Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[The Real SVP]

To step in @Banditotron 's footsteps: Less than 20% of Americans know what twitter is, and less than 2% of Twitter's users make more than 80% its posts.
And woke boys have to get better at pretending to be woke girls, if they want to get a bone.

 

[Smaug's Smokey Hole]

Quick format, just use Notepad++, takes two seconds. edit: search and replace \r\n with \r\n\r\n and it's done.

Yesterday, Mel Magazine published an apparently sincere article wondering why “woke bros” turn out not to actually be so “woke.” The truth any honest person knows is that one’s dick tends not to be politicized. We are attracted to those we are attracted to, regardless of what we might say on Twitter about “trans rights,” “fat positivity,” “racial justice,” or faux-judgement of the #metoo’d. The only thing that is true about the woke is that they are phonies. They want attention and power, not justice, and certainly not the truth.

Mel Magazine asks the question: Why won’t “Bernie Bros, male feminists, and ‘good guy’ liberals” who “all support sex work” pay a young man with a fondness for sexual objectification and a fetish for women’s clothing for sex? But the real question is, “How deep is Mel Magazine’s head up its own ass?” and “How long are we going to keep up this charade?”

Like, 3000 words, apparently.

Here’s the story: “Violet, a 25-year-old transsexual with dollish cheekbones and a primary colour wardrobe” wanted to give his friends “a ‘last chance to fuck’ while also raking in as much money as [he] could before [he] hit the Big Apple.” Wow! Generous! You both want your friends to pay you for a thing they don’t want, but also impose your sexual fetishes on them. What a good, good friend; with good, good politics.

The “journalist” interviewing “Violet” shares his interviewee’s affinity for imposing sex on people who are in fact heterosexual men who therefore prefer sex with heterosexual women. Last year, Sessi Kuwabara Blanchard published an article at Vice complaining that his heterosexual male friends didn’t want to sleep with him, writing:

“I’m single this Valentine’s Day, and I feel like shit. I feel undesirable, and I feel powerless to change that. Most of all, I want to know why the guys I crush on, namely cis, straight, male 20-somethings, won’t fuck me.”

When Blanchard discussed this problem with his friends, they tried to ease him into the truth, letting Blanchard know that pestering his male friends about this would only make him feel bad: “They said the guys I like won’t fuck me because they’re straight.” Blanchard wrote this off as “transphobia” — his friends were *gasp* “implying that heterosexuality is male attraction to women,” meaning he didn’t “make the cut.”

Despite Blanchard’s insistence that “desire is fluid,” the categories of “gay” and “straight” exist for a reason: this describes the vast majority of people’s sexual preferences. And there is very little politicizing can do about this.

A hard-to-hear reality I’ve made clear many times is that the crux of transgenderism, for many who identify as trans, is delusion. And that trans identity rests on others — the “woke,” as it were — playing along. When we use preferred pronouns, we participate in this, as we do when we refer to trans-identified males as women, and trans-identified females as male. Many claim this is simply an issue of being kind, respectful, and polite, but, in the end, these lies hurt trans-identified people, as well as the rest of us. The result is a group of males left wondering why, despite being told they are literally women, are not viewed as or treated as literal women. And women are left without rights, boundaries, or the ability to speak the truth.

The woke, I’m sorry to tell you, are liars. This is not a coincidence; it is the basis of their politics.

The answers to the questions asked by the woke are easy. But they pretend there is some long, deep discussion to be had about, as Blanchard puts it, “what it would take for someone to want to fuck me.”

The question is wrong, of course, and intentionally so. And the answer is obvious. If we were to engage with the truth, Blanchard and Violet would be less hurt by the answers. Instead, we’ve decided the lie is what is “nice.”

As a perfect example, Blanchard’s article at Mel Magazine is titled, “Why Won’t Woke Boys Pay for Sex?” In his Instagram stories, Violet posts, “If you’re someone who supports sex work at an intellectual level, would you ever hire a SWer yourself?” Oooh, clever! Naturally many of these men will say, “Yes! Of course! I would gladly demonstrate my very progressive politics by dehumanizing a woman who clearly was molested as a girl and has been told by men like me that the most empowering way to process this is to objectify herself, and engage in sexual acts with men who don’t care about who you are as a person, or about your well-being!”

Violet says he assumed his peers — “millennial-zoomer cusps with art degrees and hard-ons for progressive politics” — would be “prime clients.” After all, these were “youngish liberals” who claimed to “support sex workers and the decriminalization of their profession.”

Blanchard helpfully points out that which is true: johns are not just lonely, ugly, old men who are desperate for physical affection and love, but can’t find it, so are forced to exploit abused women. In reality, all sorts of otherwise eligible bachelors, married men, powerful men, men with girlfriends and families and kids, pay for sex.

“Some research shows that clients of sex workers tend to have their first experience of paid sex when they’re young, hot, and in their 20s, despite having more opportunities for sex than their more aged counterparts,” Blanchard writes. “In two different studies, three-quarters of arrested johns and slightly less than half of online clients using sex work review websites first paid for a sex worker when they were between the ages of 18 to 29.”

