Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
Not only do trannies demand you date them, but now they demand you hire them for sex? Wut
Hux
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 10, 2018
It's all as Metokur said on what the logical endpoint of all this is going to be in the next coming years/decades: "A graveyard full of abandoned, broken people, all who bought into a notion that they could be the pretty little girl if they just believe hard enough"
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
From the same author as "why won't chad pay me $5 to blow a load in my tranny ass" is "why won't the state pay for hormones for an insane sex pervert who's repeatedly tried to cut his balls off"
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2017
Everyone has a job that relys on complete strangers providing them an income
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2017
Then those same opportunists will tell everyone it's those evil bigots to blame when the stunning and brave believer of the crap eats a load of pills or the barrel of a gun. Nothing to do with telling them repeatedly that this is the thing that will fix everything wrong in their life for them to do it and realise they are still not happy. That all the titty skittles and ball chopping was for nought as it was not the true path to happiness they were promised. These quick fixes to deeper problems are not the way forward and no amount of browbeating the WHO into deleting sections of the DSM will help.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
At this point, why do they still exist? If it's not the chinks it's the troons
LateNightMuffin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
Does anyone know if the perp on this is a woman, as the article states, or a troon? I'm presuming troon, based on some of the links.
Calif. Middle School Teacher Is Allegedly Randomly Stabbed to Death by Woman While Walking Dog
key sentence
"The suspect — seen by neighbors who called 911 to report a fight and described the assailant as a large, long-haired man — then fled the scene in Oceanside, California, shortly before 8 a.m. on April 10, according to police."
also from the article
“Although a (woman), Ramos’ appearance resembles that of the suspect description provided by witnesses,” he [a police spokesman] told Times of San Diego."
It doesn't say whether the parentheses were put in by the cop or by the reporter. And who puts random parentheses around the word "woman"?
here is the person's facebook profile
facebook profile
prior arrests, some of which list him as male.
currently listed as female in the jail.
anyone got any more information on this guy?
Calif. Middle School Teacher Is Allegedly Randomly Stabbed to Death by Woman While Walking Dog
On his 45th birthday, Chad Danielson had returned from walking his family’s dog when someone he didn’t know attacked him in his yard with a knife.
The suspect — seen by neighbors who called 911 to report a fight and described the assailant as a large, long-haired man — then fled the scene in Oceanside, California, shortly before 8 a.m. on April 10, according to police.
Rushed to Palomar Medical Hospital, Danielson died from his injuries.
He was a physical education teacher at Jefferson Middle School in the city, reports NBC San Diego.
“Chad Danielson was tragically taken from his family, leaving behind his beautiful wife Joy and compassionate children Elizabeth and Oliver,” a family friend wrote in a GoFundMe appeal for financial help.
“This heartbreaking event is amplified with the current pandemic preventing family, friends, loved ones, and colleagues, from surrounding Joy and the children with your presence and love,” wrote Tracy Stevens, who created the fundraiser on behalf of Danielson’s wife.
On Thursday, police identified the suspect as 22-year-old Jennifer Ramos, and on Friday she was behind bars in the San Diego County jail charged with homicide in the alleged killing, Oceanside police spokesman Tom Bussey tells PEOPLE.
“Although a (woman), Ramos’ appearance resembles that of the suspect description provided by witnesses,” he told Times of San Diego.
Bussey tells PEOPLE that detectives have not identified a motive, and that the victim and alleged assailant, who lived a couple of blocks apart, were unknown to each other.
“She just went out and attacked the first person I think she could find, and then stabbed him multiple times,” he says. “I think if it would have been anybody else, she would have attacked them. He just happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time.”
Danielson was a “kind, gentle and beloved family man” who was “tragically murdered on the morning of his birthday, with a table full of unopened birthday presents waiting for him to celebrate with his family,” his family said in a statement, reports Times of San Diego.
The statement added: “It’s a random and senseless act that shattered an extremely close-knit family, a large and loving extended family, and is a profound loss for all who knew and loved him – including his students, parents, fellow teachers and the greater Oceanside community.”
