- Joined
- Nov 14, 2018
Chloe Segal 2.0???
BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.
- Thread starter RichardMongler
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Chloe Segal 2.0???
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
This sounds like a great new grift.
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
A Britbong breatuber makes a video whiteknighting for now deported ISIS bride Shamia Begum. Predictably, his main point against her getting deported and stripped of her citizenship is "muh racism".
Orginal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gqqD_v7eW8
Archive (720p):
>Shitty joke taking a jab at his ideological opposition
>"I find it disturbing that Britbongs deport ISIS brides"
>*Whiteknights for Jeremy Corbyn*
>"Muh racism"
>"If they were white and non-muslim there would be more sympathy for them"
>Gives recap of what happened with Begum from the Guardian
>"WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF JIHADIST"
>"This isn't what justice looks like"
>"This isn't what a civilized country would do"
> "Muh right wing government did this for an easy win"
>"WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!" she was 15, she almost certainly knew what ISIS is and what they stand for
>Says his younger relatives could be duped into joining similar groups
>"She's not accountable for her actions"
>"MUH RACISM"
>*Moral faggotry*
>"She's only 20"
>"Pope Benedict was a Nazi 'n shiieet"
>"MUH RACISM"
>"WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!"
>"It's our responsibility"
>"It's because she's brown and Muslim"
>"MUH RACISM"
>*MORAL FAGGOTRY*
>Shills his social media, reddit in particular
>"I find it disturbing that Britbongs deport ISIS brides"
>*Whiteknights for Jeremy Corbyn*
>"Muh racism"
>"If they were white and non-muslim there would be more sympathy for them"
>Gives recap of what happened with Begum from the Guardian
>"WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF JIHADIST"
>"This isn't what justice looks like"
>"This isn't what a civilized country would do"
> "Muh right wing government did this for an easy win"
>"WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!" she was 15, she almost certainly knew what ISIS is and what they stand for
>Says his younger relatives could be duped into joining similar groups
>"She's not accountable for her actions"
>"MUH RACISM"
>*Moral faggotry*
>"She's only 20"
>"Pope Benedict was a Nazi 'n shiieet"
>"MUH RACISM"
>"WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!"
>"It's our responsibility"
>"It's because she's brown and Muslim"
>"MUH RACISM"
>*MORAL FAGGOTRY*
>Shills his social media, reddit in particular
Archive (720p):
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2018
here's another gem from vaushes server
Here's some more gems from pigs server.
I'm sure you and all the other attention whores in these communities would love that.
These people are so desperate to be shat on they must all be masochists.
Here's some more gems from pigs server.
I'm sure you and all the other attention whores in these communities would love that.
These people are so desperate to be shat on they must all be masochists.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
To paraphrase Uncle Joe: "Idiots and degenerates."
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
Why do so many uninteresting people think that they're going to get a thread here?
horsegirl666
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2019
They've got empty lives so they crave anything that makes them feel important, like bunch of nobodies paying attention to them for even a small moment. Makes them feel like real activists fighting against real enemies.
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2020
Which one of you did this? LOOOOL. But for real though, this guy just made 3000 dollars in moments with a clearly fake story and cock email, how big of retard do you have to be to fall for this?
These people want to run the country, when they can't even run their own sub reddit to stop their fans from getting scammed. This story alone should show how exceptional these individuals are and how idiotic their ideology is.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Because they unironically think we must be some roided out deep web version of Encyclopedia Dramatica. Sure we have threads on these communities and dox of individuals like Vaush or recorded and archived videos and tweets of some idiot like Nick Fuentes but beyond that, we're just a collective herd of idiots laughing at and behind the backs of other idiots. If any of them wanted a thread, they'd have to try and stand out from all the other people because the most they can get is a single screenshot of them complaining about a forum that acts as a containment zone for a shit ton of autist.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
The funny thing is that, like you said, they could post dox of people they hate here too and it would probably stay up. The Nick Fuentes thread now is mainly lefties bitching about him but it's not gone because it archived the drama from lolisocks. If they got off their asses and made good archives they could make fun of people on the right.
