1.KIRSTEN GILLBRAND OPPOSES BILL TO STOP PEOPLE FROM MURDERING BABIES AFTER BIRTH
2.https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2020/02/25/dem-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-says-bills-to-protect-unborn-babies-and-abortion-survivors-are-violations-of-womens-civil-rights-human-rights-video/
I guess we have not reached the Random Person AOC Quote of Eat the Babbies Yet !! but i guess we are close having to govern everything in United States .
**********
If there is a definitive line between being a whacko leftist and a whacko leftist extremist, it is this. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand opposes a bill that would stop people from killing babies after they’ve been born. This has a fancy name “infanticide” but it’s straight up murder to kill a human being who has been born. Liberals can argue about whether a baby in the womb is a human or a clump of cells, but there is no argument once the baby has been born. The democrats think that being the party of post-birth abortion is a winner for 2020. They are wrong.The Senate voted on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act Tuesday, which would require medical personnel to give aide to a baby born alive after surviving an abortion attempt. In other words, it stops abortionists from killing living babies outside of the womb. This shouldn’t be controversial, but it is because liberals are f*cking horrible people.CNN described this as an “abortion restriction” bill. It doesn’t restrict abortion, it just keeps ghouls from killing living babies. But then again, this is the way CNN characterized the bill:…[the bill] would require abortion providers to work to “preserve the life and health” of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby, or face up to five years in prison.A fetus that was born? You mean like a baby? Holy crap.Hi, my name is Brian Anderson and I’m a 50-year-old fetus who thinks this is utter bullshit.The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act was defeated in a 53-44 vote because again democrats are shit people.Speaking of which, here’s one now:
https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1232363356213981184
This is one of the most f*cked up things anyone has ever said, and that means a lot considering how awful democrats are. Where do we start?
As was mentioned, the bill only stops abortion doctors from killing live babies. How does that harm women? Half of the babies would be female so if anything it helps women.
It is Gillibrand’s position that women have a Constitutional right to kill their babies after they are born, which is preposterous. No such civil right exists. Also, killing babies after they are born isn’t a woman’s human right, but it is a human rights violation against the baby who would be murdered.
It’s an intimate decision to make a baby but the decision to kill one after it’s born is called murder.
Maybe the craziest thing Gillibrand said was that stopping women from killing their babies who have been born is stepping on their religious freedoms. What religion? Satanism? I’m certain that the 1st Amendment doesn’t protect human sacrifice.
Finally, Gillibrand calls murdering a live baby “moral freedom” but in reality, murder is the result of a lack of morality. She literally got everything wrong in defense of baby killing.
44 democratic senators, including Gillibrand, are now on the record supporting infanticide thanks to this vote. I’m sure this will come up as some of these liberal monsters seek reelection in November. It’s going to have to be an incredibly solid blue state for a senator promoting killing live babies to keep his or her seat.
2.https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2020/02/25/dem-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-says-bills-to-protect-unborn-babies-and-abortion-survivors-are-violations-of-womens-civil-rights-human-rights-video/
I guess we have not reached the Random Person AOC Quote of Eat the Babbies Yet !! but i guess we are close having to govern everything in United States .
**********
If there is a definitive line between being a whacko leftist and a whacko leftist extremist, it is this. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand opposes a bill that would stop people from killing babies after they’ve been born. This has a fancy name “infanticide” but it’s straight up murder to kill a human being who has been born. Liberals can argue about whether a baby in the womb is a human or a clump of cells, but there is no argument once the baby has been born. The democrats think that being the party of post-birth abortion is a winner for 2020. They are wrong.The Senate voted on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act Tuesday, which would require medical personnel to give aide to a baby born alive after surviving an abortion attempt. In other words, it stops abortionists from killing living babies outside of the womb. This shouldn’t be controversial, but it is because liberals are f*cking horrible people.CNN described this as an “abortion restriction” bill. It doesn’t restrict abortion, it just keeps ghouls from killing living babies. But then again, this is the way CNN characterized the bill:…[the bill] would require abortion providers to work to “preserve the life and health” of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby, or face up to five years in prison.A fetus that was born? You mean like a baby? Holy crap.Hi, my name is Brian Anderson and I’m a 50-year-old fetus who thinks this is utter bullshit.The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act was defeated in a 53-44 vote because again democrats are shit people.Speaking of which, here’s one now:
https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1232363356213981184
This is one of the most f*cked up things anyone has ever said, and that means a lot considering how awful democrats are. Where do we start?
As was mentioned, the bill only stops abortion doctors from killing live babies. How does that harm women? Half of the babies would be female so if anything it helps women.
It is Gillibrand’s position that women have a Constitutional right to kill their babies after they are born, which is preposterous. No such civil right exists. Also, killing babies after they are born isn’t a woman’s human right, but it is a human rights violation against the baby who would be murdered.
It’s an intimate decision to make a baby but the decision to kill one after it’s born is called murder.
Maybe the craziest thing Gillibrand said was that stopping women from killing their babies who have been born is stepping on their religious freedoms. What religion? Satanism? I’m certain that the 1st Amendment doesn’t protect human sacrifice.
Finally, Gillibrand calls murdering a live baby “moral freedom” but in reality, murder is the result of a lack of morality. She literally got everything wrong in defense of baby killing.
44 democratic senators, including Gillibrand, are now on the record supporting infanticide thanks to this vote. I’m sure this will come up as some of these liberal monsters seek reelection in November. It’s going to have to be an incredibly solid blue state for a senator promoting killing live babies to keep his or her seat.
