Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Hey, Melinda, what do you think of the dual bloodlines where modern Jews are the seed of Cain and Satan? Just what do you think of modern Jews, anyway? Doomed to burn in hell?

Lol, when you were yapping about your big upcoming book and how it was going to be on sale absolutely everywhere, I thought you were talking about an actual book. A sexy romance novel? They don't even print those anymore unless it's by a big name with plenty of proven sales numbers. Romance novels are all about the online sales now, Kindle in particular. Those are easy to shit out and put online. If your publisher told you your sexy times tome was going to be printed up and sold in major stores they lied to you. Did they tell you that? And you believed it?

:story:
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: Adamska, Viridian and TamarYaelBatYah
Logical Fallacies said:
Lol. She was writing a paper? On what? She can't even cite an article or properly build an argument.

I don't read all of her posts. I don't want my brain leaking out of my ears. She always says the same shit over and over again.
Click to expand...
She made her grand exit Saturday to write a paper and then was promptly back Sunday 13 hours later. I rarely ever read the shit these tards write unless it's only 3-4 sentences long either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adamska and Logical Fallacies
TamarYaelBatYah said:
In context of what I said, the type of pornography I am/said I was against is visual porn -- internet and TV. IE visually seekings other's nakedness. Nothing wrong with sexual romance novels.
Click to expand...

Always the way with the puritanical, porn negative ones.

The women could use the novel to get steamy and ready for their husbands. Also, I never said occasional masturbation was problematic or wrong. A man or woman might need to do that if their spouse is away on trip, sick, or whatever. I said chronic masturbation, as a lifestyle was symptomatic of poor mental, physical or emotional health.
Click to expand...

You specifically said it was related to fear and trauma, which is a very very silly claim.

No, actually, another profile brought up the Flat Earth and then the questions were re-directed at me.

Again, you are trying to say what I feel. I'll PASS on these comments.
Click to expand...

You always do. It's not actually an effective way of dismissing the arguments. Just makes you look weak and scared, really.

TamarYaelBatYah said:
I've been here less than 10 minutes and it's 11:20 EST here. Hardly a lot of time.

Exactly, you just make up fairytales and imaginations in your head to suit your confirmation bias. GOTCHA!
Click to expand...

There's those key words again. By the by, you're using confirmation bias incorrectly here. You have the general idea of what it is correct, but you wouldn't use it in a sentence like that.

Since I'm feeling a little magnanimous and also because it will make no difference, Melinda, even if the Kiwi Farms were inventing from whole cloth every negative thing said about you, it doesn't make you the winner, because you still react to it. Like in Wargames, the only winning move is not to play.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: Adamska and TamarYaelBatYah
TamarYaelBatYah said:
Actually, Marshall is a large part of my inspiration for my novels. He knows how to tap my ass good with his big Native American dick! 😍
Click to expand...
and knowing you it's going to be as bad as fifty shades.

In context of what I said, the type of pornography I am/said I was against is visual porn -- internet and TV. IE visually seekings other's nakedness. Nothing wrong with sexual romance novels.




The women could use the novel to get steamy and ready for their husbands. Also, I never said occasional masturbation was problematic or wrong. A man or woman might need to do that if their spouse is away on trip, sick, or whatever. I said chronic masturbation, as a lifestyle was symptomatic of poor mental, physical or emotional health.
Click to expand...
What if you can't be bothered with a relationship it's too much effort

... Because, y'know relationships are a lot of effort

No, actually, another profile brought up the Flat Earth and then the questions were re-directed at me.

Again, you are trying to say what I feel. I'll PASS on these comments.




My husband wouldn't let him leech cigarettes off of him because he already owed him a bunch of money for gas/carpool






Actually, I have screenshots showing that when I stopped posting the thread continued for 2 weeks. Nice try though.





Like I said before....if it's so wrong for a person to be responded to on here (ie "have attention" as you say), THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP RESPONDING? Wouldn't that make you an ENABLER?
Click to expand...
Whenever did I say it is wrong to respond? If anything by all means, respond! Provide us with more insane comments full of LOLs that's what kiwi farms aims for!