An investigation is continuing.
The suspect — seen by neighbors who called 911 to report a fight and described the assailant as a large, long-haired man — then fled the scene in Oceanside, California, shortly before 8 a.m. on April 10, according to police.
Rushed to Palomar Medical Hospital, Danielson died from his injuries.
He was a physical education teacher at Jefferson Middle School in the city, reports NBC San Diego.
“Chad Danielson was tragically taken from his family, leaving behind his beautiful wife Joy and compassionate children Elizabeth and Oliver,” a family friend wrote in a GoFundMe appeal for financial help.
“This heartbreaking event is amplified with the current pandemic preventing family, friends, loved ones, and colleagues, from surrounding Joy and the children with your presence and love,” wrote Tracy Stevens, who created the fundraiser on behalf of Danielson’s wife.
On Thursday, police identified the suspect as 22-year-old Jennifer Ramos, and on Friday she was behind bars in the San Diego County jail charged with homicide in the alleged killing, Oceanside police spokesman Tom Bussey tells PEOPLE.
“Although a (woman), Ramos’ appearance resembles that of the suspect description provided by witnesses,” he told Times of San Diego.
Bussey tells PEOPLE that detectives have not identified a motive, and that the victim and alleged assailant, who lived a couple of blocks apart, were unknown to each other.
“She just went out and attacked the first person I think she could find, and then stabbed him multiple times,” he says. “I think if it would have been anybody else, she would have attacked them. He just happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time.”
Danielson was a “kind, gentle and beloved family man” who was “tragically murdered on the morning of his birthday, with a table full of unopened birthday presents waiting for him to celebrate with his family,” his family said in a statement, reports Times of San Diego.
The statement added: “It’s a random and senseless act that shattered an extremely close-knit family, a large and loving extended family, and is a profound loss for all who knew and loved him – including his students, parents, fellow teachers and the greater Oceanside community.”
An investigation is continuing.
key sentence
"The suspect — seen by neighbors who called 911 to report a fight and described the assailant as a large, long-haired man — then fled the scene in Oceanside, California, shortly before 8 a.m. on April 10, according to police."
also from the article
“Although a (woman), Ramos’ appearance resembles that of the suspect description provided by witnesses,” he [a police spokesman] told Times of San Diego."
It doesn't say whether the parentheses were put in by the cop or by the reporter. And who puts random parentheses around the word "woman"?
here is the person's facebook profile
facebook profile
prior arrests, some of which list him as male.
currently listed as female in the jail.
anyone got any more information on this guy?
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2020
This is nothing new. They already constantly demand money and sex. This is just them demanding both at once.
queue-anon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
.
This seems to be him: https://www.facebook.com/people/Jennifer-Mendoza-Ramos/100041662119028
Looks like a man, indeed.
Also, I'll put money on (woman) being the reporter's work. I bet the police did the unspeakably transphobic thing of qualifying Ramos' "womanhood" with the prefix "trans".
This seems to be him: https://www.facebook.com/people/Jennifer-Mendoza-Ramos/100041662119028
Looks like a man, indeed.
Also, I'll put money on (woman) being the reporter's work. I bet the police did the unspeakably transphobic thing of qualifying Ramos' "womanhood" with the prefix "trans".
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2020
The woke left is a lie — all of it: the politics, the mantras, the pronoun pins
The woke left don’t believe their own hype, and the sooner you get honest, the sooner you get free.
April 22, 2020 by Meghan Murphy
Yesterday, Mel Magazine published an apparently sincere article wondering why “woke bros” turn out not to actually be so “woke.” The truth any honest person knows is that one’s dick tends not to be politicized. We are attracted to those we are attracted to, regardless of what we might say on Twitter about “trans rights,” “fat positivity,” “racial justice,” or faux-judgement of the #metoo’d. The only thing that is true about the woke is that they are phonies. They want attention and power, not justice, and certainly not the truth.
