Snowflake Chloe Wilkinson / DissociaDID and Nanette Zuniga / Nan / TeamPinata

[(s)tori]

I just want some proper verification, there's no need for more hearsay.
*edit cause i posted screenshots after comrade*

 

[comrade666]

@comrade666 I missed some screenshots, I updated my comment with them. He’s also saying that Nan stopped with the CP after she met him, but that doesn’t match up with her timeline either, does it? He’s rewriting everything now that he has another chance with Nan, and the ironic part is that she’s shut him out

Interesting. No, it doesn't match up with her timeline. Nan did stop publishing drawings towards the end of her relationship with Sam. The last drawing was I believe September 2017, though don't quote me. That's the last drawing I listed. I think there were a handful more though I didn't document those. Sam and Nan ended their relationship 20 September 2018.
But as we know from The Disney Vlog, Nan continued to promote Mud Sky. The Disney Vlog was published 20 May 2019. Chloe knew about Mud Sky at that stage. Sam was out of the picture by then.

 

[pd2jzutg2]

Chloe’s updated her FB pic, I’d be interested in seeing an updated chat log from that group if at all possible at this point

I scrolled a good while on “Chloe Wilkinson” results on Facebook and couldn’t find one fake account using her picture. I did this earlier too and couldn’t find anything, I’m personally confident that it was her. The group wasn’t a DissociaDID fan group, it was a DID group chat (one screenshot showed a more complete name of the chat, but still not a complete name)

 

[Gramh]

It's telling that this is the first time she's been scrutinized so heavily. She's doing what any sloppy teenager who got busted with porn on the family computer would do.

 

[comrade666]

*edit cause i posted screenshots after comrade*

Was your cap not from her story? I thought I saw some additional text on there.

It's telling that this is the first time she's been scrutinized so heavily. She's doing what any sloppy teenager who got busted with porn on the family computer would do.

I would also note that it is interesting that this is the first thing she has chosen to respond to. This is the first criticism she can confidently deny. In my view, that adds weight to the arguments presented against her.

 

[HikikomoriLoser]

Chloe's definitively lying, the mods from the beehive groupchat would've definitively checked if the account was fake.

 

[(s)tori]

Was your cap not from her story? I thought I saw some additional text on there.

I would also note that it is interesting that this is the first thing she has chosen to respond to. This is the first criticism she can confidently deny. In my view, that adds weight to the arguments presented against her.

I had all three. It's just the same as what she posted plus text underlining the fake account-aspect/hiatus.

 

[pd2jzutg2]

Let me just make it clear that the only Chloe Wilkinson profile I’ve EVER found in any of the FB DID groups was chloe’s real, genuine profile. I’ve scrolled through a great number of Chloe Wilkinson’s on Facebook and haven’t found a single fake profile using her picture. The likelihood of that account being fake is extremely slim and Chloe is digging herself a much deeper hole because that’s actually verifiable stuff, even if she blocks everyone in the group chat.

 

[BigBadgerArse]

wow, just wow. What horrible people :') seriously though.. What has anyone done? exposed the truth? and to be honest we have all been really nice about it. The odd hateful comment but its been pretty peaceful and in jest. Exposing the truth about someone who is scamming thousands of people and hurting an already stigmatised mental health disorder. We are monsters

Love the screenshot of her thanking them and asking to delete the evidence of it...*chefs kiss*

Edit: to edit out my dumb reply about being the youngest in my year.. i was going to reply earlier but remembered i was one of the oldest lol my bad.. didnt realise the forum would save drafts

 

[Gramh]

If someone was going to fake a minor celebrity in an obscure mental health cult like DID they most certainly wouldn't choose to fake it on Facebook let alone in a group of people who are paranoid and alert for infiltrators. It's like Chloe doesn't even know how crazy her own fans are.

 

[comrade666]

Let me just make it clear that the only Chloe Wilkinson profile I’ve EVER found in any of the FB DID groups was chloe’s real, genuine profile. I’ve scrolled through a great number of Chloe Wilkinson’s on Facebook and haven’t found a single fake profile using her picture. The likelihood of that account being fake is extremely slim and Chloe is digging herself a much deeper hole because that’s actually verifiable stuff, even if she blocks everyone in the group chat.

I would suggest that anyone providing evidence demonstrates that the account is legitimate by recording their screen as they click on her profile and allow the page to load. It would be fairly simple to censor any identifying information. Failing that, I would be reluctant to believe the authenticity of the source. I'll spend some time looking into the group in question. I believe 'Jack' was also a member of several DID Facebook support groups. Can you verify that Chloe belonged to the 'beehive' group?