I would have thought though considering your lawsuits with null you wanted all this online talk of you to stop. It is rough on our lolcows after all to have a humiliating thread on them so we try try try to give advice on how to make it stop, but they never listen

Guess you don't want the thread to stop, you love our little rants on you
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Adamska and xtamarlover
redcent said:
and knowing you it's going to be as bad as fifty shades.


What if you can't be bothered with a relationship it's too much effort

... Because, y'know relationships are a lot of effort


Whenever did I say it is wrong to respond? If anything by all means, respond! Provide us with more insane comments full of LOLs that's what kiwi farms aims for!

I would have thought though considering your lawsuits with null you wanted all this online talk of you to stop. It is rough on our lolcows after all to have a humiliating thread on them so we try try try to give advice on how to make it stop, but they never listen

Guess you don't want the thread to stop, you love our little rants on you
Click to expand...

Melinda was only mad that we were talking about her outside of her control. It's why she continually tries to reframe this as "research" and "debate," so she can feel like she's in control of things.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Rafal Gan Ganowicz, Adamska, TamarYaelBatYah and 4 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
Native American
Click to expand...
It's funny that he's so ashamed of being a dirty Mexican than he lies about being native American. None of us are blind, we can tell a dirty beaner when we see one and @Marshall Castersen is definitely a dirty beaner. Fuck he should be selling oranges under the over pass.

TamarYaelBatYah said:
In context of what I said, the type of pornography I am/said I was against is visual porn -- internet and TV. IE visually seekings other's nakedness. Nothing wrong with sexual romance novels.
Click to expand...
hy·poc·ri·sy
/həˈpäkrəsē/

noun
  1. the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Rafal Gan Ganowicz, Logical Fallacies, Adamska and 3 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
Actually, I have screenshots showing that when I stopped posting the thread continued for 2 weeks. Nice try though.
Click to expand...
Honey, we still have active discussions in threads following dead or incarcerated cows. Those threads are much more active than this one while you're getting your head smashed against the counter by Marshall. While people still do talk here when you storm off for your little temper tantrum, the frequency of the posts slows significantly. Just because a couple of people said a few things over the course of a couple weeks, that doesn't mean the thread is alive. Learn basic internet forum etiquette if you insist on making an ass of yourself here.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Lunacy
Reactions: redcent, xtamarlover, TamarYaelBatYah and 2 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
Actually, Marshall is a large part of my inspiration for my novels. He knows how to tap my ass good with his big Native American dick! 😍
Click to expand...
We won't believe it unless we see proof. Post something sexy you wrote that was inspired by Marshall, otherwise we must assume he has erectile dysfunction and a pencil dick.

TamarYaelBatYah said:
In context of what I said, the type of pornography I am/said I was against is visual porn -- internet and TV. IE visually seekings other's nakedness. Nothing wrong with sexual romance novels.
Click to expand...
Why are you against visual porn but not written porn? With text you imagine the action in your head, so there's not much difference.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Army Burger, Adamska, Fannyscum and 3 others
Fangsofjeff said:
We won't believe it unless we see proof. Post something sexy you wrote that was inspired by Marshall, otherwise we must assume he has erectile dysfunction and a pencil dick.


Why are you against visual porn but not written porn? With text you imagine the action in your head, so there's not much difference.
Click to expand...

Because visual porn is seeing the nakedness of someone else other than your Covenant partner/Spouse, which is wrong by the standards of The Torah. The exception being a couple who makes visual porn together for their own enjoyment.

If you read a romance novel, you can picture it as your ideal spouse (to be)/lust for your potential future spouse or picture it was your actual spouse. You aren't actually seeing another's nakedness.

Except for 50 Shades of Grey, which was....a huge disappointment in terms of gender equality
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Informative
Reactions: drtoboggan, Army Burger, Sukeban and 10 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back