Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 14.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 115 24.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 84 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 193 41.7%

  • Total voters
    463
Nick's losing it hard. He referred to Lady Rackets by her real name, which I don't think he's ever done before on stream.

Also, the dichotomy between Drexel's massive black guns and Nick's pasty white chicken wings.
RacketsDrexelSwing.gif


EDIT: I'm floored that a yoked 37-year old black swinger is bonding so perfectly with a chubby ~55 year old white Texan lawyer
 
Nick's losing it hard. He referred to Lady Rackets by her real name, which I don't think he's ever done before on stream.

Also, the dichotomy between Drexel's massive black guns and Nick's pasty white chicken wings.
View attachment 1317312

EDIT: I'm floored that a yoked 37-year old black swinger is bonding so perfectly with a chubby ~55 year old white Texan lawyer
That looks like some make-a-wish shit. Terminally ill little Nicky get a visit from his favorite superhero Cuck Commander.
 
Jeez. How many exceptionals do we have around here?

Well there was the school shooter who got defeated by a couch.

Having Ty on as the straight man saved the show. I was worried we would have a massive trash fire on our hands like that PPP stream.

This turned out a lot better than having some shit-eating cuck on would have, since he probably would have bitched out in about 10 minutes it even if he had shown up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt
The cuck's criminal case against Ethan.


















Full video:

 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: TexOffender
"unless that person has consented to such disclosure"

Hey @PocketJacks you dumb fuck, you consented to disclosure when you fucking POSTED IT ON A PORN WEBSITE.

His decade-old adult films were still being sold on several clip stores as of a week ago. He also uploaded a few to his xHamster page and posted links to them on Chastity Mansion and OrgasmDenial.com

1590311646121.png

http://archive.vn/TRLu6

1590311887147.png

https://archive.vn/XGk16

He's so butthurt that he issued a DMCA strike against a video that he or his wife uploaded to the official Mistress Roulette Porn Hub page.

1590312385128.png
1590312139454.png

http://archive.vn/uTFO3
 
So following the porn site screenshots…

I'm still working my way through the six-hour Drex stream from Thursday (and the one from last night is over 5 and a half hours - if Nick doesn't go back to doing solo streams I might never catch up), and they're talking about how in some state(s?) restaurants can be open but not churches.

Surely the solution then is to hold church services in a restaurant, is it not? Rent out a party room or whatever. Especially Protestants seems to be big on the whole "where you gather in my name, I am among you" thing, so there's nothing particularly special about an actual church building to them. And so long as everyone there buys a meal and tips their waitresses, I don't think the restaurant staff would mind.

As an aside, I really like the current style of thumbnails on NIck's channel. @TiltdownDove Is that you? Good work.
 
So following the porn site screenshots…

I'm still working my way through the six-hour Drex stream from Thursday (and the one from last night is over 5 and a half hours - if Nick doesn't go back to doing solo streams I might never catch up), and they're talking about how in some state(s?) restaurants can be open but not churches.

That's an open invitation for a lawsuit, because there is no specific constitutional right to eat in a restaurant but there certainly is one to practice religion. There is absolutely no justifiable reason to restrict one more severely than the other. It does not pass even rational basis scrutiny, and the standard that actually would be applied is strict scrutiny. To the extent they are ridiculous nonsense like this, these restrictions will be shot down one by one if they are continued.
 
The closest this faggot is ever getting to being on Nick's streams.

(Threadbanned from the JMK thread so it goes in here!)
 
Back