Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

KiwiJoe said:
Michelle's video is pretty valid. Tech Censorship is obviously a thing but since it's associated with Michelle Malkin who became part of the 'dissident right' these days after partnering with Nick Fuentes (who's basically the new Richard Spencer or Sargon) she pretty much became blacklisted from conventional media.

If Michelle were to partner with someone more mainstream like Ben Shapiro I guess it would've been a different story.
Click to expand...

Being a mainstream cuckservative gets you nowhere. Ben Shapiro will gladly market himself a free speech advocative and make money off of "fighting" tech censorship. But the second it comes time to actually stand up for those values, he folds and runs away.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: [W]ehrSturmBrigada, thermocline, Nigero and 23 others
Goofy Logic said:
Good God, that is about as innocent and true as you can get! Why are people trying to censor it?
Click to expand...

Lol, is this an actual question? The truth of something is the first reason to censor it. No one genuinely wants to censor things that are blatantly wrong. If I say that the sky is pink and I publish a news article claiming the sky is pink do you think Facebook would take it down? No.

When people talk about "misinformation" and "fake news" as reasons for censoring content, they're not talking about completely wrong information, because news agencies hardly ever publish totally made up stories. They are talking about things that are credible enough to cause some sort of discussion, a discussion that they want to discourage from taking place because it keeps people from organizing or engaging with material that is deemed "problematic".

Just consider that word. "Problematic". How often have you heard it used? It doesn't mean "false". But no one ever really "defines" it, they just kind of use it and we are left to figure out what exactly it means for ourselves. Something being true is certainly not a reason not to censor it.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: [W]ehrSturmBrigada, Nigero, SlayerFan213 and 36 others
KiwiJoe said:
Michelle's video is pretty valid. Tech Censorship is obviously a thing but since it's associated with Michelle Malkin who became part of the 'dissident right' these days after partnering with Nick Fuentes (who's basically the new Richard Spencer or Sargon) she pretty much became blacklisted from conventional media.

If Michelle were to partner with someone more mainstream like Ben Shapiro I guess it would've been a different story.
Click to expand...

It's a very valid point by Malkin, but also something that's totally safe to say within the establishment GOP. You'll never see Trump RTing her opinions on demographics or the loyalties of (((dual citizens))), or her articles on platforms like VDARE and Unz. Whatever staffer has access to his social media wouldn't allow it. Ever notice how he gets spicier after Jared Kushner's bedtime? Once again, AmNats call him BASED by association, ironically falling into the exact same ideological trap as shitlib journalists.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: [W]ehrSturmBrigada, thermocline, Fek and 13 others
Smug Cat said:
This is like what someone would do if they were intentionally trying to trigger the Streisand Effect. Wait for the president of the united states to retweet a video about tech censorship before tech censoring it. Is whoever is in charge of this shit at Twitter actually this exceptional or is there some 42-dimensional parcheesi going on here that I'm missing?
Click to expand...

Jared Holt was butthurt about it, and his followers love to spam the report button. Some min-wage or third world contractor likely saw all the reports and hit the delete button, not realizing that the POTUS had retweeted it.

Screenshot_2020-05-16 Jared Holt on Twitter.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: [W]ehrSturmBrigada, Nigero and Scarface1
He Who Points And Laughs said:
So the Groypers were able to achieve what Sargon never could.
Click to expand...

Spic Fuentes is going to inflate his ego to absurd proportions after this.
Little Sarg'n is going to starve, because Nick absorbed all the dopamine...


Cypher said:
Trump literally has done nothing for AmNats, but he did tweet about them once, time to vote for him in 2020
Click to expand...

You think Fuentes is doing any of this because he cares about a cause?
I don't think he gives a rat's ass about anything but himself. Well, and maybe his little catboy friend, who may or may not be a pedophile.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Squidbot, Lou Reed's Dead Parrot, tantric_depressive and 5 others
inception_state said:
Jared Holt was butthurt about it, and his followers love to spam the report button. Some min-wage or third world contractor likely saw all the reports and hit the delete button, not realizing that the POTUS had retweeted it.

View attachment 1299730
Click to expand...
If anything I think this will be more damaging to Nick and AF in terms of optics than a positive thing.

Lefties would probably use this as the 2020 election version of Spencer's 'Hail Victory!' from 2016 although more subtle. An alt-right figure associating themselves with Orange Man which ends up being more bad PR for both sides. Though again its a much more subtle thing compared to that. Its more like Malkin being associated with that instead of directly.

Nick can't keep hiding behind Filipina Mommy GF though. No matter what Malkin does she'll always be traced back to Nick. At this rate she basically cut off any chance she can be taken seriously by the mainstream since she's now bound to him. Anyone collaborating with Nick is effectively blacklisted from anything serious.

Sure more normies will know of her clip regarding tech censorship, but what about her wants for demographics-change awareness and stop supporting Israel?

Makes me wonder if Nick will eventually grow jealous of Malkin and later on cancel her because despite having a semi-relevant pundit on his side he still can't get Trump to change.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Based_Papa_John and frozenrunner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: [W]ehrSturmBrigada, I'd buy that for a dollar and Based_Papa_John
Don't Tread on Me said:
Lol, is this an actual question? The truth of something is the first reason to censor it. No one genuinely wants to censor things that are blatantly wrong. If I say that the sky is pink and I publish a news article claiming the sky is pink do you think Facebook would take it down? No.

When people talk about "misinformation" and "fake news" as reasons for censoring content, they're not talking about completely wrong information, because news agencies hardly ever publish totally made up stories. They are talking about things that are credible enough to cause some sort of discussion, a discussion that they want to discourage from taking place because it keeps people from organizing or engaging with material that is deemed "problematic".

Just consider that word. "Problematic". How often have you heard it used? It doesn't mean "false". But no one ever really "defines" it, they just kind of use it and we are left to figure out what exactly it means for ourselves. Something being true is certainly not a reason not to censor it.
Click to expand...
low iq 130 take.
I agree with this statement 70-80% of the time BUT repetition = reality. If you say "racism (kinship) is bad" enough times, people believe it. Or look at the climate change hysteria. Or anti white scare occurring right now. The high 145+ iq take is that if you repeat a lie enough times, people will believe it so you gotta censor information. Free speech = brainwashing. Our liberal enemies understand this.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Lunacy
Reactions: [W]ehrSturmBrigada, Begemot, Bob Barker and 7 others
Smug Cat said:
This is like what someone would do if they were intentionally trying to trigger the Streisand Effect. Wait for the president of the united states to retweet a video about tech censorship before tech censoring it. Is whoever is in charge of this shit at Twitter actually this exceptional or is there some 42-dimensional parcheesi going on here that I'm missing?
Click to expand...
They're actually this retarded. That's what happens when you put dangerhairs and soyboys with an axe to grind in charge of something.

Route 79 said:
I wonder how long it will take Nick Fuentes and Michelle Malkin to chew on that thick load of clout, spewed from the Orange in Chief himself.
Click to expand...
I'm sure Nick's next show will be uncomfortably masturbatory.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Squidbot, Ira the Weatherman and Charles Kinbote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back