- Joined
- Mar 27, 2019
Jews, Asians and latinos. Latinos are white too now. Chainsaw Mexican is a klansman!
View attachment 1353462
No, you don't get it, he was a member of the QueQueQue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jews, Asians and latinos. Latinos are white too now. Chainsaw Mexican is a klansman!
View attachment 1353462
Nah, we still have the vedic scriptures, I'm sure people can work out something from that.(Modern intepretations of paganism anyway, which is all we have.
the real correct anser is, of course, to shoot the warlord himself in the headI don't know how many of you have had to take a mandatory ethics class in College for your degree or to update/modernize your degree, but Ethics is one of the classes that needs to be fumigated with napalm.
OK, here's a question, posed in EVERY ethics class I've been in. (No, it won't be the trolley. There's a reason this one is one that I abhor)
You are working in a village doing humanitarian relief. A warlord comes by and makes all the people of the village line up in front of you. He selects a single person, it doesn't matter who, and forces them to kneel in front of you. He hands you a gun as he and his men, twelve of them with weapons, watch. He tells you: "Kill him and I'll spare the village. Do not kill him and I will kill the whole village and make you watch then kill you. What is the ethical response?"
I, of course, was all: "How many bullets does the gun have and what's the terrain look like? I might be able to kill enough to let the villagers overpower the rest."
That's wrong.
Killing a single person? That's wrong.
The correct, ETHICAL, answer is to do nothing. That way the blood is not on your hands but only on the hands of the people who did the killing. It's better to let them kill everyone in the village and you, than to take a human life. Their crimes do not reflect on you.
THERE'S where the thinking is coming from. See, it doesn't matter if they're part of the mob that breaks windows, burns down buildings, and kills people. See, that sin the burden of ONLY the people who DIRECTLY did the action. Not you. Your hands, morals, ethics are still clean and pure.
You didn't do anything, they did, and ethically, you can't be held responsible for what they do.
See how poisonous this shit is?
Then you didn't get too deep. No Kant and other ivory tower faggots or anything like that?
They start with "Don't perform shit like the Standford Experiment on unknowing, uninformed people" and then get to the Trolley Question, then the Warlord Question, and then further and further. In the end it's "As long as you don't do it, your ENTIRE FUCKING CAUSE is just and cannot be blamed for the actions of a single individual who went against the ethics and morals of the group."
I just gritted my teeth and got my C and walked out.
Of course, the last two times I was in college they made Gender Studies and Women's Studies mandatory and those classes have gone from "Psychologically, women are able to recover faster from psychological trauma if given proper supporting structures but suffer more intense psychological damage" stuff to "WOMEN GOOD MAD BAD REEEEEEE!" shit.
I never understood the "original sin" mentality. The only thing I see in it is a means of controlling someone through guilt.
Sounds like the last of the ones to remember the Great Rite in New Forest in 1940. Definitely not hippies.Teenage girls who watched Charmed and read Harry Potter really have no idea about the old school Wiccans from the 50's. Like the modern druid movement in the 30's (I think) at Glastonbury they were really quite conservative. Really, really conservative.
Years ago I helped a friend with a stall at some pagan event. There was one of the old guard speaking as a headliner. Can't remember her name now but I remember she was wearing pearls and twinset and sneering at the unwashed mob. She ended her talk yelling about Britannia and vote for the Right Party to preserve Great Britain. I ran off laughing at the horrified looks from the crowd. That was in the late 90's/early 00's. I can only imagine the crowd's reaction in current year.
The instructor.Does anyone actually think letting everybody die is the best answer? Did you see any simps agreeing with that?
It really should mean “I don’t care what skin color you are, just don’t be a jerk”. The self hatred I see from woke whites is pathetic. If you weren’t involved in any way, it is not your fault.Mad how these faggots got anti racist to mean 'fuck the huwhites' magical.
How long until it gets to a point where any remotely positive portrayal of the police will be banned from the media?"Cops" and "LivePD" Are supposedly going to not be aired for the protest
![]()
‘Live PD,’ ‘Cops’ Pulled from TV Schedules in Light of George Floyd Protests (EXCLUSIVE)
A&E has decided not to run new episodes of “Live PD” this Friday and Saturday, while Paramount Network has delayed the Season 33 launch of “Cops,” the long-running reali…variety.com
View attachment 1353543
Fucking hell!
I'm now crying because of the thought that we will never return to the stability that was in the year 200020 years ago I'd be sitting down to an episode of cops right now with my folks
How long until it gets to a point where any remotely positive portrayal of the police will be banned from the media?
Because:
View attachment 1353530
For those wondering if Pride month is going to get bitter about BLM, yes but they will never say it. That is why you see signs like "Black QUEER Lives Matter", "Black TRANS Lives Matter", "Black SEX WORKER Lives Matter", etc, because of the same image above.
America isn't dead. but the NFL sure is. Can't wait for fall, when people will stop watching games and the NFL wonders why their ratings are in the toilet. Too bad XFL failed for a second time.https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1269048773591871489?s=20
America is officially dead Kaepernick won and now all the sportsball blacks are going to hop on the bandwagon nonstop now