Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[TamarYaelBatYah]

No bet. If she runs she loses out on all of her welfare bucks. Melinda literally has no other income. If the food stamps, rent subsidies, and welfare benefits don't come for even a single month, she's totally fucked. She has no resources to run with, and nowhere to run to.

Where did I ever say I receive SNAP benefits? Proof of said claim?

Proof that I have no alternate resources or sources of support? OOOOH, wait, this is the fairytale man.

If you do make a call, then godspeed friend.
If she does get investigated, how much you wanna bet she's gonna run lmao

They will more than likely filter out your call under "screened out" function.

But if they do come, I have cameras all over my house which will be recording their face and audio as well, just like I always have. They will be greeted by the same sign on my door that has been there for years now. And they would more than likely send the supervisor to make sure they do it all by the book. And I'll be showing them every screenshot from this site.

If I've never run before, what makes you think I would run now? You're a moron.

It's a common requirement for felons, especially felons convicted of crimes of violence, or felons considered to be at high risk to reoffend. Marshall certainly fits the bill as he is both.

ETA: I bet Marshall's PO thought long and hard before he allowed Marshall, guilty of a crime of violence against a woman he was in a relationship with, to move across the country to enter a relationship with a woman on welfare who has several vulnerable children. If he had been in the federal system, he likely would have been denied permission. The federal parole and probation system is much better funded and does a much more intensive job of supervision. Here's hoping your next crime gets a federal charge, Marshall!

No actually the Probation office here had more intelligence than the dumbasses in California. Virginia isn't like California. They don't lock up people for 4 years for a one hour injury.

I find it hilarious that you refuse to respond to any theological questions at all. You are completely and totally incapable of defending your theological position. I am now 100% sure you have not read the Torah cover to cover.

You can tell yourself whatever you want.

I'll answer you again in the words of The Messiah:
It's not right to take food meant for the children and give it to dogs

Want a bone doggy? Let me hear you bark like this: WOOF WOOF

I don't give truth and secrets to pigs.
"A cautious person conceals knowledge, but the heart of a fool blurts out folly." (Prov. 12:23)

Meh, she's a whore. She'd find some other chimp to shack up with, like all the times before.

Proof that I have shared a house with all of my exes?

Proof that The Torah calls serial monogamy "whoredom"?

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Proof that I have shared a house with all of my exes?

Proof that The Torah calls serial monogamy "whoredom"?

The torah DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. It's a fairy tale. And a horrific and evil one , at that. This is why no nation on earth uses it as a barometer of morality. Only sick freaks do. And one doesn't have to cohabitate to be a whore. All that is required is sexual libertinism. If you really actually lived by the torah, you'd find a group of men to stone you to death for your sexual depravity.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Also, there’s no legal way for YOU to find out who made the call. CPS reports are completely confidential and will not be released to the public eye for any reason. You cannot subpoena someone. CPS will not subpoena someone.
I’m not sure if you’re actually getting your information from somewhere or using it as a scare tactic, but you’re wrong.

Also, up to 24 hours after a report is made, the offending family will a call that a report is being filed. . You haven’t gotten a call, Melinda. You cannot take this this to court and you know it.

Incorrect. Do your research right before you go blabbing your mouth

Applicable Virginia law proving that CPS callers can be revealed when made by malicious intent:

2011 Code of Virginia :: Title 63.2 WELFARE (SOCIAL SERVICES). :: Chapter 15 Child Abuse and Neglect (63.2-1500 thru 63.2-1530) :: 63.2-1514 Retention of records in all reports; procedures regarding unfounded reports alleged to be made in b...

law.justia.com

Title 22. Social Services

law.lis.virginia.gov

"F. If a person suspects that he is the subject of a report or complaint of child abuse or neglect made in bad faith or with malicious intent, that person may petition the court for access to the record including the identity of the reporter or complainant pursuant to § 63.2-1514 of the Code of Virginia."

Look before you leap folks

 

[A Cardboard Box]

You can tell yourself whatever you want.

