Crime Utah CEO gets 210 days in jail for having 13K files of infant & child rape, bestiality


A judge sentenced admitted pedophile and former Utah CEO Douglas Saltsman to 210 days in jail and 48 months probation on Thursday for possessing more than 13,000 files of graphic child pornography, some of which involved rape and bestiality.

Saltsman was facing one to 15 years in prison, and a $10,000 fine for each of the three second-degree felonies, of which he pleaded guilty.

cf12c4d7-77c2-4b6f-9cfc-02e07092cc93-medium16x9_SaltsmanDouglasEugeneSO419955Mug2019.jpg

Saltsman, 40, was originally facing 11 charges related to the seizure of more than 13,000 files of graphic child pornography in August 2019.

Newly revealed in court Thursday was the fact that some of the child pornography files Saltsman admitted to viewing and sexually gratifying himself to featured bestiality.

Considered by many to be a "computer genius," Saltsman was the founder of a now-defunct blockchain and cryptocurrency company which was based in Sandy.

Judge Douglas Hogan, however, suspended those recommendations, giving Saltsman 210 days in jail, saying:

I'm going to suspend the imposition of the statutory terms. I'm going to place Mr. Saltsman on probation with Adult Probation & Parole (AP&P) for a period of 48 months. Consistent with the parties' stipulated agreement, Mr. Saltsman will serve 210 days in jail. Credit for the time served up to this point is 148, that leaves an outstanding balance to be served. Upon completing the total of 210 days he may be released to Adult Probation & Parole and Supervision. He's to check in immediately, which means within 48 hours. He'll be subject to group A sex offender conditions. He'll need to undergo and complete successfully sex offender treatment and therapy. He will also need to undergo a drug and alcohol evaluation and comply with any recommended treatment... Mr. Saltsman it's going to be incumbent upon you when you meet with your probation officer, make sure you completely understand all of those conditions."
During the sentencing, prosecutor Cynthia Poulsen pointed out that in his pre-sentencing evaluation, Saltsman only talked about himself and how the charges affected him.

There was never any mention of the victims, the prosecution told Judge Hogan.

Judge Hogan allowed Saltsman to address the court, which is within his rights.

24aad5f0-fe7a-4780-b76f-3e4aa9830638-medium16x9_54730353_10156200461083097_5376151632604037120_o.jpg


During his sentencing, Saltsman said:

I just want to say that every day I wake up to shame, guilt, regret, and disgust. When I did the psychosexual evaluation all I could talk about was confusion and compulsive behaviors, talk about downloading, viewing, and masturbating to child pornography. I didn't understand why I would think these things. I started seeing a psychiatrist right after that. I was prescribed medication and I began therapy. That's when I started to understand some of the deeper mental issues. I learned that my self-destructive behavior matches my self-hatred. That's what I was trying to share with AP&P. Mrs. Poulsen was right, I didn't see victims then, I saw it was only affecting myself. Now I see the victims. I just want to continue getting help. I want to repair the damage I have done, that I see that I have done. I want to be able to look at myself in the mirror. I'm sorry. I'll make sure this never happens again, you'll never see me."
The details of the sordid case began when Saltsman was first busted by police on May 7, 2019, after searching his home and seizing his electronic devices.

25a22e06-945d-4ef3-b2d5-b16dde8cfc55-medium16x9_78991359_1412819552225534_1591921850076626944_n.jpg


Police submitted the child pornography files to the law enforcement portal of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, where 279 of the submitted files depicted known identified child victims.

Police first investigated child pornography when they were alerted to an internet provider address that was sharing child pornography using a peer-to-peer file-sharing program.

The first file, according to documents, was a compilation video of prepubescent girls under 8, some as young as toddlers, being raped.

Investigators obtained a search warrant and the Internet Crimes Against Children task force, known as ICAC, helped execute the search.

According to documents, child sex abuse imagery involving toddlers and prepubescent children was found on a laptop, a black computer, an SSD storage device and an SD card. The children were bound and raped. Police also found "disturbing videos of Douglas Saltsman engaged (in) sexual intercourse with several unconscious women," on the seized devices.

They also said they found a "clandestine drug lab of some sort" in a downstairs bedroom closet and called the Sandy Fire Department and hazmat team to make sure the chemical lab was not a public safety hazard.

Saltsman made his first court appearance in December 2019.
 
During the sentencing, prosecutor Cynthia Poulsen pointed out that in his pre-sentencing evaluation, Saltsman only talked about himself and how the charges affected him.

But why would he, its not like he was actually raping them himse....

He also had videos of him raping unconscious drugged women.

Link



Yes, this is clearly a dude deserving of time served plus a couple months. Good job, Utah.
Oh. This article didn't do a very good job.
 
A lot of people are glossing over the videos of him raping unconscious women and running an illegal drug lab. Those things also can get you a sentence of more than 210 days.

This dude has connections and a filled out snitch card.
Didn't even read the whole thing. My fault for skimming but you'd think that would be the freaking main point of the article other than the sick shit he jacks it to.
 
why are videos of people being murdered legal but videos of people being raped illegal? possessing a video of a crime being committed should not be a crime.

