Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Looks like I didn't tell the full story to this 1027/1028ths colonizer Liz Warren Jr. here and that made her rather angry. The Ojibwe came from the west (somewhere in the Rocky Mountains) thousands of years ago, then got chased back west by the Iroquois in the 1600s where they then counterattacked and murdered a bunch of Iroquois and piled their heads in a skull pyramid before resuming violence against other Indians to the west where they chased them onto the Plains. Happy?

Also, why the fuck is she appropriating Egyptian culture (or black culture depending on who you ask) by claiming to be "Kemetic?"
No man, no Native American ever killed another Native American. There were no tribal conflicts, they all sat around in circles praying to the earth mother all day and everyone was vegan.

Also, since the idpol crowd follows the one drop rule, any rants about colonizers and nasty "ads" diseases don't apply to her own ancestors, despite her very obvious European heritage.

White privilege is so real that nobody wants to admit that they're partially or fully white. I'm pretty sure that's how systemic oppression has historically worked. Everyone with a Jewish great grandparent in 1930's Germany was always quick to advertise how extremely Jewish they were. In the 1920's in the southeastern US, all the light skinned mixed race people wanted to ID as black, not white, obviously.
 
No man, no Native American ever killed another Native American. There were no tribal conflicts, they all sat around in circles praying to the earth mother all day and everyone was vegan.
To be fair, archaeology can't tell us if people moved because they were getting chopped up and raped by some invader or if the "invader" (i.e. new friends) asked nicely for them to go some other place. Fucking white archaeologists (and whatever Indian, whoever scholars they've brainwashed) trying to make us think all these tribal migrations were violent.
In the 1920's in the southeastern US, all the light skinned mixed race people wanted to ID as black, not white, obviously.
homer-plessy.jpg

Well, this is a black guy according to the Supreme Court, and he really wanted to make it known he had a black great-grandpa when he tried to challenge a segregation law, so I dunno.

But a fun fact, read the text of one-drop laws and a 1/1028 black person was considered white in most states in the South.
 
To be fair, archaeology can't tell us if people moved because they were getting chopped up and raped by some invader or if the "invader" (i.e. new friends) asked nicely for them to go some other place. Fucking white archaeologists (and whatever Indian, whoever scholars they've brainwashed) trying to make us think all these tribal migrations were violent.

homer-plessy.jpg

Well, this is a black guy according to the Supreme Court, and he really wanted to make it known he had a black great-grandpa when he tried to challenge a segregation law, so I dunno.

But a fun fact, read the text of one-drop laws and a 1/1028 black person was considered white in most states in the South.
Well we do conveniently have it as a matter of record that native tribes had beef with each other that was violent, thanks to the alliances they formed with various factions of wypipo over said beefs. A good example being the French and Indian War, where the natives fought on both sides and the ones who fought for the English colonists against the far less invasive French did so pretty much entirely because they wanted to destroy the Wabanaki Confederacy which was fighting for the French.

Need some context on that guy (mainly a name), but considering he was challenging a segregation law, I would imagine that his racial heritage was already a matter of public record and he was already dealing with some institutional consequences of that. I could be wrong, and there could be a number of other reasons he would make it known, but I'd need to look up the case for full context.
 
View attachment 1185487
Here we fucking go. Again.
It’s literally impossible to have a conversation with someone who will reflexively redefine words the minute they start losing an argument. This jello dictionary bullshit is the main thing that convinced me that SJW-types were maliciously selfish rather than utterly stupid.
 
Asexual representation is the dumbest concept ever. Lack of a behavior isn't something to build a character around. Making a big deal about something you don't do is obnoxious. You can only have a character tell other people "BTW, I don't like dicks, vaginas, or sex" so many times before it starts to seem forced and tedious. And by so many times, I mean once. If you want to not give a character a love interest, go ahead, but by making a big deal out of it all you're doing is limiting future storytelling possibilities.
>implying today’s writers actually care about storytelling possibilities

So many people have basically defined themselves by being minorities; asexuals and demisexuals have been popping up because people need something unique about themselves. Representation matters because it caters to their need for validation. Doesn’t help that the staff behind these works are often pretty boring and rep hungry too.
By this logic, all slash shippers changing heterosexual men to gays for fanfictions are also disrespecting character sexualities.
Oh they have an excuse for that: “Well there’s so little gay representation in actual media so it’s okay when we do it!”

The “community” is fucking weird, especially asexuals.
 
Like most Tumblr "pagans", she doesn't know the difference between Wicca and actual historical paganism or reconstructionist paganism.

It's a common misconception to think all pagans (or even all neopagans) are Wiccan or follow some sort of Wicca-inspired theology or ideology.


It's actually a pretty interesting subject, none of the religions where egalitarian by any standards but some of them had a better track record than the periods christianity (Norse) whereas some of them where far worse (Athenian Greek) because they're often not a unified theology it's hard to actually really construct a universal principle. Conversly a lot of women converted to Christianity as a mechanism to opt out of family obligations and live a life of academic or spirital study.


Hi Ivy, I dunno why you're going on about your tribe, we've seen your pictures their's more native american in General Custer once he got the tomahawk in the skull than you. It's actually quite offensive really as is your cultural appropriation of Kemetic paganism . Also you drew our attention by being a total prick on twitter, the internet isnt your private diary-it's bellowing your beliefs in a public street so anyone passing by can see it.
 
