- Joined
- Oct 20, 2018
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lmao Twitter deleted the Michelle Malkin tweet
This is like what someone would do if they were intentionally trying to trigger the Streisand Effect. Wait for the president of the united states to retweet a video about tech censorship before tech censoring it. Is whoever is in charge of this shit at Twitter actually this exceptional or is there some 42-dimensional parcheesi going on here that I'm missing?
Ask null. He seems to think the problem all goes back to payment processors (such as paypal, mastercard), which are given near-monopolies due to government regulation.I wonder how the people complaining about their free speech rights being violated for not being allowed on Twitter, Youtube, Google and such still feel about the free market![]()
This is what the Republican party almost always does every presidential election year (less so in the biennial elections for some reason). They throw red meat to the base and become near far-right levels of based and then pretend that all never happened about 1-2 months after the electionDoesn’t anyone else find it kinda transparent that Trump is Restoking the troll/activists that helped him win 2016 now because it’s getting close to reelection?
he hasn’t touched his kekistani foot solders in years but now that he need votes because the democrats are getting aligned with Biden and Covid has pissed off a lot of his safe voters.
Reminds me of this:
View attachment 1300281
this comic could be updated with 2 extra panels, 3rd would be an advisor whispering into trumps ear that re-election is in a few months and the 4th panel showing trump dropping the goblet and eagerly screaming “come on! you guys can do it!! I’m behind you!!! Keep fighting!!!“
Harder, God Emperor. Shitpost HARDER.Holy goddamn fuck, President Trump retweeted a clip of Michelle Malkin from the offical America First clips twitter account
View attachment 1298183
![]()
Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "The Radical Left is in total command &am…
archived 16 May 2020 12:49:37 UTCarchive.li
I wouldn't have expected anything less from these professional homosexuals.lmao Twitter deleted the Michelle Malkin tweet
Fuentes' solution to nearly everything is basically just 'let the government do it'. He does call himself a statist after all and Null likes to use that clip of Fuentes wishing to jail and kill all the Libertarians as an example of Null accepting that as free speech and letting him say what he want, which to be fair is a pretty strong example.Ask null. He seems to think the problem all goes back to payment processors (such as paypal, mastercard), which are given near-monopolies due to government regulation.
That being said, Fuentes and the groypers are against the free market.
They gotta shut it down, the goyim know.Good God, that is about as innocent and true as you can get! Why are people trying to censor it?
Twitter has a habit of censoring tweets that Trump retweets, unless they're standard boomer neo-cons. Ironically, this probably has a pretty decent pro-trump effect as is just leaves normie retweets for normies to see, while the deranged leftists on twitter shout over all the non-insane leftists. If leftists seem like lunatics suffering from Trump derangement syndrome, and Trump supporters seem like regular everyday people with unobjectionable opinions, this can only work in Trump's favor. Nobody is going to vote for a party of nutcases just because the other party has a few too many boomers.Good God, that is about as innocent and true as you can get! Why are people trying to censor it?
Fuentes is just yet another in a long line of authoritarians who thinks giving the government as much power as they need to "serve the will of the people" (whatever that means) will solve all of society's problems and never result in the newly empowered authoritarians turning the guns on their own followers. This has worked occasionally, with Tito generally recognized as a leader who somehow managed to make communism work, and a few other third-world dictators regarded as benevolent. Still, the misses far out way the successes and hoping for these magical ultra-competent men to come out of nowhere and fix all the nation's problems is a fool's errand.Fuentes' solution to nearly everything is basically just 'let the government do it'. He does call himself a statist after all and Null likes to use that clip of Fuentes wishing to jail and kill all the Libertarians as an example of Null accepting that as free speech and letting him say what he want, which to be fair is a pretty strong example.
But everything he proposes boils down to this.
"Degenerates? Uh, send the Anti-Degeneracy Squads and arrest them, lol"
"Hey Government, stop supporting Israel! Oh you did? Thank you, lol"
I do find it ironic that Fuentes constantly complains about Zionist influence, and maybe rightfully so, but then he praises the roman catholic church which is basically a foreign entity/country. Rules for thee, but not for me."I'll make all these things illegal and the Gov't will do it and no one will stop them! You have to obey what the Gov' says because of CATHOLIC TRADITION!"
Fuentes doesn't seem all that fond of the constitution. I don't know if he's outright against it, but I do recall him saying it's outdated after being asked about the tenth amendment.I don't even think he's that big into guns. Last I recall he considered the Second Ammendment to be a Boomer's security blanket and was pretty iffy on the idea of Americans using their 2A rights to rebel against the Government for any Tyranny. He thinks his system of right-wing flavored tankie logic will automatically work and be accepted by the general masses instead of being laughed out of the White House.
If that happens say goodbye to the KFs.In practice, what could Trump actually do? Threaten to take away s230 protection from the social media companies? While that would be hilarious because Facebook, twitter etc would get sued into oblivion withing a week I dont think thats ever going to happen.
Do these people not understand that social media is a privately owned space? Twitter and Facebook always reserve the right to curate the content on the platform without taking responsibility for it. Deal with it. If you want a platform, buy a domain, rent a server, make a website. Whiney bitch.Archive of the video itself:
View attachment 1299455
Its because Nick isn't even an actual American nationalist.Twitter has a habit of censoring tweets that Trump retweets, unless they're standard boomer neo-cons. Ironically, this probably has a pretty decent pro-trump effect as is just leaves normie retweets for normies to see, while the deranged leftists on twitter shout over all the non-insane leftists. If leftists seem like lunatics suffering from Trump derangement syndrome, and Trump supporters seem like regular everyday people with unobjectionable opinions, this can only work in Trump's favor. Nobody is going to vote for a party of nutcases just because the other party has a few too many boomers.
Fuentes is just yet another in a long line of authoritarians who thinks giving the government as much power as they need to "serve the will of the people" (whatever that means) will solve all of society's problems and never result in the newly empowered authoritarians turning the guns on their own followers. This has worked occasionally, with Tito generally recognized as a leader who somehow managed to make communism work, and a few other third-world dictators regarded as benevolent. Still, the misses far out way the successes and hoping for these magical ultra-competent men to come out of nowhere and fix all the nation's problems is a fool's errand.
I do find it ironic that Fuentes constantly complains about Zionist influence, and maybe rightfully so, but then he praises the roman catholic church which is basically a foreign entity/country. Rules for thee, but not for me.
Fuentes doesn't seem all that fond of the constitution. I don't know if he's outright against it, but I do recall him saying it's outdated after being asked about the tenth amendment.
I don't actually think Fuentes has a hard theory of government. He's a statist who wants to imprison his political opponents, enact what is more or less a left-wing system of economics, and has strong right-wing social beliefs, though he supports free speech (or at least a vague concept he thinks is free speech). This is all relatively surface level however, and from what I've seen of Fuentes he doesn't go all that much deeper than this. To be fair, most politicians don't have a hard theory of government, but as Fuentes seeks to fill a notable void in american politics left by the death of social conservatism, I might hope for more than somewhat shallow paleoconservatism/right-wing populism mixed with Zoomer-friendly banter.
He'd march with anti-fascists if they sang the praises of fascism.He also already said a while ago that he would march with Antifa if they donned Franco and Mussolini regalia and sang the praises of Catholic Fascism and broke stuff that he wanted to break.
If a subsection of the alt right that behaved like antifa, but attacked "commies" instead of "Nazis", he'd support them.He'd march with anti-fascists if they sang the praises of fascism.
That's one hell of an if.