Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Imagine being so ignorant of actual Nazi atrocities that you think not using preferred pronouns is the marker of a Nazi. Feel free to rate me MATI for it, but these are narcissistic fucktards so self-centered that they think being misgendered is more important that millions of outright murders, genocide, and tens of millions of war dead. Imagine making such a destructive historical tragedy all about your goddamn genderfeelings.
It really disturbs how trans rights have been put on such a high pedestal that misgendering is on the level of Nazism. I’m not even joking; you can lie, cheat and steal but don’t respect someone’s pronouns, then you’re irredeemable scum.
 
I've never seen what people mean by Trans Rights. It's always this conveniently vague shit post.

It means precisely what they want it to mean. It's a cultural purr word with a nebulous definition, so it just means "something good for our cultural group". The exact definition doesn't matter, it can even shift within the same paragraph. This is a feature, not a bug.
 
Every time they actually tried to kill or get rid of Godzilla they just made him angrier and stronger. I want them to realize that.

There was an actual movie where they fuck with the timeline and accidentally made a much more aggressive and outright psychopathic Godzilla instead of the "good natured" hero one.
If you'll allow me to go off-topic and exercise my Godzilla autism...
It was always the same Godzilla. They didn't create a new one they just powered up the existing one.
The only thing the time travel in Godzilla vs. King Ghidorah accomplished was to create a Stable Time Loop that set in motion the events of the previous films.
Think 12 Monkeys but with Godzilla.
 
I've never seen what people mean by Trans Rights. It's always this conveniently vague shit post.

It's always left vague because it would sound horrible if you actually laid out what "Trans Rights" are.

It's rolling back women's rights (their safe spaces, support groups, initiatives, sport segregation, sexual preference and identity) and giving those rights to men in women's clothing.

They want men in women's bathrooms, prisons, support groups, rape shelters, and generally any other place that men clearly do not belong. They want men to replace real women's voices on all levels - from private corporations to all levels of government. The want to shame gay women into having sex with men (it isn't a penis, it's a girldick).
 
It's always left vague because it would sound horrible if you actually laid out what "Trans Rights" are.

It's rolling back women's rights (their safe spaces, support groups, initiatives, sport segregation, sexual preference and identity) and giving those rights to men in women's clothing.

They want men in women's bathrooms, prisons, support groups, rape shelters, and generally any other place that men clearly do not belong. They want men to replace real women's voices on all levels - from private corporations to all levels of government. The want to shame gay women into having sex with men (it isn't a penis, it's a girldick).

That's the bailey definition. The motte definition is that trans rights mean the right to exist and not be murderaped by roving gangs of Nazis in MAGA hats. Being able to shift back and forth between the two definitions enables all kinds of rhetorical sleight of hand.
 
I've never seen what people mean by Trans Rights. It's always this conveniently vague shit post.
It's supposed to mean that trans people are just treated equally in society (Ex: A trans person can't be fired from their job just for being trans.), but now certain people think it means trans people should be exempt from ever being made fun of for any reason, and shouldn't be held accountable when they do something terrible. (See: Sarah Nyberg.)
 
It's supposed to mean that trans people are just treated equally in society (Ex: A trans person can't be fired from their job just for being trans.), but now certain people think it means trans people should be exempt from ever being made of for any reason, and shouldn't be held accountable when they do something terrible. (See: Sarah Nyberg.)
it's funny because they already have that. it's called the constitution and by making yourself an exclusionary protected class, people are just going to hate you.
 
That's the bailey definition. The motte definition is that trans rights mean the right to exist and not be murderaped by roving gangs of Nazis in MAGA hats. Being able to shift back and forth between the two definitions enables all kinds of rhetorical sleight of hand.

"I don't think trannies should be allowed to rape people." "REEEEE why do you want to murder us?"
 
He/him lesbians:
709DC42E-4F27-4D18-9440-4F1F7154B06B.jpeg8936EC21-37B9-4278-8B07-A932BDD135EE.jpeg730EE1A2-AE0C-4A32-BF3F-471CFF4C4453.jpeg4E41027C-4E60-48A6-8FCC-DF53B5907ECF.jpeg9B837C3C-5F59-4E67-89EA-18AA27C1FBBD.jpeg96F2592C-BED2-4493-8461-2A3A53400803.jpeg078F2D8F-A7C9-47C3-A295-5D99DB7A7206.jpeg161ED953-BE57-42D8-BE52-0A886478155C.jpegEEF5D9CC-D4A4-4635-9267-E6DE818987AD.jpegC4231595-70FB-4326-81FA-7ADD983A6AFE.jpeg
 
Back