O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Now I'm plain offended, sir.I cannot be an albeist when I am criticizing you for your actions, which are unwarranted and unprovoked, not for any disability on your part.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now I'm plain offended, sir.I cannot be an albeist when I am criticizing you for your actions, which are unwarranted and unprovoked, not for any disability on your part.
I am actually a confirmed sociopath and I am taking drugs for it.I cannot be an albeist when I am criticizing you for your actions, which are unwarranted and unprovoked, not for any disability on your part.
We don't troll, and we explicitly have a 'no trolling' rule.
And, yeah, I'm not putting a lot of effort into this, you're right. Your arguments are patently ridiculous and belie an astounding lack of understanding.
Basically, you get ad hominem because that's all you've earned so far.
YOU'RE TRIGGERING MEEEE!!!I cannot be an albeist when I am criticizing you for your actions, which are unwarranted and unprovoked, not for any disability on your part.
I cannot be an albeist when I am criticizing you for your actions, which are unwarranted and unprovoked, not for any disability on your part.
You don't troll so much that you've actually sent some of your trolls to harass and hurt some of your more notorious "lolcows" in *real life*. I've read the biographies, so you can't lie to me. It beats me how sick a person needs to be to actually stalk his victims IRL just to get a rise out of them.
You don't troll so much that you've actually sent some of your trolls to harass and hurt some of your more notorious "lolcows" in *real life*. I've read the biographies, so you can't lie to me. It beats me how sick a person needs to be to actually stalk his victims IRL just to get a rise out of them.
Being a "mean troll" won't necessarily make your arguments about history or math worthless, but it certainly makes all of your pseudo-psychological drivel and ad hominem arguments worthless. Besides, why would taking the moral high ground prevent me from questioning yours? You're the one who's been explicitly attacking your "lolcows" so far, not me.
Oh, goody, another one. I think you missed the part in the thread where I & many others have doled out helpful advice hoping to get through to them (that is, keeping them from making even bigger asses of themselves on the internet & ruining their lives). When they continue to make asses of themselves, I give up & laugh with the rest. & draw shitty drawings.A nice personality and genuinely friendly? You mean like how you treat "lolcows" around here and taking pride in partaking at online harassment and bullying?
I already work in the mental health field, actually. I mentor people in recovery since I have copious amounts of life experience.Perhaps you should consider offering your assistance in mental health forums
So whats your end game @HypocrisyPro? Are you hoping we're gonna turn around and say you were right?
Whiteknighting is frowned upon here, especially if it's for a bunch of lowlifes.
If you wanna do that go here:
http://bullyingsupport.sonichu.org/
Cry and call the cyber police to backtrace us
Therefore you are not qualified to criticize anyone else about moral issues.
I have news for you, sweetie. It's called Sluthate.Because I'm not signed up to any psychopathic, sadistic forums revolving around the humiliation and dehumanization of other people.
Actually what you've just confessed now was my endgame. That you frown upon any legitimate sympathy or concern for the people targeted by you and describe them as lowlifes when you are the biggest lowlife of all. Therefore you are not qualified to criticize anyone else about moral issues.
My god, you've finally cracked the code and defeated the Kiwis. I tip my fedora to you, good sir.Actually what you've just confessed now was my endgame. That you frown upon any legitimate sympathy or concern for the people targeted by you and describe them as lowlifes when you are the biggest lowlife of all. Therefore you are not qualified to criticize anyone else about moral issues.
Actually what you've just confessed now was my endgame. That you frown upon any legitimate sympathy or concern for the people targeted by you and describe them as lowlifes when you are the biggest lowlife of all. Therefore you are not qualified to criticize anyone else about moral issues.
Actually what you've just confessed now was my endgame. That you frown upon any legitimate sympathy or concern for the people targeted by you and describe them as lowlifes when you are the biggest lowlife of all. Therefore you are not qualified to criticize anyone else about moral issues.
Actually what you've just confessed now was my endgame. That you frown upon any legitimate sympathy or concern for the people targeted by you and describe them as lowlifes when you are the biggest lowlife of all. Therefore you are not qualified to criticize anyone else about moral issues.
This was your endgame?! How sad. Celerius quam asparagi cocuntur.Actually what you've just confessed now was my endgame. That you frown upon any legitimate sympathy or concern for the people targeted by you and describe them as lowlifes when you are the biggest lowlife of all. Therefore you are not qualified to criticize anyone else about moral issues.