What gives? “The numbers suggest that more of Violet’s followers should have been down with paid sex,” Blanchard writes. Yet none of Violet’s supposedly woke bros came through.

Both Violet and Blanchard feign confusion. Positioning this as a question only of men’s willingness to “support sex workers” by paying for sex, rather than acknowledging the fact that they were pursuing heterosexual men who did not believe their own hype about “transwomen” being actual, literal women.

Surprise! That pronoun pin didn’t do what it promised. Surprise! The mean old feminist “TERFs” were right, after all.

Somehow, the stupidity of this fake question drags on for almost 2000 more words. Violet is angered that some of these “leftist male hotties” insisted they “respected women,” and therefore were not willing to pay for sex. “But,” he asks:

“Isn’t ‘respecting women’ paying them to do their job? It seems that some of these men’s theoretical recognition of women’s ability to make decisions for their own body ends up being overridden by skepticism of a sex worker’s ability to consent.”

No, you fucking tool. No man actually believes that porn and prostitution is about respecting women. We all know, full well, that this is degrading, exploitative behaviour, and that no healthy woman would voluntarily choose to fuck strangers, day in and day out, who treat her like shit. Woke politics is a lie. All of it. These mantras are lies and the people who repeat them are liars. And the sooner you admit that, the sooner you can start living an honest life, get mentally healthy, and build healthy relationships with others. Trust me: the truth and authenticity is joyful — it will change everything about your life in a positive way.

There is a reason that men who watch porn feel ashamed about it, and there is a reason that even those men won’t all go so far as to pay for sex: it feels wrong, because it is wrong. It is not normal to want to coerce someone who doesn’t want you into fucking you, and pretending to enjoy it. People who do that are sadists. And despite a culture that enthusiastically and endlessly insists that sadism is normal, healthy, and sexy, most people know in their gut that this is not so, but they just can’t say it anymore, thanks to third wave feminism and the new woke left.

Violent and Blanchard claim the problem is that these “woke bros” have been brainwashed by their second wave mothers, indoctrinating them into “white feminism” (revealing their deep disdain for women and women’s rights). They also speculate that these men’s failure to pay to fuck men in women’s clothing is about protecting their masculinity: “Paying for sex is a ‘beta move’ to some self-proclaimed ‘woke’ men,” Blanchard writes. In other words, men like a challenge, and they like to feel special — like anyone else, really. “So much of it is them feeling cool and valuable, earning the attraction of someone,” Violet explains, calling this “a super 1950s kind of vibe.” But it’s not. Most healthy people don’t want to feel replaceable — like their partner would just be with literally anyone. They want to feel special — chosen. They want to feel seen. Human. This is not a bad thing.

Here is the truth that “woke” sloganeers who say things like “sex work is work” and “transwomen are women” won’t tell you: no one wants to be objectified. We don’t want to be just bodies — empty vessels without personalities, desires, hopes, thoughts, and dreams. We want to be seen as our whole selves. We want to be loved and understood and cared for, for who we really, truly are. People like authenticity, despite what you see on Twitter and Instagram. It matters to people deeply. But for whatever reason, the new new left has decided the opposite is true: phonies are celebrated, lies are repeated, and those who repeat the lies and politic in a completely inauthentic way are encouraged.

This is why the left is failing, and this is why so many of us who are not on the right, but who are sick of the left, are bailing.

Violet goes on to tell numerous stories about his “hot lefty woke bro” buds who, despite their politics, still mysteriously won’t pay for sex or won’t date him. Violet seems angry that these men are actually kind of decent, in their real life behaviour. They actually want actual relationships with actual women. (I would argue these men are not really “good guys,” considering the shit politics they profess, but hey, they are young, and maybe will grow out of hypocrisy eventually, and stand up for something real.) But the new woke left wants to release people of any morals or ethics whatsoever — true liberation, for these folks, is a hedonistic fantasy of disembodied sadists. Righteous!

Violet and Blanchard’s purpose in these articles is to try to bully the men they find attractive into fucking them, using their politics as blackmail. And honestly, I support this strategy: if you, woke bros, really do believe “transwomen are women” and “sex work is work,” put your money where your dick is. The personal is political, is it not?

 

[Begemot]

WTF, I'm a TERF now! Jokes aside about how TERFs are second-wavers mugged by modern ID-POL most of what she said I'd agree with. Sex work damages women and nobody truly believes it's liberating.

 

[Return of the Freaker]

WTF, I'm a TERF now! Jokes aside about how TERFs are second-wavers mugged by modern ID-POL most of what she said I'd agree with. Sex work damages women and nobody truly believes it's liberating.

But modern "sex work" is liberating. Liberating simps from their money.

 

[b0o0pinsn0o0tz]

I could of told this lady YEARS ago nobody means a word of this shit and it's all an empty holier than thou act. I'll give her a bit of a thumbs up for figuring it out though.

