Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

I mean she claims not to care but she’s obviously rereading the thread because she JUST rated my older posts with disagree. (Well after she’s already rated & replied to the post-posts, may I add) We’re clearly bothering her

Totally agree with you there. We have absolutely gotten under the skin of our pet moron. She can’t stay away because we’re now a compulsion for her. She can’t stand when this thread disappears, so she’ll say something totally stupid to knock it back to the top.

 

[SS Reichsmarshall]

@TamarYaelBatYah Somewhere on this thread someone said Marshall thought his ex wife Allison was cheating on him and thats why he tried to wrestle her phone away from her. Is this true? And if so, any evidence you could provide to substantiate those claims?
We might garner more respect for you and Seniorito Marshmelito if you prove Allison cheated.

 

[White Baby]

@TamarYaelBatYah Somewhere on this thread someone said Marshall thought his ex wife Allison was cheating on him and thats why he tried to wrestle her phone away from her. Is this true? And if so, any evidence you could provide to substantiate those claims?
We might garner more respect for you and Seniorito Marshmelito if you prove Allison cheated.

Cheating would justify smashing a possession, yeah, but I still wouldn't trust anyone that caused physical harm to a spouse.

 

[lamp]

@TamarYaelBatYah Somewhere on this thread someone said Marshall thought his ex wife Allison was cheating on him and thats why he tried to wrestle her phone away from her. Is this true? And if so, any evidence you could provide to substantiate those claims?
We might garner more respect for you and Seniorito Marshmelito if you prove Allison cheated.

she hasn’t even provided the evidence she claimed she would provide to prove that his ex was involved with drugs, I honestly doubt she’d be able to substantiate that claim.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

she hasn’t even provided the evidence she claimed she would provide to prove that his ex was involved with drugs, I honestly doubt she’d be able to substantiate that claim.

Any time she does provide evidence for anything she says it's easily disproved. Which of course she'll disagree with. Such as when I proved that the evidence she had on wi-fi was easily disproved. She doesn't think things through clearly enough to even attempt at winning any argument. One must remember that failure is her usual state of being.

 

[PomegranateKing]

Melinda is the type of person who loses a game of monopoly, then combs through the rulebook until they find some arbitrary rule that was not played to the letter. And using that justification, she claims victory. Only... the rule never would have helped her anyway.

So then she makes a new version of the game with that one rule. But she also adds multiple other rules that skew the game in her favor. And, after dragging multiple people through her horrible new game, announces her ultimate victory over all games past, present, and future. Because she's never lost a game.

It's easy to win the game when you're the only player, Melinda.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Melinda is the type of person who loses a game of monopoly, then combs through the rulebook until they find some arbitrary rule that was not played to the letter. And using that justification, she claims victory. Only... the rule never would have helped her anyway.

So then she makes a new version of the game with that one rule. But she also adds multiple other rules that skew the game in her favor. And, after dragging multiple people through her horrible new game, announces her ultimate victory over all games past, present, and future. Because she's never lost a game.

It's easy to win the game when you're the only player, Melinda.

So what you're saying is that Melinda should be a modern day tabletop top game designer?

 

[Toasty]

So what you're saying is that Melinda should be a modern day tabletop top game designer?

They would be worse than Lucas's.
Think 'Life" with more spots in the car, where you get success points for not working, bonus points for living on charity and handouts. The player with the most kids and most free stuff wins. The rules are subject to change without notice, and are comprised of Linda's current interpretation of the Torah. You have to check before every game for her personal revisions. Strike that, the game will include an app, where Mindy can notify you of her revisions in real time, do that if the rules change midgame everyone knows. All changes and revisions to her Torah interpretation are retroactive.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Agreed, speed bumps are annoying and should be avoided.

You take a pay cut because you don't work. I work from home and still get more than industry standard.

@TamarYaelBatYah Somewhere on this thread someone said Marshall thought his ex wife Allison was cheating on him and thats why he tried to wrestle her phone away from her. Is this true? And if so, any evidence you could provide to substantiate those claims?
We might garner more respect for you and Seniorito Marshmelito if you prove Allison cheated.

