Monica Rial / Monica Jean Rial / Rialisms & Ron Toye / Ronald Toye III / rontoye3 - 5th Bulma and Ron "Pick Up the Phone or You'll Find Your Dog Dead When You Get Home" Toye

So how does it feel to not have changed from being the absolute inhuman monster that threatened both his wives, threaten to chop up her dog, threaten a judge and his family? Cause you can say you've changed, but the behavior traits and warning signs are pointing to the conclusion that cannot be denied that you haven't changed from being the inhuman monster you say you were.

Will be my only statement here.
 
If you are Ron, you shouldn't of tweeted over 400+ times calling Vic a pedophile, a rapist, and more things and claiming to march in 100s of wamen and show us tons of receipts. You also shouldn't of contacted tons of conventions messing with Vics contracts and forcing people into removing him. It's not any of our or Nicks, or Vics fans fault you're an insufferable piece of shit that just naturally attracts people that want to protect them from your abusive manipulative tendencies.
I have never accused him of rape. I have actually cleared this up many times. Go back and look at those 400 responses to people who were tweeting @ me. Those were replies to people. The only person pushing the phrase rape is Nick Rekieta. It is all over his videos. How embarrassing LOL
 
So, cancel culture is destroying someone's career/life over some social justice bullshit? What would you call what Nick does? or what the people who email my office? Make youtube videos? Are they not also reacting to some social justice bullshit? Would you agree that it is a bit hypocritical? Do you think you should be free to tell people things you have experienced or your opinions on things? If so, what if your opinion is different from someone else, if they disagree are they Social justice warriors? What if you did something, it bothered someone else, you didn't realize it for one reason or another, are they not able to voice their position? What if that happened to you? Would you voice your opinion?

Hoes. Mad.

1. I'm not responsible for other people calling Ron's office, neither is Nick.
2. You INSERTED YOURSELF INTO A PUBLIC CONTROVERSY, MAKING YOU A LPPF. Criticism is perfectly fine. And I haven't seen any lies about you - they're dropping those receipts, unlike you and Monica.
3. You gotta lie in the bed you made - the only reason this shit is happening to you is because you fired the first shot. Foolishly, you did it on the internet, not in the court of law. People saw how ridiculous you and Monica and Marchi and many others were acting compared to how Vic was acting and that made a bunch of chaotic neutrals interested in you. It follows, the loudest people usually have the most to hide.
 
I have never accused him of rape. I have actually cleared this up many times. Go back and look at those 400 responses to people who were tweeting @ me. Those were replies to people. The only person pushing the phrase rape is Nick Rekieta. It is all over his videos. How embarrassing LOL
Sexual Assault is Rape in Texas.

Edit: accusing people of Rape is not free speech.
Can we just ban this faggot if hes gonna shitpost without being verified then theres no points to this.
It's in his own thread (somewhat) so I think it's fine.
 
Pending verification @Ron Toye is threadbanned. Highly likely it is him tho.
1589514091619.png
 
Can we just ban this faggot if hes gonna shitpost without being verified then theres no points to this.

Didn't Shane get briefly muted while he was getting verified?

Ah, okay so that is part of the process.
 
Seems weird they would admit there was a kiss here and then change the story later. Weird right? ;)

The story hasn't changed - Vic has always maintained anything that happened between him and any woman was consensual.
The situation as Monica described was denied. Vic never denied kissing her. Hell, he's gone on the record twice stating he's never been sexually attracted to Jamie Marchi, but that's not the same for Monica. Which is why many of us think part of Monica's motives are because she was eventually rejected.

Edit: Also, if you are Ron, have you ever asked her why she went back to his room right after she claims he assaulted her? She doesn't say she was forced and had a perfect escape opportunity with dinner. Hmmmmm....

Speaking of changing stories - Monica's allegation kept evolving. You'd think she would have been better rehearsed, being an actress and all. And then there was Stan Dahlin stating he didn't remember anything like that happening and if it did, he would have remembered it.
Hilarious, Monica chose to name someone who'd left the industry. Was that because she thought he wouldn't ever find out that she used his name to bolster her crumbling narrative?
 
Last edited:
So how does it feel to not have changed from being the absolute inhuman monster that threatened both his wives, threaten to chop up her dog, threaten a judge and his family? Cause you can say you've changed, but the behavior traits and warning signs are pointing to the conclusion that cannot be denied that you haven't changed from being the inhuman monster you say you were.
I wont attempt to justify those empty immature words, there is no excuse. I was making threats in response to information I received and it was stupid. I should have just expressed what I was really feeling vs bowing to toxic masculinity standard of showing no fear and not admitting you are hurting.
If you are Ron, you shouldn't of tweeted over 400+ times calling Vic a pedophile, a rapist, and more things and claiming to march in 100s of wamen and show us tons of receipts. You also shouldn't of contacted tons of conventions messing with Vics contracts and forcing people into removing him. It's not any of our or Nicks, or Vics fans fault you're an insufferable piece of shit that just naturally attracts people that want to protect them from your abusive manipulative tendencies.

That's not proof.
Show us things not in filings, like you and your broad promised last year.
What would you call it? That is a legal document that clearly states there was a kiss. So, when did he lie? Was it in the take down request or deposition? See, you wont believe Vic's words, that is why I am not here to convince anyone just answer the questions I can.
 
Weeb Wars just keeps giving. The fact Ron Soye lied in the hearing that he doesn't have other media or accounts, the need to interact online, the need for constant attention responding to people on social media, and now he's appeared on the farms (if it really is this Charles Gellman 2.0 bootleg of a schmuck) is just too hilarious. It gets better because Ron could really be friends with another woman beater like Cucky Chuckie.

EDIT: Confirmed and ninja'd by mods.
 
I wont attempt to justify those empty immature words, there is no excuse. I was making threats in response to information I received and it was stupid. I should have just expressed what I was really feeling vs bowing to toxic masculinity standard of showing no fear and not admitting you are hurting.
Here is the part you are avoiding, dipshit, you haven't changed from the inhuman monster you were back than, you just sprayed some cheap paint over it to hide it.
 
The story hasn't changed - Vic has always maintained anything that happened between him and any woman was consensual.
The situation as Monica described was denied. Vic never denied kissing her. Hell, he's gone on the record twice stating he's never been sexually attracted to Jamie Marchi, but that's not the same for Monica. Which is why many of us think part of Monica's motives are because she was eventually rejected.

Edit: Also, if you are Ron, have you ever asked her why she went back to his room right after she claims he assaulted her? She doesn't say she was forced and had a perfect escape opportunity with dinner. Hmmmmm....

Speaking of changing stories - Monica's allegation kept evolving. You'd think she would have been better rehearsed, being an actress and all. And then there was Stan Dahlin stating he didn't remember anything like that happening and if it did, he would have remembered it.
Hilarious, Monica chose to name someone who'd left the industry. Was that because she thought he wouldn't ever find out that she used his name to bolster her crumbling narrative?
1589515307505.png
Notice how they admit there was a kiss. The problem is they can't determine if it was consensual or not, only she can. If they knew it happened why would they encourage him to sue when matters of opinions are not actionable when the event happened admitted by him through his legal team, just a difference of opinion on how she felt? So, 1 story details were added when it was the right time, the other changed their story 3 or more times. Interesting?
 
Back