Pedophile support forum - Warning: sick fuckery ahead.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Well, couldn't we just use this thead to archive and document the MAP/NOMAP movement? It's ripe on sites like Tumblr and Twitter. Those are also more "real" in the sense that they are public advocates for pedophilia, instead of just being a fringe group on darknet (which is bad in its own way).
 
I haven't read the entire thread yet, but this seems to be the place to post this and express my horror and disgust about Jason Edward Wayne 'Byrd' Dickens, and his wife, Dylan Anne McEwan-Dickens, of Toronto (or Etobicoke) Ontario.

Article regarding initial arrest in 2016.

Article about why shitbag's shitbag wife will not be hung with the paedophile label, or be given dangerous offender status, because 'women aren't paedophiles'.
The first article posted is pretty self-explanatory. Just details that they were charged, what the charges are, the fact that the 'man' charged is Jason 'Byrd' Dickens, who played Scott the abusive boyfriend on Degrassi High. What the article doesn't tell you, is that he was arrested twice either while he was still on the show, or after he left/the show ended, I forget; but that's kinda beside the point, I'm a little wordy and get sidetracked easily. The point is, while he was still a teenager, between 17-19 I think, he was arrested twice for raping two girls in a Degrassi fan club. He was subsequently acquitted.

I knew him in the early 00's; I won't go in to too much detail for obvious reasons. I ended up distancing myself from him for a few reasons, not the least of which was his Daddy fetish.

I met his wife while these two degens were still engaged, and she knew full well he was a rapist. Apparently that wasn't a deal-breaker for her.

Anyways. Last year I was watching re-runs of Degrassi, the first season of Degrassi High, I believe, and the scene where Kathleen meets Scott happens, and seeing his face on screen was like a punch in the gut. I dunno why that prompted me to google him, but I did, and that first article is what I found.

At this point, they've both plead guilty to sexual assault, sexual assault/abuse/exploitation of minors - some as young as 2 years old. Possessing, Making and Distributing child pornography/bestiality. Sexual abuse of an animal (they had two Great Danes for pets) and... I think that's it. There could be more I've forgotten, or hasn't been made public.

I do remember hearing that shortly after being arrested, Byrd had his ass handed to him a time or two. I'd send flowers to whomever did it if I knew who they were.

That's it, I guess. My own personal Horrorcows.
 
Given the developments in VR and realistic sex dolls, I see no reason why any pedophile should be acting out their fantasies on actual kids. I could care less what someone does in their basement or home in their own privacy, as long as actual kids aren't involved.
In theory, in theory...
Until someone gets the bright idea to “try the real thing.”
 
In theory, in theory...
Until someone gets the bright idea to “try the real thing.”

That's why porn in the hands of paedos won't curb their urges; maybe it'll keep them from raping children in the short-term, but it won't be enough forever, and soon or late, they'll want the real thing.

I mean, regular porn users attracted to actual, adult women will eventually turn to prostitutes if they can't get laid normally. Why would paedos be any different?

Child sex robots would be nothing but a stop gap.
 
why is there no horror or disaster tag

I had to watch "chickenhawk" during a criminal Justice training. it's pretty damn bad.

also I'm adding to say this.

normalizing these urges is how they turn into offenses. allowing pedos to discuss, fantasize, and enjoy descriptions of offenses is step one.

they will proceed to find and watch video- whether CGI, animated or real. at this point they're normalizing their feeling, thinking that others are like them, and they haven't gotten caught yet.

opening the door even a crack allows them to push boundaries. pedos are remarkably manipulative and are completely aware of the fact that they are damaging others. it's a sadistic thing; there are no "child lovers" who would "never hurt a child" in this group. the hurt they cause is a massive turn on for them.

once they've got access to dolls or VR, they're a step closer to offending with a real child. it gives them a taste. it's a tease. they don't get to hurt anyone so they will not be satisfied.

going that route, it just leads them to offend. it's unethical to support or assist pedos in any way with their sadism, allowing them to normalize and progress deeper into these behaviors is a terrible idea.

warning: strong content.

grooming and manipulating children is only step one for these people.

