Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Proof of said actions that are unwise? What the hech are you talking about?




You're accusing me of not following The Torah? šŸ˜‚




That question has already been answered.
I never asked Marshall to make videos. As I said here before, Marshall and I had a signed agreement in which one thing we agreed on was that he would NOT post videos on YouTube and he chose to do it anyway. The one video you hear me in in the background he put me on the spot and pressured me to say something. If you notice, I pushed back at first and tried to avoid being in the video. But he kept pressuring me so I allowed my voice to be in the audio. Then a second time he recorded me without me knowing in the car (the video that appears dark with my audio).

I'm still to this day against YouTube and I don't look on his video making with favor, but he continues to do it anyway. That's his own free will. He's his own person, what makes you think I can control him? No one can control anyone else.

I already told you a few pages back that this is an area Marshall and I don't agree on. It's been a source of constant tension in our covenant and that's just the way it is. No further comments, I might say something I regret, because I have nothing nice to say about this topic.





That's an incorrect use of a quote. You are infusing your own opinion of what the terms "disgraceful" mean. The words "disgraceful" and "dishonor" are subjective. You are taking moral guidelines invented in your own head (ie "spousal rape is bad") and then imposing it on the text. Whereas, the only proper way to define right and wrong is firstly from The Torah.

Again, you are relying on secular academia to displace The Torah and the scriptures. I completely disagree with that approach. The Scriptures are historically accurate and the first source of information.

You bore me, monkey.
Your blundering dances no longer bring me amusement.
Back to Brazil with you.
 
@TamarYaelBatYah hahahahaha! holy shit! I lurked this thread like a month and a half ago you said you was going leave and then you came back and did that over and over, now you still here.
Thanks... I guess.

BTW do you have any diagnoses? I guess you wouldn't dare sharing that though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xtamarlover
She won't even tell us what info she sued CPS about, trying to get it removed from her record. Between that and the multiple CPS visits, to the point where she claims CPS has an actual established procedure for dealing with her during there many home visits, what is going on that CPS is so interested in. How many visits has CPS made to her house? She won't say. Why were they there? She won't discuss it.

Most people never have a single visit from CPS. Even though almost nobody actually lives righteous lives according to her pseudo-Torah bullshit, we all still manage to live our lives with better morality and better standards of behavior toward other people, and especially better behavior in regards to the raising of our children, than Melinda and her "righteous" beliefs.
 
@TamarYaelBatYah hahahahaha! holy shit! I lurked this thread like a month and a half ago you said you was going leave and then you came back and did that over and over, now you still here.
Thanks... I guess.

BTW do you have any diagnoses? I guess you wouldn't dare sharing that though.

I took an NPD test, a bipolar test, and a test for agoraphobia. I came out on the Empath side of NPD, negative for bipolar and positive for agoraphobia. I use essential oils, breathing exercises and meditation to overcome the agoraphobia. I also don't go to crowded places.

I also have claustrophobia.


This woman is putting words in my mouth. Where have I ever said that verbal or emotional abuse is in any way okay? I said that it does not warrant physical attacks. Even if she threw a cigarette at him. He should have walked away to avoid what happened after but his brain is not big enough to think past the next five seconds. Probably too impulsive, too.

Newsflash: You live in America not Israel. Nobody, esp. not the American law gives a shit about what the Torah says. You are fucking crazy to think that what applies in the Torah will apply to a western and worldly society in 2020, like the US. You will have to abide the worldly law of the USA as long as you live there which will be forever. So stay mad. lol

Your weakling of a husband got rightfully punished for what he did. Doesn't matter how many temper tantrums you throw. Any man with a better character would be ashamed about what happened and shut up and not go around bragging about it. As if overpowering someone weaker than oneself is something to brag about.

You two deserve each other. I hope you have to live with each other for the rest of your sad, pathetic lives.

Edit: Stop calling the tings I say moral theories. It's called logic and common sense. But I know you don't like either of these two, one you're not capable off and the other you're not smart enough to apply.

Actually, you DID say that verbal and mental abuse of men is OK because you keep coming at me with this "walk away" theory.

Then one hand you say The Torah is null and void and then you turn around and try to make a moral judgment about what Marshall deserves?? You're just flat out wrong and EVIL. All you are doing is promoting sexism against women by trying to make women into untouchable angels who have no responsibility for their actions

Women are accountable for their actions TOO. PERIOD.