Mel Magazine asks the question: Why won’t “Bernie Bros, male feminists, and ‘good guy’ liberals” who “all support sex work” pay a young man with a fondness for sexual objectification and a fetish for women’s clothing for sex? But the real question is, “How deep is Mel Magazine’s head up its own ass?” and “How long are we going to keep up this charade?”
Like, 3000 words, apparently.
Here’s the story: “Violet, a 25-year-old transsexual with dollish cheekbones and a primary colour wardrobe” wanted to give his friends “a ‘last chance to fuck’ while also raking in as much money as [he] could before [he] hit the Big Apple.” Wow! Generous! You both want your friends to pay you for a thing they don’t want, but also impose your sexual fetishes on them. What a good, good friend; with good, good politics.
The “journalist” interviewing “Violet” shares his interviewee’s affinity for imposing sex on people who are in fact heterosexual men who therefore prefer sex with heterosexual women. Last year, Sessi Kuwabara Blanchard published an article at Vice complaining that his heterosexual male friends didn’t want to sleep with him, writing:
“I’m single this Valentine’s Day, and I feel like shit. I feel undesirable, and I feel powerless to change that. Most of all, I want to know why the guys I crush on, namely cis, straight, male 20-somethings, won’t fuck me.”
When Blanchard discussed this problem with his friends, they tried to ease him into the truth, letting Blanchard know that pestering his male friends about this would only make him feel bad: “They said the guys I like won’t fuck me because they’re straight.” Blanchard wrote this off as “transphobia” — his friends were *gasp* “implying that heterosexuality is male attraction to women,” meaning he didn’t “make the cut.”
Despite Blanchard’s insistence that “desire is fluid,” the categories of “gay” and “straight” exist for a reason: this describes the vast majority of people’s sexual preferences. And there is very little politicizing can do about this.
A hard-to-hear reality I’ve made clear many times is that the crux of transgenderism, for many who identify as trans, is delusion. And that trans identity rests on others — the “woke,” as it were — playing along. When we use preferred pronouns, we participate in this, as we do when we refer to trans-identified males as women, and trans-identified females as male. Many claim this is simply an issue of being kind, respectful, and polite, but, in the end, these lies hurt trans-identified people, as well as the rest of us. The result is a group of males left wondering why, despite being told they are literally women, are not viewed as or treated as literal women. And women are left without rights, boundaries, or the ability to speak the truth.
The woke, I’m sorry to tell you, are liars. This is not a coincidence; it is the basis of their politics.
The answers to the questions asked by the woke are easy. But they pretend there is some long, deep discussion to be had about, as Blanchard puts it, “what it would take for someone to want to fuck me.”
The question is wrong, of course, and intentionally so. And the answer is obvious. If we were to engage with the truth, Blanchard and Violet would be less hurt by the answers. Instead, we’ve decided the lie is what is “nice.”
As a perfect example, Blanchard’s article at Mel Magazine is titled, “Why Won’t Woke Boys Pay for Sex?” In his Instagram stories, Violet posts, “If you’re someone who supports sex work at an intellectual level, would you ever hire a SWer yourself?” Oooh, clever! Naturally many of these men will say, “Yes! Of course! I would gladly demonstrate my very progressive politics by dehumanizing a woman who clearly was molested as a girl and has been told by men like me that the most empowering way to process this is to objectify herself, and engage in sexual acts with men who don’t care about who you are as a person, or about your well-being!”
Violet says he assumed his peers — “millennial-zoomer cusps with art degrees and hard-ons for progressive politics” — would be “prime clients.” After all, these were “youngish liberals” who claimed to “support sex workers and the decriminalization of their profession.”
Blanchard helpfully points out that which is true: johns are not just lonely, ugly, old men who are desperate for physical affection and love, but can’t find it, so are forced to exploit abused women. In reality, all sorts of otherwise eligible bachelors, married men, powerful men, men with girlfriends and families and kids, pay for sex.
“Some research shows that clients of sex workers tend to have their first experience of paid sex when they’re young, hot, and in their 20s, despite having more opportunities for sex than their more aged counterparts,” Blanchard writes. “In two different studies, three-quarters of arrested johns and slightly less than half of online clients using sex work review websites first paid for a sex worker when they were between the ages of 18 to 29.”
What gives? “The numbers suggest that more of Violet’s followers should have been down with paid sex,” Blanchard writes. Yet none of Violet’s supposedly woke bros came through.
Both Violet and Blanchard feign confusion. Positioning this as a question only of men’s willingness to “support sex workers” by paying for sex, rather than acknowledging the fact that they were pursuing heterosexual men who did not believe their own hype about “transwomen” being actual, literal women.
Surprise! That pronoun pin didn’t do what it promised. Surprise! The mean old feminist “TERFs” were right, after all.
Somehow, the stupidity of this fake question drags on for almost 2000 more words. Violet is angered that some of these “leftist male hotties” insisted they “respected women,” and therefore were not willing to pay for sex. “But,” he asks:
“Isn’t ‘respecting women’ paying them to do their job? It seems that some of these men’s theoretical recognition of women’s ability to make decisions for their own body ends up being overridden by skepticism of a sex worker’s ability to consent.”
No, you fucking tool. No man actually believes that porn and prostitution is about respecting women. We all know, full well, that this is degrading, exploitative behaviour, and that no healthy woman would voluntarily choose to fuck strangers, day in and day out, who treat her like shit. Woke politics is a lie. All of it. These mantras are lies and the people who repeat them are liars. And the sooner you admit that, the sooner you can start living an honest life, get mentally healthy, and build healthy relationships with others. Trust me: the truth and authenticity is joyful — it will change everything about your life in a positive way.
There is a reason that men who watch porn feel ashamed about it, and there is a reason that even those men won’t all go so far as to pay for sex: it feels wrong, because it is wrong. It is not normal to want to coerce someone who doesn’t want you into fucking you, and pretending to enjoy it. People who do that are sadists. And despite a culture that enthusiastically and endlessly insists that sadism is normal, healthy, and sexy, most people know in their gut that this is not so, but they just can’t say it anymore, thanks to third wave feminism and the new woke left.
Violent and Blanchard claim the problem is that these “woke bros” have been brainwashed by their second wave mothers, indoctrinating them into “white feminism” (revealing their deep disdain for women and women’s rights). They also speculate that these men’s failure to pay to fuck men in women’s clothing is about protecting their masculinity: “Paying for sex is a ‘beta move’ to some self-proclaimed ‘woke’ men,” Blanchard writes. In other words, men like a challenge, and they like to feel special — like anyone else, really. “So much of it is them feeling cool and valuable, earning the attraction of someone,” Violet explains, calling this “a super 1950s kind of vibe.” But it’s not. Most healthy people don’t want to feel replaceable — like their partner would just be with literally anyone. They want to feel special — chosen. They want to feel seen. Human. This is not a bad thing.
Here is the truth that “woke” sloganeers who say things like “sex work is work” and “transwomen are women” won’t tell you: no one wants to be objectified. We don’t want to be just bodies — empty vessels without personalities, desires, hopes, thoughts, and dreams. We want to be seen as our whole selves. We want to be loved and understood and cared for, for who we really, truly are. People like authenticity, despite what you see on Twitter and Instagram. It matters to people deeply. But for whatever reason, the new new left has decided the opposite is true: phonies are celebrated, lies are repeated, and those who repeat the lies and politic in a completely inauthentic way are encouraged.
This is why the left is failing, and this is why so many of us who are not on the right, but who are sick of the left, are bailing.
Violet goes on to tell numerous stories about his “hot lefty woke bro” buds who, despite their politics, still mysteriously won’t pay for sex or won’t date him. Violet seems angry that these men are actually kind of decent, in their real life behaviour. They actually want actual relationships with actual women. (I would argue these men are not really “good guys,” considering the shit politics they profess, but hey, they are young, and maybe will grow out of hypocrisy eventually, and stand up for something real.) But the new woke left wants to release people of any morals or ethics whatsoever — true liberation, for these folks, is a hedonistic fantasy of disembodied sadists. Righteous!
