Opinion Shut down all police movies and TV shows. Now. - And yes have no fear, I archived it



Like many other industries, entertainment companies have issued statements of support for the protests against racism and police brutality now filling America’s streets. But there’s something Hollywood can do to put its money where its social media posts are: immediately halt production on cop shows and movies and rethink the stories it tells about policing in America.

For a century, Hollywood has been collaborating with police departments, telling stories that whitewash police shootings and valorizing an action-hero style of policing over the harder, less dramatic work of building relationships with the communities cops are meant to serve and protect. There’s a reason for that beyond a reactionary streak hiding below the industry’s surface liberalism. Purely from a dramatic perspective, crime makes a story seem consequential, investigating crime generates action, and solving crime provides for a morally and emotionally satisfying conclusion.

The result is an addiction to stories that portray police departments as more effective than they actually are; crime as more prevalent than it actually is; and police use of force as consistently justified. There are always gaps between reality and fiction, but given what policing in America has too often become, Hollywood’s version of it looks less like fantasy and more like complicity.

There’s no question that it would be costly for networks and studios to walk away from the police genre entirely. Canceling Dick Wolf’s “Chicago” franchise of shows would wipe out an entire night of NBC’s prime-time programming; dropping “Law & Order: Special Victims Unit” and a planned spinoff would cut even further into the lineup.

But the gap between what some companies and executives have promised this week and what they have done in the past cannot be ignored. As reality television critic Andy Dehnart points out, at ViacomCBS, cable networks chief Chris McCarthy pledged “to leverage all of our platforms to show our ally-ship.” One of those platforms also airs “Cops,” a decades-old reality show with a troubled history of participating in police censorship and peddling fear of black and brown criminals. If McCarthy means what he says, canceling “Cops” would be a start.

But simply canceling cop shows and movies would be easier than uprooting the assumptions at the heart of the problem.

Say writers made a commitment not to exaggerate the performance of police. Audiences would have to be retrained to watch, for example, a version of “Special Victims Unit” where the characters cleared only 33.4 percent of rape cases, or to accept that in almost 40 percent of murders and manslaughters, no suspect is arrested. If storytelling focused on less-dramatic but more-common crimes such as burglary and motor-vehicle theft, the stakes would shrink — along with the case-clearance rate.

In addition to revealing the world as it is, art has the power to show us the world as it can be. But when reform doesn’t seem like a real possibility, even modest optimism risks souring into mockery.

The closest thing to a reformist police show right now is “Brooklyn Nine-Nine,” a sitcom that alternates explorations of the policies and identity politics of the New York Police Department with fantastic gags and one-liners.

Series co-creator Dan Goor told me in 2016 that he hoped that the show was “Modeling what a good police-community interaction would be like.” I’ve never doubted his care in pursuing that ideal. This week, Goor and the cast donated $100,000 to the National Bail Fund Network and announced that they “condemn the murder of George Floyd and support the many people who are protesting police brutality nationally.”

Still, as Vulture’s Kathryn VanArendonk put it this week, the show can’t escape what it is: Neither the show’s good intentions and genuine good work nor “its silliness ... change the way it prioritizes police perspectives over anyone else’s,” VanArendonk wrote.

One way forward might be to emphasize the dialogues, and sometimes fierce struggles, that take place within police departments. “The Shield,” which aired on FX from 2002 to 2008, follows the reign and eventual downfall of corrupt Detective Vic Mackey (Michael Chiklis) and his Strike Team, based on the division at the center of the real-life Rampart scandal in Los Angeles. In the finale, Claudette Wyms (CCH Pounder), Mackey’s longtime colleague and a truly decent officer, wins a small victory. Mackey, in exchange for his cooperation in an investigation against the surviving members of his team, is not prosecuted for his crimes, but he is required to spend three years in a deadening desk job at Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

It takes seven seasons to even achieve that much on “The Shield.” It’s been almost six years since Michael Brown was shot and killed by Officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Mo., and no one can be blamed for feeling like national reform has moved at a similarly petty pace. If the entertainment industry truly believes change can no longer wait, it should start with its own storytelling.
 