I'll answer you again in the words of The Messiah:
It's not right to take food meant for the children and give it to dogs

Want a bone doggy? Let me hear you bark like this: WOOF WOOF

I don't give truth and secrets to pigs.
"A cautious person conceals knowledge, but the heart of a fool blurts out folly." (Prov. 12:23)

Must I remind you that the rich man that fed the crumbs from his beard to the beggar suffers eternal damnation in a lake of fire?

Do you make your neighbors and children beg for scraps? Do you humiliate them so?

This goes against His word directly. Yahweh COMMANDS that you love the alien as your neighbor and as yourself. You are rebuking His command, saying you know better than He.

Must I remind you of Proverbs 3:5-6?
5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart
and lean not on your own understanding;
6 in all your ways submit to him,
and he will make your paths straight.

Why do you hate Yahweh? Why do you rebuke Him?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You literally said “my kids shoot alongside me.” As well as saying things about not opposing kids having access to firearms.

These same supposed “malicious intent” screenshots are also biased on YOUR side, as you won’t show them what you yourself has said. There’s plenty of neglect and abuse that’s been mentioned by you in this thread. Aka, Marshall hitting you, you being a rape fetishist, etc.


Journalists calling it “the world’s biggest stalking website” doesn’t actually mean anything to CPS. Kiwifarms is legal. You’re just stupid. As you said yourself, personal opinion on the internet is not a CPS problem. You’re also ENGAGING with your so-called “stalkers.”

If you want to play that game though, I can say you’re stalking me, too. (Not to mention threatening someone’s physical safety pages back).

Any call made into CPS is anonymous, unless CPS finds out one has made a “false report” (i.e. someone called with no proof).

I did some digging, Melinda:

Malicious intent is not a thing in CPS, or any abusive family could claim it and they’d be holed up in court because of people like you.
They take all calls with equal seriousness and do a visit if they’re concerned. After that, they can decide if it was a false report or not.

Go ahead and do it. For your own safety and the kids. You’ll just look stupid, because no one here has actually called CPS.

And I’ve got another question:
are you really THAT scared of losing your kids that you have to threaten everyone who’s concerned? Your actions show defense, not offense. Something is going on.

Wow, you really are a dumbass.
I ALSO said that it is LEGAL in Virginia to allow a child to fire a gun NEXT TO YOU
I even posted the law. Are you that DUMB?

Title 18.2. Crimes and Offenses Generally

law.lis.virginia.gov

"B. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to authorize a child under the age of twelve to use a firearm except when the child is under the supervision of an adult. Any person violating this subsection shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. For purposes of this subsection, "adult" shall mean a parent, guardian, person standing in loco parentis to the child or a person twenty-one years or over who has the permission of the parent, guardian, or person standing in loco parentis to supervise the child in the use of a firearm."


Damn, now don't tell me you can't read that.


I'm not scared of anything. I respond because it shows just what a dummy you are

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Incorrect. Do your research right before you go blabbing your mouth

Applicable Virginia law proving that CPS callers can be revealed when made by malicious intent:

2011 Code of Virginia :: Title 63.2 WELFARE (SOCIAL SERVICES). :: Chapter 15 Child Abuse and Neglect (63.2-1500 thru 63.2-1530) :: 63.2-1514 Retention of records in all reports; procedures regarding unfounded reports alleged to be made in b...

law.justia.com

Title 22. Social Services

law.lis.virginia.gov

"F. If a person suspects that he is the subject of a report or complaint of child abuse or neglect made in bad faith or with malicious intent, that person may petition the court for access to the record including the identity of the reporter or complainant pursuant to § 63.2-1514 of the Code of Virginia."

Look before you leap folks

You stupid, stupid slut. Bad faith would look like :
Complainant is a scorned lover of subject, who has a personal interest in harming the Subject

Ie: if Carlson made the complaint, it could be deemed in bad faith.
HOWEVER, a complaint from an uninvolved party, with legitimate grounds to worry for the safety of the kids, cannot be deemed "in bad faith"

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

"F. If a person suspects that he is the subject of a report or complaint of child abuse or neglect made in bad faith or with malicious intent, that person may petition the court for access to the record including the identity of the reporter or complainant pursuant to § 63.2-1514 of the Code of Virginia."