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2018
They are self centered with martyr complex. They belive they can't "Fight the good Fight" with out an enemy to vilify. KiwiFarms to them is that enemy but in reality we are completely indifferent to them and I don't think they see that or they don't want to accept that. We only have threads on people are constant train wrecks. Most of the people in this thread are just people who have shit their pants in class and now have gone back to being weird and mildly boring. Someone like Vaush is constantly shitting him self then getting into slap fights with anyone who is within line of sight.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2019
On the topic of troons: they really hate Joe Rogan
tl;dr: salt
Link | Old | Archive
The top comment says it all. Joe isn't allowed to have people with the wrong opinions on his show. They're seething about this other post on the subreddit btw. The OP is a bit cringe ngl.
Had a screenshot but removed it because of it's ridiculous size
Link | Old | Archive
I do love the condensation of the first reply to the top comment by calling his audience "low information" and why is independent in quotation marks? And the main point of discussion is how to think of Joe's endorsement for Bernie and how to accept his "transphobic" past. But they almost unanimously agree he is transphobic.
Also, am I the only one sick and tired of hearing people with fringe beliefs say "bad faith arguments"? What the fuck does that even mean?
tl;dr: salt
Link | Old | Archive
The top comment says it all. Joe isn't allowed to have people with the wrong opinions on his show. They're seething about this other post on the subreddit btw. The OP is a bit cringe ngl.
Link | Old | Archive
I do love the condensation of the first reply to the top comment by calling his audience "low information" and why is independent in quotation marks? And the main point of discussion is how to think of Joe's endorsement for Bernie and how to accept his "transphobic" past. But they almost unanimously agree he is transphobic.
Also, am I the only one sick and tired of hearing people with fringe beliefs say "bad faith arguments"? What the fuck does that even mean?
Last edited:
Emperor Julian
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2015
It's simular to a lot of armchair generals wishing they could fight in a battle. They never got blasted by a hose for Civil rights or somesuch so they want attention of someone who they perceive as an oppresor.
Much like armchair generals they have no idea what they're asking for.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2018
The actual definition? Bad Faith argumentation speaks to an intent to deceive in your argumentation. Example: One of the exceptional individuals recorded in this thread makes a video going over something someone said. They claim that they are going to go into the video with an open mind then proceed to strawman the argument or take quotes out of context to "dunk" on the person. This person is making their video in bad faith.
For breadtube: any arguement/person/position/ideology that I don't like.
Puck
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2019
They're a little different but they definitely deserve their own thread
I kind of want one of them to try because a tryhard wannabe cow would be so cringey it might actually qualify them for real cowdom.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
That's basically Gutian.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
It's not just against ideologies they don't like. It's extremely common in SJW communities as well, like ResetEra and Something Awful, to say someone 'is arguing in bad faith' because they're someone who: doesn't capitulate to an emotional argument, points out flaws in what they're saying, or uses facts that don't agree with their preconceived ideas.
In more mentally damaged examples, they will say someone is arguing in bad faith if they are of the minority being discussed but has a differing opinion than what they expect, points out a pattern of bad behaviour/argumentation by the person they're talking to, or has the temerity to not be ashamed of being cis, white, straight and/or male.
It's most useful as a concern troll - 'I'm worried some people are arguing in bad faith (so I shouldn't have to engage with them at all, and you should think about banning anyone who disagrees with me).' It has become a catch-all for, yes, 'people I don't like and don't agree with', but also inevitably means 'I don't want to have to defend my position, it should just be accepted as true.'
That someone may be having a discussion without being open to hearing the other side can be considered someone arguing in bad faith has, like all SJW terms, been a concept with actual truth behind it that has been overused to the point of meaninglessness. And of course the Venn diagram of people who claim their opponents are arguing in bad faith and the people actually doing so is a complete circle. They're nothing if not consistent in their hypocrisy.
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2018
There you go, the BreadTubers say it themselves:
Then stop LARPing at being Youtube revolutionaries and go curate some gallery opening or something.
Then stop LARPing at being Youtube revolutionaries and go curate some gallery opening or something.