Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

This tweet featuring Don Lemon going TDS got a million likes, so the guy who posted it asks twitter to listen to his shitty mumble trap rap.
View attachment 1327463

View attachment 1327464

This is the video that the tweet was mentioning. I swear, these motherfuckers are the most condescending manchildren yet.
stonetoss white man kills black man kneel riot.png

View attachment 1327473 View attachment 1327474

Don Lemon, 2015 VS. 2020. Hate and alcohol ages you like a motherfucker, apparently.
What a smug ghoul.
 
You can, but if you go to the next situation screaming racism on the outset then that makes you floppier than a waffle house.

Give him a break, unlike most people who sperg about politics he will admit when he's wrong. As for the race thing it's hard to undo years of being taught it's all about race, especially when both parties are desperatley to convince you that the other is the true racist.
 
You can, but if you go to the next situation screaming racism on the outset then that makes you floppier than a waffle house.
While I agree with you that I tend to go off the deep end, I think it shows that I need to work on that.

I was completely against Trump. Although I still have some TDS, listening to others people's perspective and looking at things objectively, I have a more stable understanding of what is going on.

There's flip flopping and there's changing your mindset. Perspective is everything.

I won't compromise my beliefs, but if I'm proven to be wrong, it shows character development.
 
You can, but if you go to the next situation screaming racism on the outset then that makes you floppier than a waffle house.
I'm not sure I buy that reasoning in general. It's possible that I have a default approach to some problems, a default perspective I apply to some classes of news item. It is possible that I will have an initial reaction which I later revise when I learn more information. I don't think I'll be inclined to take any shit for that.
 
Nobody in Alabama really likes Tubbyville, but Sessions is really, deeply unpopular. The prevailing opinion, from what I've heard, is that Toobervilla will do for a one term senator.
As long as they do, in fact, only give him one term. Tuberville is a high immigration neocon.
 
I'm not sure I buy that reasoning in general. It's possible that I have a default approach to some problems, a default perspective I apply to some classes of news item. It is possible that I will have an initial reaction which I later revise when I learn more information. I don't think I'll be inclined to take any shit for that.

It sounds to me like the ideal move is to go "I reserve opinion until I see more facts" in many potentially contentious situations.
 
It sounds to me like the ideal move is to go "I reserve opinion until I see more facts" in many potentially contentious situations.
Ideal, perhaps, but how many of us do it?

When I hear a story about someone whose personal property or body was vandalized with racist or sexist slogans, my first inclination is to consider that they are probably lying.

If their assailants are conveniently identified with the insignia or appurtenances of a political movement that the accuser despises, I frown, I darken the brow, I purse my lips and consider.

I don't intend to change any of that.
 
Yes. Meanwhile, no prominent leftist is ever responsible for the actions of their supporters, even if the actions of their supporters are obviously directly inspired by their rhetoric.

This is clearly a very consistent and rational stance that is in no way hypocritical.
This.

I don't believe Bernie is responsible for when one of his supporters shoots up a baseball game or tries to firebomb an ICE facility (save the kids in cages by burning them alive). But if Trump is responsible for the actions of a single-digit number of his supporters out of tens of millions of his supporters, then so to should be Bernie.
I don't believe Joe Biden should be arrested and convicted of sexual assault without evidence based on an old accusation. But if Kavanaugh is guilty-by-accusation, then so to should be Biden.

View attachment 1327473 View attachment 1327474

Don Lemon, 2015 VS. 2020. Hate and alcohol ages you like a motherfucker, apparently.
I'm sure the gay sex doesn't help much either

It sounds to me like the ideal move is to go "I reserve opinion until I see more facts" in many potentially contentious situations.
NGL I thought Armed Robbery was murdered too until more evidence came forward.
(and I still feel there is a valid argument about where the right to self defense of a citizen attempting a citizens arrest and the right to self defense end of an accused criminal begin, but of course 2020 'Murica would make it about race)
 
Last edited:

The Zucc know what is coming and instead of losing his company to screechers he just go to with the flow, dangerhairs be damned, I think also Jack changed some wording in the term of services and rules to appease orange man but shielding his histericals on the process
 
All I have to say is two things: About fucking time, and all you fuckers who gave me rainbows can suck it dry. 🚬
I TOLD YOU this was going to happen soon with their repeated "rules for thee" shit. Although that point about establishing a group to look into things makes me nervous. Every time companies establish special social groups for shit like this they end up going awful.



Don't forget they accuse Trump supporters of being cultish and violent when ANTIFAgs, RadFems, Radical Gays/Trannies, and BLM are completely democrat and squash anyone who isn't. Even bernie supporters.
Again, they have no sense of self-awareness. They can't use the private company argument no more.
Not tds, but razors right:
Screenshot_20200527-212219_Chrome.jpg
 
It sounds to me like the ideal move is to go "I reserve opinion until I see more facts" in many potentially contentious situations.
I try to follow this, though I'm not perfect so I'm sure someone can dig up a serious comment on Armed Robbery or the most recent death.


Would you rather have me just blurt off that Ahmed did nothing wrong despite plausible evidence that says the contrary? And just stay in that echo chamber, disallowing anything that goes against my original stance?
I would rather you and many people to not go immediately to racism whenever a white person and black person interact in a way that leads to the black person dying. Both sides should be given the benefit of the doubt, maybe he actually was at fault for charging at them, and maybe he was trying to defend himself from a lynching. But all too many times are our minds primed by article headlines and our preconceived notions of how things often happen.

Shitpost away, but I try to avoid passing judgement and calling for heads until more of the story comes out, and in the case of Ahmed I was really weirded out by the timing of the story since it happened months ago.

Like I said, as long as you recognize that you leaped to judgement that you tend to go off the deep end I don't have too much of a problem with you.

You dirty commie you.

Editing to respond to more

When I hear a story about someone whose personal property or body was vandalized with racist or sexist slogans, my first inclination is to consider that they are probably lying.

If their assailants are conveniently identified with the insignia or appurtenances of a political movement that the accuser despises, I frown, I darken the brow, I purse my lips and consider.

To me that's a far cry from jumping the gun and passing judgement.
 
Last edited:
Back