I'm not here to garner respect for us. That isn't my goal. But either way, I wouldn't put The Scorpion (what we call his ex) on trial here for adultery. She isn't a Torah follower, she is a pagan. In The Torah, only those in Covenant with Elohim are held to the standards of Torah, including trials by qualified judges.

But for the sake of moral philosophy debate, I will answer the question this way: Marshall should have left her on the basis of moral principle (no intermarriage with pagan spouses who will not convert to Torah). All other conflict between them was just a symptom of their spiritual incompatibility.

Melinda is the type of person who loses a game of monopoly, then combs through the rulebook until they find some arbitrary rule that was not played to the letter. And using that justification, she claims victory. Only... the rule never would have helped her anyway.

So then she makes a new version of the game with that one rule. But she also adds multiple other rules that skew the game in her favor. And, after dragging multiple people through her horrible new game, announces her ultimate victory over all games past, present, and future. Because she's never lost a game.

It's easy to win the game when you're the only player, Melinda.

That's your theory, but all you have is a theory. Where is your Torah scholarship to back it up? You say I've "changed the rules" about Torah, but can you back up your claims with scriptural facts?

she hasn’t even provided the evidence she claimed she would provide to prove that his ex was involved with drugs, I honestly doubt she’d be able to substantiate that claim.

I've only been over to our other house once in the last two months and it was only for 3 hours to enjoy myself. I didn't have time to dig through Marshall's papers yet

Cheating would justify smashing a possession, yeah, but I still wouldn't trust anyone that caused physical harm to a spouse.

The penalty for cheating (adultery and whoredom) in The Torah is death, which is physical harm to a spouse. So I have to disagree that all harm to a spouse is always wrong. (But we live under a secular government, not in The Land, so you can't go around murdering people for cheating).

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

She isn't a Torah follower, she is a pagan.

Neither are you so you have another thing in common with her. You should be friends!

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Neither are you so you have another thing in common with her. You should be friends!

This coming from a Buddhist engaged to a secular "Jew" ....

Neither are you so you have another thing in common with her. You should be friends!

and on a side note, I would never be friends with one of my husband's exes. That's disgusting

Well she doesn't seem to know that John isn't in the Tanakh but is a New Testament thing. I guess this is what you get when you make up your own religion in modern times.

The only person here who doesn't know something is you. You haven't figured out that Catholics put together The Bible and that -- oh gee golly -- people have an inherent right to pick and choose which books they believe are authentic if they aren't Catholic. IMAGINE THAT!

The Book of John is an individual book. The Catholics created "The New Testament". I'm not Catholic.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

This coming from a Buddhist engaged to a secular "one of Trump's Chosen People" ....

At least she's actually Je wish unlike you. All you do here is play make believe and quote the New Testament.

The only person here who doesn't know something is you. You haven't figured out that Catholics put together The Bible and that -- oh gee golly -- people have an inherent right to pick and choose which books they believe are authentic if they aren't Catholic. IMAGINE THAT!

The Book of John is an individual book. The Catholics created "The New Testament". I'm not Catholic.

New Testament is also the second part of Biblical canon, created by Christians. First being the Old Testament.

Also, John is part of Gospels, Hence why it's called "Gospel of John".

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

At least she's actually Je wish unlike you. All you do here is play make believe and quote the New Testament.



New Testament is also the second part of Biblical canon, created by Christians. First being the Old Testament.

Also, John is part of Gospels, Hence why it's called "Gospel of John".

Define "actually J*-e-w*-i-s-h". That has a different definition in many sects of Judaism and in many other religions.

You can call her "actually J-e-w*-i-s-h" but she wouldn't even be considered so by Orthodox Judaism. They don't intermarry outside of their religion, otherwise you are excommunicated from them.

If you are Buddhist and she is marrying you that means she is a secular J*-e*-w* or a Reform J*-e*-w*, neither of which are considered in good standing by Ultra Orthodox, Orthodox or Conservative sects. You have to have a conversion certificate to be considered a "real J*-e*-w" by them too, which she doesn't have, otherwise you wouldn't be able to marry her. No Sanhedrin would marry the two of you

So argue all you want over who is "actually J-e-w*-i-s-h", but keep in mind, the same thing could be said about you to others.

And about canons and books...the fact remains: unless you are Catholic, you don't have to accept their canon. You have a right to pick and choose which books you believe are authentic. None of the original authors of those books bound their books together. The Catholic Church did that in 325 AD.