Look before you leap folks

Keyphrase being "made in bad faith or with malicious intent". As much as you screech and jump around like the albino baboon you are, these calls aren't inherently in bad faith. There's actual grounds for concern, whether you like it or not.

Then again, it'd be better if you were infertile from the start so no children would be fucked over by your insane ramblings.

Wow, you really are a dumbass.
I ALSO said that it is LEGAL in Virginia to allow a child to fire a gun NEXT TO YOU
I even posted the law. Are you that DUMB?

Title 18.2. Crimes and Offenses Generally

law.lis.virginia.gov

"B. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to authorize a child under the age of twelve to use a firearm except when the child is under the supervision of an adult. Any person violating this subsection shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. For purposes of this subsection, "adult" shall mean a parent, guardian, person standing in loco parentis to the child or a person twenty-one years or over who has the permission of the parent, guardian, or person standing in loco parentis to supervise the child in the use of a firearm."


Damn, now don't tell me you can't read that.


I'm not scared of anything. I respond because it shows just what a dummy you are

You're scared of CPS lmao

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You know what does bring CPS to your door? Of course you do, they've been to your door many times already. Physical abuse. Sexual abuse. Neglect. Criminal behavior which endangers the children. An unfit adult cohabitating with children. Which of these issues has CPS investigated in regards to you, Melinda? And in regards to Marshall?

It's all been tried

You stupid, stupid slut. Bad faith would look like :
Complainant is a scorned lover of subject, who has a personal interest in harming the Subject

Ie: if Carlson made the complaint, it could be deemed in bad faith.
HOWEVER, a complaint from an uninvolved party, with legitimate grounds to worry for the safety of the kids, cannot be deemed "in bad faith"

The manner in which you speak and the format of this site is enough to prove malicious intent. Trust me, I've got screenshots of everything.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

The manner in which you speak and the format of this site is enough to prove malicious intent. Trust me, I've got screenshots of everything.

That's not how it works lmao, a site can not represent a human being unless it's the owner themselves, that's the most retarded collectivist argument possible.
And if you, in fact, have screenshots that prove malicious intent, post em here. You like asking us for proof, you never provide any yourself, break the mold for once and actually post some fucking evidence, your fat ass should be able to post a goddamned JPEG here without hesitation, otherwise it's just more bluff.

now hit us with a six lawsuit saga so we can laugh at you

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

I can subpoena even more if I open another federal case, which won't get dismissed again because I only made one small error, which trust me, I won't be making again.

For $100, who can tell me why my federal suit against CPS was dismissed?

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Of course you get food benefits, you qualify for them and you have your greedy little hog trotters out for every gimme you can possibly get. The only alternative sources of income besides the government you may have are guaranteed to be grifts you are trying to pull. I'm well aware you claim to sell outdoor supplies, but I don't believe you. You have no ordering chain, no stock, no payment processor. If you do have an actual, viable business, feel free to point us to your business information. I guess it's possible you're selling cheap outdoor supplies at flea markets and swap meets. If you are, surely you're reporting that income to the relevant benefits agencies, right? If not, it's just another grift.

Do you know how often most people have CPS investigations into their home and family life? Never, that's how often. The vast majority of 'pagans' live more moral and more righteous lives than you do, Melinda.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

I can subpoena even more if I open another federal case, which won't get dismissed again because I only made one small error, which trust me, I won't be making again.

For $100, who can tell me why my federal suit against CPS was dismissed?

This is just a guess, but I think it's a pretty good one.

You didn't attend court lol

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

It's all been tried


The manner in which you speak and the format of this site is enough to prove malicious intent. Trust me, I've got screenshots of everything.