Well, couldn't we just use this thead to archive and document the MAP/NOMAP movement? It's ripe on sites like Tumblr and Twitter. Those are also more "real" in the sense that they are public advocates for pedophilia, instead of just being a fringe group on darknet (which is bad in its own way).


yes, let's
 
Last edited:
Well, couldn't we just use this thead to archive and document the MAP/NOMAP movement? It's ripe on sites like Tumblr and Twitter. Those are also more "real" in the sense that they are public advocates for pedophilia, instead of just being a fringe group on darknet (which is bad in its own way).
Shouldn't thread title be changed or a new one started about this? Since this thread was supposed to be about this one specific forum.
On topic, apparently the site was offline for a while.
703596


Found a mention of us.
703597
 
Last edited:
  • DRINK!
Reactions: PhoBingas
That's why porn in the hands of paedos won't curb their urges; maybe it'll keep them from raping children in the short-term, but it won't be enough forever, and soon or late, they'll want the real thing.

I mean, regular porn users attracted to actual, adult women will eventually turn to prostitutes if they can't get laid normally. Why would paedos be any different?

Child sex robots would be nothing but a stop gap.

Except that excessive porn in Japan has actually produced a generation of virgins: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...er-of-virgins-government-finds/?noredirect=on

There is no evidence that "regular porn users... turn to prostitutes if they can't get laid normally". In fact, Japan's statistics seem to indicate the opposite.

I'm not here to argue for or against porn in general, in fact, if you want my honest opinion, porn makes real sex less fun as it sets your standards too high. So I personally don't think porn is a good thing to do. But that doesn't mean I believe I have the right to regulate what others do, in that regard.

Back on topic, I'm only saying if there is a way, and there is, for pedos to act out their urges which does not involve children in any way shape or form, then, by all means, let them.
 
Except that excessive porn in Japan has actually produced a generation of virgins: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...er-of-virgins-government-finds/?noredirect=on

There is no evidence that "regular porn users... turn to prostitutes if they can't get laid normally". In fact, Japan's statistics seem to indicate the opposite.

I'm not here to argue for or against porn in general, in fact, if you want my honest opinion, porn makes real sex less fun as it sets your standards too high. So I personally don't think porn is a good thing to do. But that doesn't mean I believe I have the right to regulate what others do, in that regard.

Back on topic, I'm only saying if there is a way, and there is, for pedos to act out their urges which does not involve children in any way shape or form, then, by all means, let them.
we're not talking about regular porn consumers, we're talking about people who actively enjoy harming children as part of their sexual interest.
 
While I find the the LGBTQ critics tiring and over paranoid most of the time I will have to say, they are definitely onto something in regards to Pedophilia being potentially presented as an ''alternate sexuality'' in the future. Everything else has been covered and managed to gain sympathy but.. this. Eventually advocates are going to try to soften the image of a pedophile like that women who did the TED talk a few years ago claiming ''it's not their fault, that's the way they're wired. We should not hate or fear them'' etc.

Unfortunately some people may even start gaining sympathy for them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Shaka Brah
While I find the the LGBTQ critics tiring and over paranoid most of the time I will have to say, they are definitely onto something in regards to Pedophilia being potentially presented as an ''alternate sexuality'' in the future. Everything else has been covered and managed to gain sympathy but.. this. Eventually advocates are going to try to soften the image of a pedophile like that women who did the TED talk a few years ago claiming ''it's not their fault, that's the way they're wired. We should not hate or fear them'' etc.

Unfortunately some people may even start gaining sympathy for them.
At least the majority of LGBT people also want pedos to fry, but since in the last few years actual LGBT people have been getting shoved out of their own community by manipulative, hateful narcissists, it won't surprise me if pedos and their sympathizers take over eventually after those people get bored of pretending Autism is a gender and need a new way to destroy everything gay acceptance groups have worked for.
 
Back