Violet and Blanchard’s purpose in these articles is to try to bully the men they find attractive into fucking them, using their politics as blackmail. And honestly, I support this strategy: if you, woke bros, really do believe “transwomen are women” and “sex work is work,” put your money where your dick is. The personal is political, is it not?
Tags: dating, gender identity, heterosexuality, mel magazine, prostitution, sex, Sex Work, sexuality, the left, the woke left, transwomen, woke bros
Meghan Murphy
Founder & Editor
Meghan Murphy is a freelance writer and journalist. She has been podcasting and writing about feminism since 2010 and has published work in numerous national and international publications, including The Spectator, UnHerd, the CBC, New Statesman, Vice, Al Jazeera, The Globe and Mail, and more. Meghan completed a Masters degree in the department of Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies at Simon Fraser University in 2012 and lives in Vancouver, B.C. with her dog.
The woke left don’t believe their own hype, and the sooner you get honest, the sooner you get free.
April 22, 2020 by Meghan Murphy
Yesterday, Mel Magazine published an apparently sincere article wondering why “woke bros” turn out not to actually be so “woke.” The truth any honest person knows is that one’s dick tends not to be politicized. We are attracted to those we are attracted to, regardless of what we might say on Twitter about “trans rights,” “fat positivity,” “racial justice,” or faux-judgement of the #metoo’d. The only thing that is true about the woke is that they are phonies. They want attention and power, not justice, and certainly not the truth.
Mel Magazine asks the question: Why won’t “Bernie Bros, male feminists, and ‘good guy’ liberals” who “all support sex work” pay a young man with a fondness for sexual objectification and a fetish for women’s clothing for sex? But the real question is, “How deep is Mel Magazine’s head up its own ass?” and “How long are we going to keep up this charade?”
Like, 3000 words, apparently.
Here’s the story: “Violet, a 25-year-old transsexual with dollish cheekbones and a primary colour wardrobe” wanted to give his friends “a ‘last chance to fuck’ while also raking in as much money as [he] could before [he] hit the Big Apple.” Wow! Generous! You both want your friends to pay you for a thing they don’t want, but also impose your sexual fetishes on them. What a good, good friend; with good, good politics.
The “journalist” interviewing “Violet” shares his interviewee’s affinity for imposing sex on people who are in fact heterosexual men who therefore prefer sex with heterosexual women. Last year, Sessi Kuwabara Blanchard published an article at Vice complaining that his heterosexual male friends didn’t want to sleep with him, writing:
“I’m single this Valentine’s Day, and I feel like shit. I feel undesirable, and I feel powerless to change that. Most of all, I want to know why the guys I crush on, namely cis, straight, male 20-somethings, won’t fuck me.”
When Blanchard discussed this problem with his friends, they tried to ease him into the truth, letting Blanchard know that pestering his male friends about this would only make him feel bad: “They said the guys I like won’t fuck me because they’re straight.” Blanchard wrote this off as “transphobia” — his friends were *gasp* “implying that heterosexuality is male attraction to women,” meaning he didn’t “make the cut.”
Despite Blanchard’s insistence that “desire is fluid,” the categories of “gay” and “straight” exist for a reason: this describes the vast majority of people’s sexual preferences. And there is very little politicizing can do about this.
A hard-to-hear reality I’ve made clear many times is that the crux of transgenderism, for many who identify as trans, is delusion. And that trans identity rests on others — the “woke,” as it were — playing along. When we use preferred pronouns, we participate in this, as we do when we refer to trans-identified males as women, and trans-identified females as male. Many claim this is simply an issue of being kind, respectful, and polite, but, in the end, these lies hurt trans-identified people, as well as the rest of us. The result is a group of males left wondering why, despite being told they are literally women, are not viewed as or treated as literal women. And women are left without rights, boundaries, or the ability to speak the truth.
