U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
1591462780822.png

1591462835675.png

(Inset images thumbnailed below, they're large and camera-phone pics)

TLDR - NYT has completed their Maoist struggle-session, and has now run an op-ed that blatantly calls for people to accept the cult, over family.
 

Attachments

  • 1591462862593.png
    1591462862593.png
    19.8 MB · Views: 141
  • 1591462886370.png
    1591462886370.png
    19.6 MB · Views: 116
And that is why we're so fucked. Muh high IQ Asians also vote democrat. The narrative over peeohcee oppression is mostly bullshit, but that doesn't stop them being used as a political wedge.
It's a sentence with two meanings:
To those that believe the narrative it says: "We will protect you from this oppression"

To those that don't it says: "We will prioritise you even over the majority"

This is bullshit obviously but you have all these isolated immigrant communities that work hard to get their second generations into uni only to have those kids come back from school talking about oppression and racism. They know this is strange but they realise something, this is the new power structure and their kids have made it becasue of this structure, this is why they go along.

Broken branch racist Chinese grandparents don't want what the dems are peddling but they do see their kids making it in their machine as high powered activists and immigration lawyers and shit.
 
Does that mean donald is a cult of personality or that he's just pretty good to be around overall
It means his persona he puts on in public is basically the mirror image of his private behavior. He's probably more agreeable and generally more likeable in private than in public. Again, that's why he has a lot of people that are loyal to him within his circle of advisors and the like even the types like Roger Stone and General Flynn who go through hell and he returns the favor in some way. It also tells me that the people that he drags under the bus like Sessions and Gen. Mattis are snakes that act in the opposite manner.
 
Blizzard has the functionality for actual permanent bans, so there's no reason to do a ban that way.
I personally highly doubt it's real, but if someone told me a month ago about everything that's happening I'd think it's just all /pol/ schizoposting, but here we are, so anything is possible.
"Tempoary" bans might be harder to file charge backs against or is a way to sidestep European commerce laws. Irregardless is hillarious how blizzard has flipped since they were giving 1000 year bans for talking about the hong kong protests in game or in the forums.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back