Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

"How foolish of them to think that lawtwitter only has one lunatic in its ranks"

Weird flex....

I'm pretty sure we know that you are all insane, pathetic and horrible people; no one needed your cover stories to prove that, your insane actions have already demonstrated that. But please, keep conspiring on twitter to make yourselves look like clowns. You embarrassing yourselves feeds us.

It's more fun if they keep pretending that they are merely pretending to be exceptional.
 
More of Caveman and Dumbford logic.

IMG_20200328_205343.jpg
 
Of all the options available: ignore, deny, confirm, laugh; saying that Law Archive was passed around Law Twitter and you each took turns pretending to be Nick's intern is the most pathetic.

So it isn't just Kathryn Tewson who is completely pathetic, but all the rest of them are also completely pathetic?

What the fuck kind of cover story is that?
 
I remember this post I made last year


Let me update it

KV: Sex pest, sexual predator, pedo, legal definition of harassment, botox chad, David Hasselhoff, con creep, homophobe, grifter, Percy, blackface lawyer, trust fund lawyer, incels, adolescents, virgins, screech, stans, not real anime fans, misogynists, rape apologists, victim blaming, #StillFired,

ISWV: Fat

KV:
View attachment 1206002

You forgot melted Ken doll or botox Ken.

...where's our icon pics?
 
  • Late
Reactions: WarJams
You forgot melted Ken doll or botox Ken.

...where's our icon pics?

Can't you see the notification at the top of the page?
Images may fail sporadically. I have taken measures to keep the site working under high load at the expense of static content. The new server is ETA 7~10 days.
 
So that one Vicstan (CultofVM???) who said LawTwitter was several tards taking turns piloting a meme account was even more correct?

She's saying that so she doesn't have to take responsibility for what "someone else" using the account said. I wouldn't believe it. Of all the commentators on Twitter, she seemed to be one of the most level-headed. It was all a front. She likes to fling mud like the rest of the shitposters. She just didn't want to do it under her own name.

1585428732887.png

https://archive.vn/JgsTu
 
Last edited:
If LawArchive were being handled by multiple people, then 'her' personality would wildly change, along with her sentence structure and whatever made up tech-tech she tried to say to feel authentic. Most of the mouthy KVs have their own style and methods of argument, and half of them probably already have sock accounts. This is the classic KV tactic that's been used by Monica and Shane and others constantly since the start. Verify stuff that hasn't been or can't be verified, and pull a "win" by saying "you're right, BUT there's this other thing you don't know!"
 
I don't even understand the point of this attempt at obfuscation.
"No it's not just this idiot making these dumbass ineffectual jabs at someone who doesn't care, it's being handled by multiple idiots (including the accused idiot). Take that, Kiwi Farms!"

Like, what actual difference does this make? Not only is it still Kathryn who clearly made some of the statements on the account (good job on the partial confirm), the whole point is that it's way more cringeworthy and pathetic than any of the bullshit Rackets did with that account when he still had it.
 
I don't even understand the point of this attempt at obfuscation.
"No it's not just this idiot making these dumbass ineffectual jabs at someone who doesn't care, it's being handled by multiple idiots (including the accused idiot). Take that, Kiwi Farms!"

Like, what actual difference does this make? Not only is it still Kathryn who clearly made some of the statements on the account (good job on the partial confirm), the whole point is that it's way more cringeworthy and pathetic than any of the bullshit Rackets did with that account when he still had it.

The entire point of the "parody" was that they were pretending to be his female intern who may or may not have ever existed in the first place, either that she was a real person who actually hated Nick or that she was never real to begin with and so someone was puppeting her to mock him. When the identity of the person is revealed - or even worse, if they claim it's a bunch of dummies - that makes the entire account pointless.
 
TUG is still relevant enough to get fanart?
Comicsgate is dumb. Also it takes more than hamplanet wife dick pic fishing and broken mailbox gay-ops to be unpersoned by anti-SJW types. Just ask how Smug is still somewhat tolerated by those kinda people; you basically have to run an awful edgy political campaign or be a legit insane incel with degrees of Christian fundie homophobic edgelord to be mostly unpersoned (flag faggotry to be fully unpersoned)
 
Last edited:
She's saying that so she doesn't have to take responsibility for what "someone else" using the account said. I wouldn't believe it. Of all the commentators on Twitter, she seemed to be one of the most level-headed. It was all a front. She likes to fling mud like the rest of the shitposters. She just didn't want to do it under her own name.

View attachment 1206336
https://archive.vn/JgsTu
This is performative, she's putting on a show trying to convince others of how not-worried she is, but she's overdoing it.
Guess having her ID outed shook her.
 
If LawArchive were being handled by multiple people, then 'her' personality would wildly change, along with her sentence structure and whatever made up tech-tech she tried to say to feel authentic. Most of the mouthy KVs have their own style and methods of argument, and half of them probably already have sock accounts. This is the classic KV tactic that's been used by Monica and Shane and others constantly since the start. Verify stuff that hasn't been or can't be verified, and pull a "win" by saying "you're right, BUT there's this other thing you don't know!"

Not if they read/type from what is essentially a script. Just cut and paste for a while then let the next speg do some 'work' for a while. I keep saying it. People will accept reality eventually.

Why do you think that the exact same people keep popping up in all the different fandoms with the exact same talking points with just a topic change? Vic, comics, Star Wars, Doc Who, Magic, Cosplay... Does that sound like random spergery? This isn't just spergs at random. Yes there are indeed a lot of useful idiots but they are all being directed for a reason. They are being paid to rouse the crazies. What are they pushing for? Who benefits by directing a lot of people in one direction? The math ain't complex.
 
Back