- Joined
- May 23, 2020
They're not getting Chris's money, they're getting the governments. He'd have a rent of 300-400$, the rest the government pays for. But he can't have combined assets or money that totals to 2000$ assuming he's getting this on disability and he has to report all of his bank accounts and anywhere that stores wealth. If he's on disability he's actually not even allowed to be given food from other people without the government adjusting how much he gets.You have little faith in opportunistic slumlords that will bleed Chris dry of his tugboat?
The government isn't going to go out if it's way to help Chris. It's not like they've got someone keeping an eye out for him, waiting for his mother to croak so they can swoop in and save the day. If Chris doesn't actively pursue getting housing, putting in applications, filling out forms, etc. (or have someone doing it for him), then he won't be getting anything. And as others have said, the wait time can be years. There are thousands of people with developmental and mental issues like Chris living on the streets because their primary care giver (like a parent) passed away and they couldn't take care of themselves.
The government doesn't just not care, they make it hard to do. Just getting disability requires years of documentation and they'll fight you on whether or not you're disabled even if you come in missing two legs.
If Chris got a social worker to help with his living situation is it possible they may also be put in charge of his finances? Or is his tugboat untouchable?
This should have already happened. If he's on disability then they look at whether or not he needs a caretaker who handles his finances. You actually have to prove you can manage your money or else everything you get goes to your caretaker. To start managing your own funds you need to prove you're in the mental state and have the maturity to do it. In some states you absolutely have to have a financial manager. This doesn't change if you're an adult. My father still handles my SSI because that's how it was done by default. Some states just do it automatically.
I'm mentioning disability because it's how Chris could go on Section 8. They require a ton of documentation. A lot of homes that would take the disabled will actually go to your house and look at your living quarters and evaluate you. They'll look at your behaviors and dirtiness and such. Frankly, none of those houses are going to take him. He'd have to find the minority of landlords that'd take him and even then he has to look presentable and they might check his credit.
Edit: How the fuck is Chris getting more than me in disability? 1300? He's absurdly lucky to be getting SSDI. That really shouldn't have happened. He's actually getting way more than the vast majority of people on disability at a strange age. Incredible.
I just looked into this even more and it makes less sense. I actually get SSDI in the same way Chris does but that doesn't mean you get 1300$. It means they get the max that SSI would give you, so you're supposed to get a chunk of SSDI and then SSI carries the rest. This is completely ass-backwards. Chris is getting way more than he should be. I know disabled elderly people who get less than Chris does.
Last edited: