Some including Marshall.
Pull the other one, it's got bells on.
Not that this was addressed to me personally, but I noticed you repeated it in your response, and you've been showing a tendency to repeat parts of your posts. It doesn't add emphasis, it makes you look quite silly.
I'm not your stalker, and you very obviously have regrets. Otherwise you wouldn't be so defensive about your life.
I know left from right, up from down, and I know how to be a good man. Marshall doesn't rate either half of the descriptor.
You use those words, but like so many other words, you do not know what they mean.
I can say without any hesitation that Marshall was a terrible navigator, radar operator, and is a moron for thinking the world is flat.
And so you appeal to their authority, completely ignoring the experience of those numerous pilots and navigators with the consensus that the world is round. And you yell at us about "confirmation bias," misusing it many time, I might add.
Yes yes, this is the point where you rejoin with "truth is true regardless of how many people believe it" which, would have more of an impact if you were at all consistent in how you applied it or if the objective evidence against a flat earth (and young earth and steady state creationism etc.) were not so overwhelming.
You know what, let's entertain this train of thought though, at least it will be something new. Give us your best evidence for a flat earth. That's a general you, so if Marshall wants to contribute he can too.