action?

A few ugly characters would be fine because of realism, but making almost every female character in a western developed game ugly now or at least unattractive is a twisted form of virtue signaling.

The fat girl with the blue hair types DESPISE beautiful women because they are jealous and they don't want to see any of them in their media, plus they know it pisses your average male gamer off.

 

[Positron]

From Amazon (underlines mine):

This book assembles ten scholarly examinations of the politics of representation in the groundbreaking animated children’s television series Steven Universe. These analyses address a range of representational sites and subjects, including queerness, race, fandom, colonialism, and the environment, and provide an accessible foundation for further scholarship. The introduction contextualizes Steven Universe in the children’s science-fiction and anime traditions and discusses the series’ crucial mechanic of fusion. Subsequent chapters probe the fandom’s expressions of queer identity, approach the series’ queer force through the political potential of the animated body, consider the unequal privilege of different female characters, and trace the influence of anime director Kunihiko Ikuhara. Further chapters argue that Ronaldo allows satire of multiple media forms, focus on Onion as a surrealist trickster, and contemplate cross-species hybridity and consent. The final chapters concentrate on background art in connection with ecological and geological narratives, adopt a decolonial perspective on the Gems’ legacy, and interrogate how the tension between personal and cultural narratives constantly recreates memory.

 

[Reverend]

Twitter

White woman threatens to kill herself because she said "nigga" lol

Always fucking Archive goddamnitt.

 

[neverendingmidi]

View attachment 1155935

From Amazon (underlines mine):

This book assembles ten scholarly examinations of the politics of representation in the groundbreaking animated children’s television series Steven Universe. These analyses address a range of representational sites and subjects, including queerness, race, fandom, colonialism, and the environment, and provide an accessible foundation for further scholarship. The introduction contextualizes Steven Universe in the children’s science-fiction and anime traditions and discusses the series’ crucial mechanic of fusion. Subsequent chapters probe the fandom’s expressions of queer identity, approach the series’ queer force through the political potential of the animated body, consider the unequal privilege of different female characters, and trace the influence of anime director Kunihiko Ikuhara. Further chapters argue that Ronaldo allows satire of multiple media forms, focus on Onion as a surrealist trickster, and contemplate cross-species hybridity and consent. The final chapters concentrate on background art in connection with ecological and geological narratives, adopt a decolonial perspective on the Gems’ legacy, and interrogate how the tension between personal and cultural narratives constantly recreates memory.

Publish or perish, in the modern age.

I'm hoping these are some pointless undergraduate theses.

 

[Steamboat_Bill]

Publish or perish, in the modern age.

I'm hoping these are some pointless undergraduate theses.

There’s a lot of bullshit in academic papers, sad to say.

 

[Private Pyle]

View attachment 1155935

From Amazon (underlines mine):

This book assembles ten scholarly examinations of the politics of representation in the groundbreaking animated children’s television series Steven Universe. These analyses address a range of representational sites and subjects, including queerness, race, fandom, colonialism, and the environment, and provide an accessible foundation for further scholarship. The introduction contextualizes Steven Universe in the children’s science-fiction and anime traditions and discusses the series’ crucial mechanic of fusion. Subsequent chapters probe the fandom’s expressions of queer identity, approach the series’ queer force through the political potential of the animated body, consider the unequal privilege of different female characters, and trace the influence of anime director Kunihiko Ikuhara. Further chapters argue that Ronaldo allows satire of multiple media forms, focus on Onion as a surrealist trickster, and contemplate cross-species hybridity and consent. The final chapters concentrate on background art in connection with ecological and geological narratives, adopt a decolonial perspective on the Gems’ legacy, and interrogate how the tension between personal and cultural narratives constantly recreates memory.

So basically, someone is gathering up their tumblr analysis posts (read: clapping about how woke it is) of an overrated CN show and is publishing it for money?
The 20s are off to a fucking weird start.

 

[AnOminous]

interrogate how the tension between personal and cultural narratives constantly recreates memory.

You could write a Markov bot to generate gibberish like this and get it published.

