- Joined
- Dec 24, 2019
Can I ask why they went down this path? I mean if you already have the weaboo demographic nailed down, why jeopardize that monopoly by actively maligning it?There's lots of reasons the Wii U flopped, but getting into that in detail would get too off-topic so I'll just keep it at these quick bullet points: a lacking library and shitty marketing that didn't explain the Wii U enough and went after an audience that stopped caring because they had mobile games.
Either way, Sony is stupid for dropping such a large part of their audience. The PS3 was the weeb console of its generation. Guess it's totally worth it now that nobody likes TLOU2 tho.
As I understand it, Sony moving the gaming HQ to California is somewhat taboo in Japan because of the national pride having such media giants on home soil, but the real kicker seems to be the neglect and tone policing they did after crossing the Pacific.
Thing is, when your corporate portfolio range like Sony's, where you've got so many business interests but only the life insurance and the videogames brand are actually generating a profit overall, shouldn't money trump ideology here? I mean this goes for a lot of Sony's actions lately. Discontinuing the PSP and ceding the handheld market to Nintendo is pretty bad, as is failing to carve a niche in the growing phone game market (e.g. people WILL pay a subscription for PS1 games on your Samsung). The weirdest part, not touching the politics, is how they only release like 2 or 3 First Party games a year, and they all have this over-the-shoulder movie-game feel to them. Everybody rightly critiques Nintendo for being a hostile environment for 3rd party devs, but at least their IP all vaguely represent different game genres. It feels like Sony gave up trying to give its audience gameplay diversity around 2007.
Why are they so shit at business?