U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
1591464365197.png



Most of the deaths listed are legitimately accidental deaths, with zero evidence of foul play.
 
All I'm saying is that either the genocide of black Americans at the hands of the police either didn't exist, or was ignored by the vast majority of Americans until the media and big companies brought it up a couple weeks ago.

Ask an average white American a month ago what they thought about the police exterminating the blacks, and they'd have no idea what you were talking about.
 
I hate the mentality.

"Make a Big deal about race!"

"But what If I don't and just want to treat everyone the same without making a big deal?"

"Then you're a white supremacist."
It was the same after Eric Holder called for a "national conversation on race," and the right really did try to engage with the left.

"Okay, let's talk about it. Here are some crime statistics, and I think this is why other races may be reticent to interact with--"

"Racist!"

"Actually, I just want a colorblind society where individuals are judged on character and merit. Here are some ways we can deemphasize race in--"

"Double racist!"

"Look, I agree black lives matter. If we can't talk about the homicide rate, can we at least discuss abortions? I know it's a contentious issue, but more black lives are lost to--"

"Racist misogynist!"

It is an axiom of the left that rioting is the natural and appropriate response when one's complaints aren't heard. I don't think they are the ones who haven't been heard.
 
Honestly, the more I think about it, the more I think that this is really a mix of a neoliberal-backed leftist coup and a perfect storm scenario colliding.

I would not be surprised if the DNC and their corporate compatriots had some sort of scenario like this planned out as a last case resort for removing Trump but the finer details may not have been fully planned out or organized, and they'd need to use it at the right moment.

Biden is a dud of a candidate and the impeachment failed, and now we have the shocking swerve of COVID-19 to add more fuel to the fire.

The unexpected pandemic put a lot more tension on the DNC and their backers financially thanks to the economic shutdowns, and they needed a moment that could be the spark to light the powder keg as they got increasingly desperate.

The jogger incident failed, but then George Floyd died in a pretty horrifying way on camera for the whole world to see. Whether it's police brutality or drug overdose, the video is pretty hard to watch.

That gave the Left and their neoliberal backers the opportunity to capitalize on the outrage and go for the last card they can still play.


I also kind of find it eerie that they've been hyper-vigilant on pushing the Black Lives Matter angle and more or less promoting outright black supremacy more than anything else.

I think there's another reason beyond capitalizing on Floyd's death and it probably has to do with Biden's infamous "You Ain't Black" gaffe on national television.

Biden needs a high black voter turnout if the DNC wants to win 2020, and that gaffe more or less ensured a lot would sit the election out this year.

Then Floyd dies and it's all caught on video, so they capitalize on this, starting their coup outright and leaning heavily on BLM militant rhetoric to try and rally the troops as it were.

They're desperate and they're throwing everything they have left into this, hoping they can get the complete win they need to pull it off. If it fails and isn't a 100% success rate, it'll slow them down at best and break them at worst.

Basically, the DNC is afraid of a potential Seventh Party System that would emerge in the event of a Trump victory in 2020 and a lot of the older neoliberals and neocons in the DNC and GOP are too unwilling to let go of that power.

Of course, part of what led to the Sixth Party System was the chaos and unrest of the late 60's and 70's, leading to Nixon's landslide victory in 1972 and from there, the codification of the new party alignments under Reagan in the 80's.

If this succeeds for the bigwigs, we're all fucked harder than a two-dollar whore.

If this fails for them, the backlash will be a rude awakening for them.
 
Browsing /pol/ sometimes they are talking about the Feds / glowniggers most probably organizing a false flag attack with the brand new so called "boogaloo bois" / boogaloo movement, when it was allways a term used sarcastically to describe when any kind of shit hit the fan (like Hurricane Katrina : Electric Boogaloo or Covid 19 : Pandemic Boogaloo and shit ) now it's real that this last week we saw a huge amount of pretty obvious post asking /polacks to join in the "boogaloo bois" out of nowhere and they have been pointing out at the obvious setting up...

/pol/ Theory is that, the fed tried very hard to have "right wing" activists to confront Antifa in the previous riots but didn't get anything, as /pol/ just laughed at the whole thing as the joggers and commies were destroying mostly democratic states / their hometown / their own buisenesses and quality of life, and glowies baiting /poltards everyday with "you are all talk n sheeit but you scared of antifa, pussies" now that everything went to shit for the feds they seem to throw in a last attempt in desperation and begun, since end of may, to push the narrative of the boogaloo movement in the press and wikipedia , freshly created articles about the "movement" (wich doesn't exist).

From personnal experience i also saw a lot of baiting and hundred of threads copy pasted on 4chan baiting real hard / provocating last week and can see it how they try to find a way to frame 4Chan /pol by creating something like this in total desperation since so much videos / witnesses kept blaming antifa for all the destruction...