 

[pd2jzutg2]

I would suggest that anyone providing evidence demonstrates that the account is legitimate by recording their screen as they click on her profile and allow the page to load. It would be fairly simple to censor any identifying information. Failing that, I would be reluctant to believe the authenticity of the source. I'll spend some time looking into the group in question. I believe 'Jack' was also a member of several DID Facebook support groups. Can you verify that Chloe belonged to the 'beehive' group?

I’ve finally found the origin of the group (the post where it’s mentioned), I’m looking into it but am not going to try to join, I doubt they’re even accepting true people who want to have a support group chat atm

 

[BigBadgerArse]

I think the screenshots are real, everyone in the group chimped out when she replied.. For sure each of them would have clicked on her profile to check if it was the real Chloe, they then confirmed it over and over telling others Chloe was here and thanked us. That is confirmation enough for me. There is no way they didnt click on the profile to confirm it. Ive done it myself when any large creator replies to me. If the whole chat is faked is another story but i recognised profile pics commenting and that is a lot of fake accounts to make to make it seem real...

 

[pd2jzutg2]

Okay so there isn’t much information to gather it turns out. I’m pretty sure this is the group chat in question, but it’s true that the name isn’t exactly as it appears in the screenshots (either this isn’t the group or they changed the name formatting, either is equally plausible).

The only person from the screenshots who interacted with either of these posts by the creator of the group was Ali Dick/Ramsey and Alley. Absolutely no one else from the screenshots liked either post or commented on either. These two posts were after Chloe’s banishment from the largest DID group on Facebook (banished on April 15th — aka “removed for her own safety”). I found no evidence of her ever being in the smaller group that this was posted in, but anything’s possible, she doesn’t interact with a lot of posts in these groups so it’s entirely possible she was in it at some point and just didn’t interact with any posts.

As for how a Chloe account made it into the group — it’s possible that she was friends on Facebook with one of the people in the group chat. Her friend’s list on Facebook is hidden (one of her smarter social media moves), so we can’t compare it against who we know is in the group chat or who we know has heard of the group chat. I’m still of the opinion that it really truly was her, until proof that it wasn’t surfaces. I’ve stated my reasons why before but I’ll say it again: I have never found a fake profile of her in any Facebook groups or Facebook in general. I scrolled to the point of Facebook showing me results for Kloe Wilks and still not one fake profile using her picture. I did this when the screenshots surfaced as well as a few hours after. Not one fake profile in sight. I’ve been keeping an eye on Chloe’s membership in these groups since I first started posting about the Facebook groups (was it late March? I have no idea someone save me from this hell). Never seen anything suspicious.

It would be entirely too easy for those in the group chat to prove if it is or isn’t her in the group chat, so I’m crossing my fingers that someone attempts the mythical screen record.

One thing that I don’t understand is how all the people in the screenshot found the group as they’re not all in the same groups. However, all the profiles I’ve found are in either one or both of the groups the creator of the chat posted in. Maybe people were invited, maybe people privately messaged the creator to join.

I censored the names of the people who weren’t in the screenshots, but left the profile picture of the chat creator to show it’s the same person in the screenshots.

Edit for the dummies on twitter who don’t know how a Facebook group chat works: you can change your display name to the group as well as the name of others. On the iPhone messenger app, your full name does not show up in a group chat, even when you’re not friends with someone, only their first name. That’s what’s suspicious to me, but I also don’t know how the Android app works. If a fake Chloe account made it into the group or if someone changed their nickname and photo for those screenshots, then that speaks volumes on the creator and the other users in the group for being extremely gullible. I need confirmation about Android messenger app group chats with strangers though before I can say for sure if it’s not possible for her last name to show up.

 

[lamp]

she’s back to liking only the comments that victimize her again

Also, why’s she saying she’s not active on social media when she’s been going through and liking YouTube comments, etc?

 

[BScaller!]

I think the screenshots are real, everyone in the group chimped out when she replied.. For sure each of them would have clicked on her profile to check if it was the real Chloe, they then confirmed it over and over telling others Chloe was here and thanked us. That is confirmation enough for me. There is no way they didnt click on the profile to confirm it. Ive done it myself when any large creator replies to me. If the whole chat is faked is another story but i recognised profile pics commenting and that is a lot of fake accounts to make to make it seem real...

Chloe would have to be watching pretty closely to find these caps. She either watches social media constantly and us (how flattering) or she knew she fucked up and made a vow of silence with her cult members haha. It's just bizarre. People say kiwi farms don't check sources I hope you read this part of the thread!

 

[GrAngo FID]

Chloe is a fraud. Anyone with the ability to think critically can see that this is a Hollywood type disorder and not one based in reality. She created her account after Split came out (a movie she claims harms her and others with DID for being so hugely inaccurate, but with the way she presents herself, it doesn’t seem that inaccurate truth be told).