Basically, I think they want zero positive portrayals of police officers so that they can completely own the narrative and totally demonize any law enforcement. They're so anal about it at this point that Buzzfeed posted an article saying that posting stories about police and protesters cooperating and not acting like petulant children toward one another was hurting the narrative about police brutality.

Damn, they really won't like it if you post stats showing blacks rarely get shot by the police despite...
 
No because i love modern svu.

This bizarre over arching plot is so insane that I watch it pretending either Olivia is confused by the situation at hand because of Mariskas bad acting or it's another plot by Olivia to kidnap another child like she did with Noah

Also delete reno 911 and I'll start a race war no one could see coming
 
If this were to be a thing though, what if it didn't stop at police based media? They could end up just removing all 'offensive' media entirely and have...I'm not actually sure if there is a single piece of media that wouldn't offend someone, somewhere. Reminds me of the idea of removing all instances of the twin towers from old media in case people get triggered or something for seeing that they used to be there or whatever.
Also I love crime/cop shows, I used to watch COPS as a kid with my parents, its nostalgic.
 
Me who has CSI, NCIS and Criminal Minds on DVD.
aPs0N1A9_400x400.jpg
 
Lots of Hollywood actors in cop shows, is it possible to get rid of cop shows without pissing them off? They know its a good revenue stream and they contribute a lot to the Dems.
 
If this were to be a thing though, what if it didn't stop at police based media? They could end up just removing all 'offensive' media entirely and have...I'm not actually sure if there is a single piece of media that wouldn't offend someone, somewhere. Reminds me of the idea of removing all instances of the twin towers from old media in case people get triggered or something for seeing that they used to be there or whatever.
Also I love crime/cop shows, I used to watch COPS as a kid with my parents, its nostalgic.

I think that's what they want to achieve ultimately, since apparently media is not woke enough for them since there's too much "problematic" stuff from before the 2010's floating around and it's all more popular and more of a draw than modern wokeshit.

These people view pop culture and entertainment as mere tools for propaganda.

Now, with the Twin Towers, from what I understand, they only removed the towers from stuff that was in production while 9/11 happened (the first Spider-Man movie) or had an upcoming season (The Sopranos)

The only retroactive 9/11-related memory-holing that was notable is "The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson" not being aired in certain markets for about a year after 9/11. Even then, it was a voluntary decision that was optional, and it was up to whatever your local Fox affiliate was.

If that shit happened today, Disney would remove the episode from Disney+ and give it the old "Song of the South" treatment, if their response to the Leaving Neverland fiasco was anything to go by.
 
You can have my Law and Order DONK DONK when you pry it from my cold, dead hands....



They're behaving exactly the same way. The only difference is the fundies were somewhat constrained by the words in their holy book while the wokesters don't believe anything with any consistency.

The fundies drew the line at personal choice, they promised you hellfire if you didn't listen to their sage advice, but let you sin more or less unmolested, content God would get you himself some day. At most, they'd try and cancel your TV shows, your vidya, your Dungeons and Dragons, take away your dice and force you to wear a skirt that went BELOW the knee if you wanted a job or to stay in school, but they wouldn't ever try to cancel YOU, personally.

SJWs, not believing in Gods, see it as their mission to not only promise you hell, but deliver it personally until you shape up. And not only will they cancel your shows, and your job, and your social life, but, if you're bad enough as they see it, you should be beat to death in the street by "protesters".
 
Last edited:
Also the fundies weren't espousing policies that will lead to societal breakdown and the destruction of America.

Right, but I don't want to give the wrong impression: fundies were insufferable, manipulative moral scolds who pushed for censorship, authoritarianism, and never shut the fuck up about Jesus because they were locked in permanent, competitive, and increasingly ridiculous purity spirals with each other. They tried as hard as they could to ruin they lives of people they disagreed with, too. I don't want anything to do with them ever again. Nick Fuentes and his ilk all across the country should be ridiculed and shoved into lockers.

That said, they weren't as bad as the current crop of self-hating losers on the left.
 
Back