Do Marshall and I deserve each other? Maybe? Because if a man got up in my face and threw a cigarette at me and mentally abused me, and verbally abused me, and trapped me in the relationship by children and stealing all my money, you damn well better believe I might just slug his ass!


Fascinating how she's suddenly started calling her thing with Marshall a "covenant" instead of a marriage.
God I'm getting sucked down into this Dana Cain level of black hole of a thread.


I use "covenant" to emphasize the importance of agreement in context what I'm saying. We are still married.
 
I took an NPD test, a bipolar test, and a test for agoraphobia. I came out on the Empath side of NPD, negative for bipolar and positive for agoraphobia. I use essential oils, breathing exercises and meditation to overcome the agoraphobia. I also don't go to crowded places.

I also have claustrophobia.

Start telling people that you are a neo-nazi with real strong pro segregation views and people typically will leave you be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adamska
See you're doing what you're saying I am. You're applying your fucked up interpretation of the Torah on Kant, who was not a one of Trump's Chosen People, and obviously hated rape so much he said women should rather die. So you're wrong.

Also give me some third party information stating the Torah is 100% accurate.

By "100% accurate" do you mean without scribal interpolations? Like textual criticism of the text?
 
So since it wasn't enough that she said words he didn't like, you need to find another excuse why it was ok for your husband, oops sorry, covenant partner, to assault a woman. Looks like now she tossed a cigarette in his direction. All along it's been because she said word's that hurt him. We have been led to believe that his only recourse to his manhood being challenged by a woman's words was physical violence.
I can't help but think that his manhood must be awfully insecure if a woman's words require violence to re-establish it.
You have only ever used " covenant partner' to refer to your sexual partners/ children's father's before. So it is logical to find your referring to your " husband" that way suspect.
Can some statistics kiwi step in and show how many women die from physical assault vs the amount of men who die from cigarette burns?
I already know the be answer, but for the sake of truthiness.
How many men die per year of verbal abuse? How many women die of being permanently silenced?
 
Last edited:
I took an NPD test, a bipolar test, and a test for agoraphobia. I came out on the Empath side of NPD, negative for bipolar and positive for agoraphobia. I use essential oils, breathing exercises and meditation to overcome the agoraphobia. I also don't go to crowded places.

I also have claustrophobia.
Aight! so you mean online test or doctor provided test?? you sure have a lot of what I find to be odd believes, like the earth being flat and what not, the human race has known the earth is a spheroid since the ancient Greeks, speaking of tests have you checked if your perception of things are as they ought to be? I don't mean to be mean so you know, I am genuinely curious.
Before I forget again ,what made you think @Null was a Mason? is there a tell, that gives them away?
 
  • Like
Reactions: xtamarlover
Aight! so you mean online test or doctor provided test?? you sure have a lot of what I find to be odd believes, like the earth being flat and what not, the human race has known the earth is a spheroid since the ancient Greeks, speaking of tests have you checked if your perception of things are as they ought to be? I don't mean to be mean so you know, I am genuinely curious.
Before I forget again ,what made you think @Null was a Mason? is there a tell, that gives them away?
Somehow the Podunk judge in her Podunk town was influenced by the Podunk judge in the Podunk town that null's mailing address is in. Somehow these couple of Podunk judges, called in their highly secret Mason contacts on the supreme Court and shut down Melinda's cases, because they were such a matter of national security that they couldn't be allowed to go forward.
It was all those silly little men wearing fez. For fucks sake. Why are we still here? Can this please just die?
 
Last edited:
Somehow the Podunk judge in her Podunk town was influenced by the Podunk judge in the Podunk town that bull's mailing address is in. Somehow these couple of Podunk judges, called in their highly secret Mason contacts on the supreme Court and shut down Melinda's cases, because they were such a matter of national security that they couldn't be allowed to go forward.
It was all those silly little men wearing fez. For fucks sake. Why are we still here? Can this please just die?
When the COVID-19 scare is over there will be less people checking her page to give her the attention she craves. I bet people only check her page because of the forced quarantine so it stays on the front page. If it's not, Melinda comes in and comments putting her thread back on the main page.
 