Started because of females seeing themselves as superior gender, men letting them. society seing rape as something that primary affects women and now it applise to rape in general.
 
why are videos of people being murdered legal but videos of people being raped illegal? possessing a video of a crime being committed should not be a crime.
because CP is produced commercially with the explicit purpose of selling it to people. by creating demand for more cp, they create a demand for more child rape.
same reasoning would apply to snuff movies, but there's a few problems: how to distinguish snuff material from regular crime/war/terrorism footage for example. this distinction doesn't exist with cp because there literally is no possible situation where the filming of a child being raped can be a legitimate situation.


Why do all these pedoshits always have so much cp? Every time they catch these fuckers it's entire hard drives worth of kiddy porn. I know that's beside the point, but why would anyone need/want that much saved porn?
i can think of two possible reasons
first: because they paid for it so they dont want to throw it away
second: because it's hard to find on the web. regular dudes don't stockpile terabytes worth of porn videos because they can just open a browser and access whatever they want on pornhub instantly, so there's no need to make backups on their own pc. i guess finding new cp isn't as easy as that, so that's why they hoard this shit
 
because CP is produced commercially with the explicit purpose of selling it to people. by creating demand for more cp, they create a demand for more child rape.
then why don't they just make it illegal to buy CP but legal to pirate it? why doesn't the FBI just upload their entire CP collection (probably several petabytes) to their website to eliminate the demand for more CP production? studies have also shown that fewer rapes occur when people have something to jerk off to. I'm not a pedo but this would be better for everyone, especially people who own websites like 9chan.
 
then why don't they just make it illegal to buy CP but legal to pirate it? why doesn't the FBI just upload their entire CP collection (probably several petabytes) to their website to eliminate the demand for more CP production? studies have also shown that fewer rapes occur when people have something to jerk off to. I'm not a pedo but this would be better for everyone, especially people who own websites like 9chan.
consumption of cp (like consumption of regular porn) triggers a positive feedback loop in which the consumers desire to consume more extreme forms of it is increased over time.
this is how coomers go from vanilla sex videos to increasingly grotesque fetish porn like MINDBREAK FACIAL ABUSE TRIPLE ANAL MONSTER COCK BONDAGE GANGBANG, and this is also how pedos go from wanking to 14 year olds in bikinis to watching 5 year olds getting raped.

tl;dr ur a retärd
 
He's a CEO, they have a high rate of psychopathy.
See, this is why I fully believe we should figure out the root differences in brain-structure which differentiates sociopaths from normal people, and tattoo all sociopaths on the forehead with a label that tells everyone they’re a sociopath. Having a group of people with no sense of empathy, compassion, or sense of right and wrong loose in our society is, and has been, disastrous.
Also fuck this pussy judge, I bet he’s a big consoomer of pizza. Utah still has the firing squad, fucking use it you faggots.
 
then why don't they just make it illegal to buy CP but legal to pirate it? why doesn't the FBI just upload their entire CP collection (probably several petabytes) to their website to eliminate the demand for more CP production? studies have also shown that fewer rapes occur when people have something to jerk off to. I'm not a pedo but this would be better for everyone, especially people who own websites like 9chan.

i mean the stuff is already made , why not decrease the need for new stuff by increasing avalibility of the old stuff ? that is if its kids who come first not the disgust at ewwww pedophiles. Imho Children first despite pedophiles being disgusting.
 
consumption of cp (like consumption of regular porn) triggers a positive feedback loop in which the consumers desire to consume more extreme forms of it is increased over time.
this is how coomers go from vanilla sex videos to increasingly grotesque fetish porn like MINDBREAK FACIAL ABUSE TRIPLE ANAL MONSTER COCK BONDAGE GANGBANG, and this is also how pedos go from wanking to 14 year olds in bikinis to watching 5 year olds getting raped.

tl;dr ur a retärd
wrong, pedophilia is basically caused by a crosswiring in the brain between the desire to fuck bitches and the desire to protect/care for children. it's not caused by watching too much porn. I was jerking off with my own piss and shit since I was 12, before I even started cooming to porn. people are born with fetishes and sometimes discover more of their fetishes as they find weirder porn, the porn does not hypnotize them into having those fetishes. I've seen thousands of gay porn images and it hasn't turned me gay.
 
Last edited:
He's a CEO, they have a high rate of psychopathy.

Not true actually. CEO's tend to have a high rate of Conscientiousness. They want to work hard ALL the time, and better things around them. Put everything in its proper place to an autistic degree and see those positive gains. Not Psychopathic traits at all. Why full on Psychos become CEO's is that the people promoting can confuse the two. A Sociopath is more then happy to pretend to have all the positive traits so long as it gets them what they want. That promotion. Once they get their position though, then the mask comes off. Most companies with a full on Sociopath in control will fall apart. The only exception to this seems to be in privately held financial companies that serve more as vehicles for the psychos own money then for anyone elses.

Its why even in these days of technology you see so much business being done face to face, over alcohol and so on. Big money men are very aware of the Psycho problem and are always looking to root it out. If you give your millions to a psycho you end up like the Madoff or Theranos investors. People can still get duped, but its very much the exception proving the rule.
 
Last edited:
Back