 

[Begemot]

But modern "sex work" is liberating. Liberating simps from their money.

I bet iduubz was sold on 'his' girl's pictures as a liberating experience.

 

[kobox666]

I find it really interesting that the article she is citing only talks about "fucking", not healthy relationships, like if they wanted to live in some porn fantasy world. I mean, sex is good and all, but falling in love is a hundred times better, caring for someone who reciprocate those feelings. Maybe they got their ideas of human relationships from porn and are unable to distinguish between fiction and reality.

 

[queue-anon]

This is optimistic, - it is just beginning and those statements are not set in stone.

As far as some imbeciles are concerned, - "puberty blockers" and many such procedures are fully reversible. Olson-Kennedy, a person I feel genuine wrath at, has even claimed that a masectomy is a reversible procedure as you can always add silicon tits if you regret mutilating healthy breast tissue.

If trannies' bad bolt-ons are any indication, silicone tits look really weird if you don't have any underlying breast tissue to work with. Also, the procedure they do where they put the implant underneath the breast tissue looks as close to natural as possible, which is impossible if you're a man or if you're a woman who self-mutilated.

 

[Twinkletard]

Clearly, the left is very stupid.

 

[TowinKarz]

I find it really interesting that the article she is citing only talks about "fucking", not healthy relationships, like if they wanted to live in some porn fantasy world. I mean, sex is good and all, but falling in love is a hundred times better, caring for someone who reciprocate those feelings. Maybe they got their ideas of human relationships from porn and are unable to distinguish between fiction and reality.

Wouldn't doubt it.

Most fictional depictions of relationships don't (and largely can't due to story and time restraints) focus on the "happily ever after" part of life that keeps you fulfilled and going when the boning and moaning part wears out it's novelty or if married, you get too old to do it. Sex is shorthand for love and commitment in fiction by necessity, but because it's all that's shown (and all some want to see in a work) the socially inept develop the mentality of it being the only thing that's important.

Or they're just hedonists, upset that they can't indulge in a society that, to them, is not giving them what's rightfully theirs.

But modern "sex work" is liberating. Liberating simps from their money.

Also, it's the only illegal and socially-shunned vocation that has that special "out" where it's really not that bad, it's just you doing what you gotta do to survive and isn't that what all human work is? Sure you have to make some pretty shitty life choices to fall to having to do it, but that's not the point! Dignify the women who fill it's ranks, they have no other way to live! (Oh, but drug pushers, car thiefs, burglars, fences, mobsters, gang-bangers, Ponzi-scheme heads, hucksters, Gypsy driveway repairmen etc, they are all still criminal scum, cuz they're largely men. They can always find better paying and legit jobs if they wanted to.....they're just evil and their poor choices are all on them for being stupid males.)

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

WTF, I'm a TERF now! Jokes aside about how TERFs are second-wavers mugged by modern ID-POL most of what she said I'd agree with. Sex work damages women and nobody truly believes it's liberating.

Sex work damages EVERYONE in the end.

 

[ObeseScreamingBlackMan]

Nobody wants the trooncock, version 9001.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

I bet iduubz was sold on 'his' girl's pictures as a liberating experience.

It was liberating for him, though.

It liberated him from his dignity.

 

[Spiteful Crow]

Alec Holowka certainly believed in the wokeness

 

[MuuMuu Bunnylips]

The only thing missing is the number of abortions she's had.

Ah ah ah... We don't call them "Abortions" any more; we call them "Going-Away Parties".

 

[I-chi]

Man I LOVE watching the femme harpies, soymouthed fags and troons rip each other apart. It's better than pay-per-view wrestling.

All this time saying whatever it takes to avoid the blue and pink incelephant in the room screaming to have his ladycock sucked, and NOT ONE of the allies is willing to pony up,

This is what you all wanted, so get on your knees and get those lips nice and wet for social justice.

 

[Garm]

It was liberating for him, though.

It liberated him from his dignity.

It sounds like he didn't have much to begin with though.

 

[the clap]

The big secret about paying for sex is that, usually for the first time, the guy gets to choose his sexual partner. Even if its between Methy Bethy and Crack Pat the guy still gets to choose, which until that point in his life has not been an option. These aren't chads generally.
The sad thing is that most guys want genuine affection, which Methy Becky can't give. Neither can a screeching feminist.

 

[Sexual Chocolate]

If only we had some kind of socially agreed on set of rules that told young women NOT to sell their pussies for money and also discouraged young men from the masturbatory fetish lifestyle, and promoted normal stuff like fucking your wife and having babies?

Maybe even meet up every Sunday to get a reminder and a pep talk before going for chicken with your family?

 

[The Real SVP]

I find it really interesting that the article she is citing only talks about "fucking", not healthy relationships,

Or they're just hedonists,

Sex is all they have. Judging by personal interactions, interviews, and case studies many confused young gentelmen's interpretation of "being a woman" is "getting laid a lot". Many consider a "career" in pornography or prostitution as their ultimate goal and proof of femininity.