Anyone else find it interesting that this disorder seems to only impact females between the ages of 12 to 32ish? Or soy boys in the same age range. Or trans boys (aka girls). I will expose her for the fraudster she is if it’s the last thing I do. If she just made content for her retarded ass fans and they wanted to believe it like it’s some Twilight romance novel, I wouldn’t care so much. But the fact she’s making so much money off of these people? Fuck her. She’s done.

 

[BigBadgerArse]

Okay so there isn’t much information to gather it turns out. I’m pretty sure this is the group chat in question, but it’s true that the name isn’t exactly as it appears in the screenshots (either this isn’t the group or they changed the name formatting, either is equally plausible).

The only person from the screenshots who interacted with either of these posts by the creator of the group was Ali Dick/Ramsey and Alley. Absolutely no one else from the screenshots liked either post or commented on either. These two posts were after Chloe’s banishment from the largest DID group on Facebook (banished on April 15th — aka “removed for her own safety”). I found no evidence of her ever being in the smaller group that this was posted in, but anything’s possible, she doesn’t interact with a lot of posts in these groups so it’s entirely possible she was in it at some point and just didn’t interact with any posts.

As for how a Chloe account made it into the group — it’s possible that she was friends on Facebook with one of the people in the group chat. Her friend’s list on Facebook is hidden (one of her smarter social media moves), so we can’t compare it against who we know is in the group chat or who we know has heard of the group chat. I’m still of the opinion that it really truly was her, until proof that it wasn’t surfaces. I’ve stated my reasons why before but I’ll say it again: I have never found a fake profile of her in any Facebook groups or Facebook in general. I scrolled to the point of Facebook showing me results for Kloe Wilks and still not one fake profile using her picture. I did this when the screenshots surfaced as well as a few hours after. Not one fake profile in sight. I’ve been keeping an eye on Chloe’s membership in these groups since I first started posting about the Facebook groups (was it late March? I have no idea someone save me from this hell). Never seen anything suspicious.

It would be entirely too easy for those in the group chat to prove if it is or isn’t her in the group chat, so I’m crossing my fingers that someone attempts the mythical screen record.

One thing that I don’t understand is how all the people in the screenshot found the group as they’re not all in the same groups. However, all the profiles I’ve found are in either one or both of the groups the creator of the chat posted in. Maybe people were invited, maybe people privately messaged the creator to join.

I censored the names of the people who weren’t in the screenshots, but left the profile picture of the chat creator to show it’s the same person in the screenshots.

Edit for the dummies on twitter who don’t know how a Facebook group chat works: you can change your display name to the group as well as the name of others. On the iPhone messenger app, your full name does not show up in a group chat, even when you’re not friends with someone, only their first name. That’s what’s suspicious to me, but I also don’t know how the Android app works. If a fake Chloe account made it into the group or if someone changed their nickname and photo for those screenshots, then that speaks volumes on the creator and the other users in the group for being extremely gullible. I need confirmation about Android messenger app group chats with strangers though before I can say for sure if it’s not possible for her last name to show up.

Its more than possible that they are in a private invite only group. Experience in those myself. You cant find them in searches. Would explain why they are each in all or some of them. They are in a private invite only (only inviting people they know 100% can be trusted) Which also means screenshots perhaps came from a trusted source....??

Edit: There are a few DID youtubers who i know had a niggling jealousy of Chloe and her success. In general these fakers of DID are pretty crazy people who enjoy playing mind games. I think she has a mole in the camp. Im living for it. Hey mole! drop some more bombs

Edit two: I see the group name has been confirmed to be real, they could still have a private invite only one of the same name. Again personal experience of such a thing. One is public, other is invite only/secret... same name.

 

[incorrigible shit goblin]

The skeptic chat has gone quiet. There was some debate over if those screens are real or not. Some shit doesn’t add up. Why wouldn’t the admins see it’s a fake account? Why would someone go through THAT MUCH trouble to make those screenshots? Getting profile pics and everything? The main issue is that the sender had most likely faked hate they received. Even if those screenshots are real, nobody will believe them now.

Just a lot of talking about nothing tbh. It’s possible we’ll never know the truth about those screenshots.

 

[Negative Nancy]

Chloe’s updated her FB pic, I’d be interested in seeing an updated chat log from that group if at all possible at this point

I scrolled a good while on “Chloe Wilkinson” results on Facebook and couldn’t find one fake account using her picture. I did this earlier too and couldn’t find anything, I’m personally confident that it was her. The group wasn’t a DissociaDID fan group, it was a DID group chat (one screenshot showed a more complete name of the chat, but still not a complete name)

I find this incredibly suspicious as she has no reason other than the chat screenshots to suddenly change her profile picture. Feels like she is planning to say "oh that's not even my profile photo on Facebook" to people who will ask about this (I mean people she knows irl or close followers, if they ever grow some brain cells and not believe every single thing this woman says).