Nope. Same as if you were posting on a pedo site. The nature of your admissions is the only factor that matters, not the nature of the site. Nice try though. Can't wait for you to try to argue your quasi-legal mumbojumbo to the cops and CPS. They will just tick the box that says "uncooperative/hostile to investigation" and hold it further against you. People here are legitimately concerned for your children. You should consider your track record where it comes to tribunals before waxing smug in your knowledge of law and procedure. Your degree is in Jungle Gyms, not Law.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Oh, and maybe you should put up the court documents about that CPS case? I'd love to see them, finally discover what that 'malicious' info was that you were so desperate to have removed from your record.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Keyphrase being "made in bad faith or with malicious intent". As much as you screech and jump around like the albino baboon you are, these calls aren't inherently in bad faith. There's actual grounds for concern, whether you like it or not.

Then again, it'd be better if you were infertile from the start so no children would be fucked over by your insane ramblings.



You're scared of CPS lmao

You have no grounds legally for anything. Not liking what someone believes is not legal grounds. Fairytale suspicion isn't either.

Nope. Same as if you were posting on a pedo site. The nature of your admissions is the only factor that matters, not the nature of the site. Nice try though. Can't wait for you to try to argue your quasi-legal mumbojumbo to the cops and CPS. They will just tick the box that says "uncooperative/hostile to investigation" and hold it further against you. People here are legitimately concerned for your children. You should consider your track record where it comes to tribunals before waxing smug in your knowledge of law and procedure. Your degree is in Jungle Gyms, not Law.

Dont try that fake phoney bologna "concern" crap with me. If you were so concerned about my children you wouldnt be enabling a stalker and doxxing my children's address all over the internet back in 2017.

The only thing you are concerned about is your wounded sexist ego. Take a hike and get a life loser.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

You have no grounds legally for anything. Not liking what someone believes is not legal grounds. Fairytale suspicion isn't either.

Fucking rich for you to be scorning "fairytales" while creeching that the torah is the unimpeachable barometer of morality and law.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Dont try that fake phoney bologna "concern" crap with me. If you were so concerned about my children you wouldnt be enabling a stalker and doxxing my children's address all over the internet back in 2017.

The only thing you are concerned about is your wounded sexist ego. Take a hike and get a life loser.

You doxxed yourself by filing the lawsuit lmao

Not liking what someone believes is not legal grounds.

You're correct on this, which is kinda why your suits against KF failed

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Nope. Same as if you were posting on a pedo site. The nature of your admissions is the only factor that matters, not the nature of the site. Nice try though. Can't wait for you to try to argue your quasi-legal mumbojumbo to the cops and CPS. They will just tick the box that says "uncooperative/hostile to investigation" and hold it further against you. People here are legitimately concerned for your children. You should consider your track record where it comes to tribunals before waxing smug in your knowledge of law and procedure. Your degree is in Jungle Gyms, not Law.

Incorrect. Your disposition toward a person is enough to establish malicious intent. But by all means, keep running your mouth because you are just giving me more and more to work with here

Hostile toward what? I've let them in every time they come. And recorded them with my security cameras and audio. You're a moron

You doxxed yourself by filing the lawsuit lmao

Incorrect. I filed my lawsuit under a confidential PO BOX you moron.

 

[Papa Adolfo's Take'n'Bake]

Dont try that fake phoney bologna "concern" crap with me. If you were so concerned about my children you wouldnt be enabling a stalker and doxxing my children's address all over the internet back in 2017.

The only thing you are concerned about is your wounded sexist ego. Take a hike and get a life loser.

You do realize, at least by now, if you weren't a vexatious litigator who unironically stans spousal rape, and feeds the trolls 24/7 there'd be no reason to dox you, right?

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Dont try that fake phoney bologna "concern" crap with me. If you were so concerned about my children you wouldnt be enabling a stalker and doxxing my children's address all over the internet back in 2017.

The only thing you are concerned about is your wounded sexist ego. Take a hike and get a life loser.

I myself wasn't even here in 2017, and had no part in your doxxing. HOWEVER, it must be said that the risk of a random wierdo targeting your piglets is orders of magnitude less than the risk of Marshall physically or sexually abusing them, or you warping them beyond redemption.