The woke, I’m sorry to tell you, are liars. This is not a coincidence; it is the basis of their politics.
The answers to the questions asked by the woke are easy. But they pretend there is some long, deep discussion to be had about, as Blanchard puts it, “what it would take for someone to want to fuck me.”
The question is wrong, of course, and intentionally so. And the answer is obvious. If we were to engage with the truth, Blanchard and Violet would be less hurt by the answers. Instead, we’ve decided the lie is what is “nice.”
As a perfect example, Blanchard’s article at Mel Magazine is titled, “Why Won’t Woke Boys Pay for Sex?” In his Instagram stories, Violet posts, “If you’re someone who supports sex work at an intellectual level, would you ever hire a SWer yourself?” Oooh, clever! Naturally many of these men will say, “Yes! Of course! I would gladly demonstrate my very progressive politics by dehumanizing a woman who clearly was molested as a girl and has been told by men like me that the most empowering way to process this is to objectify herself, and engage in sexual acts with men who don’t care about who you are as a person, or about your well-being!”
Violet says he assumed his peers — “millennial-zoomer cusps with art degrees and hard-ons for progressive politics” — would be “prime clients.” After all, these were “youngish liberals” who claimed to “support sex workers and the decriminalization of their profession.”
Blanchard helpfully points out that which is true: johns are not just lonely, ugly, old men who are desperate for physical affection and love, but can’t find it, so are forced to exploit abused women. In reality, all sorts of otherwise eligible bachelors, married men, powerful men, men with girlfriends and families and kids, pay for sex.
“Some research shows that clients of sex workers tend to have their first experience of paid sex when they’re young, hot, and in their 20s, despite having more opportunities for sex than their more aged counterparts,” Blanchard writes. “In two different studies, three-quarters of arrested johns and slightly less than half of online clients using sex work review websites first paid for a sex worker when they were between the ages of 18 to 29.”
What gives? “The numbers suggest that more of Violet’s followers should have been down with paid sex,” Blanchard writes. Yet none of Violet’s supposedly woke bros came through.
Both Violet and Blanchard feign confusion. Positioning this as a question only of men’s willingness to “support sex workers” by paying for sex, rather than acknowledging the fact that they were pursuing heterosexual men who did not believe their own hype about “transwomen” being actual, literal women.
Surprise! That pronoun pin didn’t do what it promised. Surprise! The mean old feminist “TERFs” were right, after all.
Somehow, the stupidity of this fake question drags on for almost 2000 more words. Violet is angered that some of these “leftist male hotties” insisted they “respected women,” and therefore were not willing to pay for sex. “But,” he asks:
“Isn’t ‘respecting women’ paying them to do their job? It seems that some of these men’s theoretical recognition of women’s ability to make decisions for their own body ends up being overridden by skepticism of a sex worker’s ability to consent.”
No, you fucking tool. No man actually believes that porn and prostitution is about respecting women. We all know, full well, that this is degrading, exploitative behaviour, and that no healthy woman would voluntarily choose to fuck strangers, day in and day out, who treat her like shit. Woke politics is a lie. All of it. These mantras are lies and the people who repeat them are liars. And the sooner you admit that, the sooner you can start living an honest life, get mentally healthy, and build healthy relationships with others. Trust me: the truth and authenticity is joyful — it will change everything about your life in a positive way.
There is a reason that men who watch porn feel ashamed about it, and there is a reason that even those men won’t all go so far as to pay for sex: it feels wrong, because it is wrong. It is not normal to want to coerce someone who doesn’t want you into fucking you, and pretending to enjoy it. People who do that are sadists. And despite a culture that enthusiastically and endlessly insists that sadism is normal, healthy, and sexy, most people know in their gut that this is not so, but they just can’t say it anymore, thanks to third wave feminism and the new woke left.