 

[theshep]

Chase Strangio is an FTM troon lawyer and the LGBTBBQ++ advisor for the ACLU. Chase is also a certifiable lunatic. Today’s she’s screeching at the WaPo:

View attachment 959500

What has her twat waffled? The Washington Post correctly referring to her as a “transgender American Civil Liberties Union lawyer”:

View attachment 959502

Poor Chase thought she should be more than just a man’s arm candy, regardless that the Emmys (and Hollywood) have fuck all to do with the Harris case other than Laverne Cox flashing his protest handbag on the red carpet... which is the only reason he and Chase were mentioned in the story in the first place.

Not exactly sure how meeting the This Is Us cast counts as “working” on the Harris case, but Chase isn’t known for her maturity or stability.

View attachment 959501
Two happy, healthy heterosexuals enjoying a glamourous night out among the stars.

Put in their place by someone from their own team (Twittter: @S3LF_MAD3_WOMAN).

 

[Cilleystring]

Twitter

White woman threatens to kill herself because she said "nigga" lol

Always fucking Archive goddamnitt.

Since her twitter down I'm guessing she ended up saying "nigga" again

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

You could write a Markov bot to generate gibberish like this and get it published.

We already have several people on these forums that do that job, so do we really need to automate the process?

 

[Longjack Attack]

Although it’s weird how they made February LGBT history month when it’s already black history month. It’s actually gotten to a point that I’ve seen little black history and instead, lots of pride stuff.

From the way i see it, i think of it as a tactic from some members of the LGBT community to equate their struggle to those in the black community; but according to a historical standpoint, their worlds are far apart from each other.

Black people had all sorts of fucked up shit happen to them for a majority of their tenure in the USA(i.e Lynchings, mutilations, being used as literal bate for animals, segregation, housing discrimination etc.) compared to the average gay person. They don't have the ability to magically peel away their own skin in exchange for a new one compared to a gay person who switches their sexuality every week or a trans who has the luxury of putting on a dress and wig every time they go out in public. As far as i know, the only REAL issue the gay community really had was the WBC/fundies throughout the 90's and mid 2000's; but other than that most of their issues boil down to self-infliction within their own communities.

For the gays to compare themselves to the black communities issues is quite insulting

 

[Book Thief]

From the way i see it, i think of it as a tactic from some members of the LGBT community to equate their struggle to those in the black community; but according to a historical standpoint, their worlds are far apart from each other.

Black people had all sorts of fucked up shit happen to them for a majority of their tenure in the USA(i.e Lynchings, mutilations, being used as literal bate for animals, segregation, housing discrimination etc.) compared to the average gay person. They don't have the ability to magically peel away their own skin in exchange for a new one compared to a gay person who switches their sexuality every week or a trans who has the luxury of putting on a dress and wig every time they go out in public. As far as i know, the only REAL issue the gay community really had was the WBC/fundies throughout the 90's and mid 2000's; but other than that most of their issues boil down to self-infliction within their own communities.

For the gays to compare themselves to the black communities issues is quite insulting

The comparison would've made sense 20 or more years ago, when you could be ostracized or assaulted because of who you felt attracted to. Hysteria surrounding the HIV epidemic throughout the 70's and 80's certainly didn't help matters either. Today, though? They probably have it just as easy as any straight person, especially since, as you said, you can simply mask your sexuality depending on the situation at hand. If you're going to your aunt's place and they happen to be Christian fundamentalists who think homosexuality is a sin, then there's no reason why you can't just lie and say that you have a girlfriend or boyfriend of the opposite sex. Black people can't do that. They have to wear their identity in public. They have to be able to own the idea that some people just won't like them based on the color of their skin.

 

[Jet Fuel Johnny]

To quote a rant I once heard on a voicechat:

"Motherfucker, I can't just put on my 'white people' shirt and nobody will know I'm goddamn black. I can't have a maid come over and 'white people' up my fucking apartment when my mom's comes over. Stop acting like your faggot cross dressing ass is the same as my skin. Get a job, nigga."

 

[WinchesterPremium]

To quote a rant I once heard on a voicechat:

"Motherfucker, I can't just put on my 'white people' shirt and nobody will know I'm goddamn black. I can't have a maid come over and 'white people' up my fucking apartment when my mom's comes over. Stop acting like your faggot cross dressing ass is the same as my skin. Get a job, nigga."