She's a narcissist and/or a masochist. She has no fellowship with any others of her faith offline because she's too busy raising six piglets and they all think she's insane anyways, so "debating" with us is the closest she'll ever get to actualizing her delusions of scholarly grandeur.

Do you know what making up fairytales without facts is called?

It's easy to win the game when you're the only player, Melinda.

Yet what you don't understand is that this is Elohim's board game, and neither am I playing alone. Neither do you understand the rules. The only one under a delusion -- between the two of us -- is ...well...you!

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Define "actually J*-e-w*-i-s-h". That has a different definition in many sects of Judaism and in many other religions.

You can call her "actually J-e-w*-i-s-h" but she wouldn't even be considered so by Orthodox Judaism. They don't intermarry outside of their religion, otherwise you are excommunicated from them.

If you are Buddhist and she is marrying you that means she is a secular J*-e*-w* or a Reform J*-e*-w*, neither of which are considered in good standing by Ultra Orthodox, Orthodox or Conservative sects. You have to have a conversion certificate to be considered a "real J*-e*-w" by them too, which she doesn't have, otherwise you wouldn't be able to marry her. No Sanhedrin would marry the two of you

So argue all you want over who is "actually J-e-w*-i-s-h", but keep in mind, the same thing could be said about you to others.

And about canons and books...the fact remains: unless you are Catholic, you don't have to accept their canon. You have a right to pick and choose which books you believe are authentic. None of the original authors of those books bound their books together. The Catholic Church did that in 325 AD.



Do you know what making up fairytales without facts is called?

Melinda, you don't even follow an actual religion. What you follow is a made up bullshit you and Marshall created. What you believe in isn't believed by any proper J ew. By the way, I hate to break it to you but it's pretty common for Jewish people to marry non-Je wish people today. Some research shows it's up to 44% in the United States and 33% here in my fiancees age category. Keep on playing pretend Melinda.

 

[SS Reichsmarshall]

Melinda, you don't even follow an actual religion. What you follow is a made up bullshit you and Marshall created. What you believe in isn't believed by any proper J ew. By the way, I hate to break it to you but it's pretty common for Trump's Chosen people to marry non-Je wish people today. Some research shows it's up to 44% in the United States and 33% here in my fiancees age category. Keep on playing pretend Melinda.

Melinda's just a fool who uses her Mountain Troll religion to feel better about her many failures in life. There's really nothing more to be said and even after all of this debate I still don't know, or care, whatever the fuck an "Elohim" is. Is an Elohim some sort of Giant or a Golem or something? Sounds like a creatura from the Monsters Inc. movie. And no, im not googling it because I dont want to taint my computer with weird searches.

 

[Spergichu]

But for the sake of moral philosophy debate, I will answer the question this way: Marshall should have left her on the basis of moral principle (no intermarriage with pagan spouses who will not convert to Torah). All other conflict between them was just a symptom of their spiritual incompatibility.

But Marshall wasn’t a jéw until you hooked up with him. Are you retconning reality like CWC now?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

But Marshall wasn’t a jéw until you hooked up with him. Are you retconning reality like CWC now?

Of course she is, she even tries to retcon the Bible.

 

[PomegranateKing]

That's your theory, but all you have is a theory. Where is your Torah scholarship to back it up? You say I've "changed the rules" about Torah, but can you back up your claims with scriptural facts?

Did I mention the torah in my comment, Melinda? No? Hmmm. Seems like you're assuming things. Go read over my post again. When your reading comprehension improves, I might entertain answering you.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

But Marshall wasn’t a jéw until you hooked up with him. Are you retconning reality like CWC now?

Does this mean Melinda is gonna start the Biblical Merge soon?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Did I mention the torah in my comment, Melinda? No? Hmmm. Seems like you're assuming things. Go read over my post again. When your reading comprehension improves, I might entertain answering you.

You'll be waiting 10100 years for Melinda's reading comprehension to improve (this site can't handle superscript so I had to settle for subscript, so 10 plus 100 zeros in front of it.) which coincidentally is the same amount of time before the heat death of the universe will occur.

Does this mean Melinda is gonna start the Biblical Merge soon?

She's already been doing that with her make believe religion.