Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess to these people the "modern western world" is America. I dunno, I have a hard enough time parsing their ambiguous use of language.

It's America, Canada, the U.K. Sweden, Germany and France. That's what they mean by Modern Western World.
 
RoK's evopsycho argument is fucking boring. But this gem caught my eye:

About.png


I like how they argue that ideologies they don't like both decrease fertility rate and increase state burden (presumably by encouraging single-parenthood -- an obsession by Fuckbot) at the same time
 
Found this post.
http://sluthate.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=78218
xB6d9Sa.png


"Hey girl, I know 6 languages and can do some other cool stuff. My personality is pretty awesome as well. Can I bone you now?"

"Self-praise is for losers. Be a winner. Stand for something. Always have class, and be humble."
-John Madden
"I’m intelectual but intense character." *sigh*

If he conceives of himself as some kind of serene, social, sophisticated warrior-poet, to what does he attribute his failure? Are we really still talking about chins?
Ugh. More red-pill nonsense.
get


Divorced raped?

Right, because marriage is always a trap and should be avoided like the plague because women are evil and manipulative. Why do these people refuse to be self-aware and accept ignorance as the truth. *sigh*
I realize this is a relatively minor flaw, but that bar graph's formatting makes no sense. Why color-code the bars by gender if you're also going to group them by gender? It prevents you from easily comparing the change.
 
Last edited:
REAL MEN™ drive F-450s with rolling coal mods and use them to haul nothing but their dog.
I disagree. REAL men drive this car.
Oldsmobile_Cutlass_Supreme_sedan.jpg

It was the same type of car that Mr. Rogers used that was stolen by criminals, only to be returned after the fact because of their respect for him.

fred_rogers_quote.png


A true paragon of the human race every Sluthater should aspire to be but never will.
 
Wait, if I'm reading that chart right:
28% of women wanted to get married in 1997
35% of men wanted to get married in 1997


35-28=7
Difference: 7 "Statistically equal"

37% of women want to get married today
29% of men want to get married today
Difference: 8 "Significantly smaller number of men"
37-29=8
Uhm.....

EDIT: No, I am not reading it correctly, he means 35% of men used to, now 29% do, 6% difference, vs 28% of women then and 37% now, which is also statistically significant.

EDIT EDIT: Of course, it must be because women are blood-sucking cumvampires. Surely, there aren't complex social and economic reasons for this change. Complex things mean I cannot autistically categorize them. *flaps violently*
 
Wait, if I'm reading that chart right:
28% of women wanted to get married in 1997
35% of men wanted to get married in 1997


35-28=7
Difference: 7 "Statistically equal"

37% of women want to get married today
29% of men want to get married today
Difference: 8 "Significantly smaller number of men"
37-29=8
Uhm.....

EDIT: No I am dumb, I am not reading it correctly, he means 35% used to, now 29% do, 6% difference, vs 28% of women then and 37% now.

EDIT EDIT: Of course, it must be because women are blood-sucking cumvampires. Surely, there aren't complex social and economic reasons for this change. Complex things mean I cannot autisitically categorize them. *flaps violently*

The real issue with that statistic is that they confuse correlation with causation in order to push a biased agenda.
 
I like how they argue that ideologies they don't like both decrease fertility rate and increase state burden (presumably by encouraging single-parenthood -- an obsession by Fuckbot) at the same time

Decreasing birth rates are associated with increased social welfare burden on the state because you've got fewer young people to support the number of aging dependents in a country. This is something that China, for example, is facing because of its one child policy.

That has nothing to do with what these idiots are talking about (which is probably just reactionary whining about welfare queens or some shit)
 

"East Asian" is incredibly redundant because he has heritage in Southeast Asia so that's fucktarded off the bat. Also has be a type 1 on the Fitzpatrick scale?

fitzpatrick_scale.jpg
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back