Violent and Blanchard claim the problem is that these “woke bros” have been brainwashed by their second wave mothers, indoctrinating them into “white feminism” (revealing their deep disdain for women and women’s rights). They also speculate that these men’s failure to pay to fuck men in women’s clothing is about protecting their masculinity: “Paying for sex is a ‘beta move’ to some self-proclaimed ‘woke’ men,” Blanchard writes. In other words, men like a challenge, and they like to feel special — like anyone else, really. “So much of it is them feeling cool and valuable, earning the attraction of someone,” Violet explains, calling this “a super 1950s kind of vibe.” But it’s not. Most healthy people don’t want to feel replaceable — like their partner would just be with literally anyone. They want to feel special — chosen. They want to feel seen. Human. This is not a bad thing.
Here is the truth that “woke” sloganeers who say things like “sex work is work” and “transwomen are women” won’t tell you: no one wants to be objectified. We don’t want to be just bodies — empty vessels without personalities, desires, hopes, thoughts, and dreams. We want to be seen as our whole selves. We want to be loved and understood and cared for, for who we really, truly are. People like authenticity, despite what you see on Twitter and Instagram. It matters to people deeply. But for whatever reason, the new new left has decided the opposite is true: phonies are celebrated, lies are repeated, and those who repeat the lies and politic in a completely inauthentic way are encouraged.
This is why the left is failing, and this is why so many of us who are not on the right, but who are sick of the left, are bailing.
Violet goes on to tell numerous stories about his “hot lefty woke bro” buds who, despite their politics, still mysteriously won’t pay for sex or won’t date him. Violet seems angry that these men are actually kind of decent, in their real life behaviour. They actually want actual relationships with actual women. (I would argue these men are not really “good guys,” considering the shit politics they profess, but hey, they are young, and maybe will grow out of hypocrisy eventually, and stand up for something real.) But the new woke left wants to release people of any morals or ethics whatsoever — true liberation, for these folks, is a hedonistic fantasy of disembodied sadists. Righteous!
Violet and Blanchard’s purpose in these articles is to try to bully the men they find attractive into fucking them, using their politics as blackmail. And honestly, I support this strategy: if you, woke bros, really do believe “transwomen are women” and “sex work is work,” put your money where your dick is. The personal is political, is it not?
Tags: dating, gender identity, heterosexuality, mel magazine, prostitution, sex, Sex Work, sexuality, the left, the woke left, transwomen, woke bros
Meghan Murphy
Founder & Editor
Meghan Murphy is a freelance writer and journalist. She has been podcasting and writing about feminism since 2010 and has published work in numerous national and international publications, including The Spectator, UnHerd, the CBC, New Statesman, Vice, Al Jazeera, The Globe and Mail, and more. Meghan completed a Masters degree in the department of Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies at Simon Fraser University in 2012 and lives in Vancouver, B.C. with her dog.
- Joined
- May 3, 2019
The decision is to protect under-18s from "from making those irreversible decisions"
The United Kingdom government is set to outlaw gender reassignment or confirmation surgeries for minors as part of reforming Gender Recognition Act set to take place this summer.
Equalities minister Liz Truss made the announcement confirming the intention to prohibit irreversible medical procedures on under-18s suffering from gender dysphoria.
According to Talk Radio, she said: “I believe strongly that adults should have the freedom to lead their lives as they see fit, but I think it’s very important that while people are still developing their decision-making capabilities that we protect them from making those irreversible decisions.”
In the UK, minors are allowed to undergo reconstructive surgery if they have parental consent–something which has been a source of controversy in recent years as the child transgender topic becomes a hotly debated topic in media and political circles.
Despite requiring parental consent for medical procedures on their genitals to match their gender, most cases are protracted, delaying the procedure until the patient has legally reached adulthood.
Transgender individuals require a two-year waiting period before being granted reconstructive surgery. A review from a specialist panel is also required to be undertaken before the surgery can take place.
Before the coronavirus lockdowns began dominating headlines, several stories relating to transgenderism in minors had arisen from the UK in particular.
