Twitter Hides POTUS Tweet

[Pepsi-Cola]

Maybe I'm just dumb and don't understand American politics but the president can't just repeal an entire section of the very important legal congress thingy right? Like he doesn't just have the power to magically do that? I assume it would be a pretty long process if he was serious about it.

 

[Null]

even if he could repeal whatever he wants, he can't apply it to a server located outside the US - .md or .pl or .za or whatever. It's easy to open a company online (and sometimes it's free) in many countries, have it owned by bearer shares if you want, it's simple and doesn't take a genius lawyer. He's doing things for show imho.

WRONG.
1. Section 230 is what enables what few competent and confident companies to exist to dare to host a site like this! Companies in other countries without these protections will fold at the first sign of trouble.
2. Without 230, even hosting the site in Estonia (the only country I can think of with similar provisions), I am still legally liable as a person for what gets posted here.

You get it? Do you fucking people get this yet?

 

[Too Many Catgirls]

You get it? Do you fucking people get this yet?

People get it.

But those rioters aren't the only ones with a "burn it down" mindset after the last two decades.

 

[Distant Stare]

WRONG.
1. Section 230 is what enables what few competent and confident companies to exist to dare to host a site like this! Companies in other countries without these protections will fold at the first sign of trouble.
2. Without 230, even hosting the site in Estonia (the only country I can think of with similar provisions), I am still legally liable as a person for what gets posted here.

You get it? Do you fucking people get this yet?

>Currently passing around his tiny apartment ranting to himself
>Poor Serbian window pigeon is starting to panic at the sight
>Neighbors can hear the manic screaming of the pudgy American in the apartment above them

Yeah, this MATI will be a good one

Annnnddd...its gone

 

[Fistbeard_McThunderaxe]

This is the slowest apocalypse into distopian future ever.

 

[Null]

People get it.

But those rioters aren't the only ones with a "burn it down" mindset after the last two decades.

Okay, be reckless. Give up the few things you have in promise of nothing to spite Jack Dorsey, but I'll be gone. It's not worth trying to help retarded Americans anymoe

 

[Near]

I'm reserving this for when @Null gets banned

 

[BillyGoat2]

WELP

 

[Ivan Shatov]

View attachment 1330151

That will never happen. He's saying outlandish things to scare Jack Dorsey and get Paul Singer's attention.

The actual policy agenda is contained in the EO.

I mean, maybe I'm wrong, maybe he's planning another EO repealing Section 230 in its entirety. Which simultaneously destroys the chief communication channels for his reelection campaign, immediately eliminates $2.2 T from the US GDP, puts him at war with people like Peter Thiel, and alienates everyone in America under 70. Sounds plausible.

 

[big ups liquid richard]

View attachment 1330109

No, you see. That's 4D Chess to own the libs.
Now get on the trump train, its maga 2020 time, pedes!

 

[Inquisitor_BadAss]

In this thread Null mad.

 

[Tomboy Respecter]

I can't be arsed to care really. This is the gayest drama I've ever seen on all fronts. I have problems in real life that need attending to rather spergs sperging about shit that doesn't even remotely affect me in the slightest past me not being able to say nigger or kike.

 

[CockPockets]

In this thread Null mad.

at the internet

 

[Zero Day Defense]

View attachment 1330151

Aside from the aforementioned process of Trump, and considering that "repealing Section 230" involves action by Congress, do you really think they'll get to work dismantling something that had strong bipartisan support when it was passed to the point that both the act as a whole and Section 230 specifically were crafted by a two sets of a Republican and Democrat working together?

 

[Dr. Geronimo]

So can those of us who's been calling him a traitor to the republic get our dickpats now?

 

[Ask Jeeves]

You have to admire Trumps ability to outright lie about what he's doing and still get support.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

I can't be arsed to care really. This is the gayest drama I've ever seen on all fronts. I have problems in real life that need attending to rather spergs sperging about shit that doesn't even remotely affect me in the slightest past me not being able to say nigger or kike.

Well, it'd likely not affect you as much as it'd affect the hosts of websites. In other words, it'd be Null that'd be held liable for you saying naughty words.

 

[disenchanted]

#repeal230

Let's this this shit done muthafuckaaaaaaaaas

 

[Inquisitor_BadAss]

Tbh Trump and Dorsey should just get it over with and fuck already.

 

[WhoBusTank69]

Maybe I'm just dumb and don't understand American politics but the president can't just repeal an entire section of the very important legal congress thingy right? Like he doesn't just have the power to magically do that? I assume it would be a pretty long process if he was serious about it.

That would be why he's asking for Congress to go through with it, and it seems many politicians may have a stake in censoring the internet since at any given time each side is bitten by it.
There may be nuance involved, but outright screaming "REMOVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH" is a retarded move.