When the COVID-19 scare is over there will be less people checking her page to give her the attention she craves. I bet people only check her page because of the forced quarantine so it stays on the front page. If it's not, Melinda comes in and comments putting her thread back on the main page.
I'm actively considering unwatching this thread because the only thing that Melinda deserves is going homeless and her kids safely in a foster home.

The REEEE's for attention and her decisive demolition on every topic she brings up make this a big reason.
 
I took an NPD test, a bipolar test, and a test for agoraphobia. I came out on the Empath side of NPD, negative for bipolar and positive for agoraphobia. I use essential oils, breathing exercises and meditation to overcome the agoraphobia. I also don't go to crowded places.

I also have claustrophobia.




Actually, you DID say that verbal and mental abuse of men is OK because you keep coming at me with this "walk away" theory.

Then one hand you say The Torah is null and void and then you turn around and try to make a moral judgment about what Marshall deserves?? You're just flat out wrong and EVIL. All you are doing is promoting sexism against women by trying to make women into untouchable angels who have no responsibility for their actions

Women are accountable for their actions TOO. PERIOD.


Do Marshall and I deserve each other? Maybe? Because if a man got up in my face and threw a cigarette at me and mentally abused me, and verbally abused me, and trapped me in the relationship by children and stealing all my money, you damn well better believe I might just slug his ass!





I use "covenant" to emphasize the importance of agreement in context what I'm saying. We are still married.

I can not believe, really not believe you do not understand the difference between saying that verbal abuse of men is okay or saying that men should walk away from these situations to avoid physical conflict and probably legal concequences. Is it a lack of reading comprehension or a lack of IQ?

Let me say it very clearly for you:
1)Verbal/Emotional abuse is bad. And so is physical abuse.
2) Reacting to verbal abuse with physical abuse is dumb because it is not self-defense and will land your ass in jail. Just ask your husband. He knows. :)
3)Walking away from a potentially dangerous situation is a valid form of deescalation. It doesn't mean one condones what has been done to oneself. It merely means that one removed oneself from a dangerous situation before it escalated. It's the smart thing to do. But you wouldn't know that, of course.
3) Women should be held accountable for their actions, yes, but not with violence. Nobody should. There are other measures, like laws, to hold people accountable for their actions.
4)Sure women are not untouchable angels. You're case in point of that. But your violent ideas about how women should be treated are disgusting. I don't care for it and my own view about women's rights won't be changed by your deranged babblings about feminism. Stay mad. :)

Also, I'm not a J-ew. Your stupid Torah is null and void for me ALWAYS. Don't give a shit about what's in there. Or any other holy book for that matter. I only care about the worldly law of the country I am in.

Oh, and I wouldn't advice you to hit a man. You'd get beaten into a pulp. After all, you are all for men defending themselves from women, aren't you? Unless one of your delusions is that you have higher physical strength than a man. There is a fine line between bravery and stupidity. But then, I already know which side you are on so why am I even saying anything?
 
Somehow the Podunk judge in her Podunk town was influenced by the Podunk judge in the Podunk town that null's mailing address is in. Somehow these couple of Podunk judges, called in their highly secret Mason contacts on the supreme Court and shut down Melinda's cases, because they were such a matter of national security that they couldn't be allowed to go forward.
It was all those silly little men wearing fez. For fucks sake. Why are we still here? Can this please just die?
I'm curious , I really want to hear her actual rationalization, but I get what you mean.
I have a strong suspicion, as am sure many other have to, that she has a problem with perceiving reality.
 
So what did his daughter's mother say to him that was so abusive that his only remedy was violence? What evil words did the pagan woman with her "hand in your husband's wallet " speak?

Is that even his daughter? Last time I checked she was grooming the child to call someone else "dad". But using Marshall to pay the bill.

Not to mention she refused to do a DNA test on the child


I can not believe, really not believe you do not understand the difference between saying that verbal abuse of men is okay or saying that men should walk away from these situations to avoid physical conflict and probably legal concequences. Is it a lack of reading comprehension or a lack of IQ?