Last edited:
Well we do conveniently have it as a matter of record that native tribes had beef with each other that was violent, thanks to the alliances they formed with various factions of wypipo over said beefs. A good example being the French and Indian War, where the natives fought on both sides and the ones who fought for the English colonists against the far less invasive French did so pretty much entirely because they wanted to destroy the Wabanaki Confederacy which was fighting for the French.
It's pretty hardcore shit and kept continuing into the 19th century like the tribes who had alliances with the British (Canadians) and those who had alliances with the US. I wonder what "Native Twitter" (heard there's a lot of worshippers there of the Wetsuweten chief Frank Alec, convicted wifebeater who basically stole his "hereditary" title) thinks of the lengthy tradition of slavery amongst Native Americans, like the "Five Civilized Tribes" buying lots of black people (and the last Confederate States general to surrender being Stand Watie, a Cherokee leader). Or best of all, the indigenous slavery tradition in the Pacific Northwest where tribes would kidnap kids and women as slaves (or just buy them, you'd trade a few horses or canoes or shells apparently) and in all the anthropological accounts the Indian informants seem almost boastful about the people they owned. Even more fun, the fur trade there helped some tribes rule others, and that's why the Haida gained a reputation as "Vikings", because they got the guns first so could more efficiently enslave and kill other Indians.
Need some context on that guy (mainly a name), but considering he was challenging a segregation law, I would imagine that his racial heritage was already a matter of public record and he was already dealing with some institutional consequences of that. I could be wrong, and there could be a number of other reasons he would make it known, but I'd need to look up the case for full context.
That's Homer Plessey of Plessey v Ferguson fame, an octoroon (7/8ths white) who wanted to challenge a segregation law. In high school learning about him some people in my class laughed when they saw his picture after they wondered out loud what a 1/8th black person looked like.
 
That's Homer Plessey of Plessey v Ferguson fame, an octoroon (7/8ths white) who wanted to challenge a segregation law. In high school learning about him some people in my class laughed when they saw his picture after they wondered out loud what a 1/8th black person looked like.
That's Homer Plessy, huh? I've never actually seen a picture of him before. But yeah, Plessy's case was actually an activist attempt to strike down segregation, which ended up backfiring and having the exact opposite of the intended effect.

Due to Plessy's phenotype being white, Plessy could have ridden in a railroad car restricted to people classified as white. However, under the racial policies of the time, he was an "octoroon" having 1/8th African-American heritage, and therefore was considered black. Hoping to strike down segregation laws, the Citizens' Committee of New Orleans (Comité des Citoyens) recruited Plessy to deliberately violate Louisiana's 1890 separate-car law. To pose a clear test, the Citizens' Committee gave notice of Plessy's intent to the railroad, which opposed the law because it required adding more cars to its trains. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer_Plessy
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Jhonson Jhonson
To be fair, archaeology can't tell us if people moved because they were getting chopped up and raped by some invader or if the "invader" (i.e. new friends) asked nicely for them to go some other place. Fucking white archaeologists (and whatever Indian, whoever scholars they've brainwashed) trying to make us think all these tribal migrations were violent.

homer-plessy.jpg

Well, this is a black guy according to the Supreme Court, and he really wanted to make it known he had a black great-grandpa when he tried to challenge a segregation law, so I dunno.

But a fun fact, read the text of one-drop laws and a 1/1028 black person was considered white in most states in the South.

Looked this up to verify and found it's Pinckney Stewart Benson Pinchbeck. Wikipedia said no photo of Plessey exists, and I double checked this was Pinchbeck. No information percentage of blackness but had a mulatto mother (black, white, Indian) and white father, "first black state governor"

 
Looked this up to verify and found it's Pinckney Stewart Benson Pinchbeck. Wikipedia said no photo of Plessey exists, and I double checked this was Pinchbeck. No information percentage of blackness but had a mulatto mother (black, white, Indian) and white father, "first black state governor"

Doing a quick google search, it looks like Pinchback gets mislabeled as Plessy a lot, for some reason. Probably started somewhere and caused a domino effect.
 
Found an old video from 2008 of Tim Wise talking about white privilege, which I'm kinda surprised to see the term go back that far.


What's interesting about this is he sounds exactly like a fundie preacher, I don't know if it's an intentional imitation or what, but it's actually kinda chilling.

Nope, nothing cult like about social justice, oh no.
 

'Oh no I said something rëtarded in public and are getting my shit kicked in by people rightfully pointing out the facts of the situation and the delay of spread and incubation for Europe being a factor of why it's happening so quickly atm for them!' -this dickhead

Also, I don't think this is a time for slap fights over privilege and race but hell, I know petty fuckers will certainly try to make it about that if they can.
 
I saw that video once, it's distressing to think it dates back to 2013.

I've tended to want to think of 2013 as largely being before this current zeitgeist but I've actually been looking over some stuff online from that year and learning that sadly no, things were already pretty similar to today even back then.

And it's also funny because the reality is the opposite, it's feminists who are wanting to take all the ice cream for themselves, to use the video's metaphor.

Not just that. The video has deeply propagandistic overtones. It's not a clever satiric mockery, it's the presentation of a strawman and a call to despise him. Everything about the video is extremely imperative. The text consuming the entire screen while a robotic voice drones the strawman's lines, the ugly geometrical characters that are an affront to nature. All of it shows there was no artistic passion channeled into it, only an obsessive need to control and humiliate. All I can say is it's like the Two Minutes Hate from 1984, but more realistically an infantilized version of it.
 
Back