Michael Jackson managed it

 

[Longjack Attack]

They probably have it just as easy as any straight person, especially since, as you said, you can simply mask your sexuality depending on the situation at hand.

But yet for some reason, they still run around and act like their being heavily persecuted under extreme measures. I understand if there are certain aspects of discrimination they may face but it ain't like people are taking the time out of their day stalking and hunting them for trophies like it's deer season.

 

[Wallace]

But yet for some reason, they still run around and act like their being heavily persecuted under extreme measures. I understand if there are certain aspects of discrimination they may face but it ain't like people are taking the time out of their day stalking and hunting them for trophies like it's deer season.

They like the social reward for claiming to have suffered harm, so there's an incentive to claim being harmed and exaggerate the harm suffered.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

How's the ex, and the twitch channel, faggot? And what the fuck is this supposed to mean, anyway? Is this supposed to be some kind of shot at centrists and liberals, when in reality, it's just a demonstration that you project like fucking IMAX? You're one of the poster children of the "Us/Them" dichotomy that exists in contemporary western culture, you clown.

(Sorry, I find this fuck almost as grating as I find Sargon.)

Well, this is a take, I guess.

Allow me to rebut you -

Did I already post this one? If so, fuck it, I want to laugh at this future clock-resetting fuck some more, and it's a great segue from the above -

Jesus Christ, this fucker is almost guaranteed to be a predator -

His whole timeline is like this, and I'm actually scared to go check his facebook, which he conveniently included in his twitter bio, so all the feminist ladies can find him, I guess?

Spoiler: It gets worse

What the fuck, ladies? He's 5'11", 297lbs, unemployed and autistic, at 36, with 4 small dogs, why aren't you snapping him up? THIS IS A PRIME HUSBANDO MATERIAL, YOU UNGRATEFUL WHORES, HOW DARE YOU IGNORE THIS MONTANA-BRED STALLION!

Thankfully, women have equal rights, and they definitely have the equal protection. As far as the whole "legal equality thing", they're less likely to be investigated, charged, prosecuted, receive lighter criminal sentencing, and are more likely to receive non-criminal sentences.

And as far as the "more men sexually/physically assaulting women than the other way around", the PASK dv meta-analysis shows that reciprocal DV has a 50/50 gender parity in victimization. The CDC NISVS shows that bi women, bi men, and lesbian women are the 3 most victimized demographics by sexuality, which all coincidentally date women, and gay men are the least victimized, which is exactly the opposite of what feminists insist should happen, if men are as violent as they claim. Oh, and Harvard Medical did a study of unidirectional dv, and found that women initiate 70% of that, so basic math indicates that women initiates 60% of all DV. The only gendered deviation in DV is at the lethal level, after all the previous escalations have occurred, and prevention at the base stages would eliminate all that escalation.

TL;DR - feminists wrong about domestic and sexual violence, part 8,105,371,094.

@sophnar0747's article about the gatekeeping of the gaming media continues to piss off the usual suspects, although this exchange is obviously not 100% fresh -

I know this should go in the Celluloid Robert thread, but I'm sure someone already put it there, and he deserves to be laughed at, generally -

Think anyone has told him that intersectionalists and TRA's are anti-science, RBG thinks Roe V. Wade was a legal disaster for the battle for women's autonomy, and that pushing everyone into the cities isn't going to get him banging blue alien ass on a starship?

And this is just fucking funny, because the intersectional left if losing their fucking minds over her refusal to bow to their name-calling -

 

[dopy]

tempted to print this out and put it in a picture frame above my blood-stained sacrificial altar tbh

 

[CheezzyMach]

Think anyone has told him that intersectionalists and TRA's are anti-science, RBG thinks Roe V. Wade was a legal disaster for the battle for women's autonomy, and that pushing everyone into the cities isn't going to get him banging blue alien ass on a starship?

And this is just fucking funny, because the intersectional left if losing their fucking minds over her refusal to bow to their name-calling -

Example XXXXXXXX of a Twitter Leftard still stuck in the 90s that doesn't realize his side is now the Moral Majority pissing off the country with it's bullshit.