Let me say it very clearly for you:
1)Verbal/Emotional abuse is bad. And so is physical abuse.
2) Reacting to verbal abuse with physical abuse is dumb because it is not self-defense and will land your ass in jail. Just ask your husband. He knows. :)
3)Walking away from a potentially dangerous situation is a valid form of deescalation. It doesn't mean one condones what has been done to oneself. It merely means that one removed oneself from a dangerous situation before it escalated. It's the smart thing to do. But you wouldn't know that, of course.
3) Women should be held accountable for their actions, yes, but not with violence. Nobody should. There are other measures, like laws, to hold people accountable for their actions.
4)Sure women are not untouchable angels. You're case in point of that. But your violent ideas about how women should be treated are disgusting. I don't care for it and my own view about women's rights won't be changed by your deranged babblings about feminism. Stay mad. :)

Also, I'm not a J-ew. Your stupid Torah is null and void for me ALWAYS. Don't give a shit about what's in there. Or any other holy book for that matter. I only care about the worldly law of the country I am in.

Oh, and I wouldn't advice you to hit a man. You'd get beaten into a pulp. After all, you are all for men defending themselves from women, aren't you? Unless one of your delusions is that you have higher physical strength than a man. There is a fine line between bravery and stupidity. But then, I already know which side you are on so why am I even saying anything?

Striking someone who is verbally abusing you is not abuse. It's provocation.

I'm actively considering unwatching this thread because the only thing that Melinda deserves is going homeless and her kids safely in a foster home.

The REEEE's for attention and her decisive demolition on every topic she brings up make this a big reason.

Another tantrum from team Patriarchy

Somehow the Podunk judge in her Podunk town was influenced by the Podunk judge in the Podunk town that null's mailing address is in. Somehow these couple of Podunk judges, called in their highly secret Mason contacts on the supreme Court and shut down Melinda's cases, because they were such a matter of national security that they couldn't be allowed to go forward.
It was all those silly little men wearing fez. For fucks sake. Why are we still here? Can this please just die?

Yet somehow after they did me dirty, a plague came on this country. There is a righteous Elohim.

Next 4th of July I'm burning an American flag
 
That's not how it works in this country, Melinda. Or any sensible country.
Not necessarily. In the US women are often acquitted of first degree murder when they kill physically abusive men. It's considered provocation and distress.

You are conflating scientific proof and facts with philosophical opinions. They are nothing alike. 2 plus 2 is 4 even if the Torah says it’s shellfish.

Melinda... why do you have a thread here on Kiwifarms?

I have a thread because I defied
the male social contract of Patriarchy.

Let's find point A....together.

The Stalker is Point A. Had he not made YouTube videos about me, no one would know anything about the personal details of my life.

The (unrighteous) vindictive ex-wife of Marshall is Point B. She's the original poster of the thread on Kiwi Farms trying to trash Marshall and I. I have my personal opinion about her motives, but no need to say here. Her internalized misogyny shows in her writing though.

Kiwi Farms fan club is Point C. They seek to scapegoat anything that defies Patriarchy. Male anxiety about women who defy Patriarchy results in abuse and violence towards though women.

Joshua Moon is Point D. As I've seen from how he spoke to an official of Australia, he doesn't handle civility well.

Each of these people's spiritual sicknesses fed off of each other. And the threads were born.

 
Is that even his daughter? Last time I checked she was grooming the child to call someone else "dad". But using Marshall to pay the bill.

Not to mention she refused to do a DNA test on the child




Striking someone who is verbally abusing you is not abuse. It's provocation.



Another tantrum from team Patriarchy



Yet somehow after they did me dirty, a plague came on this country. There is a righteous Elohim.

Next 4th of July I'm burning an American flag
Part of the reason you claim he had to use physical assault for defense against words, rather than walk away like a man, is because there were children involved. So which is it? His daughter, therefore a valid excuse, or now, apparently not his daughter, so not a valid excuse. Can't have it both ways.
Hitting someone who says words you don't like is assault. Welcome to America. You like our social welfare programs, enjoy our laws while you're at it.
Enjoy buying yourself a flag, maybe barbeque some pork Frank's over it while you burn it. Waste of cloth, frankly. Hope you get a cotton one and not one of those cheap polyester ones, we're running low on polar bears and shit.
 
Not necessarily. In the US women are often acquitted of first degree murder when they kill physically abusive men. It's considered provocation and distress.
Okay. How does that relate to Marshall beating his ex because she said mean words to him? Are you saying that if she somehow managed to kill Marshall during that incident, she would be vindicated?
 
Back