I touch wood and hope i'm wrong but they reaaaaally try to push this fake story.


The boogaloo thing they were pushing last week was so fucking gay, up there with the evil hacker known as 4chan. They've got the niggers and NPC whites worked up to such a frothing at the mouth hysteria they're going to need to show some kind of win or they risk losing control. A false flag sniper attack on the peaceful dindu looters by an Alt Right terrorist, Las Vegas style would be my guess. The problem for them is they're going to have to do the work themselves as the actual white nationalists aren't biting, which means a much higher risk. The next couple of days are going to be lit.
 
Public polls underestimated Trump’s potential in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. However the national polls, which has to do with the popular vote, were in the aggregate pretty good.
View attachment 1355519

The reason why people constantly remember the polls looking so bad for Trump were because the state level polls for the states I mentioned were not great for him thus limiting his electoral map victories. And you had some really fucking retarded election models predicting a Clinton victory at 90% likely. When 538 had her at a 75 percent chance or so.

2016 was in some ways a failure of public polling but a victory for Private Polling as some of that polling was what made Trump campaign in PA, WI, and MI.

The problem with that is it ignores the long term failure of the polls and only focus on the final week or month. The pattern that always happens with these phony polls is that for the entire year leading up the election the democrat (even generic before they have a nominee) is always "blowing the republican away" to create the narrative of inevitability. So they make polls showing the dem up 6 four months out, 8 three months out, 11 two months out, then every single time the polls in the last couple weeks up until the election magically narrow to within 3 points so whatever happens they can pretend they were not too far off.

What was the aggregate for Clinton 1 month from the election? 2 months? 3 months? 5 months?
 
Does anyone have a list of these companies that promote this, especially those that tout anti White racism. Thinking of real life activism with flyers or ad hoc lawn signs pointing out their vile racism against Whites. Someone has to crack the first egg IRL.
activism won't do anything for your cause.
the key point with activism is that it works exactly as well as the press wants it to work. activists and journalists form a symbiotic relationship: activists provide journalists with a convenient excuse to constantly report on issues that they really like to push (racism etc) while journalists provide activists with a gigantic platform to amplify their voice.

if journalists just push non stop race baiting without any underlying real world event then they're basically just spamming opinion pieces and very obvious propaganda. that's why they need activists to provide them with some "real" event to cover, that way they're not just opining but actually reporting on something, which strongly increases their credibility. that's why the press needs activists.
on the other side, if activists do their gay activism shit without approval of the press then the media will just ignore them and literally nobody will get their message at all, they'd be screaming into the void. or, even worse, the press would do non stop negative coverage and hit pieces on the activists, subjecting them to mockery and ridicule and hostility. over time, this kills your morale and destroys your reputation, so it's a death sentence for your activism. that's why activists need the press to be on their side.

this is why, for example, those anti immigration protests in europe never ever achieve anything - because the press just bashes them whenever they try to do something, and when the police decides to crack down hard on them, the press looks the other way and ignores it. THAT is what you can expect from doing activism that doesn't align with the approved MSM narrative.
 
The problem with that is it ignores the long term failure of the polls and only focus on the final week or month. The pattern that always happens with these phony polls is that for the entire year leading up the election the democrat (even generic before they have a nominee) is always "blowing the republican away" to create the narrative of inevitability. So they make polls showing the dem up 6 four months out, 8 three months out, 11 two months out, then every single time the polls in the last couple weeks up until the election magically narrow to within 3 points so whatever happens they can pretend they were not too far off.

What was the aggregate for Clinton 1 month from the election? 2 months? 3 months? 5 months?
Thats because campaigns change over time so a narrowing of leads is generally a sign of more campaign spending through ground game, ads, and so on.

Also gaffes, debates, and a general shift in conditions can explain shifts in polling.


Also the reason we don’t do aggregates over 2 months, 3 months, and so on is because polls are fundamentally snap shots of where an electorate is at that moment.

That is to say, what the electorate thinks about candidates the week before an election is going to be more accurate than what they think about them 5 months out.
 
View attachment 1355347
Tweet: https://archive.ph/Wn0NQ
Article: https://archive.ph/Yg9QS
Pagely reminder that the DSA went on a recruitment push mere weeks ago and it was signal boosted by the atlantic
Archive of the new article posted by @Bosmadden
Its funny where were all laughing at these fucks doing the jazz hands and triggered by clapping and whispering and shit.

Was that all an act or they purged their ranks of deadweight or we looking at a creation of a new party or faction that is about to dominate the democratic party and remove the business dems and neoliberals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back