A bizarre story involving a medical error saw a transgender man have his vagina removed by cosmetic surgeons during the “bottom” procedure.
Some states in America are in the process of banning gender reassignment procedures to minor patients.
Hungary saw the opportunity in the coronavirus to end legal recognition of transgender individuals, making it almost impossible to legally alter their sex on legal documents.
Poland, currently without any coherent sex ed curriculum, is pressing to criminalize teachers who give their students sex ed classes, with up to 5-year prison terms for anybody found guilty.
The United Kingdom government is set to outlaw gender reassignment or confirmation surgeries for minors as part of reforming Gender Recognition Act set to take place this summer.
Equalities minister Liz Truss made the announcement confirming the intention to prohibit irreversible medical procedures on under-18s suffering from gender dysphoria.
According to Talk Radio, she said: “I believe strongly that adults should have the freedom to lead their lives as they see fit, but I think it’s very important that while people are still developing their decision-making capabilities that we protect them from making those irreversible decisions.”
In the UK, minors are allowed to undergo reconstructive surgery if they have parental consent–something which has been a source of controversy in recent years as the child transgender topic becomes a hotly debated topic in media and political circles.
Despite requiring parental consent for medical procedures on their genitals to match their gender, most cases are protracted, delaying the procedure until the patient has legally reached adulthood.
Transgender individuals require a two-year waiting period before being granted reconstructive surgery. A review from a specialist panel is also required to be undertaken before the surgery can take place.
Before the coronavirus lockdowns began dominating headlines, several stories relating to transgenderism in minors had arisen from the UK in particular.
A bizarre story involving a medical error saw a transgender man have his vagina removed by cosmetic surgeons during the “bottom” procedure.
Some states in America are in the process of banning gender reassignment procedures to minor patients.
Hungary saw the opportunity in the coronavirus to end legal recognition of transgender individuals, making it almost impossible to legally alter their sex on legal documents.
Poland, currently without any coherent sex ed curriculum, is pressing to criminalize teachers who give their students sex ed classes, with up to 5-year prison terms for anybody found guilty.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
So now if your not a simp for trannies your a bigot? I seriously cant wait for the terracougha army to finish us off already.
DumbDude42
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2019
the jokes literally write themselves
JULAY
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
Cue the troons screaming "41%"!
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2019
“We finally decided it is inhumane to put your child on hormone-altering drugs that will permanently remove your child’s ability to feel sexual pleasure when they become an adult.”
Hoplixe
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2019
This is terrible! How will quirky socially-retarded white girls show off their specialness on Tumblr and twitter now?
Won't anyone think of the Wine Moms who will have to suffer under the shadow of obscurity now that they can't pimp out their crotch spawn?
Good, hopefully, they'll start investigating and revealing the horrid practices of these gender therapists and their clinics.
Isn't it nearing 50% now?
Won't anyone think of the Wine Moms who will have to suffer under the shadow of obscurity now that they can't pimp out their crotch spawn?
Good, hopefully, they'll start investigating and revealing the horrid practices of these gender therapists and their clinics.
Isn't it nearing 50% now?
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2020
Most of this is obvious, but will still be ignored and the trannies will keep asking why the goodlooking guys won't fuck them. Introspection is not something they do, afterall.
DumbDude42
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2019
18 is still way too young, should be 25 imo
actually this stuff should just be outlawed entirely tbh, nothing of value would be lost
still, better than nothing i suppose
actually this stuff should just be outlawed entirely tbh, nothing of value would be lost
still, better than nothing i suppose
- Joined
- May 19, 2018
Paragraphs, how do they work?
That aside, this looks like yet another rehash of the pro/anti porn feminist catfight. Though she might want to reconsider her final question, because with her initial call for honesty she may well get a lot of unexpected answers.
That aside, this looks like yet another rehash of the pro/anti porn feminist catfight. Though she might want to reconsider her final question, because with her initial call for honesty she may well get a lot of unexpected answers.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
if troons just admit that they have a cross dressing fetish their dating pool would widen.